Publishing - Eyewitness Research 

Abshire, J. & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 471-480.

Addison, B.M. (1978). Expert testimony on eyewitness perception. Dickinson Law Review, 82, 465-485.

Akehurst, L., Milne, R., & Köhnken, G. (2003). The effects of children's age and delay on recall in a cognitive or structured interviews. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 97-107.

Alexander, J. F. (1972). Search factors influencing personal appearance identification. In A. Zavala & J. J. Paley (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Alley, T. R., & Cunningham, M. R. (1991). Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science, 2, 123-125.

Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 8, 61-81.

Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt.

Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Johansson, M. (2003). Increased realism in eyewitness confidence judgements: The effect of dyadic collaboration. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 545-561.

Alper, A., Buckhout, R., Chern, S., Harwood, R., & Slomovits, M. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Accuracy of individual vs. composite recollections of a crime. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 147-149.

Anderson. C. A., Lepper M. R. & Ross. L. (1989). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037- 1049.

Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2, 406-412.

Anderson. R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.

Anthony, T., Cooper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social-cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296-301.

Aronson, E ., & Carlsmith, J . M . (1968) . Experimentation in social psychology. In G . Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2d Ed.), ( 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

Aronstam, D., & Tyson, G. A. (1980). Racial bias in eyewitness perception. The Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 177-182.

Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

Aschermann, E., Mantwill, M., & Kohnken, G. (1991). An independent replication of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 489-495.

Atal, B. S. (1972). Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 1687-1697.

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds. ), The psychology of learning and motivation ( 2). New York: Academic Press.

Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-612). New York: Academic Press.

Ault, R. L., Jr. (1979). FBI guidelines for use of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 449-451.

Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 1 -21.

Ayuk, R. E. (1990). Cross racial identification of transformed, untransformed, and mixed race faces. International Journal of Psychology, 25(4) 509-527. 

Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Applied cognitive and cognitive applied psychology: The case of face recognition. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1982). Portraiture literature and person recognition. Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge University.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1982). Depth of processing, context, and face recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 148-164.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1983). Improving face recognition. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester: Wiley.

Bahrick, H.P., Bahrick, P.O., & Wittlinger, R.P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and   faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.

Bailis, K. L., & Mueller, J. H. (1981). Anxiety, feedback, and self-reference in face recognition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 85-96.

Baker, E. (1967). Perceiver variables involved in the recognition of faces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.

Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 23(2), 145-152.

Barkowitz, P., & Brigham, J. C. Own race bias and time delay. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Barkowitz, P., & Brigham, J. C. (1982). Recognition of faces: Own-race bias, incentive, and time delay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 255-268.

Bartholomeus, B. (1973). Voice identification by nursery school children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 464-472.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.

Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory and Cognition, 12, 219-228.

Bartlett, J.C., & Fulton, A. (1991). Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age. Memory      and Cognition, 19, 229-238.

Bazelon, D. L. (1981, March). Eyewitness news. Psychology Today, 101-106.

Beal, C.R., Schmitt, K.L., & Dekle, D. (1995). Eyewitness identification of children: Effects of absolute judgments, nonverbal response options, and event encoding. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 197-216.

Behrman, B.W., & Davey, S.L. (2001). Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 475-491.

Behrman, B.W., & Vayder, L.T. (1994). The biasing influence of a police showup: Does the observation of a single suspect taint later identification? Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79,1239-1248.

Behrman, B. W. & Richards, R. E. (2005). Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: A reality monitoring analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 279-301.

Bekerian, D. A., & Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 'J, 139-145.

Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1997). Imagery effects in spoken and written recall. In D. Payne and F. Conrad (Eds.), Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp. 175-191).

Bekerian, D. A., Dennett, J. L., Hill, K., & Hitchcock, R. (1990). Effects of detailed imagery on simulated wilness recall. Unpublished manuscript, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge.

Belbin, E. (1950). The influence of interpolated recall upon recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 163-169.

Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(14) 1171-1192.

Bell, B.E., & Loftus, E.F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few)     minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679.

Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Ceneral, 118, 72-85.

Belli, R.F. (1993). Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final        modified tests: Evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 407-427.

Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., & McCarthy, T. T. (1992). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Manuscript in preparation.

