Publishing - Eyewitness Research 

Abshire, J. & Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Juror sensitivity to the cross-race effect. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 471-480.

Addison, B.M. (1978). Expert testimony on eyewitness perception. Dickinson Law Review, 82, 465-485.

Akehurst, L., Milne, R., & Köhnken, G. (2003). The effects of children's age and delay on recall in a cognitive or structured interviews. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 97-107.

Alexander, J. F. (1972). Search factors influencing personal appearance identification. In A. Zavala & J. J. Paley (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Alley, T. R., & Cunningham, M. R. (1991). Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychological Science, 2, 123-125.

Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 8, 61-81.

Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. J. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York: Holt.

Allwood, C. M., Granhag, P. A., & Johansson, M. (2003). Increased realism in eyewitness confidence judgements: The effect of dyadic collaboration. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 545-561.

Alper, A., Buckhout, R., Chern, S., Harwood, R., & Slomovits, M. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Accuracy of individual vs. composite recollections of a crime. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 147-149.

Anderson. C. A., Lepper M. R. & Ross. L. (1989). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037- 1049.

Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.

Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2, 406-412.

Anderson. R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1-12.

Anthony, T., Cooper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social-cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296-301.

Aronson, E ., & Carlsmith, J . M . (1968) . Experimentation in social psychology. In G . Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2d Ed.), ( 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.

Aronstam, D., & Tyson, G. A. (1980). Racial bias in eyewitness perception. The Journal of Social Psychology, 110, 177-182.

Asch, S. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

Aschermann, E., Mantwill, M., & Kohnken, G. (1991). An independent replication of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 489-495.

Atal, B. S. (1972). Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 1687-1697.

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds. ), The psychology of learning and motivation ( 2). New York: Academic Press.

Atkinson, R. C., & Juola, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-612). New York: Academic Press.

Ault, R. L., Jr. (1979). FBI guidelines for use of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 449-451.

Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 1 -21.

Ayuk, R. E. (1990). Cross racial identification of transformed, untransformed, and mixed race faces. International Journal of Psychology, 25(4) 509-527. 

Baddeley, A. D. (1979). Applied cognitive and cognitive applied psychology: The case of face recognition. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1982). Portraiture literature and person recognition. Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge University.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1982). Depth of processing, context, and face recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 148-164.

Baddeley, A. D., & Woodhead, M. M. (1983). Improving face recognition. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester: Wiley.

Bahrick, H.P., Bahrick, P.O., & Wittlinger, R.P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and   faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.

Bailis, K. L., & Mueller, J. H. (1981). Anxiety, feedback, and self-reference in face recognition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 85-96.

Baker, E. (1967). Perceiver variables involved in the recognition of faces. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.

Barclay, C. D., Cutting, J. E., & Kozlowski, L. T. (1978). Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 23(2), 145-152.

Barkowitz, P., & Brigham, J. C. Own race bias and time delay. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Barkowitz, P., & Brigham, J. C. (1982). Recognition of faces: Own-race bias, incentive, and time delay. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 255-268.

Bartholomeus, B. (1973). Voice identification by nursery school children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 464-472.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.

Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., & Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory and Cognition, 12, 219-228.

Bartlett, J.C., & Fulton, A. (1991). Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age. Memory      and Cognition, 19, 229-238.

Bazelon, D. L. (1981, March). Eyewitness news. Psychology Today, 101-106.

Beal, C.R., Schmitt, K.L., & Dekle, D. (1995). Eyewitness identification of children: Effects of absolute judgments, nonverbal response options, and event encoding. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 197-216.

Behrman, B.W., & Davey, S.L. (2001). Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 475-491.

Behrman, B.W., & Vayder, L.T. (1994). The biasing influence of a police showup: Does the observation of a single suspect taint later identification? Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79,1239-1248.

Behrman, B. W. & Richards, R. E. (2005). Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: A reality monitoring analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 279-301.

Bekerian, D. A., & Bowers, J. M. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: Were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 'J, 139-145.

Bekerian, D. A., & Dennett, J. L. (1997). Imagery effects in spoken and written recall. In D. Payne and F. Conrad (Eds.), Intersections in Basic and Applied Memory Research, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp. 175-191).

Bekerian, D. A., Dennett, J. L., Hill, K., & Hitchcock, R. (1990). Effects of detailed imagery on simulated wilness recall. Unpublished manuscript, MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge.

Belbin, E. (1950). The influence of interpolated recall upon recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 163-169.

Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(14) 1171-1192.

Bell, B.E., & Loftus, E.F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few)     minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679.

Belli, R. F. (1989). Influences of misleading postevent information: Misinformation interference and acceptance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Ceneral, 118, 72-85.

Belli, R.F. (1993). Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final        modified tests: Evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 407-427.

Belli, R. F., Lindsay, D. S., Gales, M. S., & McCarthy, T. T. (1992). Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experiments with short retention intervals. Manuscript in preparation.

Belli, R.F., Windschitl, P.D., & McCarthy, T.T. (1992). Detecting memory impairment with a     modified test procedure: Manipulating retention interval with centrally presented event items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 356-367.

Bennett, P. J. (1986). Face recall: A police perspective. Human Learning Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 5(4) 197-202.

Benson, P., & Perrett, D. (1991). Computer averaging and manipulation of faces. In P. Wombell (Ed.), Photovideo: Photography in the Age of the Computer. London: Rivers Oram Press.

Benson, P. & Perrett, D. (1992). Face to face with the perfect image. New Scientist, 133, 3235.

Benton, A. L. (1980). The neuropsychology of facial recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176-186.

Benton, A. L., & Gordon, M. C. (1971). Correlates of facial recognition. Transactions of the A merican Neurological Association, 96, 146- 150 .

Benton, A. L., Hamsher. K. S., ~arney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1983). Facial recognition: Stimulus and multiple choice pictures. Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Berliner, L., & Barbieri, M. K. (1984). The testimony of the child victim of sexual assault. Jounal of Social Issues, 40, 125-137.

Berman, G.L., & Cutler, B.L. (1996). Effects of inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony on     mock-juror decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 170-177.

Berman, G.L., & Cutler, B.L. (1998). The influencing of processing instructions at encoding and retrieval on face recognition accuracy. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 4, 89-106.

Bermant, G. (1986). Two conjectures about the issue of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 97-100.

Berresheim, A., & Weber, A. (2003). Die Strukturierte Zeugenvernehmung und Ihre Wirksamkeit [Structured witness interviewing and its effectiveness]. Kriminalistik, 57, 757-771.

Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L.Z. (1985). Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.

Berry, D. S., & McArthur, L. Z. (1986). Perceiving character in faces: The impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 3-18.

Bersoff, D. N. (1986). Psychologists and the judicial systems: Broader perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 151-165.

Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.

Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W. (1973). Searching for objects in real world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.

Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.

Binet, A. (1900) La suggestibilite (On suggestibility). Paris: Schleicher.

Bird, C. (1927). The influences of press upon the accuracy of report. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 22, 123-129.

Black, M. M., & Rollins, H. A., Jr. (1982). The effects of instructional variables on young children's organization and free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 1-19.

Blair, W. G. (1982, March 11). Witnesses in New York differ over tanker blast. New York Times, p. 17.

Blakemore, C. (1977). The unsolved marvel of memory. The New York Times Magazine, February 6.

Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229-246.

Blaney, R. L., & Winograd, E. (1978). Developmental differences in children's recognition memory for faces. Developmental Psychology, 14, 441-442.

Block, R. A. (1974). Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect. Memory and Cognition, 2, 153-160.

Block, R. A. (1978). Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity. Memory and Cognition, 6, 320-326.

Blonstein, R., & Geiselman, R. E. (1990). Effects of witnessing conditions and expert witness testimony on credibility of an eyewitness. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 8(4) 11-19.

Boice, R., Hanley, P., Shaughnessy, P., & Gansler D. (1982). Eyewitness accuracy: A general observational skill? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 193-195.

Bonto, M. A., & Payne, D. G. (1991). Role of environmental context in eyewitness memory. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 117-134.

Boon, J., & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognitive interviewing. Psychology, Crime and Law, 1, 59-69.

Borchard, E. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Errors of criminal justice. New Haven, CT:        Yale University Press.

Bornstein, B. (1963). Prosopagnosia. In. Halpern (Ed.), Problems of dynamic neurology (pp.283-317). Jerusalem, Israel: Hadassah Medical Organization.

Bornstein, B.H., Liebel, L.M., & Scarberry, N.C. (1998). Repeated testing in eyewitness memory: A means to improve recall of a negative emotional event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 119-131.

Bornstein, B., Sroka, II., & Munita, II. (1969). Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. Cortex, 5, 164-169.

Bornstein, B., & Zickafoose, D.J. (1999). “I know I know it, I know I saw it”: the stability of the confidence-accuracy relationship across domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, no.1, 76-88.

Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). A meta-analysis of eyewitness research: Cross-racial identification. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Malpass, R.S. (1989). Cross racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.

Bothwell, R.K., Brigham, J.C., & Pigott, M.A. (1987). An exploratory study of personality         differences in eyewitness memory. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 335-   343.

Bothwell, R.K., Deffenbacher, K.A., & Brigham, J.C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.

Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Predicting eyewitness accuracy from confidence: The optimality hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Bothwell, R. K., & Thomas, C. E. (in press). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identifications.

Bower, G. (1967)  A multicomponent theory of memory trace.  In K. W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.)  The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,  1, New York: Academic Press.

Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 29, 129-148.

Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751-757.

Bower, G.H., & Karlin, M.B. (1974). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.             Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

Bower, G. H., Montiero, K. P., & Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 573-585.

Bower, J. M., & Bekerian, D. A. (1984). When will postevent information distort eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 466-472.

Brace, N., Pike, G., Kemp, R., Turner, J., & Bennett, P. (2006). Does the presentation of multiple facial composites improve suspect identification? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 213-226.

Bradfield-Douglass, A., Smith, C., & Graser-Thill, R. (2005). A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: Photospread administrators use one eyewitness’s confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 543-562.

Bradfield, A. L., & Wells, G. L. (2000). The perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of the five Biggers criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 581-594.

Bradfield, A. L. & Wells, G. L. (2005). Not the same old hindsight bias: Outcome information distorts a broad range of retrospective judgments. Memory and Cognition, 33, 120-130.

Bradfield, A. L., Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2002). The damaging effect of confirming feedback on the relation between eyewitness certainty and identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 112-120.

Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Models for the processing and identification of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 443-448.

Brainerd. C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1993). Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review, 100. 42-67.

Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and children's false memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 81-129.

Brainerd, C. J. & Reyna, V. F. (1998). Memory loci of suggestibility development: Comment on Ceci, Ross, and Toglia (1987). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 197-200.

Brainerd, C.J., Reyna, V.F., & Brandse, E. (1995). Are children’s false memories more persistent than their true memories? Psychological Science, 6, 359-364.

Brandon R., & Davies, C. (1973). Wrongful imprisonment: Mistaken convictions and their consequences. London: George Allen and Unwin. 

Bregman, N. J., & McAllister, H. A. (1987). Perceived innocence or guilt: Role of eyewitness identification and fingerprints. Southern Psychologist, 3(2) 49-52.

Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 353-364.

Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002) Improving the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification: Evidence from correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 44-56.

Brewer, N., Keast, A., & Rishworth, A. (2002). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 46-58.

Brewer, N., Potter, R., Fisher, R.P., Bond, N., & Luszcz, M.A. (1999). Beliefs and data on the relationship between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 297-313.

Brewer, N., Weber, N., & Semmler, C. (2005). Eyewitness identification. In N. Brewer & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 177-221). New York: Guilford.

Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11-30.

Bricker, P. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1966). Effects of stimulus content and duration on talker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 40, 1441-1449.

Brigham, J. C. (1980a). Perspectives on the impact of lineup composition, race, and witness confidence on identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 315-321.

Brigham, J. C. (1981). The accuracy of eyewitness evidence: How do attorneys see it? The Florida Bar Journal, 55, 714-721.

Brigham, J. C. (1983). Psychological factors in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11(1) 47-56.

Brigham, J. C. (1986). Distinctiveness of appearance as a moderator variable in the confidence-accuracy relationship in facial identifications. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.

Brigham, J. C. (1988). Is witness confidence helpful in judging eyewitness accuracy? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory ( 1, pp. 7782). Chichester: Wiley.

Brigham, J. C. (1989). Disputed eyewitness identifications: Can experts help? The Champion, 8(5), 10-18.

Brigham, J. C. (1990). Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in facial identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 101-l15.

Brigham, J.C., & Barkowitz, P. (1978). Do "They all look alike?" The effect of race, sex, experience, and attitudes on the ability to recognize faces. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 306-318.

Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 19-30.

Brigham, J.C., & Brandt, C.C. (1992). Measuring lineup fairness: Mock witness responses vs.            direct evaluations of lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 475-489. [lineup fairness measures obtained using the mock witness task with students correspond reasonably well with measures and judgments of lineup fairness provided by police officers]

Brigham, J.C., & Cairns, D.L. (1988). The effect of mugshot inspections on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1394-1410.

Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Martinez, D., & Whittenberger, G. (1983). The effect of arousal on facial recognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 279-293.

Brigham, J. C., Maas, A., Snyder, L. D., & Spaulding K. (1982). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 673-680.

Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own-and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139-155.

Brigham, J.C., Meissner, C.A., & Wasserman, A.W. (1999).  Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13: S73-S92.

Brigham, J.C., & Pfeifer, J.E. (1994). Evaluating the fairness of lineups. In D.F. Ross, J.D.       Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 201-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brigham, J.C., & Ready, D.J. (1985). Own-race bias in lineup construction. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 415-424.

Brigham, J.C., Ready, D.J., & Spier, S.A. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of       photograph lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 149-163. [lineup fairness measures obtained using the mock witness task with students correspond reasonably well with measures and judgments of lineup fairness provided by police officers]

Brigham, J. C., Van Verst, M., & Bothwell, R. K. (1986). Accuracy of children's eyewitness identifications in a field setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(4) 295-306.

Brigham, J. C., & Williamson, N. L. (1979). Cross-racial recognition and age: When you're over 60 do they still "all look alike?" Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 218-222.

Brigham, J.C., & Wolfskiel, M.P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349.

Brimacombe, C.A.E. (nee Luus), Jung, S., Garrioch, L, & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: Will you believe me when I’m 64?. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 507-522.

Brimacombe, C.A.E. (nee Luus), Quinton, N., Nance, N., & Garrioch, L. (1997). Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 619-634.

Bringmann, M. W., Tyler, K., McAhren, P. E., & Bringmann, W. G. (1989). A successful and unsuccessful replication of William Stern's eyewitness research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69(2) 619-625.

Brooks, K. & Siegal, M. (1991). Children as eyewitnesses: Memory, suggestibility, and credibility. Australian Psychologist, 26(2), 84-88.

Brooks, N. (1983). Police guidelines: Pretrial identification procedures. Ottawa: Law Reform Commission.

Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K., & Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of the encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 311-318.

Brown, M. R. (1926). Legal psychology. Indianapolis: Bobbs. 

Bruce, V. (1979). Searching for politicians: An information processing approach to face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 373-395.

Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processing in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.

Bruce, V. (1983). Recognizing faces. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 302, 423-436.

Bruce. V. (1986). Recognizing familiar faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Jace processing (pp. 107-117). Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: ~i jhoff .

Bruce, V. (1988). Recognizing faces. Hove, Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bruce, V., Henderson, Z., Greenwood, K., Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M., & Miller, P.  (1999). Verification of face identities from images captured on video. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 339-360.

Bruce, V., Ness, H., Hancock, P. J. B., Newman, C., & Rarity, J. (2002). Four heads are better than one: Combining face composites Yields improvements in face likeness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 894-902.

Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305-327.

Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999).  The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419-439.

Bruck, M., Ceci, S.J., & Francoeur, E. (1999). The accuracy of mothers’ memories of conversations with their preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, No.1, 89-106.

Bruck, M., Ceci, S.J., Francoeur, E., & Barr, R.J. (1995). “I hardly cried when I got shot!”: Influencing children’s reports about a visit to their pediatrician. Child Development, 66, 193-208.

Brunswick, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.

Buchanan, D. R. (1985). Enhancing eyewitness identification: Applied psychology for law enforcement officers. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13(4), 303-309.

Buckhout, R. (1968). Through a bag, darkly. American Psychologist, 23, 832-833.

Buckhout, R. (1974). Eyewitness testimony. Scientific American, 231, 23-31.             

Buckhout, R. (1974b). Eyewitness recall of facts about a person. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 191-192.

Buckhout, R. (1975a). Nearly 2000 witnesses can be wrong. Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, 7.

Buckhout, R. Note. (1975b). Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, 7.

Buckhout, R. (1976). Eyewitness identification: Effects of suggestion and bias in identification from photographs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R. (1976). Psychology and eyewitness identification. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 75-92.

Buckhout, R. (1977). Eyewitness identification and psychology in the courtroom. Criminal Defense, 4, 5-10.

Buckhout, R. (1980). Nearly 2,000 witnesses can be wrong. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 307-310.

Buckhout, R. (1984). Double mistaken identification in Dallas: Texas v. Lenell Geter and Anthony Williams. Social Action and the Law, 10, 3-11.

Buckhout, R. (1986). Personal values and expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 127-144.

Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M. (1974). Determinants of      eyewitness performance on a lineup. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R., & Ellison, K. W. (1977, June). The lineup: A critical look. Psychology Today, pp. 82-84; 88.

Buckhout, R., Eugenio, P., Licitra, T., Oliver, L., & Kramer, T. (1982). Memory, hypnosis and evidence: Research on eyewitnesses. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Responsive Psychology, Brooklyn College.

Buckhout, R., Figueroa, D., & Hoff, E. (1973, May). Psychology and the eyewitness. American Journal of Criminal Law.

Buckhout, R., Figueroa, D., & Hoff, E. (1975). Eyewitness identification: Effects of suggestion and bias in identification from photographs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 71-74.

Buckhout, R. & Frier, V. (1975). Suggestivity in lineups and photospreads. Center for Responsive Psychology Monograph No. CR-5. New York: Brooklyn College C.U.N.Y.

Buckhout, R., Rabinowitz, M., Alfonso, V., Kanellis, D., & Anderson, J. (1988). Empirical          assessments of lineups: Getting down to cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 323-331.

Bull, R. (1978). Eyewitnesses also have ears. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Bull, R. (1979). The influence of stereotypes on person identification. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, & S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Bull, R. (1980). Psychological factors in eyewitness testimony. British Psychological Society Conference: Lawyers and psychologists the way forward (1980, London, England. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 1981 No 1 27-39.

Bull, R. (1992). Obtaining evidence expertly: The reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence, 1, 5-12.

Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1976). Identification: The Devlin report. New Scientist, 70, 307-308.

Bull, R., & Clifford, B. (1979). Eyewitness memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Applied problems in memory. New York: Academic Press.