Belli, R.F., Windschitl, P.D., & McCarthy, T.T. (1992). Detecting memory impairment with a     modified test procedure: Manipulating retention interval with centrally presented event items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 356-367.

Bennett, P. J. (1986). Face recall: A police perspective. Human Learning Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 5(4) 197-202.

Benson, P., & Perrett, D. (1991). Computer averaging and manipulation of faces. In P. Wombell (Ed.), Photovideo: Photography in the Age of the Computer. London: Rivers Oram Press.

Benson, P. & Perrett, D. (1992). Face to face with the perfect image. New Scientist, 133, 3235.

Benton, A. L. (1980). The neuropsychology of facial recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176-186.

Benton, A. L., & Gordon, M. C. (1971). Correlates of facial recognition. Transactions of the A merican Neurological Association, 96, 146- 150 .

Benton, A. L., Hamsher. K. S., ~arney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Facial recognition: Stimulus and multiple choice pictures. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Berliner, L., & Barbieri, M. K. (1984). The testimony of the child victim of sexual assault. Jounal of Social Issues, 40, 125-137.

Berman, G.L., & Cutler, B.L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on     mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170-177.

Berman, G.L., & Cutler, B.L. (1998). The influencing of processing instructions at encoding and retrieval on face recognition accuracy. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 4, 89-106.

Bermant, G. (1986). Two conjectures about the issue of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 97-100.

Berresheim, A., & Weber, A. (2003). Die Strukturierte Zeugenvernehmung und Ihre Wirksamkeit [Structured witness interviewing and its effectiveness]. Kriminalistik, 57, 757-771.

Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L.Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.

Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3-18.

Bersoff, D. N. (1986). Psychologists and the judicial systems: Broader perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 151-165.

Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.

Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.

Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.

Binet, A. (1900) La suggestibilite (On suggestibility). Paris: Schleicher.

Bird, C. (1927). The influences of press upon the accuracy of report. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 22, 123-129.

Black, M. M., & Rollins, H. A., Jr. (1982). The effects of instructional variables on young children's organization and free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 1-19.

Blair, W. G. (1982, March 11). Witnesses in New York differ over tanker blast. New York Times, p. 17.

Blakemore, C. (1977). The unsolved marvel of memory. The New York Times Magazine, February 6.

Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229-246.

Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441-442.

Block, R. A. (1974). Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect. Memory and Cognition, 2, 153-160.

Block, R. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity. Memory and Cognition, 6, 320-326.

Blonstein, R., & Geiselman, R. E. (1990). Effects of witnessing conditions and expert witness testimony on credibility of an eyewitness. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 8(4) 11-19.

Boice, R., Hanley, P., Shaughnessy, P., & Gansler D. (1982). Eyewitness accuracy: A general observational skill? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 193-195.

Bonto, M. A., & Payne, D. G. (1991). Role of environmental context in eyewitness memory. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 117-134.

Boon, J., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 59-69.

Borchard, E. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Errors of criminal justice. New Haven, CT:        Yale University Press.

Bornstein, B. (1963). Prosopagnosia. In. Halpern (Ed.), Problems of dynamic neurology (pp.283-317). Jerusalem, Israel: Hadassah Medical Organization.

Bornstein, B.H., Liebel, L.M., & Scarberry, N.C. (1998). Repeated testing in eyewitness memory: A means to improve recall of a negative emotional event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 119-131.

Bornstein, B., Sroka, II., & Munita, II. (1969). Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. Cortex, 5, 164-169.

Bornstein, B., & Zickafoose, D.J. (1999). “I know I know it, I know I saw it”: the stability of the confidence-accuracy relationship across domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, no.1, 76-88.

Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis of eyewitness research: Cross-racial identification. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1989). Cross racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.

Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Pigott, M.A. (1987). An exploratory study of personality         differences in eyewitness memory. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 335-   343.

Bothwell, R.K., Deffenbacher, K.A., & Brigham, J.C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.

Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Predicting eyewitness accuracy from confidence: The optimality hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bothwell, R. K., & Thomas, C. E. (in press). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identifications.

Bower, G. (1967)  A multicomponent theory of memory trace.  In K. W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.)  The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,  1, New York: Academic Press.

Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 29, 129-148.

Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751-757.

Bower, G.H., & Karlin, M.B. (1974). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.             Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

Bower, G. H., Montiero, K. P., & Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 573-585.

Bower, J. M., & Bekerian, D. A. (1984). When will postevent information distort eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 466-472.

Brace, N., Pike, G., Kemp, R., Turner, J., & Bennett, P. (2006). Does the presentation of multiple facial composites improve suspect identification? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 213-226.

Bradfield-Douglass, A., Smith, C., & Graser-Thill, R. (2005). A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: Photospread administrators use one eyewitness’s confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 543-562.

Bradfield, A. L., & Wells, G. L. (2000). The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 581-594.

Bradfield, A. L. & Wells, G. L. (2005). Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. Memory and Cognition, 33, 120-130.

Bradfield, A. L., Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2002). The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 112-120.

Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Models for the processing and identification of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 443-448.

Brainerd. C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1993). Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review, 100. 42-67.

Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children's false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 81-129.

Brainerd, C. J. & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Memory loci of suggestibility development: Comment on Ceci, Ross, and Toglia (1987). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 197-200.

Brainerd, C.J., Reyna, V.F., & Brandse, E. (1995). Are children’s false memories more persistent than their true memories? Psychological Science, 6, 359-364.

Brandon R., & Davies, C. (1973). Wrongful imprisonment: Mistaken convictions and their consequences. London: George Allen and Unwin. 

Bregman, N. J., & McAllister, H. A. (1987). Perceived innocence or guilt: Role of eyewitness identification and fingerprints. Southern Psychologist, 3(2) 49-52.

Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 353-364.

Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002) Improving the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification: Evidence from correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 44-56.

Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 46-58.

Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R.P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M.A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297-313.

Brewer, N., Weber, N., & Semmler, C. (2005). Eyewitness identification. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 177-221). New York: Guilford.

Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11-30.

Bricker, P. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1966). Effects of stimulus content and duration on talker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 1441-1449.

Brigham, J. C. (1980a). Perspectives on the impact of lineup composition, race, and witness confidence on identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 315-321.

Brigham, J. C. (1981). The accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? The Florida Bar Journal, 55, 714-721.

Brigham, J. C. (1983). Psychological factors in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11(1) 47-56.

Brigham, J. C. (1986). Distinctiveness of appearance as a moderator variable in the confidence-accuracy relationship in facial identifications. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Brigham, J. C. (1988). Is witness confidence helpful in judging eyewitness accuracy? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory ( 1, pp. 7782). Chichester: Wiley.

Brigham, J. C. (1989). Disputed eyewitness identifications: Can experts help? The Champion, 8(5), 10-18.

Brigham, J. C. (1990). Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in facial identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 101-l15.

Brigham, J.C., & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do "They all look alike?" The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306-318.

Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 19-30.

Brigham, J.C., & Brandt, C.C. (1992). Measuring lineup fairness: Mock witness responses vs.            direct evaluations of lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 475-489. [lineup fairness measures obtained using the mock witness task with students correspond reasonably well with measures and judgments of lineup fairness provided by police officers]

Brigham, J.C., & Cairns, D.L. (1988). The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1394-1410.

Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Martinez, D., & Whittenberger, G. (1983). The effect of arousal on facial recognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 279-293.

Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673-680.

Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own-and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.

Brigham, J.C., Meissner, C.A., & Wasserman, A.W. (1999).  Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13: S73-S92.

Brigham, J.C., & Pfeifer, J.E. (1994). Evaluating the fairness of lineups. In D.F. Ross, J.D.       Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 201-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brigham, J.C., & Ready, D.J. (1985). Own-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 415-424.

Brigham, J.C., Ready, D.J., & Spier, S.A. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of       photograph lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 149-163. [lineup fairness measures obtained using the mock witness task with students correspond reasonably well with measures and judgments of lineup fairness provided by police officers]

Brigham, J. C., Van Verst, M., & Bothwell, R. K. (1986). Accuracy of children's eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4) 295-306.

Brigham, J. C., & Williamson, N. L. (1979). Cross-racial recognition and age: When you're over 60 do they still "all look alike?" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 218-222.

Brigham, J.C., & Wolfskiel, M.P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349.

Brimacombe, C.A.E. (nee Luus), Jung, S., Garrioch, L, & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: Will you believe me when I’m 64?. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 507-522.