Bull, R. H. C., & Reid, R. L. (1975). Recall after briefing: T.V. versus face to face presentation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 48, 73-78. 

Burke, E. J. (1981, November30). Eyewitness testimony: How reliable? The National Law Journal, pp. 3-4.

Burton, A.M., Cowan, M., Wilson, S., & Bruce, V. (1999). Face recognition in poor quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243-248.

Burtt, H. E. (1931). Legal psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Busey, T.A., Turnicliff, J., Loftus, G.R., & Loftus, E.F. (2000). Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 26-48.

Byatt, G., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Identification of own-race and other-race faces: Implications for the representation of race in face space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 735-741.

Cabeza, R., Bruce, V., Kato, T., & Oda, M. (1999). The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits. Memory and Cognition, 27 (1), 139-151.

Cady, H.M. (1924). On the psychology of testimony. American Journal of Psychology, 35, 110-          112.

Cahill. D., & Mingay, D. J. (1986). Leading questions and the police interview. Policing, Autumn, 212-224.

Campbell, R. (1982). Asymmetries in moving faces. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 95-103.

Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representations of faces.           Science, 195, 312-314.

Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1981). Development of face recognition--A maturational component? Developmental Psychology, 16, 257-269.

Carterette, E. C., & Barnebey, A. (1975). Recognition memory for voices. In A. Cohen, & S. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and process in speech perception: Proceedings of the symposium on dynamic aspects of speech perception. New York: Springer Verlag.

Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child eyewitness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.

Ceci, S.J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A Scientific analysis of children’s    testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986). A day at the races: A study of IQ, expertise and cognitive complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, II5, 255-266.

Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (?). Age differences in suggestibility: narrowing the uncertainties.

Ceci, S.J., Toglia, M.P., & Ross, D.F. (Eds.), (1987). Children's eyewitness memory. New        York: Springer-Verlag.

Ceci, S. J., Toglia, M. P., & Ross, D. F. (1988). On remembering.... More or less: A trace strength interpretation of developmental differences in suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Ceneral, 117, 201-203.

Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Suggestibility of children's memory: Psycho legal implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 116(1) 38-49.

Ceci, S.J., Ross, D.F., & Toglia, M.P. (Eds.), (1989). Perspectives on children’s testimony.       New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.

Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003) Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29,1343-1356.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979a). Reliability of face recognition performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 115-117.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979b). Depth of processing in response to faces. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri.

Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. (1981). Depth of processing in response to own and other race faces. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 475-480.

Chance, J.E., & Goldstein, A.G. (1984). Face recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 69-85.

Chance, J.E., Goldstein, A.G., & McBride, L. (1975). Differential experience and recognition    memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 243-253.

Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G., & Schicht, W. (1967). Effects of acquaintance and friendship on children's recognition of classmate's faces. Psychonomic Science, 7, 223-224.

Chance, J. E., Turner, A. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1982). Development of differential recognition for own-and other-race faces. The Journal of Psychology, 112, 29-37.

Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Applied lineup theory. In D. Read et al. (Eds.) Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Christiansen, R. E., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and post-event information. Memory and Cognition, 7-75.

Christiansen, R. E., Ochalek, K., Sweeney, J. D. (1984). Individual differences in eyewitness memory and confidence judgments. Journal of Genetic Psychology, IO. 47-52.

Christiansen, R. E., Sweeney, J. D., & Ochalek, K. (1983). Influencing eyewitness descriptions. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 59-65.

Christianson, S.A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.

Christianson, S.A., & Bylin, S. (1999). Does simulating amnesia mediate genuine forgetting for a crime event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 495-511.

Christianson, S.A., Karlsson, I., & Persson, L.G.W. (1998, February). Police personnel as eyewitnesses to a violent crime. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 1355-3259.

Christie, D. F. M., Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Evaluating a new computer based system for face recall. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 209-218.

Christie, D. F. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Photofit constructions versus verbal descriptions of faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 358-363.

Clark, S. E. (1997). A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 233-238.

Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629-654.

Clark, S. E. (2005). A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 395-424.

Clark, S. E. & Davey, S. L. (2005). The target-to-foils shift in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 151-172.

Clark, S.E., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T.P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1578-1588.

Clark, S.E., & Tunnicliff, J.L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 199-216.

Clarke, C., &  Milne, R. (2001) National Evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme.  Report Number PRAS/149.

Clifford, B.R. (1976). Police as eyewitnesses. New Society, (pp.176-177).

Clifford, B. R. (1978). A critique of eyewitness research. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Clifford, B. R. (1979a). Eyewitness testimony: The bridging of a credibility gap. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Clifford, B. R. (1979b, March). The relevance of psychological investigation to legal issues in testimony and identification. The Criminal Law Review, 153-163.

Clifford, B. R. (1980). Voice identification by human listeners: On earwitness reliability. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 373-394.

Clifford, B. R. (1983). Memory for voices: The feasibility and quality of earwitness evidence. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock and B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence. Chichester, Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons.

Clifford, B. R., & Bull, R. (1978). The psychology of person identification. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. (1977). Eyewitness testimony: A review of theory, data, and paradigms. Unpublished manuscript.

Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. R. (1978). Experimentally manipulated arousal and eyewitness testimony. Unpublished manuscript, North East London Polytechnic.

Clifford, B.R., & Hollin, C.R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of             perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364-370.

Clifford, B. R., & Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1983). Evaluating eyewitness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Clifford, B. R., Rathborn, H., & Bull, R. (1981). The effects of delay on voice recognition accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 201-208.

Clifford, B.R., & Scott, J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352-359.

Cohen, M. E., & Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 383-384.

Cohen, M. E., & Nodine, C. F. (1978). Memory processes in facial recognition and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 317-319.

Cohen, R. L., & Harnick, M. A. (1980). The susceptibility of child witnesses to suggestion. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 201-210.

Cole, G. F. (1986). The American system of criminal justice, 4th ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Cole, W. G., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Incorporating new information into memory. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 413-425.

Coleman, R. O. (1978). Speakers' sex identification as a function of listeners' sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 351-354.

Coleman, R. O., & Lass, N. L. (1981). Effect of prior exposure to stimulus material on identification of speakers' sex, height, and weight. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 619-622.

Comish, S.E. (1987). Recognition of facial stimuli following an intervening task involving the Identi-Kit.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 488-491.

Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N. & McEwan, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated             by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Alexandria, VA: National Institute of Justice.

Cook, M. (1978). Eye movements during recognition of faces. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Cote, P, (1998). FACES: The Ultimate Composite Picture (Version 3.0). [Computer software]. Saint Hubert, Quebec, Canada.

Courtois, M. R., & Mueller, J. H. (1979). Processing multiple physical features in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 74-76.

Courtois, M.R., & Mueller, J.H. (1981). Target and distractor typicality in face recognition.      Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 639-645.

Cox, S. D., & Wollen, K. A. (1981). Bizarreness and recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 244-245.

Coxon, P., & Valentine, T. (1997). The effects of age of eyewitnesses on the accuracy and suggestibility of their testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 415-430.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. 

Cronbag, H.F.M., Wagenaar, W.A., & Van Koppen, P.J. (1996). Crashing memories and the   problem of “source monitoring”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 95-104.

Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J. (1971). Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 10, 393-396.

Crozier, W. R. (1981). Do photographs of facial displays provide a sound basis for classifying the primary emotions. Current Psychological Research, 1(3) 199-202.

Cunningham, J. L., & Bringmann, W. G. (1986). A re examination of William Stern's classic eyewitness research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63(2, Pt 1) 565-566.

Cutler, B.L., Berman, G.L., Penrod, S., & Fisher, R.C.L. (1994). Conceptual, practical, and       empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.163-181). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7(2), 215-225.

Cutler, B.L., Dexter, H.R., & Penrod, S.D. (1990). Non-adversarial methods for improving juror sensitivity to eyewitness evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1197-1207.

Cutler, B. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1990). Live lineups, videotaped lineups, and photo arrays. Forensic Reports, 3, 439-448.

Cutler, B. L., Fisher. R. P., & Chicvara, C. L. (1989). Eyewitness identification from live versus videotaped lineups. Forensic Reports, 2, 93-106.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification:      Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1989a). Forensically-relevant moderators of the relationship between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 650-652.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1989b). Moderators of the confidence-accuracy relation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95-107.

Cutler, B.L., & Penrod, S.D. (1995). Mistaken identification: The eyewitness, psychology,      and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H.R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and           the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., & Dexter, H.R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Martens, T.K. (1987a). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Martens, T.K. (1987b). Improving the reliability of eyewitness    identifications: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.

Cutler, B.R., Penrod, S., O'Rourke, T.E., & Martens, R.K. (1986). Unconfounding the effect of             contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behavior, 2, 113-134.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Stuve, T.E. (1988). Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-56.

Cutler, B. & Penrod, S. (1988). Context reinstatement and eyewitness identification. In G. Davies & D. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in Context: Context in Memory. Chichester: Wiley.

Cutler, B, L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 281-290.

Cutshall. J. L., & Yuille, J. C. (1989). Field studies of eyewitness memory of actual crimes. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 97124). New York: Springer.

Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question of the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269-277.

Dallenbach, K. M. (1913). The relation of memory error to time interval. Psychological Review, 20, 323-337.

Dane, F., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1982). Effects of defendants' and victims' characteristics on jurors' verdicts. In N. L. Kerr and R. M. Bray (Eds.), The Psychology of the Courtroom (pp. 83-115). New York: Academic Press.

Dashiell, J. F. (1933). Experiments in the sifting of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 720.

Daubert, et ux., etc., et., Petitioners v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. CT. 2786;    125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

Davies, G. M. (1969). Recognition memory for pictured and named objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 7, 448-458.

Davies, G. M. (1978). Face recognition: Issues and theories. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Davies, G.M. (1981). Face recall systems. In G.M. Davies, H.D. Ellis, & J.W. Shepherd, (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Davies, G. M. (1983). The recognition of persons from drawings and photographs. Human Learning, 2, 237-249.

Davies, G. M. (1984). The legal impact of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: British and American experiences. (given at the 91st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association in August 1983), Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 24( 3), pp 165-175. Davies, G. (1986). Forensic face recall: The role of visual and verbal information. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological evidence and new perspectives (pp. 103-123). Chichester: Wiley.

Davies, G. (1986). Capturing likeness in eyewitness composites: the police artist and his rivals. (Great Britain), Medicine, Science, and the Law, 26(4), pp 283-290.

Davies, G. (1990, September). Influencing public policy on eye-witnessing: Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the Second European Law and Psychology Conference, Nuremberg, Germany. Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., & Shepherd, J.W. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.

Davies, G. M., & Christie, D. (1982). Face recall: An examination of some factors limiting composite production accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 103-109.

Davies, G. M., Ellis, H. D., & Shepherd, J. W. (1977). Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the Photofit technique. Perception, 6, 263-269.

Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., & Shepherd, J.W. (1981). Perceiving and remembering faces. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Davies, G., & Jenkins, F. (1985). Witnesses can be misled by police composite pictures: How and when. In F. L. Denmark (Ed.), Social/ecological psychology and the psychology of women (pp. 103-115). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

Davies, G.M., Kurvink, A., Mitchell, R., & Robertson, N. (1996). Memory for cars and their drivers: A test of the interest hypothesis. In D. Herrmann, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, P. Hertel, & M.K. Johnson (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Practical applications Vol 2., pp. 37-50. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Davies, G. M., Milne, J. E., & Glennie, B. J. (1973). On the significance of "double encoding" for superior recall of pictures to names. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 413-423. Davies, G., & Milne, A. (1982). Recognizing faces in and out of context. Current Psychological Research, 2, 235-246.

Davies, G. & Milne. A. (1985). Eyewitness composite production: A function of mental or physical reinstatement of context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 209-220.

 Davies, G.M., & Robertson, N. (1993). Recognition memory for automobiles: A developmental study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 103-106.

Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1979). Similarity effects in face recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 507-523.

Davies, G. M., Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1979a). Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.

Davies, G., Shepherd, J., & Ellis, H. (1979). Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 232-237.

Davies, G., Shepherd, J., Shepherd, Jean, Flin, R., & Ellis, H. (1986). Training skills in police Photofit operators. Policing, 2, 35-46.

Davies. G. & Thompson, D. (19g8). (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory. London: Wiley.

Davis, M., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. (2004). The efficacy of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time-critical investigations. 19, 75-93.

Davis, R. D., & Sinha, D. (1950). The effect of one experience upon the recall of another. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 43-52.

Daw, P. S., & Parkin, A. J. (1981). Observations on the efficiency of two different processing strategies for remembering faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 351-355.

Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about            their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, K. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent  

            psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 235-251). Chichester, England:   Wiley.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Brown, E. L., & Sturgill, W. (1978). Some predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Carr, T. H., & Leu, J. R. (1981). Memory for words, pictures, and faces: Retroactive interference, forgetting, and reminiscence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 299-305.

Deffenbacher, K. A. & Homey, J. (1981). Psycholegal aspects of face identification. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces. London and New York: Academic Press.

Deffenbacher, K. A., Leu, J. R., & Brown, E. L. (1981). Memory for faces: Testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 13-26.

Deffenbacher, K., & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15-30.

Dekle, D.J., Beal, C.R., Elliot, R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-12.

Dent, H.R. (1977). Stress as a factor influencing person recognition in identification parades.           Bulletin of British Psychology, 30, 339-340.

Dent, H. R. (1978). Interviewing child witnesses. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Dent, H. (1992). The effects of age and intelligence on eyewitnessing ability. In H. Dent, & R.           Flin, (Eds.) Children as witnesses (pp. 1-13). New York: Wiley.

Dent, H., & Flin, R. (Eds.), (1992). Children as witnesses. New York: Wiley.

Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). Identification evidence: Experimental investigations of factors affecting the reliability of juvenile and adult witnesses. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, & S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Dent, H. R., & Stephenson. G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, l~, 41-51.

Devenport, J. L., & Cutler, B. L. (2004). Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 569-576.

Devenport, J.L., Penrod, S.J., & Cutler, B.L. (1998). Eyewitness identification evidence: Evaluating commonsense evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 338-361.

Devine, P. G., & Malpass, R. S. (1985). Orienting strategies in differential face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 33-40.

Devlin, Lord (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases.  London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.

Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental changes in the representation of faces.      Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1-22.

Dixon, S., & Memon, A. (2005). The effect of post-identification feedback on the recall of crime and perpetrator details. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 935-951.

Dodd, D. H., & Bradshaw, J. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 695-704.

Dodson, C.S., Johnson, M.K., & Schooler, J.W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 129-139.

Dodson, C. & Reisberg, D. (1991). Indirect testing of eyewitness memory: The (non)effect of misinformation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(4) 333-336.

Doob, A.N., & Kirshenbaum, H. (1973). Bias in police lineups -- partial remembering. Journal             of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287-293.

Doris, J. (Ed.). (1991). The suggestibility of children's recollections. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Doty, N.D. (1998). The influence of nationality on the accuracy of face and voice recognition.  American Journal of Psychology, 111, 191-214.

Douglass, A. B., & Steblay, N. (in press).  Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect.  Applied Cognitive Psychology.

Dragone, G. A., Brown, M., Krane, A. R., Krane, R. V. (1980). Hypermnesia for pictures and for words: The role of recall modality (pictures vs. words). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 16, 258-260.

Dricker, J., Butters, N., Berman, G., Samuels, I., & Carey, S. (1978). The recognition and encoding of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemispheric patients. Neuropsychologia, 16, 683-695. 

Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 71-99). New York

Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup ?

Dunker, K. (1939). The influence of past experience on perceptual properties. American Journal of Psychology, 52, 255-265.

Dunn, John C. (2004). Remember-Know: A Matter of Confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542.

Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10 - to - 12 second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 951-962.

Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1991). Examining the generality of eyewitness hypermnesia: A close look at time delay and question type. Manuscript, Cornell University.

Dunning, D., & Stern, L.B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications via             inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.

Dysart, J.E. & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2001). A preidentification questioning effect: Serendipitously increasing correct rejections. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 155-165.

Dysart, J.E., Lindsay, R.C.L., MacDonald, T.K., & Wicke, C. (2002). The intoxicated witness: Effects of alcohol on identification accuracy from show-ups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 170-175.

Dywan, J., & Bowers, K. S. (1983). The use of hypnosis to enhance recall. Science, 222, 184185.

Eakin, D. K., and Schreiber, T. A. (2003). Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 813-825.

Ebbesen, E., & Flowe, S. (2002). Simultaneous versus sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved July 29, 2002 from http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/%7eeebbesen/SimSeq.htm

Ebbesen, E. B., & Konecni, V. J. (1980). On the external validity of decision-making research: What do we know about decisions in the real world? In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ebbesen, E., & Rienick, C.B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745-762.

Ebbinghaus, H. E. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.

Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 30, 770-782.

Egan, D., Pittner, M., & Goldstein, A. G. (1977). Eyewitness identification: Photographs vs. live models. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 199-206.

Egan, J.P., & Clarke, F.R. (1966). Psychophysics and signal detection. In J.V. Sidowski           (Ed.), Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 161-177). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Egeth, H.E., & McCloskey, M. (1984). Expert testimony about eyewitness behavior: Is it safe and    effective? In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives.

Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistency in the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 85, 395-416.

Elliott, E. S., Wills E. J., & Goldstein A. G. (1973). The effects of discrimination training on the recognition of white and oriental faces. Bulletin of Psychonomic Sociology, 2, 71-73.

Elliott, M. L., Geiselman, R. E., & Thomas, D. J. (1981). Modality effects in short term recognition memory. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 85-104.

Elliott, R. (1990). More on the discredibility of eyewitnesses. Psychological Reports, 67(3, Pt 2) 1211-1215.

Elliott, R., Farrington, B., & Manheimer, H. (1988). Eyewitnesses credible and discredible. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(16, Pt 2) 1411-1422.

Ellis, H.D. (1975). Recognizing faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 409-426.

Ellis, H.D. (1981). Theoretical aspects of face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp.171-197). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Ellis, H. D. (1982). The performance of witnesses on identity parades. Unpublished research report sponsored by the Home Office Research Unit.

Ellis, H. D. (1984). Practical aspects of face memory. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 12-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, H.D., Davies, G.M., & Shepherd, J.W. (1977).  Experimental studies of face identification. Journal of Criminal Defense, 3, 219-234.

Ellis, H.D., Davies, G.M., & Shepherd, J.W. (1978). A critical examination of the photofit system for recalling faces. Ergonomics, 21, 297-301.

Ellis, H.D., Deregowski, J.B., & Shepherd, J.W. (1975). Descriptions of black and white faces by White and Black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 119-123.

Ellis, H. D., & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Within-race and between-race recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 27-35.

Ellis. H. D., Ellison, K. W., & Buckhout, R. (1981). Psychology & Criminal Justice. New York: Harper & Row.

Ellis, H. D., Jeeves. M. A., Newcombe, F., & Young, A. (1986). (Eds.), Aspects of Face Processing. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Bruce, A. (1973). The effects of age and sex upon adolescents' recognition of faces. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 173-174.

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1975). An investigation of the Photofit technique for recalling faces. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 29-37.

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & Davies, G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431-439.

Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., & Davies, G.M. (1980). The deterioration of verbal descriptions of faces over different delay intervals. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 101-106.

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., Flin, R. H., Shepherd, J. & Davies, G. M. (1989). Identification from a computer-driven retrieval system compared with traditional mugshot ablum search: A new tool for police investigations. Ergonomics, 32, 167-177.

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W. Gibling, F., & Shepherd. J. (1988). Stimulus factors in face learning. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. ~. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues. Volume 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 136-l44). New

Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., Shepherd, Jean,  Klin, Rhona H.,  et al. (1989).  Identification from a computer driven retrieval system compared with a traditional mug shot album search: A new tool for police investigations. Ergonomics, 1989

Engen, T., & Ross, B. (1973). Long term memory of odors with and without verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 221-227.

Ernsdorf, G.N., & Loftus, E.F. (1993). Let sleeping memories lie? Words of caution about      tolling the statute of limitations in cases of memory repression. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, 129-174.

Fahsing, I. A., Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2004). The man behind the mask: Accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 722-729.

Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J.W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.

Fanselow, M. (1975). How to bias an eyewitness. Social Action and the Law, 2, 3-4.

Fanselow, M. (1975). How to bias an eyewitness: A review of research on expectancy applied to eyewitness identification testing. Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, (3), 3-6.

Fanselow, M.S., & Buckhout, R.F. (1976). Nonverbal cueing as a source of biasing information in eyewitness identification testing. Center for Responsive Psychology Monograph No. CR-26. New York: Brooklyn College C.U.N.Y.

Farah, M.J., Wilson, K.D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J.N. (1998). What is “special” about face recognition? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.

Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates. (1975). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

Feingold, G. A. (1914). The influence of environment on identification of persons and things. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 5, 39-51.

Feinman, S., & Entwistle, D.R. (1976). Children’s ability to recognize other children’s faces.   Child Development, 47, 506-510.

Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. (1986). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory and Cognition, 13, 333-345.

Feuerlicht, R. S. (1977). Justice crucified: The story of Sacco and Vanzetti. New York: McGraw Hill.

Fischhoff, B. (1977). Perceived informativeness of facts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 349-358.

Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 552-564.

Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ¹ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299.

Fisher, R.P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 732-764.

Fisher, R. P. (2005). The Cognitive Interview: Question & Answers. The National Transportation Safety Board Academy, Ashburn, Virginia. http://www.ntsb.gov/Academy/courseinfo/Q&A_Fisher.pdf 

Fisher, R. P., Brennan, K. H., & McCauley, M. R. (2002). The cognitive interview method to enhance eyewitness recall. In M. Eisen, G. Goodman, & J. Quas (Eds.)

            Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. (pp.  265-286).

Fisher, R. P., & Chandler, C. C. (1991). Independence between recalling interevent relations and specific events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 722-733.

Fisher, R. P., & Cutler, B. L. (1992). The relation between consistency and accuracy of eyewitness testimony. Third European Conference of Law and Psychology, Oxford.

Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Chas. Thomas.

Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Amador. M. (1989). Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 722-727.

Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., & Raymond, D. S. (1987a). Analysis of police interview techniques. Journal of Science and Administration. 15, 177-185.

Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., Raymond, D. S., Jurkevich, L. M., & Warhaftig, M. L. (1987b). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration. lS, 291-297.

Fisher, R.P., McCauley, M.R., & Geiselman, R.E. (1994). Improving eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.),    Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.245-272). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fisher, R. P., & Quigley, K. L. (1991). Applying cognitive theory in public health investigations: Enhancing food recall. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about Questions. New York: Sage Press.

Fisher, R. P., Quigley, K. L., Brock, P., Chin, E., & Cutler, B. L. (1990). The effectiveness of the cognitive interview in description and identification tasks. Paper presented at the American Psychology- Law Society, Williamsburg, VA.

Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (in press). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In Toglia, M., Lindsay, R.,  Ross, D & Reed, J. (Eds.)  The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume One. Memory for events. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.

Fishman, D. B., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness identification. Law and Psychology Review, 4, 87-103.

Fivush, R. & Hammond, N.R. (1990). Autobiographical memory across the preschool years:   Toward a reconceptualizing childhood amnesia. In R. Fivush & J.A. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 223-248). New York: Cambridge             University Press.

Flanagan, E. J. (1981). Interviewing and interrogation techniques. In E. J. Grau (Ed.), Criminal and civil investigation handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Fleet, M.L., Brigham, J.C., & Bothwell, R.K. (1987). The confidence-accuracy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 171-187.

Fleishman, J.J., Buckley, M.L., Klosinsky, M.J., Smith, N., & Tuck, B. (1976). Judged attractiveness in recognition memory of women's faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 709-710.

Flexser, A. J., & Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85, 153-171.

Flin, R. H. (1980). Age effects in children's memory for unfamiliar faces. Developmental Psychology, 16, 373-374.

Flin, R., Boone, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five-month delay on children’s and adult’s eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 323-336.

Flin, R.H. & Shepherd, J.W. (1986). Eyewitnesses’ ability to estimate height and weight        characteristics. Human Learning Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 5, 29-38.

Foley, M. A., Santini, C., & Sopasakis, M. (1989). Discriminating between memories: Evidence for children's spontaneous elaborations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 146169.

Foley, M. A., Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1983). Age-related changes in confusion between memories for thoughts and memories for speech. Child Development, 54, 51-60.

Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusion between memories for performed and imagined actions. Child Development, 56, 1145-1155.

Foley, M. A., Durso, F. T., Wilder, A., & Friedman, R. (1991). Developmental comparisons of explicit versus implicit imagery and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 51, 1-13.

Forgas, J. P., Lahm, S. M., & Vargas, P. T. (2005). Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 574-588.

Fox, S.G., & Walters, H.A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony      and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10,     215-228.

Frank, J. (1949). Courts on trial. Princeton: Princeton University.

Frank, J., & Frank, B. (1957). Not guilty. London: Gallanez.

Frankfurter, F. (1927). The case of Sacco and Vanztti. New York: Little, Brown.

Franks, I. M., & Miller, G. (1986). Eyewitness testimony in sport. Journal of Sport Behavior, 9(1) 38-45.

Fraser, I. H., Craig, G. L., & Parker, D. M. (1990). Reaction time measures of feature saliency in schematic faces. Perception, I9, 661-673. 

Frowd, C. D., Bruce, V., McIntyre, A., Ross., D., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2006). Adding Holistic Dimensions to a Facial Composite System. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (pp. 183-188). Los Alamitos: Ca.

Frowd, C. D., Carson, D., Ness, H., McQuiston, D., Richardson, J., Baldwin, H., & Hancock, P. J. B. (2005). Contemporary composite techniques: The impact of a forensically-relevant target delay. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 63-81.

Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Alan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533-543.

Galper, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207-208.

Galper, R. E. (1973). Functional race membership and recognition of faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 455-462.

Galper, R. E., & Hochberg, J. (1971). Recognition memory for photographs of faces. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 351-355.

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty. London: Dent.

Garcia, L. T., & Griffitt, W. (1978). Impact of testimonial evidence as a function of witness characteristics. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 37-40.

Gardner, D. S. (1933). The perception and memory of witnesses. Cornell Law Quarterly, 18, 391-409.

Garrioch, L. & Brimacombe, C.A.E. (2001). Lineup administrators' expectations: Their impact on eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 299-315.

Garry, M., Manning, C.G., Loftus, E.F., & Sherman, S.J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 208-214.

Gass, R. S. (1979). The psychologist as expert witness: Science in the courtroom. Maryland Law Review, 38, 539-561.

Garven, S., Wood, J.M., Malpass, R.S., & Shaw, J.S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin Preschool Case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347-359.

Gauld, A., & Stephenson, G. M. (1967). Some experiments relating to Bartlett's theory of remembering. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 39-49.

Geiselman, R. E., & Bellezza, F. S. (1976). Long term memory for speaker's voice and source location. Memory and Cognition, 4, 483-489.

Geiselman, R. E., & Bjork, R. A. (1980). Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 188-205.

Geiselman, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990) Reverse versus forward recall of script-based texts, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141-144.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Cohen, G., Holland, H., & Surtes, L. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14 31-39.

Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., & Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74-80.

Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., & Holland, H.L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401-412.

Geiselman, R. E., & Padilla, J. (1988). Interviewing child witnesses with the cognitive interview. Journal of Poliee Science and Administration, l6, 236-242.

Geiselman. R. E., Saywitz, K. J., & Bornstein, G. K. (in press). Effects of cognitive questioning techniques on children's recall performance. To appear in G. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Understanding and improving children's testimony: Developmental, clinical, and legal

Geiselman, R.E., Schroppel, T., Tubridy, A., Konishi, T. & Rodriguez, V. (2000).  Objectivity bias in eyewitness performance.  Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 323-332.

Gentner, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Integration of verbal and visual information as evidenced by distortions in picture memory. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 363-375.

George, R.C. (1991). A field evaluation of the cognitive interview.  Unpublished  Masters Thesis,  Polytechnic of East London.

Gibling, F., & Davies, G. (1967). Reinstatement of context following exposure to post event information. British Journal of Psychology, 79(1) 129-141.

Gilbert, D.T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.

Gilbert, D.T., & Malone, P.S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.

Gilbert vs. California (1967) 388 U.S. 263.

Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V.H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.

Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower, & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation( 5). New York: Academic Press. 

Godden, D., & Baddeley, A. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology, 71, 99-104.

Goff, L.M., & Roediger, H.L. (1998). Imagination inflation for events: Repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections. Memory and Cognition, 26, 20-33.

Gogel, W. C. (1981). The role of suggested size in distance responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 30, 149-155.

Gogel, W. C., & Tietz, J. D. (1980). Relative cues and absolute distance perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 321-328.

Going, M., & Read, J. D. (1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 109-110.

Goldstein, A. G. (1977). The fallibility of the eyewitness: Psychological evidence. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum.

Goldstein, A. G. (1979a). Race related variation of facial features: Anthropometric data I. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 187-190.

Goldstein, A. G. (1979b). Facial feature variation: Anthropometric data II. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 191-193.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1964). Recognition of children's faces. Child Development, 35, 129-136.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1965). Recognition of children's faces II. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 548.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 237-241.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1976). Measuring psychological similarity of faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 407-408.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. (1978, August). Memory for faces: Pattern recognition and eyewitness identification. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. (1979, November). Memory for faces and schema theory. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Phoenix.

Goldstein, A., & Chance, J. (1979). Do foreign faces really look alike? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 111-113.

Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E. & Schneller, G. R. (1989). Frequency of eyewitness identification in criminal cases: A survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 71-74.

Goldstein, A. G., Johnson, K. S., & Chance, J. (1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 15-18.

Goldstein, A. G., & Mackenberg, E. J. (1966). Recognition of human faces from isolated facial features: A developmental study. Psychonomic Science, 6, 149-150.

Goldstein, A. G., Stephenson, B., & Chance, J. (1977). Face recognition memory: Distribution of false alarms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 416-418.

Gonzalez, R., Davis, J., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1995). Who should stand next to the suspect? Problems in the assessment of lineup fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 525-531.

Gonzalez, R., Ellsworth, P.C., & Pembroke, M. (1993). Misidentifications and failures to identify         in lineups and showups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 525-537.

Goodman, G. S. (1984). The child witness: Conclusions and future directions for research and legal practice. Journal of Social Issues, 40(2) 157-175.

Goodman, G. S. (1989). The emotional effects on child sexual assault victims of testifying in criminal court. Final report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

Goodman, G.S., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event. Child Development, 61, 1859-1871.

Goodman, G.S., & Bottoms, B.L. (1993). Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony. New York: Guilford Press.

Goodman, G.S., Bottoms, B.L., Rudy, L., Davis, S.L., & Schwartz-Kenney, B.M. (2001). Effects of past abuse experiences on children’s eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 269-298.

Goodman, G.S., Bottoms, B.L., Schwartz-Kennedy, B.M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's testimony for a stressful event: Improving children's reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69-99.

Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Herscovici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim s perceived credibility. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 1-22). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Goodman, G. S. Golding, J. M., & Haith M. M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139-156.

Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11. 27-40.

Goodman, G. S., & Michelli, J. A. (1981). Would you believe a child witness? Psychology, 15, 83-95.

Goodman, G.S., Quas, J.A., Batterman-Faunce, J.M., Riddlesburger, J., & Kuhn, J. (1994), Predictors of accurate and inaccurate memories of traumatic events experienced in childhood. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 269-294.

Goodman, G.S., & Reed, R.S. (1986). Age differences in children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Behavior, 10, 317-322.

Goodman, G.S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B.L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children’s concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children’s eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds.) Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249-284). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Goodman, J., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). The relevance of expert testimony on eyewitness memory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3(1) 115-121.

Goodrich, G. H. (1975). Should experts be allowed to testify concerning eyewitness testimony in criminal cases? Judges' Journal, 14, 70-71.

Gordon, I. E., Zukas, M., & Chan, J. (1981). Responses to schematic faces: A cross-cultural study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 201-202.

Gorenstein, G.W., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1980). Effect of choosing an incorrect photograph on a             later identification by an eyewitness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 616-622.

Graham, E. S., & Kabacy, R. E. (1990). Expert testimony by psychologists: Novel scientific evidence. Law and Psychology Review, 14 71-85.

Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Granhag, P.A., Stromwall, L.A., & Allwood C.M. (2000). Effects of reiteration, hindsight bias, and memory on realism in eyewitness confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 397-420.

Greenberg, M.S., Westcott, D.R., & Bailey, S.E. (1998). When seeing is believing: The effect of scripts on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 685-694.

Greenberg, M. S., Wilson, C. E., Ruback, R. B., & Mills, M. K. (1979). Social and emotional determinants of victim crime reporting. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 364-372.

Green, D. L. & Geiselman, R. E. (1989). Building composite facial images: Effects of feature saliency and delay of construction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 714-721.

Greene, E. (1981). Whodunit? Memory for evidence in text. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 479-496.

Greene, E. (1988). Judges' instructions on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 252-276.

Greene, E., Flynn, M. S., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 207-219.

Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1985). When crimes are joined at trial. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 193-207.

Greer, D. S. (1978). Anything but the truth? The reliability of testimony in criminal trials. In J. Baldwin, & A. K. Bottomley (Eds.), Criminal justice: Selected readings. London: Martin Robertson.

Gronlund, S. D. (2004). Sequential lineups: Shift in criterion or decision strategy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 362-368.

Gronlund, S. D. (2005). Sequential lineup advantage: Contributions of distinctiveness and recollection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 23-37.

Gross, H. (1911). Criminal psychology (4th ed.) (M. Kallen, translation), Mount Claire, NJ: Paterson Smith.

Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1996). Eyewitness identification by 5- to 6-year-old children. Law and           Human Behavior, 20, No.3, 359-373.

Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (1978). Sex differences in facial memory. New York: Academic Press.

Gwyer, P., & Clifford, B.R. (1997). The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence, and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 121-145.

Haber, R.N., & Haber, L.A. Meta-Analysis of Eyewitness Accuracy When Making an Identification in a Lineup. (LINK)

Haber, R.N., & Haber, L. (2000). Experiencing, remembering and reporting events. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 1057-1097.

Hafstad, G. S., Memon, A., & Logie, R. (2004). Post-identification feedback, confidence and recollections of witnessing conditions in child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 901-912.

Hagen, M.A., & Perkins, D. (1983). A refutation of the hypothesis of the superfidelity of        caricatures relative to photographs. Perception, 12, 55-61.

Hall, D. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1975). Accuracy of eyewitness identification after biased or unbiased instructions. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.

Halperin, D.A. (Ed.) (in press). False memory syndrome: Theraputic and forensic perspectives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.

Hargraves, W. A., & Starkweather, J. A. (1963-64). Recognition of speaker identity. Language and Speech, 6, 63-67.

Harley, E. M., Carlsen, K. A., & Loftus, G. R. (2004). The “saw-it-all-along” effect: Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 960-968.

Harmon, L. D. (1973). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229, 71-82.

Harris, M.J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31 meta-            analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363-386.

Harris, R. J. (1973). Answering questions containing marked and unmarked adjectives and adverbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 399-401.

Hasel, L., & Wells, G. L. (2006). Catching the bad guy: Morphing composite faces helps. Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Hasher, L., Attig, M. S., & Alba, J. W. (1981). I knew it all along: Or, Did I? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 86-96. 

Hastie, R. (1986). Notes on the psychologist expert witness. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 79-82.

Hastie, R., Landsman, R., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: The dangers of guessing. Jurimetrics Journal, 19, 1-8.

Hastings, M. W. (1982). Effectiveness of face-name learning strategies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 167-170.

Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril H. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129-134.

Hatton, D. E., Snortum, J. R., & Oskamp, S. (1971). The effects of biasing information and dogmatism upon witness testimony. Psychonomic Science, 23, 425-427.

Hatvany, N., & Strack, F. (1980). The impact of a discredited key witness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, in press.

Haugaard, J. J., Reppucci, N. D., Laird, J., & Nauful, T. (1991). Children's definitions of the truth and their competency as witnesses in legal proceedings. Law and Human Behavior, 15(3) 253-271.

Haw, R. M., & Fisher, R. P. (2004). Effects of administrator-witness contact on eyewitness identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1106-1112.

Hay, D. C.. Young, A.W., & Ellis. A. W. (1986). What happens when a face rings a bell?: The automatic processing of famous faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.) Aspects of face processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.

Henderson, Z., Bruce, V., & Burton, A.M. (2001). Matching the faces of robbers captured on video. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 445-464.

Herrmann, D. J. (1982). Know thy memory: The use of questionnaires to access and study memory. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 434-452.

Hilgard, E. R., & Loftus, E. F. (1979). Effective interrogation of the eyewitness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 342-357.

Hilgendorf, E.L., & Irving, B.L. (1978). False positive identification. Medicine, Science and      the Law, 18, 255-262.

Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation ( 10). New York: Academic Press. 

Hinz, T., & Pezdek, K. (2001). The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 185-198.

Hirschberg, N., Jones, L. E., & Haggerty, M. (1978). What's in a face: Individual differences in face perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 488-499.

Hockley, W.E., Hemsworth, D.H., & Consoli, A. (1999). Shades of the mirror effect: Recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Memory and Cognition, 27 (1), 128-138.

Hoffheimer, M. H. (1989). Effect of particularized instructions on evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Psychology Review, 13 43-58.