Brimacombe, C.A.E. (nee Luus), Quinton, N., Nance, N., & Garrioch, L. (1997). Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 619-634.

Bringmann, M. W., Tyler, K., McAhren, P. E., & Bringmann, W. G. (1989). A successful and unsuccessful replication of William Stern's eyewitness research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(2) 619-625.

Brooks, K. & Siegal, M. (1991). Children as eyewitnesses: Memory, suggestibility, and credibility. Australian Psychologist, 26(2), 84-88.

Brooks, N. (1983). Police guidelines: Pretrial identification procedures. Ottawa: Law Reform Commission.

Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of the encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.

Brown, M. R. (1926). Legal psychology. Indianapolis: Bobbs. 

Bruce, V. (1979). Searching for politicians: An information processing approach to face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 373-395.

Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processing in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.

Bruce, V. (1983). Recognizing faces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 302, 423-436.

Bruce. V. (1986). Recognizing familiar faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Jace processing (pp. 107-117). Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: ~i jhoff .

Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing faces. Hove, Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M., & Miller, P.  (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339-360.

Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P. J. B., Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one: Combining face composites Yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902.

Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.

Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999).  The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419-439.

Bruck, M., Ceci, S.J., & Francoeur, E. (1999). The accuracy of mothers’ memories of conversations with their preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, No.1, 89-106.

Bruck, M., Ceci, S.J., Francoeur, E., & Barr, R.J. (1995). “I hardly cried when I got shot!”: Influencing children’s reports about a visit to their pediatrician. Child Development, 66, 193-208.

Brunswick, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.

Buchanan, D. R. (1985). Enhancing eyewitness identification: Applied psychology for law enforcement officers. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13(4), 303-309.

Buckhout, R. (1968). Through a bag, darkly. American Psychologist, 23, 832-833.

Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American, 231, 23-31.             

Buckhout, R. (1974b). Eyewitness recall of facts about a person. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 191-192.

Buckhout, R. (1975a). Nearly 2000 witnesses can be wrong. Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, 7.

Buckhout, R. Note. (1975b). Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, 7.

Buckhout, R. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Effects of suggestion and bias in identification from photographs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R. (1976). Psychology and eyewitness identification. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 75-92.

Buckhout, R. (1977). Eyewitness identification and psychology in the courtroom. Criminal Defense, 4, 5-10.

Buckhout, R. (1980). Nearly 2,000 witnesses can be wrong. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 307-310.

Buckhout, R. (1984). Double mistaken identification in Dallas: Texas v. Lenell Geter and Anthony Williams. Social Action and the Law, 10, 3-11.

Buckhout, R. (1986). Personal values and expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 127-144.

Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M. (1974). Determinants of      eyewitness performance on a lineup. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R., & Ellison, K. W. (1977, June). The lineup: A critical look. Psychology Today, pp. 82-84; 88.

Buckhout, R., Eugenio, P., Licitra, T., Oliver, L., & Kramer, T. (1982). Memory, hypnosis and evidence: Research on eyewitnesses. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Responsive Psychology, Brooklyn College.

Buckhout, R., Figueroa, D., & Hoff, E. (1973, May). Psychology and the eyewitness. American Journal of Criminal Law.

Buckhout, R., Figueroa, D., & Hoff, E. (1975). Eyewitness identification: Effects of suggestion and bias in identification from photographs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R. & Frier, V. (1975). Suggestivity in lineups and photospreads. Center for Responsive Psychology Monograph No. CR-5. New York: Brooklyn College C.U.N.Y.

Buckhout, R., Rabinowitz, M., Alfonso, V., Kanellis, D., & Anderson, J. (1988). Empirical          assessments of lineups: Getting down to cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 323-331.

Bull, R. (1978). Eyewitnesses also have ears. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Bull, R. (1979). The influence of stereotypes on person identification. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, & S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Bull, R. (1980). Psychological factors in eyewitness testimony. British Psychological Society Conference: Lawyers and psychologists the way forward (1980, London, England. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 1981 No 1 27-39.

Bull, R. (1992). Obtaining evidence expertly: The reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence, 1, 5-12.

Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1976). Identification: The Devlin report. New Scientist, 70, 307-308.

Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1979). Eyewitness memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Applied problems in memory. New York: Academic Press.

Bull, R. H. C., & Reid, R. L. (1975). Recall after briefing: T.V. versus face to face presentation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 48, 73-78. 

Burke, E. J. (1981, November30). Eyewitness testimony: How reliable? The National Law Journal, pp. 3-4.

Burton, A.M., Cowan, M., Wilson, S., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248.

Burtt, H. E. (1931). Legal psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Busey, T.A., Turnicliff, J., Loftus, G.R., & Loftus, E.F. (2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 26-48.

Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 735-741.

Cabeza, R., Bruce, V., Kato, T., & Oda, M. (1999). The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits. Memory and Cognition, 27 (1), 139-151.

Cady, H.M. (1924). On the psychology of testimony. American Journal of Psychology, 35, 110-          112.

Cahill. D., & Mingay, D. J. (1986). Leading questions and the police interview. Policing, Autumn, 212-224.

Campbell, R. (1982). Asymmetries in moving faces. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 95-103.

Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representations of faces.           Science, 195, 312-314.

Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1981). Development of face recognition--A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.

Carterette, E. C., & Barnebey, A. (1975). Recognition memory for voices. In A. Cohen, & S. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception: Proceedings of the symposium on dynamic aspects of speech perception. New York: Springer Verlag.

Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child eyewitness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.

Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A Scientific analysis of children’s    testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, II5, 255-266.

Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (?). Age differences in suggestibility: narrowing the uncertainties.

Ceci, S.J., Toglia, M.P., & Ross, D.F. (Eds.), (1987). Children's eyewitness memory. New        York: Springer-Verlag.

Ceci, S. J., Toglia, M. P., & Ross, D. F. (1988). On remembering.... More or less: A trace strength interpretation of developmental differences in suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Ceneral, 117, 201-203.

Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycho legal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 116(1) 38-49.

Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F., & Toglia, M.P. (Eds.), (1989). Perspectives on children’s testimony.       New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003) Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,1343-1356.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979a). Reliability of face recognition performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 115-117.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979b). Depth of processing in response to faces. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1981). Depth of processing in response to own and other race faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 475-480.

Chance, J.E., & Goldstein, A.G. (1984). Face recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 69-85.

Chance, J.E., Goldstein, A.G., & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition    memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243-253.

Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G., & Schicht, W. (1967). Effects of acquaintance and friendship on children's recognition of classmate's faces. Psychonomic Science, 7, 223-224.

Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own-and other-race faces. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 29-37.

Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Applied lineup theory. In D. Read et al. (Eds.) Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Christiansen, R. E., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and post-event information. Memory and Cognition, 7-75.

Christiansen, R. E., Ochalek, K., Sweeney, J. D. (1984). Individual differences in eyewitness memory and confidence judgments. Journal of Genetic Psychology, IO. 47-52.

Christiansen, R. E., Sweeney, J. D., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Influencing eyewitness descriptions. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 59-65.

Christianson, S.A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.

Christianson, S.A., & Bylin, S. (1999). Does simulating amnesia mediate genuine forgetting for a crime event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 495-511.

Christianson, S.A., Karlsson, I., & Persson, L.G.W. (1998, February). Police personnel as eyewitnesses to a violent crime. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 1355-3259.

Christie, D. F. M., Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Evaluating a new computer based system for face recall. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 209-218.

Christie, D. F. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 358-363.

Clark, S. E. (1997). A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 233-238.

Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629-654.

Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 395-424.

Clark, S. E. & Davey, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 151-172.

Clark, S.E., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T.P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578-1588.

Clark, S.E., & Tunnicliff, J.L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 199-216.

Clarke, C., &  Milne, R. (2001) National Evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme.  Report Number PRAS/149.

Clifford, B.R. (1976). Police as eyewitnesses. New Society, (pp.176-177).

Clifford, B. R. (1978). A critique of eyewitness research. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Clifford, B. R. (1979a). Eyewitness testimony: The bridging of a credibility gap. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Clifford, B. R. (1979b, March). The relevance of psychological investigation to legal issues in testimony and identification. The Criminal Law Review, 153-163.

Clifford, B. R. (1980). Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 373-394.