Hoffman, H.G., Loftus, E.F., Greenmun, N., & Dashiell, R.L. (1992). The generation of misinformation. In F. Losel, D. Bender, and T. Bliesener (Eds.) Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 292-301). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R. & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A byproduct of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 566-581.

Holliday, R. E. (2003a). Reducing misinformation effects in children with cognitive interviews: Dissociating recollection and familiarity. Child Development, 74, 728-751

Holliday, R. E. (2003b). The effect of a prior cognitive interview on children's acceptance of misinformation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 443-457.

Hollin, C. R. (1981). Nature of the witnessed incident and status of interviewer as variables influencing eyewitness recall. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 295-296.

Hollin, C. R. (1984). Arousal and eyewitness memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 266.

Holmes, D. (1990). The evidence for repression: An examination of sixty years of research. In          J. Singer (Ed.), Repression and dissociation: Implications for personality, theory, psychopathology, and health (pp. 85-102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Horgan, Terrence G., Mast, Marianne Schmid., Hall, Judith A., & Carter, Jason D. (2004). Gender Differences in Memory for the Appearance of Others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 185-196.

Hosch, H. M. (1980). A comparison of three studies of the influence of expert testimony on jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 297-302.

Hosch, H. M. (1993). Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. In D. Ross, J. D. Read. & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hosch, H.M. (1994). Individual differences in personality and eyewitness identification. In D.F.         Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 328-347). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hosch, H.M., Beck, E.L., & McIntyre, P. (1980). Influence of expert testimony regarding         eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 287-296.

Hosch, H. M., Bothwell, R. K., Sporer. S. L., & Saucedo, C. (1990). The accuracy of witness' choice: Facial recognition ability, reaction time, and confidence. Southwestern Psychological Association, Houston, T8.

Hosch. H. M., Bothwell. R. K., Sporer. S. L., & Saucedo. C. (1991). Assessing eyewitness identification accuracy: An individual differences approach. Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.

Hosch, H.M., & Cooper, D.S. (1982). Victimization as a determinant of eyewitness accuracy.             Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 649-652.

Hosch, H.M., Leippe, M.R., Marchioni, P.M., & Cooper, D.S. (1984). Victimization, self- monitoring, and eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 280-288.

Hosch, H.M., & Platz, S.J. (1984). Self-monitoring and eyewitness accuracy. Personality        and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 283-289.

Hosie, J.A., & Milne, A.B. (1995). Distinctiveness and memory for unfamiliar faces. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition, (pp. 95-112). London: Routledge.

Houts, M. (1981). The accuracy/fallibility of eyewitness reporting. Trauma, 23, 1-6.

Howells, T. H. (1928). A study of ability to recognize faces. Applied Psychology, 12, 317-334.

Howells, T.H. (1938). A study of ability to recognize faces. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 33, 124-127.

Huff, R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1986). Guilty until proven innocent. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 518-544.

Hutchins, R., & Slesinger, H. (1928). Some observations of the law of evidence: Memory. Harvard Law Review, 41, 860-873.

Hutchins, R., & Slesinger, D. (1929). Legal psychology. Psychological Review, 36, 13-26.

Illinois Pilot Program on Double-Blind Sequential Procedures. (2006). Retrieved March 21, 2006, from http://www.chicagopolice.org/IL%20Pilot%20on%20Eyewitness%20ID.pdf

Iowa v. Chidester 570 N.W. 2d 78 (1996).

Iowa v. Schawitsch, No. 848(S)0699 (District Court, Lee County, Jan. 18, 2000).

Jaccoby, L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.

Jacoby, L. L., & Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory ( 18, pp. 1-47). New York: Academic Press.

Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.

Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1992). Unconscious influences of memory: Dissociations and automaticity. In D. Milner & M. Rugg (Eds.), The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp. 201-233). New York: Academic Press.

Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.). Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Toth, J. P. (in press). Unconscious processes revealed: A question of control. American Psychologist.

Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 118, 126-135.

Jaccoby, L. L., & Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 300-324.

Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, ll5-125.

Jenkins, F., & Davies, G. (1985). Contamination of facial memory through exposure to misleading composite pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 164-176.

Jenkins, J. R., Stack, W. B., & Deno, S. L. (1969). Children's recognition and recall of picture and word stimuli. Audiovisual Communication Review, 17, 265-271.

Johnson, C., & Scott, B. (1976, September). Eyewitness Testimony and suspect identification           as a function of arousal, sex of witness, and scheduling of interrogation. Paper         presented the 84th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

Johnson, K. J., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2005). “We all look the same to me”: Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 875-881.

Johnson, M. D., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.

Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas. A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.

Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological        Bulletin, 114, 3-28.

Johnson, M. K., & Lindsay, D. S. (1986). Despite McCloskey and Zaragoza, suggestibility effects may reflect memory impairment. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 

Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85. 

Jones, G., & Smith P. K. (1984). The eyes have it: Young children's discrimination of age in masked and unmasked facial photographs. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 328-337.

Jones v. State, 232 Ga. 762, 208 S.E.2d 850 (1974).

Juslin, P., Olson, N., & Winman, A. (1996). Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in        eyewitness identification: Comments on what can and cannot be inferred from a low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 5, 1304-1316.

Kafer, N. F. (1981). Peer acceptance and facial recognition. The Journal of Psychology, 108, 291-295.

Kagehiro, D. K., & Stanton, W. C. (1985). Legal vs. quantitative definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178.

Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffd, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics           and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction.  Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.

Kallio, K. D. & Cutler, B. L. (1987). Does lexical marking affect eyewitness recall. Journal of Psychology, 121(3), 249-258.

Karelitz, T. M. & Budescu, D. V. (2004). You Say "Probable" and I Say "Likely": Improving Interpersonal Communication With Verbal Probability Phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 25-41.

Kargon, R. (1986). Expert testimony in historical perspective. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 15-27.

Kassin, S. M. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Victims versus bystanders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,  14(6) 519-529.

Kassin, S.M. (1985). Eyewitness identification: Retrospective self awareness and the confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 878-893.

Kassin, S.M. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: The fifth rule. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 649-653.

Kassin, S. M., & Barndollar, K. A. (1992). The psychology of eyewitness testimony: A comparison of experts and prospective jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1241-1249.

Kassin, S.M., Ellsworth, P., & Smith, V.L. (1989). The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.

Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.

Kassin, S.M., Rigby, S., & Castillo, S.R. (1991). The accuracy-confidence correlation in eyewitness testimony: Limits and extensions of the retrospective self-awareness effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 698-707.

Kassin, S.M., Tubb, V.A., Hosch, H.M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1979). On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instructions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1877-1887.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133-146.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 489-506.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. M. Kassin and L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Katz, L. S., & Read, J. F. (1977). Expert testimony on the fallibility of eyewitness identification. Criminal Justice Journal, 1, 177-206.

Katz, R., Vesel, B., Buckhout, R., & Wolft (Eds.). (1975). A reliability checklist for lineups. Social Action and the Law Newsletter, 2, (3), 9-10.

Katzev, R. D., & Wishart, S. S. (1985). The impact of judicial commentary concerning eyewitness identifications on jury decision-making. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 733-745.

Kebbell, M.R. (2000). The law concerning the conduct of lineups in England and Wales: How well does it satisfy the recommendations of the American psychology-law society? Law and Human Behavior, 24, 309-

Kebbell, M., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perception of eyewitness factors in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323-330.

Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 101-115.

Kebbell, M. R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G. (2001). The cognitive interview in forensic investigations: A review. In G.B. Traverson & L. Bagnoli (Eds.). Psychology and Law in a changing world: New trends in theory, research and practice (pp. 185-198). London: Routledge.

Kelloway, E. K., Stinson, V., & MacLean, Carla. (2004). Eyewitness Testimony in Occupational Accident Investigations: Towards a Research Agenda. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 115-132.

Kennedy, D., Beard, D., & Carr, W. J. (1982). Differential recognition of the left vs. the right side of human faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 72-73.

Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (1982). The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

Kirby vs. Illinois (1972) 406 U.S. 682.

Klatzky, R. L., Martin, G. L., & Kane, R. A. (1982). Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces. Memory and Cognition, 10, 195-206.

Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis    testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.

Klobuchar, A. & Caliguiri, H. L. (2005). Protecting the innocent/convicting the guilty: Hennepin County’s pilot project in blind sequential eyewitness identification. William Mitchell Law Review, 32, 15-27.

Klobuchar, A., Steblay, N., & Caligiuri, H. (in press). Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin County’s Blind Sequential Lineup Project. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal.

Kohnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work. Social Behavior, 2(1) 1-17.

Kohnken, G. & Brockmann, C. (1987). Unspecific post-event information, attribution of responsibility, and eyewitness performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1(3) 197-207.

Kohnken, G. & Maass. A. (1988). Eyewitness testimony: False alarms on biased instructions? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 363-370.

Kohnken, G., Malpass, R.S., & Wogalter, M.S. (1996). Forensic applications of line-up research. In S.L. Sporer, R.S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.) Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 205-231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). A meta-analysis on the effects of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime & the Law, 5, 3-27.

Köhnken, G., Schimmossek, E., Aschermann, E., & Höfer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults’ statements.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 671-84.

Köhnken, G., Thurer, C., & Zorberbier, D. (1994) The cognitive interview: Are interviewers memories enhanced too? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 13-24.

Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1979). External validity of research in legal psychology. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 39-70.

Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (Eds.). (1982). The criminal justice system: A socio-psychological analysis. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1986). Courtroom testimony by psychologists on eyewitness identification issues: Critical notes and reflections. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117-126.

Koriat, A., Goldsmith, M., & Pansky, A. (2000). Towards a psychology of memory accuracy. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 481-537.

Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107-118.

Kottoor, T. M. (1989). Recognition of faces by adults. Psychological Studies, 34(2) 102-105.

Kovera, M.B., Penrod, S.D., Pappas, C., & Thill, D.L. (1997). Identification of computer-generated facial composites. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 235-246.

Kozlowski, L. T., & Cutting, J. E. (1977). Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 575-580.

Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58-69.

Kramer, T.H., Buckhout, R., & Eugenio, P. (1990). Weapon focus, arousal, and eyewitness    memory. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 167-184.

Kramer, E. (1963). Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 408-420. 

Kroll, N. E., Ogawa, K. H., & Nieters, J. E. (1988). Eyewitness memory and the importance of sequential information. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(5), 395-398.

Krouse, F.L. (1981). Effects of pose, pose change, and delay on face recognition performance.        Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 651-654.

Kuehn, L. L. (1974). Looking down a gun barrel: Person perception and violent crime. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 1159-1164.

Kuraner, A. (1931). The consistency of testimonial accuracy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 22, 406-413.

Lampinen, J. M., Judges, D. P., Odegard, T. N., & Hamilton, S. (2005). The Reactions of Mock Jurors to the Department of Justice Guidelines for the Collection and Preservation of Eyewitness Evidence. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 155-162.

Lampinen, J.M., Neuschatz, J.S., & Payne, D.G. (1999). Source attributions and false memories: A test of the demand characteristics account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6 (1), 130-135.

Lane, A. B. (1972). Effects of pose position on identification. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati (Eds.), Personal appearance identification, Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Lane, M. J. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Should psychologists be permitted to address the jury. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75(4) 1321-1365.

Lange, K. H. (1985). Eyewitness expert permitted to testify in New York. Social Action and the Law, 11(2) 41-46.

Langois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.

Langois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214-220

Langois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A., Musselman, L.. & Acton, S. (1991).  A picture is worth a thousand words: Reply to “On the difficulty of averaging faces.” Psychological Science, 2, 354-357.

Larsen, S.F. (1992). Potential flashbulbs: Memories of ordinary news as a baseline. In E.     Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: The problem of    “flashbulb” memories. (pp.32-64). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Laughery, K. R. (1972). Photograph type and cross-racial factors in facial identification. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Laughery, K., Alexander, J., & Lane, A. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target            exposure, target position, pose position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.

Laughery, K., Fessler, P., Lenorovitz, D., & Yoblick, D. (1974). Time delay and similarity         effects in facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.

Laughery, K. R., & Fowler, R. H. (1977). Factors affecting facial recognition. University of Houston Mug File Project, Report No. UHMUG-2.

Laughery, K. R., & Fowler, R. H. (1980). Sketch artist and identkit procedures for recalling faces. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 307-316.

Laughery, K.R., Jensen, D.G., & Wogalter, M.S. (1988). Response bias with prototypic faces. In M.M. Gruneberg, R. Sykes, & P. Morris (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 157-162). Chichester, England: Wiley. [computerized foils were created by varying only one facial feature from the original target.  Results indicated that the target was chosen by mock witnesses as the most “familiar” of the faces at a rate greater than chance.]

Laumann, L.A., & Elliott, R. (1992). Reporting what you have seen: Effects associated with age and mode of questioning on eyewitness reports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 799-818.

Lavrakas, P.J., Buri, J.R., & Mayzner, M.S. (1976). A perspective on the recognition of other-race faces. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 475-481.

Leippe, M.R. (1980). Effect of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-274.

Leippe, M.R. (1985). The influence of eyewitness nonidentifications on mock-jurors' judgments of a court case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 656-672.

Leippe, M.R. (1994). The appraisal of eyewitness testimony. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.385-418). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Leippe, M.R. (1995). The case for expert testimony about eyewitness memory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 909-959.

Leippe, M. R., Brigham, J. C., Cousins, C., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). The opinions and practices of criminal attorneys regarding child eyewitnesses: A survey. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, ~ M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children s testimony (pp. 10~130). New York:

Leippe, M.R., Manion, A.P., & Romanczyk, A. (1992). Eyewitness persuasion: How and how well do fact finders judge the accuracy of adults' and children's memory reports? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 181-197.

Leippe, M.R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp.155-177). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Leippe, M.R., & Romanczyk. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The       influence of juror's preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103-132.

Leippe, M.R., Romanczyk, A., & Manion, A.P. (1991). Eyewitness memory for a touching        experience: Accuracy differences between adult and child witness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 367-379.

Leippe, M.R., Wells, G.L., & Ostrom, T.M. (1978). Crime seriousness as a determinant of       accuracy in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 345-351.

Lempert, R. (1986). Social sciences in court: On "eyewitness experts" and other issues. Law           and Human Behavior, 63, 345-351.

Lenorovitz, D. R., & Sussman, E. D. (1972). The discrimination similarities and differences in facial appearance: A pilot study. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Lesgold, A. M., & Petrush, A. R. (1977). Do leading questions alter memories? Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.

Levi, A.M. (1998). Are defendants guilty if they were chosen in a lineup? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 389-408.

Levi, A.M. (1998). Protecting innocent defendants, nailing the guilty: A modified sequential lineup. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 265-275.

Levi, A. M. (2002). Lineup size, the modified sequential lineup, and the sequential lineup. Cognitive Technology, 7, 39-46.

Levi, A.M., & Jungman, N. (1995). The police lineup: Basic Weaknesses, radical solutions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 373-386.

Levin, D.T. (1996). Classifying faces by race: The structure of face categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1364-1382.

Levine, F., & Tapp, J. (1973). The psychology of criminal identification: The gap from Wade to           Kirby. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121, 1079-1131.

Levine, F. J., & Tapp, J. L. (1982). Eyewitness identification: Problems and pitfalls. In V. J. Konecni, & E. B. Ebbesen (Eds.), The criminal justice system: A socio-psychological analysis. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Levy, R. A. (1987). A method for the recovery of mishap related events lost to amnesia. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 58(3) 257-259.

Lewis, M. S. (1975). Determinants of visual attention in real world scenes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 411-416.

Lezak, M. D. (1973-4). Some psychological limitations on witness reliability. Wayne Law Review, 20, 117-133.

Libkuman, T.M., Nichols-Whitehead, P., Griffith, J., & Thomas, R. (1999). Source of Arousal and Memory for Detail. Memory and Cognition, 27 (1), 166-190.

Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 159-183.

Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: State of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Light, L.L., Hollander, S., & Kayra-Stuart, F. (1981). Why attractive faces are harder to remember. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 269-276.

Light, L.L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and        unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212-228.

Lind, E. A., Erickson, B., Conley, J. M., and O'Barr, W. M. (1978). Social attributions and conversational style in trial testimony. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1558-1567.

Lindholm, T., Christianson, A., & Karlsson, I. (1997). Police officers and civilians as witnesses: Intergroup biases and memory performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 431-444.

Lindsay, D. S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 1077-1083.

Lindsay, D.S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.27-55). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lindsay, D. S., Hagen, Lisa, Read, J. Don, Wade, Kimberley A., & Garry, Maryanne. (2004). True Photographs and False Memories. Psychological Science, 15, 149-154.

Lindsay, D.S., Jack, Jr, P.C., & Christian, M.A. (1991). Other-race face perception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 587-589.

Lindsay, D.S., & Johnson, M.K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory and Cognition, 17, 349-358.

Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989b). The reversed eyewitness suggestibility effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 111-113.

Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1991). Recognition memory and source monitoring. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 203-205.

Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., & Kwon, P. (l991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.

Lindsay, D.S., & Read, J.D. (1994). Psychotherapy and memories of childhood sexual abuse: A cognitive perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 281‑ 338.

Lindsay, D.S., & Read, J.D. (1995). “Memory work” and recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse: Scientific evidence and public, professional, and personal issues. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 846-909.

Lindsay, R.C.L. (1994). Biased lineups: Where do they come from? In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.),             Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.182-200). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lindsay, R.C.L. (1994). Expectations of eyewitness performance: Jurors’ verdicts do not follow from their beliefs. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.362-384). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lindsay, R.C.L. (1986). Confidence and accuracy in eyewitness identification from lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 229-239. (Shows that certainty in mistaken identifications is function of ecphoric similarity.)

Lindsay, R.C.L. (1999). Applying applied research: Selling the sequential lineup.  Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 219-225.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Bellinger, K. (1999). Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 No.3, 315-321.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Lea, J.A., & Fulford, J.A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Lea, J.A., Nosworthy, G.J., Fulford, J.A., Hector, J., LeVan, V., & Seabrook, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796-802.

Lindsay, R. C. L., MacDonald. P., & McGarry, S. (1989). Perspectives on the role of the eyewitness expert. Behavior Sciences & the Law, 11, 457-4~4.

Lindsay, R. C. L., & Malpass, R. S. (1999). Measuring lineup fairness [Special issue]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13 (S1).

Lindsay, R.C.L., Martin, R., & Webber, L. (1994). Default values in eyewitness descriptions: A problem for the match-to-description lineup foil selection strategy. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 527-541.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Lim, R., Mirando, L., & Cully, D. (1986). Mock juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 447-459.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Nosworthy, G. J., Martin, R., & Martynuck, C. (1994). Using mugshots to find suspects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 121-130. (also showed clothing bias)

Lindsay, R.C.L., Pozzulo, J., Craig, W., Lee, K., & Corber, S. (1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 391-404.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Wallbridge, H., & Drennan, D. (1987). Do clothes make the man? An exploration of the effect of lineup attire on eyewitness identification accuracy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 463-478. [clothing bias; false positive identifications are greatly increased by having a lineup photo or mug shot of an innocent person wearing clothing similar to that worn by the criminal during the crime]

Lindsay, R.C.L., & Wells, G.L. (1980). What price justice? Exploring the relationship between lineup fairness and identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 303-314.

Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1980a). What is an eyewitness identification error? Unpublished manuscript, University of Alberta.

Lindsay, R.C.L., & Wells, G.L. (1983). What do we really know about cross-race identifications? In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Witness evidence: Critical and empirical papers (pp. 219-234). New York: Wiley.

Lindsay, R.C.L., & Wells, G.L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556­-564.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Wells, G.L., & O'Connor, F. (1989). Mock juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 333-340.

Lindsay, R.C.L., Wells, G.L., & Rumpel, C. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and between situations? Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.

Lipmann, P. (1911). Pedagogical psychology of report. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 253-261.

Lipscomb, T. J., McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, N. J. (1985). Bias in eyewitness accounts: The effects of question format, delay interval, and stimulus presentation. Journal of Psychology, 119(3) 207-212.

Lipton, J.P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79-89.

List, J. A. (1986). Age and schematic differences in the reliability of eyewitness testimony. Developmental Psychology, 22, 50-57.

Lloyd-Bostock, S.M.A., & Clifford, B.R. (1983). Evaluating witness evidence: Recent research and new perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Loftus, E. F. (1974). Reconstructive memory: The incredible eyewitness. Psychology Today, 8, 116-119.

Loftus, E. F. (1975, October). Eyewitness. Puget Soundings, pp. 32-37.

Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.

Loftus, E.F. (1976). Unconscious transference in eyewitness identification. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 93-98.

Loftus, E. F. (1977). Shifting human color memory. Memory and Cognition, 5, 696-699.

Loftus, E. F. (1978). Reconstructive memory processes in eyewitness testimony. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology. New York: Plenum.

Loftus, E. F. (1979b). The malleability of human memory. American Scientist, 67, 312-320.

Loftus, E.F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Loftus, E.F. (1980). Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 6-15.

Loftus, E. F. (1980b). Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony. In F. Wright, C. Bahn, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Forensic psychology and psychiatry ( 347). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

Loftus, E. F. (1981). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological research and legal thought. In M. Tonry, & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research ( 3). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Loftus, E. F. (1981). Mentalmorphosis: Alterations in memory produced by the mental bonding of new information to old. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance I8 (pp. 417-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 

Loftus, E. F. (1983b). Whose shadow is crooked? American Psychologist, 38, 576-577.

Loftus, E.F. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 65, 9-15.

Loftus, E.F. (1986). Experimental psychologist as advocate or impartial educator. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 63-78.

Loftus, E. F. (1986b). Ten years in the life of an expert witness. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 241-263.

Loftus, E.F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518‑537.

Loftus, E. F. (2005). A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory, 12, 361-366.

Loftus, E. F., Altman, D., & Geballe, R. (1975). Effects of questioning upon a witness's later recollections. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 162-165.

Loftus, E. F., Donders, K., Hoffman, H. G., & Schooler, J. W. (1989). Creating new memories that are quickly accessed and confidently held. Memory and Cognition, 17, 607-616. 

Loftus, E. F., & Doyle, J. M (1989). Eyewitness testimony: Civil and criminal. Kluwer.

Loftus, E.F., & Doyle, J.M. (1997). Eyewitness testimony: Civil and criminal. Charlottesville, VA: Lexis law Publishing.

Loftus, E. F., & Goodman. J. (1985). Questioning witnesses. In S. M. Kassin & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 253-279). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Loftus, E.F., & Greene, E. (1980). Warning: Even memory for faces may be contagious. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 323-334.

Loftus, E.F., & Ketcham, K. (1991). Witness for the defense. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Loftus, E.F., & Ketcham, K. (1994). The myth of repressed memory: False memories and allegations of sexual abuse. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Loftus, E.F., & Loftus, G.R. (1980). On the permanence of stored information in the human   brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.

Loftus, E.F., Loftus, G.R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about "weapon focus." Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.

Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19-31. 

Loftus, E. F., & Monahan, J. (1980). Trial by data: Psychological research as legal evidence. American Psychologist, 35, 270-283.

Loftus, E.F., & Palmer, J.C. (1974). Reconstruction of an automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and        Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.

Loftus, E. F. & Schneider, N. G. (1987). "Behold with strange surprise"; Judicial reactions to expert testimony concerning eyewitness reliability. UMKC Law Review, 56, 1-45.

Loftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., & Wagenaar, W.A. (1985). The fate of memory: Comment on McCloskey and Zaragoza. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 375-380.

Loftus, E. F., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86-88.

Loftus, G. R. (1972). Eye fixations and recognition memory for pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 525-551.

Loftus, G., & Bell, S.M. (1975). Two types of information in picture memory. Journal of           Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 103-113.

Loftus, G. R., & Kallman, H. J. (1979). Encoding and use of detail information in picture recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 197-211.

Loftus, G. R., & Loftus, E. F. (1976). Human memory: The processing of information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 

Lower, J. S. (1978). Psychologists as expert witnesses. Law and Psychology Review, 4, 127-139.

Luce, T. S. (1974, November). Blacks, whites, and yellows: They all look alike to me. Psychology Today, pp. 105-108.  

Luce, T. S. (1977). The neglected dimension in eyewitness identification. Criminal Defense, 4, 5-8.

Luus, C.A.E. (1991). Eyewitness confidence: Social influence and belief perseverance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University.

Luus, C.A.E., & Wells, G.L. (1991). Eyewitness identification and the selection of distracters for lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 43-57.

Luus, C.A.E., & Wells, G.L. (1992). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses. In H.        Dent, & R. Flin (Eds.), Children as witnesses (pp. 73-92). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Luus, C.A.E., & Wells, G.L. (1994). Eyewitness identification confidence. In D. F. Ross,           J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348-362). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Luus, C.A.E., & Wells, G.L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714-724.

Luus, C.A.E., Wells, G.L., & Turtle, J.W. (in press). Child eyewitnesses: Seeing is believing. Journal of Applied Psychology.

Lyle, K. B., & Johnson, M. K. (2004). Effects of Verbalization on Lineup Face Recognition in an Interpolated Inspection Paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 393-403.

Maas, A., & Brigham, J. C. (1982). Eyewitness identifications: The role of attention and encoding specificity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 54-59.

Maas, A., Brigham, J. C., & West, S. G. (1985). Testifying on eyewitness reliability: Expert advice is not always persuasive. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 207-229.

Maas, A., & Clark, R. D., III. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.

Maas, A., & Kohnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification: Simulating the "weapon effect." Law and Behavior, 13, 397-408.

MacKinnon, D. P., O'Reilly, K. E., & Geiselman, R. E. (1990). Improving eyewitness recall for licence plates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(2) 129-140.

MacLeod, M. (2002). Retrieval-induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: Forgetting as a consequence of remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 135-149.

MacLeod, M. D., & Ellis, H. D. (1986). Modes of presentation in eyewitness testimony research. Human Learning Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 5(1) 39-44.

MacLeod, M.D., Frowley, J.N., & Shepherd, J.W. (1994). Whole body information: Its relevance to eyewitnesses. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.125-143). New York: Cambridge University Press.

MacLeod, M.D., & Shepherd, J.W. (1986). Sex differences in eyewitness reports of criminal   assaults. Medicine, Science, and Law, 26, 311-318.

MacLin, O., Wells, G. L., & Pehlan, C. (2004). [Target removal-without-replacement in lineups.] Unpublished raw data.

MacLin, O. H., Zimmerman, L. A., & Malpass, R. S. (2005). PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: Computer-based lineup administration. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 303-321.

MacWhinney, B., Keenan, J. M., & Reinke, P. (1982). The role of arousal in memory for conversation. Memory and Cognition, 10, 308-317.

Mainguet, C. (1990). Common knowledge of factors influencing memory in the context of eyewitness testimony. Psychologica Belgica, 30(1 2) 65-87.

Malpass, R. S. (1979). A cross-cultural face recognition field manual: Description and a validation study. In Eckensberger, Lonner, & Poortinga (Eds.), Cross cultural contributions to psychology. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Malpass, R.S. (1981). Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 299-309.

Malpass, R. S. (1981). Training in face recognition. In G. H. Davies, H. D. Ellis, & J. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 271-285). London: Academic Press.

Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G. (1980). Realism and eyewitness identification research. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 347-358.

Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G. (1981a). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482-489.

Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G. (1981b). Guided memory in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 343-350.

Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G. (1983). Measuring the fairness of eyewitness identification      lineups. In S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence,    (pp.81-102). London: Wiley.

Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photospreads. In G. L. Wells and E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Malpass, R.S., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1999). Measuring lineup fairness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13(SI), S1-S8.

Manson v. Braithwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 1977.

Marin, B.V., Holmes, D.L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295-306.

Margolick, D. (1982, April 9). Right to lawyer before lineups denied by court: Counsel not mandated prior to filing charges. New York Times, p. 15. 

Marquis, K.H., Marshall, J., & Oskamp, S. (1972). Testimony validity as a function of question            form, atmosphere, and item difficulty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 42-53.

Marshall, J. (1969). The evidence: Do we see and hear what is? Or do our senses lie? Psychology Today, pp. 48-52.

Marshall, J., Marquis, K. H., & Oskamp, S. (1971). Effects of kind of question and atmosphere of interrogation on accuracy and completeness of testimony. Harvard Law Review, 84, 1620-1643.

Marston, W. M. (1924). Studies in testimony. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 15, 5-31.

Mason, S. E. (1986). Age and gender as factors in facial recognition and identification. Experimental Aging Research, 12(3) 151-154. 

Mather, M., Shafir, E., & Johnson, M.K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice. Psychological Science, 11, 132-

Matthews, M.L. (1978). Discrimination of Identi-kit constructions of faces: Evidence for dual             processing strategy. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 153-161.

Maudlin, M. A., & Laughery, K. R. (1981). Composite production effects on subsequent facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 351-357.

Mazzoni, G.A.L., Kirsch, I., & Loftus, E.F. (2001). Changing beliefs about implasible autobiographical events: A little plausibility goes a long way. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 51-59.

McAllister, H. A. (1990). Effects of eyewitness evidence on plea bargain decisions by prosecutors and defense attorneys. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(18, Pt 2) 1461-1473.

McAllister, H.A., Bearden, J.N., Kohlmaier, J.R., & Warner, M.D. (1997). Computerized mug books: Does adding mulitmedia help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 688-698.

McAllister, H.A., Blair, M.J., Cerone, L.G., & Laurent, M.J. (2000). Multimedia mug books: How multi should the media be? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 277-291.

McAllister, H.A., & Bregman, N. (1986). Effects of victim and bystander testimony on juror decision-making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Tucson, AZ.

McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, N. J. (1988). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: Theoretical and practical implication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1) 168-170.

McAllister, H.A., & Bregman, N.J. (1989). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: A test of the disconfirmed expectancy explanation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 20-29.

McAllister, H. A., Bregman, N. J., & Lipscomb, T. J. (1988). Speed estimates by eyewitnesses and earwitnesses: How vulnerable to postevent information. Journal of General Psychology, 115(1) 25-35.

McCarty, D. G. (1929). Psychology for the lawyer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McCarty, D. G. (1960). Psychology and the law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McCloskey, M. (1992). Special versus ordinary memory mechanisms in the genesis of flashbulb memories. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: The problem of “flashbulb” memories. (pp.227-235). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

McCloskey, M., & Egeth, H. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a             jury? American Psychologist, 38, 550-563.

McCloskey, M., & Egeth, H. E. (1983). A time to speak, or a time to keep silent. American Psychologist, 38, 573-575.

McCloskey, M., Egeth, H., & McKenna, J. (1986). The experimental psychologist in court: The            ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 1-13.

McCloskey, M., Egeth, H., Webb, E., Washburn, A., & McKenna, J. (1981). Eyewitnesses, jurors and the issue of overbelief. Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University.

McCloskey, M., Wible, C.G., & Cohen, N.J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb memory mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 171-181.

McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory-impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.

McConkey, K.M., & Roche, S.M. (1989). Knowledge of eyewitness memory. Australian           Psychologist, 24, 377-384.

McDonald, H. C. (1960). The Identi-Kit manual. Santa-Anna, CA: Townsend Company (Identi-Kit Division).

McGarry, S. (1990). Perspectives on the role of the eyewitness expert. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8(4) 457-464.

McGehee, F. (1937). The reliability of identification of the human voice. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 249-271.

McGehee, F. (1944). An experimental study of voice recognition. The Journal of General Psychology, 31, 53-65.

McGeoch, J. A. (1928). The influence of sex and age upon the ability to report. American Journal of Psychology, 40, 458-466.

McKelvie, S. J. (1976). The role of eyes and mouth in the memory of a face. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 311-323.

McKelvie, S. J. (1978). Sex differences in facial memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

McKelvie, S. J. (1981). Sex differences in memory for faces. The Journal of Psychology, 107, 109-125.

McKelvie, S. J. (1988). The role of spectacles in facial memory: A replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66(2) 651-658.

McKenna, J., Treadway, M., & McCloskey, M. E. (1992). Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability: Selling psychology before its time. In P. Suedfeld & P. E. Tetlock (Eds.), Psychology and Social Policy (pp. 283-293). New York: Hemisphere Publishing McNemar,

McKenzie, C. R. M., & Amin, M. B. (2002). When wrong predictions provide more support than right ones. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 821-828.

McKone, Elinor. (2004). Isolating the Special Component of Face Recognition: Peripheral Identification and a Mooney Face. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 181-197.

McNeil, J. E., Wray, J. L., Hibler, N. S., Foster, W. D. et al. (1987). Hypnosis and Identi Kit: A study to determine the effect of using hypnosis in conjunction with the making of Identi Kit composite. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(1) 63-67.

McQuiston, D.E., & Malpass, R.S. (2002). Validity of the mockwitness paradigm: Testing the assumptions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 439-453.

Meadows, J.C. (1974). The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 37, 489-501.

Meissner, C. A, & Brigham, J. C. (2001). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.

Meissner, C. A, & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Twenty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.

Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelly, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29, 351-357.

Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Schooler, J. W. (in press). Person descriptions as eyewitness evidence. To appear in R. Lindsay et al.’s (Eds.), Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum & Assoc.

Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. J., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005) Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups, Memory & Cognition, 33, 783-792.

Melara, R.D., DeWitt-Rickards, & O'Brien, T.P. (1989). Enhancing lineup identification             accuracy: Two codes are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 706-713.

Mello, E. W., & Fisher, R. P. (1996). Enhancing older adult eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 403-18.

Melton, G. B. (1987). Bringing psychology to the legal system: Opportunities, obstacles, and efficacy. American Psychologist, 42, 488-495.

Melton, G. B. (1981). Children's competency to testify. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 73-85.

Memon, A. (2006). The Cognitive Interview. In O. Hargie (Ed). A Handbook of Communication Skills  Routledge, London & NY. Third Edition.

Memon, A., & Bruce, V. (1983). The effects of encoding strategy and context change on face recognition. Human Learning, 2, 313-326.

Memon, A., & Bruce, V. (1985). Context effects in episodic studies of verbal and facial memory: A review. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 4(4) 349-369.

Memon, A., & Bull, R. (Eds.) (1999). Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing. Chichester, Wiley.

Memon, A., Cronin, Ó., Eaves, R., & Bull, R. (1993). The Cognitive Interview and Child Interviewees.  In G.M. Stephenson & N.K. Clark (Eds.)  Children, evidence and procedure:  Issues in criminological & legal psychology.   No. 20. British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK.

Memon, A., & Gabbert, F. (2003). Unraveling the effects of sequential presentation in culprit-present lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 703-714.

Memon, A., & Higham, P. (1999). A review of the cognitive interview. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 177-196.

Memon, A., Hope, L., Bartlett, J., & Bull, R. (2002). Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1219-1227.

Memon, A., Hope, L., & Bull, R. (2003). Exposure duration: Effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 339-354.

Memon, A., Milne, R., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Koehnken, G. (1994). Towards understanding the effects of interviewer training in evaluating the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 641-659

Memon, A., & Stevenage, S.V. (1996). Interviewing witnesses: What works and what doesn’t? Psycholoquy 7 (6), Witness Memory (1).

Memon, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Köhnken, G. (1997). Isolating the effects of the cognitive interview techniques.  British Journal of Psychology, 88, (2), 179-198.

Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Köhnken, G. (1997).  Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews. Memory, 5, 639-55.

Mende, L., MacKinnon, D. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1987). Memory for license plates as a function of exposure time. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15(1) 68-71.

Messick, S., & Damarin F. (1964). Cognitive styles and memory for faces. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 313-318.

Metcalfe, J. (1990). Composite Holographic Associative Recall Model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 119(2) 145-160.

Metcalfe, J. (1991). Representations, predictions, and remembrances in CHARM: A reply to Lindsay. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120(3) 313-315.

Metcalf, J., & Bjork, R. A. (1991). Composite models never (well, hardly ever) compromise: Reply to Schooler and Tanaka (1991). Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120(2) 203-210.

Millar, K., Styles, B. C., & Wastell, D. G. (1980). Time of day and retrieval from long-term memory. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 407-414.

Miller, D. G., & Loftus, E. F. (1976). Influencing memory for people and their actions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 9-11.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

Miller, G. R., Bender, D. C., Boster, F., Florence, B. T., Fontes, N., Hocking, J., & Nicholson, H. (1975). The effects of videotaped testimony in jury trials. Brigham Young University Law Review, 331-373.

Miller, G. R. & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting assessments of witness credibility. In N. Kerr & R. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom, New York: Academic Press. 

Miller, L. K., & Barg, M. D. (1983). Dissociation of feature vs. configural properties in the discrimination of faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21(6) 453-455.

Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2006). Interviewing victims of crime, including children and people with intellectual difficulties. In M. R. Kebbell, and G. M. Davies. (Eds.), Practical psychology for forensic investigations. Chichester: Wiley.

Milne, R., Bull, R., Memon, A., & Köhnken, G.  (1995). The cognitive interview and suggestibility. In G.M. Stephenson & N.K. Clark (Eds.),  Criminal Behaviour: Perceptions, Attributions and Rationality. Division of Criminological & Legal Psychology Occasional Papers,  No. 22. British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK.

Milne, R., Clare, I. C. H., and Bull, R. (1999). Using the cognitive interview with adults with mild learning disabilities. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5, 81-100.

Milord, J. T. (1978). Aspects of faces: A (somewhat) phenomenological analysis using multidimensional scaling methods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 205-216.

Mingay, D. J. (1987). The effect of hypnosis on eyewitness memory: Reconciling forensic claims and research findings. Applied Psychology An International Review, 36(2) 163-183.

Missouri v. Huchting 927 S.W. 2d 411 (1996).

Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences . In The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 179-195) Edited by E. Tulving & F.I. M. Craik, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Mitchell, K. J., Livosky, M., & Mather, M. (1998). The weapon focus effect revisited: The role of novelty. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 287-303.

Montepare, J. M., & Zebrowitz-McArthur, L. (1988). Impressions of people created by agerelated qualities of their gaits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 547-556.

Moore, C. C. (1908). Psychology in the courts. Law Notes, 11, 185-187.

Morgan, C. A., Hazlett, G., Doran, A, Garrett, S., Hoyt, G., Thomas, P., Baranoski, M., & Southwick, S. M. (2004) Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 265-279.

Morgan, C. S. (1917). A study in the psychology of testimony. Journal of American Institutional Criminal Law, 8, 222-232.

Morrison, M. W. (1988). Psychological assessment of eyewitness testimony. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6(2) 37-48.

Moskowitz, M. J. (1977). Hugo Munsterberg: A study in the history of applied psychology. American Psychologist, 32, 824-842.

Moston, S. (1990). How children interpret and respond to questions: Situational sources of suggestibility in eyewitness interviews. Social Behaviour, 5(3) 155-167.

Mueller, J. H. (1978). The effects of individual differences in test anxiety and type of orienting task on levels of organization in free recall. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 100-116.

Mueller, J. H. (1979). Anxiety and encoding processes in memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 288-294.

Mueller, J. H. (1980). Test anxiety and the encoding and retrieval of information. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mueller, J. H. (1981). Self awareness and access to material rated as self descriptive of nondescriptive. Unpublished manuscript, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Mueller, J. H., Bailis, K. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 70, 511-515.

Mueller, J. H., Carlomusto, M., & Goldstein, A. G. (1978). Orienting task and study time in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 313-316.

Mueller, J. H., & Courtois, M. R. (1980). Test anxiety and breadth of encoding experiences in free recall. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 458-466.

Mueller, J. H., & Courtois, M. R. (1980). Retention of self descriptive and nondescriptive words as a function of test anxiety level. Motivation and Emotion, 4, 229-237.

Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., & Ross, M. J. (1984). Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 1-24.

Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., & Ross, M. J. (1984). Body-image, consciousness, and self-reference effects in face recognition. British Journal of Social Psychology.

Mueller, J. H., Heesacker, M., Ross, M. J., & Nicodemus, D. R. (1983). Emotionality of encoding activity in face memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 198-217.

Mueller, J. H., Nicodemus, D. R., & Ross, M. J. (1981). Self awareness in facial recognition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 145-147.

Mueller, J. H., & Wherry, K. L. (1979). Orienting strategies at study and test in facial recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 2-20.

Muhnsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. Garden City, NY: Clark, Boardman.

Muhnsterberg, H. (1914). Psychology and social sanity. New York: Doubleday, Page.

Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand. New York: Doubleday, Page.

Muensterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand. New York: Doubleday.

Murray, D., & Wells, G.L. (1982). Does knowledge that a crime was staged affect eyewitness performance? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 42-53.

Murray, J.E., Yong, E., & Rhodes, G. (2001). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychology Science, 11, 492-496.

Muscio, B. (1915). The influence of the form of a question. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 351-389.

Narby, D.J., & Cutler, B.L. (1994). Effectiveness of voir dire as a safeguard in eyewitness cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 724-729.

Navon, D. (1990). How critical is the accuracy of eyewitness memory? Another look at the    issue of lineup diagnosticity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 506-510.

Navon, D. (1992). Selection of foils by similarity to suspect is likely to misfire. Law and Human          Behavior, 16, 575-593.

Navon, D. (1981). Do attention and decision follow perception? Comment on Miller. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 1175-1182.

Neil v. Biggers, 409 US 188 (1972).

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean’s Memory: A Case Study. Cognition, 9, 1-22).

Neisser, U. (1982). Snapshots or benchmarks? In U.Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed (pp.43-            48). New York: W.H. Freeman.

Neisser, U. (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Neisser, U. (1982). Memory: What are the important questions? In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. San Francisco: Freeman. 

Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news          about Challenger. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser, (Eds.) Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of ‘flashbulb’ memories (pp.9-31). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nelson, J. D. (2005). Finding useful questions: On Bayesian diagnosticity, probability, impact, and information gain.  Psychological Review, 112, 979-999.

Nettles, W., Nettles, Z., & Wells, G.L. (1996). “I noticed you paused on number three:” Biased         testing in eyewitness identification. Champion, November.

Neuschatz, J. S., Preston, E. L., Burkett, A. D., Toglia, M. R.,  Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., Fairless, A. H., Lawson, D. S., Powers, R. A., & Goodsell, C. A. (2005). The effects of post-identification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 435-453.

Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.

Nolan, J., & Markham, R. (1998). The accuracy-confidence relationship in an eyewitness task: Anxiety as a modifier. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 43-54.

Noon, E., & Hollin, C.R. (1987). Lay knowledge of eyewitness behaviour: A British survey. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 143-153.

Nosworthy, G.J., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1990). Does nominal lineup size matter? Journal of         Applied Psychology, 75, 358-361.

Nowicki, S., Jr., Winograd, E., & Millard, B. A. (1979). Memory for faces: A social learning approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 460-468.

O'Brien, E. J., & Wolford, C. R. (1982). Effect of delay in testing on retention of plausible versus bizarre mental images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 148-152.

O'Callaghan, G., D'Arcy, H. (1989). Use of props in questioning preschool witnesses. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41(2) 187-195.

O'Rourke, T. E., Penrod. S. D., Cutler, B. L., & Stuve, T. E. (1989). The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 385-395.

Ober, B. A., & Stillman, R. C. (1988). Memory in chronic alcoholics: Effects of inconsistent versus consistent information. Addictive Behaviors, 13(1) 11-15.

Okamoto, S., & Sugahara, Y. (1986). Effects of postevent information on eyewitness testimony.      Japanese Psychological Research, 28, 196-201.

Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What Makes a Good Alibi? A Proposed Taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 157-176.

Olsson, N. (2000). A comparison of correlation, calibration, and diagnosticity as measures of the confidence-accuracy relationship in witness identification.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 504-511.

Olsson, N., & Juslin, P. (1999). Can self-reported encoding strategy and recognition skill be diagnostic of performance in eyewitness identifications? Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 42-49.

Olsson, N., Juslin, P., & Winman, A. (1998). Realism of confidence in earwitness versus eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 101-118.

Pachella, R.G. (1986). Personal values and the values of expert testimony. Law and Human             Behavior, 10, 145-150.

Palmer, S. E. (1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory and Cognition, 3, 519-526.

Parker, J.F., & Caranza, L.E. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children in target-present and            target-absent lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 133-149.

Parker, J.F., Haverfield, E., & Baker-Thomas, S. (1986). Eyewitness testimony of children.     Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287-302.

Parker, J.F., & Ryan, V. (1993). An attempt to reduce guessing behavior in children’s and     adult’s eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 11-26.

Parkin, A. J., & Goodwin, E. (1983). The influence of different processing strategies on the recognition of transformed and untransformed faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 272-277.

Patterson, H. M. & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Co-witness talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 181-191. [86% of witnesses discuss]

Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 406-407.

Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying conceptual properties in different modalities produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124.

Penfield, W. (1969). Consciousness, memory, and man's conditioned reflexes. In K. Pribram (Ed.), On the biology of learning. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.

Penfield, W.W., & Perot, P. (1963). The brain’s record of auditory and visual experience.      Brain, 86, 595-696.

Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.

Penrod, S. (1980). Confidence, accuracy, and the eyewitness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.

Penrod, S. (1984, October). Conducting experimental research with real trials. Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Salt Lake City, UT.

Penrod, S. (2003). Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, 54,  36-47. hyperlink

Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1987). Assessing the competency of juries. In I. Weiner & A. Hess (Eds.), The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. New York: Wiley.

Penrod, S.D., Fulero, S.M., & Cutler, B.L. (1995). Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 229-259.

Penrod, S., Loftus, E. F., & Winkler, J. D. (1982). Eyewitness reliability. In R. Bray, & N. Kerr (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

Penrod, S.D., Loftus, E.F., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective. In N. Kerr & R. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 119-168). New York: Academic Press.

Penry, J. (1971). Looking at faces and remembering them: A guide to facial identification. London: Elek Books.

People v. Brnja, 70 A.D.2d 17, 419 N.Y.S.2d 591 (1979), affd, 50 N.Y.2d 366, 406 N.E.2d 1066, 429 N.Y.S.2d 173 (1980).

People v. Johnson, 38 Cal. App. 3d 1, 112 Cal. Rptr. 834 (1974).

People v. McDonald, 37 Cal.3d 351, 208 Cal. Rptr. 236 (1984).

People v. Russell, 69 Cal.2d 187, 443 P.2d 794, 70 Cal. Rptr. 210, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 (1968).

Perfect, T.J. (2004). The Role of Self-rated Ability in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgements in Eyewitness Memory and General Knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 157-168.

Perfect, T.J., & Hollins, T.S. (1996). Predictive feeling of knowing judgments and postdictive confidence judgments in eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 371-382.

Perkins, D. (1975). A definition of caricature and recognition. Studies in the Anthropology of             Visual Communication, 2, 1-24.

Peters, D.P. (1987). The impact of naturally occurring stress on children's memory. In S.J.     Ceci,     M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp.122-141), New York: Springer-Verlag.

Pettinger, J. B. (1991). On the difficulty of averaging faces: Comments on Langois & Roggman. Psychological Science, 2, 351-353.

Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology ( 19, pp. 123-205). New York, Academic Press.

Pezdek, K. (1977). Cross modality semantic integration of sentence and picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 515-524.

Pezdek, K. (1980). Life span differences in semantic integration of pictures and sentences in memory. Child Development, 51, 720-729.

Pezdek, K., & Chen, H. C. (1982). Developmental differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 207-215.

Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (in press). Children’s Face Recognition Memory: More Evidence for the Cross-Race Effect, Journal of Applied Psychology, in press (hyperlink to ms.)

Pezdek, K., & Roe, C. (in press). The effect of memory trace strength on suggestibility. Journal         of Experimental Child Psychology.

Phillips, M.R., McAuliff, B.D., Kovera, M.B., & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 940-951.

Phillips, R. J. (1978). Recognition, recall and imagery of faces. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Phillips, R. J. (1977). Identification parades. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 30, 415.

Pickel, K. L. (1998). Unusualness and threat as possible causes of "weapon focus." Memory, 6, 277-295.

Pickel, K.L. (1999). Distinguishing eyewitness descriptions of perceived objects from descriptions of imagined objects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 399-413.

Pickel, K. L. (1999). The influence of context on the “weapon focus” effect. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 299-311.

Piggot, M.A., & Brigham, J.C. (1985). Relationship between accuracy of prior description and            facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 547-555.

Piggot, M.A., Brigham, J.C., & Bothwell, R.K. (1990). A field study on the relationship between quality of eyewitnesses' descriptions and identification accuracy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 84-88.

Pike, G.E., Kemp, R.I., Towell, N.A., & Phillips, K.C. (1997) Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition, 4, 409-437.

Pittenger, J. B., Shaw, R. E., & Mark, L. S. (1979). Perceptual information for the age level of faces as a higher order invariant of growth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 478-493.

Platz, S.J., & Hosch, H.M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 972-984. (Hispanic cross-racial)

Pollack, I., Pickett, J. M., & Sumby, W. H. (1954). On the identification of speakers by voice. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 403-406.

Poole, D., & Lamb, M. (1998). Investigative interviews with children: A guide for helping professionals. American Psychological Association: DC.

Poole, D.A., & Lindsay, D.S. (2001). Children’s eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 27-50.

Poole, D.A., & White, L.T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975-986.

Poole, D.A., & White, L.T. (1993). Two years later: Effect of question repetition and retention           interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 29, 844-853.

Pope, K.S. (1996). Memory, abuse, and science: Questioning claims about the false memory syndrome epidemic. American Psychologist, 51, 957-974.

Porter, K. A. (1977, June). The never ending wrong. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 38-64.

Postman, L. J., Bruner, J. S., & McGinnies, E. (1948). Personal values as selective factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 142-154.

Powers, P.A., Andriks, J.L., & Loftus, E.F. (1979). Eyewitness accounts of males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 339-347.

Pozzulo, J.D., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 549-570.

Pozzulo, J.D., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1999). Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 167-176.

Pryke, S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Dysart, J. E., & Dupuis, P. (2004). Multiple Independent Identification Decisions: A Method of Calibrating Eyewitness Identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 73-84.

Putnam, W.H. (1979). Hypnosis and distortions in eyewitness memory. International Journal           of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 437-448.

Pylyshyn, A. W. (1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1-24.

Rabinowitz, M. J. (1985). The child as an eyewitness: An overview. Social Action and the Law, 11, 5-10.

Rahaim, G. L., & Brodsky, S. L. (1982). Empirical evidence versus common sense: Juror and lawyer knowledge of eyewitness accuracy. Law and Psychology Review, 7, 1-15.

Raimo, A. M. (1987). Psychological challenges to eyewitness testimony. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5(1), 23-36.

Rainis, N. (2001). Semantic contexts and face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 173-186.

Rathborn, H. A., Bull, R. H., Clifford, B. R. (1981). Voice recognition over the telephone. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 9, 280-284.

Rattner, A. (1988) Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system.       Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293.

Read, J. D. (1979). Rehearsal and recognition of human faces. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 71-85.

Read, J.D. (1994). Understanding bystander misidentifications: The role of familiarity and     contextual knowledge. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.56-79). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Read, J. D., Barnsley, R. H., Ankers, K., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1978). Variations in severity of verbs and eyewitnesses' testimony: An alternative interpretation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 795-800.

Read, J. D., Hammersley, R. H., Cross-Calvert. S., & McFadzen, E. (1989). Rehearsal of faces and details in action events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 295-311.

Read, J. D., & Peterson, R. H. (1975). Individual differences in the ease of imagining the faces of others. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 347-349.

Read, J. D. Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R. H., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3-31.

Read, J.D., Vokey, J.R., & Hammersley, R. (1990). Changing photos of faces: Effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy-confidence relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 870-882.

Read, J. D., Yuille, J. C., & Tollestrup, P. (1992). Recollections of a robbery: Effects of arousal and alcohol upon recall and person identification. Law & Human Behavior. 16, 425-446.

Regina v. Audy, 1977, 34 C.C.C. 2d 231 Ont. C.A. 

Report of the Task Force on the role of psychology in the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 33, 1099-1113 (1978).

Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures:           Implications for mental representation of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.

Rhodes, G., Roberts, J., & Simmons, L. W. (1999). Reflections on symmetry and attractiveness. Psychology, Evolution, & Gender, 1, 279-295.

Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and attractive faces. Psychological Science, 7, 105-110.

Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., & Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception, 30, 611-625.

Risinger, M.D., Saks, M.J., Thompson, W. C., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90, 1-56.

Roberts, K.P., Lamb, M.E., & Sternberg, K.J. (1999). Effects of the timing of postevent information on preschoolers’ memories of an event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 541-559.

Roberts, M. D. (1984). Eyewitness identification and the local psychologist. American-Psychologist, 39(9), 1064.

Roberts, W. T., & Higham, P. A. (2002). Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8 (1): 33-43.

Robinson, J., & McArthur, L. Z. (1982). Impact of salient vocal qualities on causal attributions for a speaker's behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 236-247.

Robinson, M.D., & Johnson, J.T. (1996). Recall memory, recognition memory, and the confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 587-594.

Robinson, M.D., & Johnson, J.T. (1998). How not to enhance the confidence-accuracy relation: the detrimental effects of attention to the identification process. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 409-428.

Robinson, M.D., Johnson, J.T., & Herndon, F. (1997). Reaction time and assessments of cognitive effort as predictors of eyewitness memory accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 416-425. [Subjective assessments of automaticity and reaction time related to accuracy.]

Robinson, M.D., Robertson, D.A., & Johnson, J.T. (2000). Process versus content in eyewitness metamemory monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 207-221.

Rosenthal, R. (1967). Covert communication in the psychological experiment. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 356-367.

Rosenthal, R. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Irvington Press.

Rosenthal, R. (2002). Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. American Psychologist, 57, 838-849. (includes Biography for winning the Award for Distinguished Scientific Applications of Psychology.)

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectations and the pupil's intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377-386.

Ross, B. H. (1981). The more, the better?: Number of decisions as a determinant of memorability. Memory and Cognition, 9, 23-33.

Ross, B. H., & Anderson, J. R. (1981). A test of parallel versus serial processing applied to memory retrieval. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 24, 183-223.

Ross, D.F., Ceci, S.J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M.P. (1994). Unconscious transference and         lineup identification: Toward a memory blending approach. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.),   Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.80-100). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia. M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 523.

Ross, D.F., Read, J.D., & Toglia, M.P. (Eds.), (1994). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current      trends and developments, pp. 223-244. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortion in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology ( 10). New York: Academic Press.

Rouke, F. L. (1957). Psychological research on problems of testimony. Journal of Social Issues, 13, 50-59.

Ryan, R. H., & Geiselman, R. E. (1991). Effects of biased information on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29(1), 7-9.

Ryan, T.A., & Schwartz, C.B. (1956). Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs? Memory and Cognition, 13, 45-49.

Safer, M.A., Christianson, S., Autrey, M.W., & Osterlund, K. (1998). Tunnel memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 99-117. [People under stress process details that are source of stress and restrict the scene’s boundaries.]

Saks, M. J. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 279-280. 

Saks, M. J., & Hastie, R. (1978). Social psychology in court. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Salzberg, H. C. (1977). The hypnotic interview in crime detection. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 19, 255-258.

Sanders, G. L. (1984). The Effects of Context Cues on Eyewitness Identification Responses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 386-397.

Sanders, G. S. (1986). On increasing the usefulness of eyewitness research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 333-335.

Sanders, G. S., Chiu, W. (1988). Eyewitness errors in the free recall of actions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18(14), 1241-1259.

Sanders, G. S., Gansler, D. A., &Reisman, S. (1989). The effects of hypnosis on eyewitness testimony and reactions to cross examination. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7(1), 33-60.

Sanders, G. L., & Simmons, W. L. (1983). Use of hypnosis to enhance eyewitness accuracy: Does it work? Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 70-77.

Sanders, G.S., & Warnick, D. (1980). Some conditions maximizing eyewitness accuracy: A     learning/memory analogy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 395-403.

Sanders, G.S., & Warnick, D.H. (1981). Truth and consequences: The effect of responsibility             on eyewitness behavior. Basic and Applied Psychology, 2, 67-69.

Savage, S., &  Milne, R. (in press). Miscarriages of justice – the role of the investigative process. A chapter to appear in T. Newburn, T. Williamson. and A. Wright. (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation. Cullompton: Willan.

Saywitz, K. J., Geiselman, R. E., & Bornstein, G. K. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children’s recall performance.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 744-756.

Schacter, D. L. (1983). Feeling of knowing in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 39-54.

Scheck, B., Neufeld, P. & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence.  New York: Random House.

Schiffman, H.R., & Bobko, D.J. (1974). Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of      short temporal durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 156-159.

Schemper, T., Voss, S., & Cain, W. S. (1981). Odor identification in young and elderly persons: Sensory and cognitive limitations. Journal of Gerontology, 36, 446-452.

Schill, T. R. (1966). Effects of approval motivation and varying conditions of verbal reinforcement on incidental memory for faces. Psychological Reports, 19, 55-60.

Schmidt, S.R., & Bohannon, J.N., III. (1988). In defense of the flashbulb-memory hypothesis:           A comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 332-335.

Schneider, D.M., & Watkins, M.J. (1996). Response conformity in recognition testing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 481-481.

Schneider, R. R. (1981). Fourteenth Amendment - The last gasp of due process requirements on eyewitness identifications: The admissibility of identification evidence may be determined in the jury's presence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 1410-1425.

Schooler, J.W., & Engstler-Schooler, T.Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.  [Limiting recognition to 5 seconds eliminates the verbal overshadowing effect.]

Schooler, J.W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 171-181.

Schooler, J. W., & Tanaka, J. W. (1991). Composites, compromises, and CHARM: What is the evidence for blend memory representations? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120(1), 96-100.

Schreiber, N., Wentura, D., & Wolfgang, B. (2001). “What else could he have done?” Creating false answers in child witnesses by inviting speculation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 525-532.

Schreiber, T.A., & Sergent, S.D. (1998). The role of commitment in producing misinformation effects in eyewitness memory. Psychonomic Bulleting and Review, 5, 443-448.

Schum, D. A. (1981). Sorting out the effects of witness sensitivity and response-criterion placement upon the inferential value of testimonial evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 153-196.

Schwartz, A. R., & Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1989). Eyewitness testimony of children and the school psychologist. School Psychology Review, 18(2), 235-246.

Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-Reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54, no.2, 93-105.

Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 371-377.

Sealy, A. P. (1979). The contribution of psychology to legal processes: An analysis of jury studies. In D. P. Farrington, K. Hawkins, S. M. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, law and legal processes. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Seamon, J. G., Stolz, J. A., Bass, D. H., & Chatinover, A. I. (1978). Recognition of facial features in immediate memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 231-234.

Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing rates on face recognition and eyewitness identification tasks. Memory and Cognition, 27, 538-552.

Searcy, J.H., Bartlett, J.C., Swanson, K., & Memon, A. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 207-214.

Sebeok, T.A., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). The Clever Hans phenomenon. Annals of the New York           Academy of Science, Whole volume, 364.

Seelau, S.M., & Wells, G.L. (1995). Applied eyewitness research: The other mission. Law      and Human Behavior, 19, 317-322.

Seltzer, R., Lopes, G. M., & Venuti, M. (1990). Juror ability to recognize the limitations of eyewitness identifications. Forensic Reports, 3(2), 121-137.

Semmel-Albin, R. (1981, March 17). How the recollections of witnesses often go awry. The New York Times: Science Times, pp. C2.

Semmler, C., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2004). Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 334-346.

Sergent, J., & Bindra D. (1981). Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 541-554.

Shaughnessy, J. J. (1979). Confidence-judgment accuracy as a predictor of test performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 505-514.

Shapiro, P.N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of racial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.

Shaw, J.I., & Skolnick, P. (1999). Weapon focus and gender differences in eyewitness accuracy: Arousal versus salience. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2328-2341.

Shaw, J.S., III. (1996). Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 126-146.

Shaw, J.S. III., Garven, S., & Wood, J.M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 503-523. [Information about co-witness provided by interviewer or by co-witness. Witnesses incorporated the incorrect information into their reports.]

Shaw, J.S., III., & McClure K.A. (1996). Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated          levels of eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 629- 654.

Shaw, J.S., III., Zerr, T.K. (2003). Extra effort during memory retrieval may be associated with increases in eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 315-329.

Shaw, J.S., III., Zerr, T.K., & Woythaler, K.A. (2001). Public eyewitness confidence ratings can differ from those held privately. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 141-154.

Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.

Shepard, R. N., Kilpatrick, D. W., & Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-138.

Shepherd. E. (1991). Ethical interviewing. Policing, 7, 42-60.

Shepherd, J. W. (1986). An interactive computer system for retrieving faces. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves. F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of Face Processing. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

Shepherd, J. W., Davies, G. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1978). How best shall a face be described? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Shepherd, J. W., Davies, G. M., and Ellis, H. D. (1980). Identification after delay. Final Report to the Home Office Research Unit, London, England.

Shepherd. J. W., Davies, G. M., & Ellis. H. D. (1980). Identification after delay. Unpublished manuscript, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.

Shepherd. J. W., Davies, G. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1981). Studies of cue saliency. In G. M. Davies, H. D. Ellis. & J. W. Shepherd (Eds.), Perceiving and remembering faces (pp. 105-131). London: Academic Press. Shepherd, J. W., & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Races and faces--a comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 125-133.

Shepherd, J. W., Deregowski, J. B., & Ellis, H. D. (1974). A cross-cultural study of recognition memory for faces. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 205-211. Shepherd, J. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1973). The effect of attractiveness on recognition memory for faces. American Journal of Psychology, 86, 627-633.

Shepherd, J.W., Ellis, H.D., & Davies, G.M. (1977). Perceiving and remembering faces. Technical Report to the British Home Office.

Shepherd, J.W., Ellis, H.D., & Davies, G.M. (1982). Identification evidence: A psychological    evaluation. Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen University Press.

Shepherd, J. W., Shepherd, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (1990). Interim report on the development of a database of coded whole-body descriptions obtained during observation of targets. S.R.D.B. of the Home Office SC/86 7121/4.

Shifffman, H.R., & Bobko, D.J. (1975). Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 156-159.

Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.

Shrimpton, A., Oates, K., & Hayes, S. (1998). Children’s memory of events: Effects of stress, age, time delay, and location of interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 133-143.

Siegel, J. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1978). Impact of anxiety and life stress upon eyewitness testimony. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 479-480.

Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 385, 88 S. Ct. 967, 971, 1968.

Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness: Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48.

Singletary v. United States, 383 A.2d 1064 (D.C. 1978).

Slack, A. T. (1982). Facial recognition in eyewitness testimony. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Slater, A. (1994). Identification parades: A scientific Evaluation. Police Research Award Scheme. London: Police Research Group, Home Office.

Smith, A.D., & Winograd, E. (1978). Age differences in remembering faces. Developmental    Psychology, 14, 443-444.

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith, M.C. (1983). Hypnotic memory enhancement of witnesses: Does it work? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 387-407.

Smith, J. E., Pleban, R. J., & Shaffer, D. R. (1982). Effects of interrogator bias and a police trait questionnaire on the accuracy of eyewitness identification. The Journal of Social Psychology, 116, 19-26.

Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460-471.

Smith, S. M. (1994) Theoretical Principles  of context dependent memory. In P.Morris,  M. Grunerberg  (Eds).  Aspects of Memory (Second Edition): Theoretical Aspects, Routledge Press, New York. p.169-195 

Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory and Cognition, 6, 342-353.

Smith, S.M., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Pryke, S. (2000). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identification be diagnosed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 542-550.

Smith, S.M., Lindsay, R.C.L.,  Pryke, S., & Dysart, J. E. (2001). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed in the cross-race situation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 153-169.

Smith, S.M., & Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.    Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 125-139.

Smith, V. L., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1987). The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 294-300.

Smith, V.L., Kassin, S.M., & Ellsworth, P.C. (1989). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence:       Within versus between-subject correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 356-359.

Snee, T., & Lush, D. (1941). Interaction of the narrative and interrogatory methods of obtaining      testimony. Journal of Psychology, 11, 229-230

Sobel, N. R. (1980). Exclusionary sanctions under Wade-Gilbert-Stovall. In N. R. Sobel, Supplement to eyewitness identification. New York: Clark Boardman.

Sobel, N.R. (1985). Eyewitness identification: Legal and practical problems (2nd Ed.). New   York: Clark & Boardman.

Sporer, S. L. (1982). A brief history of the psychology of testimony. Current Psychological Reviews, ', 323-339.

Sporer, S. L. (1985). Line-up procedures in the Federal Republic of Germany: An exploratory archival analysis. In F. L. Denmark (Ed.), Social/ecological psychology and the psychology of women (pp. 69-90). Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers.

Sporer, S. L. (1987). Verbal and visual processes in person identification. In H. Wegener, F. Losel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives. New York/Heidelberg: Springer.

Sporer, S.L. (1992). Person descriptions in an archival analysis of criminal cases. Unpublished manuscript, University of Marburg, Germany.

Sporer, S.L. (1992). Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157-180.

Sporer, S.L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in     simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22-33.

Sporer, S.L. (1994). Decision times and eyewitness identification accuracy in simultaneous   and sequential lineups. In D.F. Ross, J.D Read, and M.P. Toglia (Eds.) pp. 300-327. Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sporer, S. L. (1996). Describing others: Psychological issues. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken, Psychological issues in person identification.

Sporer, S. (in press). Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help? Psychology, Crime & Law.

Sporer, S., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy:             A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.

Sommer, R. (1959). The new look on the witness stand. Canadian Psychologist, 8, 94-99. 

Spanos, N. P., & D'Eon, J. L. (1980). Hypnotic amnesia, disorganized recall, and inattention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 744-750.

Spanos, N. P., Gwynn, M. I., & Terrade, K. (1989).  Effects on mock jurors of experts favorable and unfavorable toward hypnotically elicited eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 922-926. 

St. John, R. C. (1981). Lateral asymmetry in face perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 213-223.

Stafford, C. F. (1962). The child as a witness. Washington Law Review, 37, 303-324.

Stalnaker, J. M., & Riddle, E. E. (1932). The effect of hypnosis on long-delayed recall. Journal of General Psychology, 6, 429-440. 

Starkman, D. (1979). The use of eyewitness identification evidence in criminal trials. Criminal Law Quarterly, 21, 361-386.

State v. Ammons, 208 Neb. 812, 305 N.W.2d 812 (1981).

State v. Chapple, 135 Ariz. 281, 660 P.2d 1208 (1983).

State of Maryland v. Kirk N. Bloodsworth, 84-CR-3138 (Baltimore County, 1984).

Steblay, N.M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human    Behavior, 16, 413-424.

Steblay, N.M. (1997). Social influence in eyewitness recall: A meta-analytic review of lineup instruction effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283-298.

Steblay, N.M., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-474.

Steblay, N.M., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2003). Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 523-540.

Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933.

Stein, L., & Memon, A. (in press) Testing the efficacy of the cognitive interview in a developing country. Applied Cognitive Psychology, Special Issue (Loftus).

Stephenson, G. M. (1990). Should collaborative testimony be permitted in courts of law? Criminal Law Review, 302-314.

Stephenson. G. M., Clark, N. K., & Wade, G. S. (1986). Meetings make evidence? An experimental study of collaborative and individual recall of a simulated police interrogation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1113-1122.

Stern, L. D. (1981). Time of encoding as a retrieval cue in recognition memory. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 99-112.

Stern, L. W. (1904). Die Aussage als geistige Leistung und als Verhörsprodukt [The statement as a mental achievement and product of interrogation]. Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage, 3, 269-­415.

Stern, L. W. (1910). Abstracts of lectures in the psychology of testimony and on the study of individuality. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 270-282.

Stern, L. W. (1939). The psychology of testimony. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 3-20.

Stern, L.B., & Dunning, D. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications: A reality monitoring approach. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia    (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.273-299). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Stevenage, S., & Memon, A. (1997). On the importance of imagery in the cognitive interview. Reply to Roberts. Psycholoquy, 8 (3) Witness Memory (16).

Stevenage, S.V., Nixon, M.S., & Vince, K. (1999). Visual analysis of gait as a cue to identify. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 513-526.

Stewart, N., Gordon, D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112, 881-911.

Stinson, V., Devenport, J.L., Cutler, B.L., & Kravitz, D.A. (1996). How effective is the presence-of counsel-safeguard? Attorney perceptions of suggestiveness, fairness and correctability of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 64-75.

Stinson, V., Devenport, J.L., Cutler, B.L., & Kravitz, D.A. (1997). How effective is the motion-to-suppress safeguard? Judges’ perceptions of suggestiveness and fairness of biased lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 211-220.

Stovall v. Denno. (1967). 388 US 293.

Survey of prosecutors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1989, 27(1) 71-74.

Sussman, E. D., & Sugarman, R. C. (1972). The effect of certain distractions on identification by witnesses. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

Sussman, E. D., Sugarman, R. C., & Zavala, A. (1972). A comparison of three media used in identification procedures. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati, (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Sutherland, R., & Harlene, H. (2001). The effect of postevent information of adults’ eyewitness reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 249-263.

Talarico, J. M., Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455-461.

Tanaka, J.W., & Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-246.

Tanaka, J.W., & Sengco, J.A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.

Tapp, J. L. (1976). Psychology and the law: An overture. Annual Review of Psychology, 359-404.

Taylor, J. P. (1980). Eyewitness testimony: Possible legal response to the lessons from psychology on the fallibility of eyewitness identification. In J. P. Taylor (Ed.), Recent developments in the law of evidence. Vancouver: Butterworths.

Taylor, M., & Flavell, J. H. (1984). Seeing and believing: Children's understanding of the distinction between appearance and reality. Child Development, 55, 1710-1720.

Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

Terr, L. (1988). What happens to early memories of trauma? A study of 20 children under    age 5 at time of documented traumatic events. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 96‑ 104.

Terr, L. (1991). Childhood traumas: An outline and overview. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 10‑20.

Thomassin, L., & Alain, M. (1990). Performance of witnesses when giving evidence and making eyewitness identification. Canadian Police College Journal, 14(4), 233-246.

Thompson, C. P. (1985). Voice identification: Speaker identifiability and a correction of the record regarding sex effects. Human Learning, 14, 19-27.

Thomson, D. M. (1981). Person identification: Influencing the outcome. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 14, 49-54.

Thomson, D. M., Robertson, S. L., & Vogt, R. (1982). Person recognition: The effect of context. Human Learning, 1, 137-154.

Thorson, G., & Hochhaus, L. (1977). The trained observer: Effects of prior information on eyewitness reports. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 454-456.

Tiberghien, G. (1986). Context effects in recognition memory of faces: Some theoretical problems. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 88-104). NATO ISI Series, Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences-No. 28,

Timm, H. W. (1981). The effect of forensic hypnosis techniques on eyewitness recall and recognition. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 9, 188-194.

Toglia, M. P., Ross, D. F., & Ceci, S. J. (in press). The suggestibility of children's memory: A cognitive and social-psychological interpretation. In M. L. Howe, C. J. Brainerd, & V. F. Reyna (Eds.), The development of long-term retention. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Toland, K., Hoffman, H., & Loftus, E.F. (1991). How suggestion plays tricks with memory. In J.F. Schumaker (Ed.), Human suggestibility: Advances in theory, research, and application (pp. 235-252). New York: Routledge.

Tollestrup, P.A., Turtle, J.W., & Yuille, J.C. (1994). Actual witnesses to robbery and fraud: An            archival analysis. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness    testimony: Current trends and developments (pp 144-162). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Tomes, J.L., & Katz, A.N. (1997). Habitual susceptibility to misinformation and individual differences in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 233-251.

Tooley, V., Brigham, J. C., Maass, A., & Bothwell, R. K. (1987). Facial recognition: Weapon effect and attentional focus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 845-859.

Treadway, M., & McCloskey, M. (1987). Cite unseen: Distortions of the Allport and Postman rumor study in the eyewitness testimony literature. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 19-25.

Treadway, M., & McCloskey, M. (1989). Effects of racial stereotypes on eyewitness performance: Implications of the real and the rumored Allport and Postman studies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3(1), 53-63.

Tredoux, C.G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217-238.

Tuite, P. A., Braun, B. G., & Frischholz, E. J. (1986). Hypnosis and eyewitness testimony. Psychiatric Annals, 16(2), 91-95.

Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving and W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press.

Tulving, E. (1974). Cue-dependent forgetting. Scientific American, 62, 74-82.

Tulving, E. (1979). Relations between encoding specificity and levels of processing. In L. S. Cermak and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal   Behavior, 20, 479-496.

Tulving, E. (1982). Synergistic ecphory in recall and recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 130-147.

Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.

Tulving, E., & Thomson. D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.

Tunnicliffe, J.L., & Clark, S.E. (2000). Selecting foils for identification lineups: Matching suspects or descriptions? Law and Human Behavior, 24, 231-258.

Turati, Chiara. (2004). Why Faces Are Not Special to Newborns: An Alternative Account of the Face Preference. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 5-8.

Turtle, J. W., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (2003). Best practice recommendations for eyewitness evidence procedures: New ideas for the oldest way to solve a case. The Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 1, 5-18.

Turtle, J.W., & Wells, G.L. (1987). Setting the stage for psychological research on the child   eyewitness. In S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, & D.F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory, New York: Springer-Verlag Publishers.

Turtle, J.W., & Wells, G.L. (1988). Children versus adults as eyewitnesses: Whose testimony holds up under cross examination? In M.W. Gruneberg et al. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 27-33). New York: Wiley.

Turtle, J.W., & Yuille, J.C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hyper amnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 260-271.

Turtle, J. W., & Wells, G. L. (1989). Children versus adults as eyewitnesses: Whose testimony holds up under cross-examination'? In Gruneberg et al. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Wiley. 

Tversky, B., & Baratz, D. (1985). Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs?          Memory & Cognition, 13, 45-49.

Undeutsch, U. (1982). In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27-56). Stockholm: Nostedt & Soners.

Underwood, J., & Pezdek, K. (1998). Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 449-453.

U.S. vs. Ash (1973). 413 U.S. 300.

United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d 1148 (9th Cir. 1973).

United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 1048 (10th Cir. 1976).

United States v. Fosher, 590 F.2d 381 (1st Cir. 1979).

United States v. Nobles, 422, U.S. 225 (1975).

United States v. Telfaire, 469 F.2d 552 (D.C. Cir. 1972).

U.S. vs. Wade (1967). 388 U.S. 218.

Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.

Valentine, T., Darling, S., & Donnelley, M. (2004). Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 482-487.

Valentine, T., Harris, N., Piera, A. C., & Darling, S. (2003). Are police video identifications fair to African-Carribean suspects? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 459-476.

Valentine T., & Heaton, P.  (1999).  An evaluation of the fairness of police line-ups and video identifications, Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, S59-S72.

Valentine, T., Pickering, A., & Darling, S. (2003). Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 969-993.

van Koppen, P.J., & Lochun, S.K. (1997). Portraying perpetrators: The validity of offender descriptions by witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 661-685.