Clifford, B. R. (1983). Memory for voices: The feasibility and quality of earwitness evidence. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock and B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.

Clifford, B. R., & Bull, R. (1978). The psychology of person identification. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. (1977). Eyewitness testimony: A review of theory, data, and paradigms. Unpublished manuscript.

Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1978). Experimentally manipulated arousal and eyewitness testimony. Unpublished manuscript, North East London Polytechnic.

Clifford, B.R., & Hollin, C.R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of             perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364-370.

Clifford, B. R., & Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1983). Evaluating eyewitness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Clifford, B. R., Rathborn, H., & Bull, R. (1981). The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201-208.

Clifford, B.R., & Scott, J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352-359.

Cohen, M. E., & Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 383-384.

Cohen, M. E., & Nodine, C. F. (1978). Memory processes in facial recognition and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 317-319.

Cohen, R. L., & Harnick, M. A. (1980). The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 201-210.

Cole, G. F. (1986). The American system of criminal justice, 4th ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Cole, W. G., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Incorporating new information into memory. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 413-425.

Coleman, R. O. (1978). Speakers' sex identification as a function of listeners' sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 351-354.

Coleman, R. O., & Lass, N. L. (1981). Effect of prior exposure to stimulus material on identification of speakers' sex, height, and weight. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 619-622.

Comish, S.E. (1987). Recognition of facial stimuli following an intervening task involving the Identi-Kit.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 488-491.

Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N. & McEwan, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated             by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Alexandria, VA: National Institute of Justice.

Cook, M. (1978). Eye movements during recognition of faces. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Cote, P, (1998). FACES: The Ultimate Composite Picture (Version 3.0). [Computer software]. Saint Hubert, Quebec, Canada.

Courtois, M. R., & Mueller, J. H. (1979). Processing multiple physical features in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 74-76.

Courtois, M.R., & Mueller, J.H. (1981). Target and distractor typicality in face recognition.      Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 639-645.

Cox, S. D., & Wollen, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 244-245.

Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415-430.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. 

Cronbag, H.F.M., Wagenaar, W.A., & Van Koppen, P.J. (1996). Crashing memories and the   problem of “source monitoring”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 95-104.

Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.

Crozier, W. R. (1981). Do photographs of facial displays provide a sound basis for classifying the primary emotions. Current Psychological Research, 1(3) 199-202.

Cunningham, J. L., & Bringmann, W. G. (1986). A re examination of William Stern's classic eyewitness research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(2, Pt 1) 565-566.

Cutler, B.L., Berman, G.L., Penrod, S., & Fisher, R.C.L. (1994). Conceptual, practical, and       empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.163-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7(2), 215-225.

Cutler, B.L., Dexter, H.R., & Penrod, S.D. (1990). Non-adversarial methods for improving juror sensitivity to eyewitness evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1197-1207.

Cutler, B. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1990). Live lineups, videotaped lineups, and photo arrays. Forensic Reports, 3, 439-448.

Cutler, B. L., Fisher. R. P., & Chicvara, C. L. (1989). Eyewitness identification from live versus videotaped lineups. Forensic Reports, 2, 93-106.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification:      Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1989a). Forensically-relevant moderators of the relationship between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 650-652.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1989b). Moderators of the confidence-accuracy relation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95-107.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology,      and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H.R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and           the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H.R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Martens, T.K. (1987a). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Martens, T.K. (1987b). Improving the reliability of eyewitness    identifications: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., O'Rourke, T.E., & Martens, R.K. (1986). Unconfounding the effect of             contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behavior, 2, 113-134.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Stuve, T.E. (1988). Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-56.

Cutler, B. & Penrod, S. (1988). Context reinstatement and eyewitness identification. In G. Davies & D. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in Context: Context in Memory. Chichester: Wiley.

Cutler, B, L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 281-290.

Cutshall. J. L., & Yuille, J. C. (1989). Field studies of eyewitness memory of actual crimes. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 97124). New York: Springer.

Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question of the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269-277.

Dallenbach, K. M. (1913). The relation of memory error to time interval. Psychological Review, 20, 323-337.

Dane, F., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1982). Effects of defendants' and victims' characteristics on jurors' verdicts. In N. L. Kerr and R. M. Bray (Eds.), The Psychology of the Courtroom (pp. 83-115). New York: Academic Press.