Van Santen, J. P. H., & Jonides, J. A. (1978). A replication of the face superiority effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 378-380.

Verinis, J., & Walker, V. (1970). Policeman and the recall of criminal details. Journal of Social Psychology, 81, 217-221.

Verinis, J., & Walker, V. (1975). Policeman and the recall of orienting tasks on recognition    memory. Memory and Cognition, 81, 217-221.

Vickery, K., & Brooks, L. M. (1938). Time paced reporting of a "crime" witnessed by college girls. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 29, 371-382.

Voiers, W. D. (1964). Perceptual bases of speaker identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1065-1073.

Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1988). Typicality, familiarity and the recognition of male and female faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 489-495.

Vokey, J. R., & Read, J. D. (1992) Familiarity, memorability and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory & Cognition, 20, 291-302.

Wagenaar, W.A. & Veefkind, N. (1992). Comparison of one-person and many-person lineups: A warning against unsafe practices. In F. Losel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesner (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 275-285). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.  KEYWORD showup

Wagstaff, G. F. (1982). Hypnosis and recognition of a face. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 816-818.

Walker-Smith, G. J. (1978). The effects of delay and exposure duration in a face recognition task. Perception and Psychophysics, 24, 63-70.

Walker-Smith, G. J. (1980). Memorizing facial identity, expression and orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 415-424.

Walker-Smith, G.J., Gale, A.G., & Findlay, J.M. (1977). Eye-movement strategies involved in               face perception. Perception, 6, 313-326.

Wall, P. M. (1965). Eyewitness identification in criminal cases. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Walters, C. M. (1985). Admission of expert testimony on eyewitness identification. California Law Review, 73, 1402-1430. 

Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980). The effects of group discussion on eyewitness accuracy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 10, 249-259.

Warnick, D. H., & Sanders, G. S. (1980b). Why do eyewitnesses make so many mistakes? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 362-366.

Warrington, E. K., & James, M. (1967). An experimental investigation of facial recognition with unilateral cerebral lesions. Cortex, 3, 317-3'6.

Weber, N. & Brewer, N. (2003). The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 490-499.

Weber, N., & Brewer, N. (2004). Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative

            face recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 156-172.

Weber, N., Brewer, N., Wells, G. L., Semmler, C, & Keast, A. (2004). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: The unruly 10-12 second rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 139-147.

Wegner, D. M., Fuller, V. S., & Sparrow, B. (2003). Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 5-19.

Weinberg, H. I., Wadsworth, J., & Baron, R. S. (1983). Demand and the impact of leading questions on eyewitness testimony. Memory and Cognition, 11, 101-104.

Weingardt, K., Toland, H., & Loftus, E. (1994). Reports of suggested memories: Do people truly believe them? In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.3-26). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Weingartner, Miller, & Murphy (1977). Mood-state-dependent retrieval of verbal associations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 276-284.

Weld, H. P. (1954). Legal psychology: The psychology of testimony. In F. L. Marcuse (Ed.), Areas of psychology. New York: Harper.

Wells, G.L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.

Wells, G.L. (1980). Eyewitness behavior: The Alberta Conference. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 237-242.

Wells, G.L. (1984). A re-evaluation of the expert testimony issue. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G.L. (1984). Do the eyes have it? More on expert eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, (comment), 39, 1064-1065.

Wells, G.L. (1984). How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G.L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social

            Psychology, 14, 89-103.

Wells, G.L. (1985). Experimental psychology and the courtroom. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 363-374.

Wells, G.L. (1985). The eyewitness. In S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and courtroom procedure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Wells, G.L. (1985). Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 619-626.

Wells, G.L. (1986). Expert psychological testimony: Empirical and conceptual analyses of effects. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 83-96.

Wells, G.L. (1987). Behavioral scientists in courts and corrections. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 391-392.

Wells, G.L. (1988). Eyewitness identification: A system handbook. Toronto: Carswell Legal Publications.

Wells, G.L. (1990). Identifying Ivan: A case study in legal psychology. Social Behavior, 13, 110-121.

Wells, G.L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.

Wells, G.L. (1994). The perceived credibility of eyewitness. In M.D. MacLeod & M. Macrae (Eds.), Stereotypes in the criminal justice system. London: The Falmer Press.

Wells, G.L. (1995) Scientific study of witness memory: Implications for public and legal policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 1, 726-731.

Wells, G.L. (1997). Eyewitness identification. In D.L. Faigman, D. Kaye, M.J. Saks, & J. Sanders (Eds.) Scientific evidence reference manual. Minneapolis: West Publishing.

Wells, G.L. (2001). Police lineups: Data, theory, and policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 791-801.

Wells, G. L. (2005). Eyewitness identification evidence: Science and reform. The Champion, April Issue (Cover Story) pages 12-21.

Wells, G. L. (2005). Helping experimental psychology affect legal policy. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.) Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 483-500). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.

Wells, G. L. (2006). Eyewitness identification: Systemic reforms. Wisconsin Law Review, in press.

Wells, G.L., & Bradfield, A.L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect:” Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360-376.

Wells, G.L., & Bradfield, A.L. (1999). Distortions in eyewitnesses' recollections: Can the postidentification feedback effect be moderated? Psychological Science, 10, 138-144.

Wells, G.L., & Bradfield, A.L. (1999). Measuring the goodness of lineups: parameter estimation, question effects, and limits to the mock witness paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13S, 27-40.

Wells, G. L., Charman, S. D., & Olson, E. A. (2005). Building face composites can harm lineup identification performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 147-157.

Wells, G.L., Ferguson, T.J., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implication for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688-696.

Wells, G.L., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12, 338-344.

Wells, G.L., & Leippe, M.R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682-687.

Wells, G.L., & Leippe, M.R. (In press). Prospects and problems with partial identification. Criminal Justice and Behavior.

Wells, G.L., Leippe, M.R., & Ostrom, T.M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 285-293.

Wells, G.L., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776-784.

Wells, G.L., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1983). How do people infer the accuracy of memory? Studies of performance and a meta-memory analysis. In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Witness evidence: Critical and empirical papers. New York: Wiley.

Wells, G.L., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (1985). Methodological notes on the accuracy-confidence relationship in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 413-419.

Wells, G.L., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Ferguson, T.J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology 64, 440-448.

Wells, G.L., Lindsay, R.C.L., & Tousignant, J.P. (1980). Effects of expert psychological advice on juror judgments in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 275-286.

Wells, G.L., & Loftus, E.F. (Eds.), (1984). Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G.L., & Loftus, E.F. (1984). Eyewitness research: Then and now. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G.L., & Loftus, E.F. (1987). Eyewitness testimony. International encyclopedia of communications. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg School of Communications and Oxford Univ. Press.

Wells, G.L., & Loftus, E.F. (1991). Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J.L. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 168-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wells, G.L., & Luus, E. (1990). Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a

            framework for properly-conducted lineups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 106­-117.

Wells, G.L., & Luus, C.A.E. (1990). The diagnosticity of a lineup should not be confused with the diagnostic value of non-lineup evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 511-516.

Wells, G.L., Luus, C.A.E., & Windschitl, P.D. (1994). Maximizing the utility of eyewitness identification evidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 3, 194-197.

Wells, G.L., Malpass, R.S., Lindsay, R.C.L., Fisher, R.P., Turtle, J.W., & Fulero, S. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598.

Wells, G. L., Memon, A, & Penrod, S. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, in press.

Wells, G.L., & Murray, D.M. (1983). What can psychology say about the Neil vs. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness identification accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 347-362.

Wells, G.L., & Murray, D. (1984). Eyewitness confidence. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. L. & Olson, E. A. (2001). The other-race effect in eyewitness identification: What do we do about it? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 230-246.

Wells, G. L. & Olson, E. (2002). Eyewitness identification: Information gain from incriminating and exonerating behaviors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 155-167.

Wells, G. L. & Olson, E. (2003). Eyewitness identification.  Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277-295.

Wells, G. L., Olson, E., & Charman, S. (2002).  Eyewitness identification confidence.  Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 151-154.

Wells, G. L., Olson, E., & Charman, S. (2003). Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 42-52.

Wells, G.L., Rydell, S.M., & Seelau, E.P. (1993). On the selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 835-844.

Wells, G.L. & Seelau, E.P. (1995). Eyewitness identification: Psychological research and legal policy on lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 765-791.

Wells, G.L., Seelau, E., Rydell, S., & Luus, C.A.E. (1994). Recommendations for properly conducted lineup identification tasks. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 223-244). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G.L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R.S., Fulero, S.M., & Brimacombe, C.A.E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads, Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.

Wells, G.L., & Turtle, J.W. (1986). Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 320-329.

Wells, G.L., & Turtle, J.W. (1987). Eyewitness testimony: Current knowledge and emergent controversies. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 363-388.

Wells, G.L., & Turtle, J.W. (1988). What is the best way to encode faces? In M.W. Gruneberg et al. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 163-168). New York: Wiley.

Wells, G.L., Turtle, J.W., & Luus, C.A. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use their own words? In Ceci et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 23-39). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Wells, G.L., & Windschitl, P.D. (1999). Stimulus sampling in social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.

Wells, G.L., & Wright, E.F. (1986). Practical issues in eyewitness research. In J. Kaplan (Ed.), The impact of social psychology on procedural justice. Springfield, IL: Chas. C. Thomas.

Wells, G.L., Wright, E.F., & Bradfield, A.L. (1999). Witnesses to crime: Social and cognitive factors governing the validity of people’s reports. In R. Roesch & S. Hart (Eds.) Psychology and law: State of the discipline (pp. 53-87). New York: Plenum Press.

Westcott, H., Davies, G., & Bull, R. (2002). Children’s testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

Whipple, G.M. (1909). The obtaining of information: Psychology of observation and report. Psychological Bulletin, 8, 419-421.

Whipple, G. M. (1909). The observer as reporter: A survey of the psychology of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 153- 170.

Whipple, G. M. (1910). Recent literature on the psychology of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 7, 365-368.

Whipple, G. M. (1911). The psychology of testimony. Psychological Bulletin, 8, 307-309.

Whipple, G.M. (1912). Psychology of testimony and report. Psychological Bulletin, 10, 264-269.

Whitley, A.M., & Warrington, E.K. (1977). Prosopagnosia: A clinical, psychological, and anatomical study of three patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 40, 395-403.

Whitley, B. E. (1987). The effects of discredited eyewitness testimony: A meta analysis. Journal of Social Psychology, 127(2), 209-214.

Whitley, B. E. Jr., & Greenberg, M. S. (1986). The role of eyewitness confidence in juror perceptions of credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 387-409.

Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Muensterburg and the psychology of testimony.  Illinois Law Review, 399-445.

Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Muensterberg and the psychology of evidence. Illinois Law Review, 3, 399-445.

Wigmore, J. H. (1933). Evidence--corroboration by witness' identification of an accused on arrest. Illinois Law Review, 25, 550-552.

Wigmore, J. H. (1937). The science of judicial proof. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.

Williams, G. (1955). The proof of guilt: a study of the English criminal trial. London: Stevens and Sons.

Williams, L.M. (1994). Recall of childhood trauma: A prospective study of women's memories of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1167-1176.

Williams, L., & Greenwald, M. (1975). When witnesses think too much. Social Action and the Law, 2, 5-6.

Windschitl, P. D., & Chambers, J. R. (2004). The Dud-Alternative Effect in Likelihood Judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 198-215.

Winograd, E. (1976). Recognition memory for faces following nine different judgments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 8, 419-421.

Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 7, 181-190.

Winograd, E., & Rivers-Bulkeley, N. T. (1977). Effects of changing context on remembering faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 397-405.

Winterdyk, J. (1988). Canadian police officers and eyewitness evidence: A time for reform. Canadian Police College Journal, 12(3), 175-191.

Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What US Judges Know and Believe About Eyewitness Testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 427-443.

Wogalter, M.S., Malpass, R.S., & Burger, M.A. (1993). How police officers construct lineups: A national survey. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37, 640-644.

Wogalter, M.S., Marwitz, D.B., & Leonard, D.C. (1992). Suggestiveness in photospread lineups: Similarity induces distinctiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 443-453.

Wollert, R. (2006) Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes’s Theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56-85.

Woocher, F.D. (1977). Did your eyes deceive you? Expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Stanford Law Review, 29, 969-1030.

Woocher, F. D. (1986). Legal principles governing expert testimony by experimental psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 47-61.

Woodhead, M. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (1981). Individual differences and memory for faces, pictures, and words. Memory and Cognition, 9, 368-370.

Woodhead, M.M., Baddeley, A.D., & Simmonds, D.C. (1979). On training people to recognize faces. Ergonomics, 22, 333-343.

Woolnough, P.S., & MacLeod, M.D. (2001). Watching the birdie watching you: Eyewitness memory for actions using CCTV recording of actual crimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology,15, 395-411.

Wright, D. B., Boyd, C. E., & Tredoux, C. G. (2003). Inter-racial contact and the own-race bias for face recognition in South Africa and England . Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 365-373.

Wright, D., & Loftus, E. (1998). How misinformation alters memories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 155-164.

Wright, D. B., Mathews, S. A., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2005). Social recognition memory: The effect of other people’s responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 200-209.

Wright, D.B., & McDaid, A.T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.

Wright, D.B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91(2), 189-202.

Wright, D.B., & Skagerberg, E. M. (in press). Post-identification feedback affects real eyewitnesses. Psychological Science, in press.

Wright, D.B., & Stroud, J.N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 641-654.

Wright, D.B., Varley, S., & Belton, A. (1996). Accurate second guesses in misinformation studies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 13-21.

Yarmey, A. D. (1971). Recognition memory for familiar "public" faces: Effects of orientation and decay. Psychonomic Science, 24, 286-288.

Yarmey, A. D. (1973). I recognize your face but I can't remember your name: Further evidence in the tip of the tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 1, 287-290.

Yarmey, A. D. (1974). Proactive interference in short term retention of human faces. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 333-338.

Yarmey, A. D. (1975, May). Social-emotional factors in recall and recognition of human faces. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The effects of attractiveness, feature saliency and liking on memory for faces. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction. New York: Pergamon Press.

Yarmey, A.D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979c). Through the looking glass: Sex differences in memory for self facial poses. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 450-459.

Yarmey, A. D. (1982). Eyewitness identification and stereotypes of criminals. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 205-225). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Yarmey, A.D. (1984). Age as a factor in eyewitness memory. In G.L. Wells & E.L. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp.142-154). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yarmey, A. D. (1986). Ethical responsibilities governing the statements experimental psychologists make in expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, IO, 101-116.

Yarmey, A. D. (1986a). Verbal, visual, and voice identification of a rape suspect under different levels of illumination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 363-370.

Yarmey, A. D. (1988). Victims and witnesses to deadly force. Canadian Police College Journal, 12(2) 99-109.

Yarmey, A.D. (1990). Accuracy and confidence of duration estimates following questions containing marked and unmarked modifiers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1139-1149. Yarmey, A. D. (1990). Understanding police and police work: Psychosocial issues. New York: New York University Press.

Yarmey, A. D. (1991). Descriptions of distinctive and nondistinctive voices over time. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 31, 421-428.

Yarmey, A. D. (1991c). Voice identification over the telephone. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1868-1876.

Yarmey, A. D. (199lb). Retrospective perceptions of police following victimization. Canadian Police College Journal, 15, 137-143.

Yarmey, A.D. (1994). Earwitness evidence: Memory for a perpetrator’s voice. In D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp.101-124). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Yarmey, A. D. (2004). Eyewitness recall and photo identification: A field experiment. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 53-68. 

Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Accuracy of memory of male and female eyewitnesses to criminal assault and rape. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 89-92.

Yarmey, A.D., & Jones, H.P.T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp.13-40). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Yarmey, A. D., &  Kent, J. (1980). Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law and Human Behavior, 4(4) 359-371.

Yarmey, A. D., & Matthys, E. (1992). Voice identification of an abductor. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 367-377. 

Yarmey, A.D., Yarmey, M.J., & Yarmey, A.L. (1996). Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in showups and lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 459-477.

Yarmey, A.D., Yarmey, A.L., Yarmey, M.J., & Parliament, L. (2001). Commonsense beliefs and the identification of familiar voices. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 283-299.

Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.

Young, A. W., & Ellis, H. D. (1989). (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Face Processing. North Holland: Elsevier.

Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., & Ellis, H. D. (1985). The faces that launched a thousand slips: Everyday difficulties and errors in recognizing people. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 495-523.

Yount, M. B., & Laughery, K. R. (1982). Facial memory: Constructing familiar and unfamiliar faces. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 80-82.

Yuille, J. C. (1980). A critical examination of the psychological and practical implications of eyewitness research. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 335-345.

Yuille, J. C. (1986). Meaningful research in the police context. In Yuille, J. C. (Ed.), Police selection and training: The role of psychology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.

Yuille, J., & Cutshall, J. (1986). A case study of eyewitnesses’ memory of a crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 291-301.

Yuille, J. C., & Cutshall, J. L. (1989). Analysis of the statements of victims, witnesses and suspects. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment (pp. 175-191). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Yuille, J.C., Davies, G., Gibling, F., & Marxsen, D. (1994). Eyewitness memory of police trainees for realistic role plays. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 931-936.

Yuille, J. C., & Kim, C. K. (1987). A field study of the forensic use of hypnosis. Canadian Journal of Beh(lvioral Science, 19, 418-419.

Yuille, J.C., & McEwan, N.H. (1985). Use of hypnosis as an aid to eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 389-400.

Yuille, J.C., & Tollestrup, P.A. (1990). Some effects of alcohol on eyewitness memory.  Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 268-273.

Yuille, J.C., & Wells, G.L. (1991). Concerns about the application of research findings: The issue of ecological validity. In J.L. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 118-128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Zanni, G. R., & Offermann, J. T. (1978). Eyewitness testimony: An Exploration of question wording upon recall as a function of neuroticism. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 163-166.

Zaragoza, M. S. (1991). Preschool children's susceptibility to memory impairment. In l. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's memory (with special reference to the child witness). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Zaragoza, M. S., & Koshmider, J. W., III. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 246-255.

Zaragoza, M. S., & McCloskey, M. (1989). Misleading postevent information and the memory impairment hypothesis: Comment on Belli and reply to Tversky and Tuchin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 92-99.

Zaragoza, M. S., Payment, K. E., Ackil, J. K., Drivdahl, S. B., & Beck, M. (2001). Interviewing witnesses: Forced confabulation and confirmatory feedback increase false memories. Psychological Science, 12, 473-477. 

Zavala, A. (1972a). Identifying suspects on the basis of their utterances. In A. Zavala, J. J. Paley, & R. R. J. Gallati (Eds.), Personal appearance identification. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

Zimbardo, P. G. (1967). The psychology of police confessions. Psychology Today, 82, 17-20; 25-27.

 

 

 

.