Dashiell, J. F. (1933). Experiments in the sifting of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 720.

Daubert, et ux., etc., et., Petitioners v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. CT. 2786;    125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

Davies, G. M. (1969). Recognition memory for pictured and named objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 448-458.

Davies, G. M. (1978). Face recognition: Issues and theories. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Davies, G.M. (1981). Face recall systems. In G.M. Davies, H.D. Ellis, & J.W. Shepherd, (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Davies, G. M. (1983). The recognition of persons from drawings and photographs. Human Learning, 2, 237-249.

Davies, G. M. (1984). The legal impact of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: British and American experiences. (given at the 91st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association in August 1983), Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 24( 3), pp 165-175. Davies, G. (1986). Forensic face recall: The role of visual and verbal information. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological evidence and new perspectives (pp. 103-123). Chichester: Wiley.

Davies, G. (1986). Capturing likeness in eyewitness composites: the police artist and his rivals. (Great Britain), Medicine, Science, and the Law, 26(4), pp 283-290.

Davies, G. (1990, September). Influencing public policy on eye-witnessing: Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the Second European Law and Psychology Conference, Nuremberg, Germany. Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., & Shepherd, J.W. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.

Davies, G. M., & Christie, D. (1982). Face recall: An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 103-109.

Davies, G. M., Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. W. (1977). Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the Photofit technique. Perception, 6, 263-269.

Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., & Shepherd, J.W. (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Davies, G., & Jenkins, F. (1985). Witnesses can be misled by police composite pictures: How and when. In F. L. Denmark (Ed.), Social/ecological psychology and the psychology of women (pp. 103-115). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

Davies, G.M., Kurvink, A., Mitchell, R., & Robertson, N. (1996). Memory for cars and their drivers: A test of the interest hypothesis. In D. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M.K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications Vol 2., pp. 37-50. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davies, G. M., Milne, J. E., & Glennie, B. J. (1973). On the significance of "double encoding" for superior recall of pictures to names. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 413-423. Davies, G., & Milne, A. (1982). Recognizing faces in and out of context. Current Psychological Research, 2, 235-246.

Davies, G. & Milne. A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production: A function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 209-220.

 Davies, G.M., & Robertson, N. (1993). Recognition memory for automobiles: A developmental study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 103-106.

Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1979). Similarity effects in face recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 507-523.

Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1979a). Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.

Davies, G., Shepherd, J., & Ellis, H. (1979). Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.

Davies, G., Shepherd, J., Shepherd, Jean, Flin, R., & Ellis, H. (1986). Training skills in police Photofit operators. Policing, 2, 35-46.

Davies. G. & Thompson, D. (19g8). (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory. London: Wiley.

Davis, M., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. (2004). The efficacy of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. 19, 75-93.

Davis, R. D., & Sinha, D. (1950). The effect of one experience upon the recall of another. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 43-52.

Daw, P. S., & Parkin, A. J. (1981). Observations on the efficiency of two different processing strategies for remembering faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 351-355.

Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about            their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, K. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent  

            psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 235-251). Chichester, England:   Wiley.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Brown, E. L., & Sturgill, W. (1978). Some predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Carr, T. H., & Leu, J. R. (1981). Memory for words, pictures, and faces: Retroactive interference, forgetting, and reminiscence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 299-305.

Deffenbacher, K. A. & Homey, J. (1981). Psycholegal aspects of face identification. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. London and New York: Academic Press.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Leu, J. R., & Brown, E. L. (1981). Memory for faces: Testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 13-26.

Deffenbacher, K., & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15-30.

Dekle, D.J., Beal, C.R., Elliot, R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-12.

Dent, H.R. (1977). Stress as a factor influencing person recognition in identification parades.           Bulletin of British Psychology, 30, 339-340.

Dent, H. R. (1978). Interviewing child witnesses. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Dent, H. (1992). The effects of age and intelligence on eyewitnessing ability. In H. Dent, & R.           Flin, (Eds.) Children as witnesses (pp. 1-13). New York: Wiley.

Dent, H., & Flin, R. (Eds.), (1992). Children as witnesses. New York: Wiley.

Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). Identification evidence: Experimental investigations of factors affecting the reliability of juvenile and adult witnesses. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, & S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Dent, H. R., & Stephenson. G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, l~, 41-51.

Devenport, J. L., & Cutler, B. L. (2004). Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 569-576.

Devenport, J.L., Penrod, S.J., & Cutler, B.L. (1998). Eyewitness identification evidence: Evaluating commonsense evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 338-361.

Devine, P. G., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). Orienting strategies in differential face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 33-40.

Devlin, Lord (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases.  London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.

Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces.      Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1-22.

Dixon, S., & Memon, A. (2005). The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator details. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 935-951.

Dodd, D. H., & Bradshaw, J. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 695-704.

Dodson, C.S., Johnson, M.K., & Schooler, J.W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 129-139.

Dodson, C. & Reisberg, D. (1991). Indirect testing of eyewitness memory: The (non)effect of misinformation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(4) 333-336.

Doob, A.N., & Kirshenbaum, H. (1973). Bias in police lineups -- partial remembering. Journal             of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287-293.

Doris, J. (Ed.). (1991). The suggestibility of children's recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Doty, N.D. (1998). The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition.  American Journal of Psychology, 111, 191-214.

Douglass, A. B., & Steblay, N. (in press).  Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect.  Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Dragone, G. A., Brown, M., Krane, A. R., Krane, R. V. (1980). Hypermnesia for pictures and for words: The role of recall modality (pictures vs. words). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 258-260.

Dricker, J., Butters, N., Berman, G., Samuels, I., & Carey, S. (1978). The recognition and encoding of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemispheric patients. Neuropsychologia, 16, 683-695. 

Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71-99). New York

Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup ?

Dunker, K. (1939). The influence of past experience on perceptual properties. American Journal of Psychology, 52, 255-265.

Dunn, John C. (2004). Remember-Know: A Matter of Confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.

Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10 - to - 12 second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 951-962.

Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1991). Examining the generality of eyewitness hypermnesia: A close look at time delay and question type. Manuscript, Cornell University.

Dunning, D., & Stern, L.B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications via             inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.

Dysart, J.E. & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2001). A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 155-165.

Dysart, J.E., Lindsay, R.C.L., MacDonald, T.K., & Wicke, C. (2002). The intoxicated witness: Effects of alcohol on identification accuracy from show-ups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 170-175.

Dywan, J., & Bowers, K. S. (1983). The use of hypnosis to enhance recall. Science, 222, 184185.

Eakin, D. K., and Schreiber, T. A. (2003). Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 813-825.

Ebbesen, E., & Flowe, S. (2002). Simultaneous versus sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved July 29, 2002 from http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/%7eeebbesen/SimSeq.htm

Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, V. J. (1980). On the external validity of decision-making research: What do we know about decisions in the real world? In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ebbesen, E., & Rienick, C.B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745-762.

Ebbinghaus, H. E. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.

Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 30, 770-782.

Egan, D., Pittner, M., & Goldstein, A. G. (1977). Eyewitness identification: Photographs vs. live models. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 199-206.

Egan, J.P., & Clarke, F.R. (1966). Psychophysics and signal detection. In J.V. Sidowski           (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 161-177). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Egeth, H.E., & McCloskey, M. (1984). Expert testimony about eyewitness behavior: Is it safe and    effective? In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives.

Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistency in the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395-416.

Elliott, E. S., Wills E. J., & Goldstein A. G. (1973). The effects of discrimination training on the recognition of white and oriental faces. Bulletin of Psychonomic Sociology, 2, 71-73.

Elliott, M. L., Geiselman, R. E., & Thomas, D. J. (1981). Modality effects in short term recognition memory. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 85-104.

Elliott, R. (1990). More on the discredibility of eyewitnesses. Psychological Reports, 67(3, Pt 2) 1211-1215.

Elliott, R., Farrington, B., & Manheimer, H. (1988). Eyewitnesses credible and discredible. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(16, Pt 2) 1411-1422.

Ellis, H.D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 409-426.

Ellis, H.D. (1981). Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp.171-197). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Ellis, H. D. (1982). The performance of witnesses on identity parades. Unpublished research report sponsored by the Home Office Research Unit.

Ellis, H. D. (1984). Practical aspects of face memory. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 12-37). New