AP-LS LINKS - Publishing

Publishing

Professional Organizations and Activities

Publishing - Jury Research

Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). S.12 of the Canada evidence act and the deliberation of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253.

Kohn, Alan, Conviction upset by challenges to get predominant black jury, New York Law Journal, Vol 193, p 1, May 16, 1985,

Postel, Theodore, Unpublished, revised jury instructions. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 179, p 1, Tue, September 13, 1988.

'Death-qualified' juries more likely to conflict?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, January 13, 1986,

Abbott, Walter F., Shadow juries: a checklist of practical decisions, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 10, No 3, pp 30-35, September 22, 1987, - Fal.

Abramovsky, Abraham, Peremptory challenges in New York, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 43, p 1, Mon, March 7, 1988.

Acker, J. R. (1987). The supreme court's use of social science research in criminal cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University Of New York, Albany.

Acker, James R. (1990). Social science in Supreme Court criminal cases and briefs: The actual and potential contribution of social scientists as amici curiae. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 25-42

Ackerman, Adele M.; McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Defendant characteristics and judgment behaviors of adolescent mock jurors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 123-130

Ackerman, Adele M.; McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Mock trial jury decisions as a function of adolescent juror guilt and hostility. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 195-201

Adkins, J. C. (1968-1969, December/January). An art? A science? Or luck? Trial, 37-39.

Adler, F. (1973, Winter). Socioeconomic factors influencing jury verdicts. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 1-10.

Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

Ainsworth, Price; Miller, Mike C., Removing the blindfold: general verdicts and letting the jury know the effects of its answers. (appendix contains survey of state law) (Texas), South Texas Law Review, Vol 29, No 1, pp 233-261, October, 1987.

Alexander, M., & Licker, J. (1975, July). Jury selection: Finding rigid and flexible jurors and deciding if they are needed (Report No. CR-18). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology Report Series, Brooklyn College, C.U.N.Y.

Alker, H. R., Jr., Hosticka, C., & Mitchell, M. (1976). Jury selection as a biased social process. Law and Society Review, 11, 9-41.

Allen, R. J. (1982). Presumptions, inferences and burden of proof in federal civil actions--an anatomy of unnecessary ambiguity and a proposal of reform. Northwestern University Law Review, 76, 892-912.

Allison, Scott T.; Messick, David M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579

Amato, P. R. (1979). Juror-defendant similarity and the assessment of guilt in politically motivated crimes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 79-88.

Amsterdam. (1976). Trial Manual for Defense of Criminal Cases. The American Law Institute.

Anderson, D. D. (1981). Defendant's past criminal record: effects of attributional information and judicial instructions on verdict-related judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Andrews, F. M. (1981). The influence of evidenciary and extraevidenciary factors on decisions in a simulated rape trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.

Andrews, L. B. (1952). Mind control in the courtroom. Psychology Today, March 1982, pp. 66-70; 73. Appleman, J. A. Chapter 7. In J. A. Appleman (Ed.),Successful jury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Angira, K. K. (1987). Effect of physical attractiveness on the Juridic judgement of male and female jurors. Indian Journal of Current Psychological Research, 2, 89-92.

Anthony, Philip K.; Vinson, Donald E., Demonstrative exhibits: a key to effective jury presentations, For the Defense, Vol 28, No 11, pp 13-17, November, 1986.

Antley, Roy, Unconstitutional presumptions in criminal trials may be harmless error, Houston Law Review, Vol 25, No 1, pp 203-216, January, 1988.

Appelbaum, Paul S. (1984). Standards for civil commitment: A critical review of empirical research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 133-144

Applegate, Joe, Rand study finds big jury awards frequently shrink, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Thu, July 9, 1987.

Appleman, J. A. (1952). Chapter 7. In J. A. Appleman (Ed.), Successful jury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Arbuthnot, Jack (1983). Attributions of responsibility by simulated jurors: Stage of moral reasoning and guilt by association. Psychological Reports, 52, 287-298.

Arbuthnot, Jack (1986). Jurors' views on due process and the death penalty: A sociomoral framework for voir dire and jury selection. Social Action and the Law, 12, 3-9, 27 30.

Arbuthnot, Jack, Jurors' views on due process and the death penalty: a sociomoral framework for voir dire and jury selection, Social Action and the Law Vol 12, No 1, pp 3-9, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Archer, Richard L.; Foushee, H. Clayton; Davis, Mark H.; Aderman, David (1979). Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 275-291

Arden, P. K. (1984). Two methods of simulated jury selection: a comparison of information usage and decision-making strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School Of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

Are juries capricious? Study raises question, Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 7, p 3, December 17, 1984,

Arnold, Robert Paul, Discrimination in jury selection via peremptory challenge: many are called, but few are chosen, Northern Illinois University Law Review, Vol 5, No 1, pp 71-96, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Arnold. (May 5, 1974). How Mitchell-Stans jury reached acquittal vote. New York Times, 1, col. 6.

arter, P.B., Do courts decide according to the evidence? (Canada, Great Britain), University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol 22, No 2, pp 351-367, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Ashby, J. B. (1978). Juror selection and the sixth amendment right to an impartial jury. Creighton Law Review, 11, 1137-1168.

Asken, M. J. (1976). Psychology in the courtroom: jury instructions and the myth of jury decision by legal principle.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.

Atlas, David Y., The unanimous acquittal instruction: a rational approach to instructing jurors on lesser included offenses, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol 16, No 2, pp 331-360, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Aubrey, M. (1989). Content analysis of jury deliberations in a child sexual abuse mock trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University Of New York, Buffalo.

Aubrey, Moss; Ewing, Charles P. (1989). Student and voter subjects: Differences in attitudes toward battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 289-297

Austin, Arthur D., What makes juries listen., (Book reviews), American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Vol 8, No 3, pp 509-514, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Austin, W. T. (1982). Portrait of a courtroom: Social and ecological impressions of the adversary process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 286-302.

Babcock, B. A. (1975). Voir dire: Preserving "its wonderful power." Stanford Law Review, 27, 545-565.

Baer, Donald M. (1981). A hung jury and a Scottish verdict: "Not proven." Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 91-97

Bailey, F. L., & Rothblatt, H. B. (1974). Fundamentals of criminal advocacy. New York: The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co.

Baker, E. (1984). Conviction proneness as a predictor of sworn juror decisions (jury selection, scientific). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University Of New York.

Baker, Paul M. (1984). Seeing is behaving: Visibility and participation in small groups. Environment and Behavior, 16, 159-184

Baker, Steven J., Jury impeachment: the illusory clerical error exception. (Mich.), University of Detroit Law Review, Vol 63, No 3, pp 499-516, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Balch, Robert W.; Giffiths, Curt T.; Hall, Edwin L.; Winfree, L. Thomas (1976). The socialization of jurors: The voir dire as a rite of passage. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 271-273

Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Trial by jury: Some empirical evidence on contested criminal cases in England. Law and Society Review, 13, 861-890.

Balkany, N. S. (1987). Perceived effectiveness of seven psychological interventions in trial preparation and courtroom performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union For Experimenting Colleges And Universities.

Ballew vs. Georgia. (1978, March 21). Opinions--The United States Law Week, 46, 4217-4223.

Bankart, C. Peter; Powers, Scott W. (1986). Individual decisions and group consensus. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 369-374

Bankhead, Missy Kelly, Peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude a group of persons from a jury based upon a group, rather than a specific, bias. (California Supreme Court Survey: June 1985 - August 1985), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 2, pp 530-531, January, 1986,

Bankhead, Missy Kelly, When there is evidence to justify a conviction of a lesser offense than the one for which the defendant is being tired, the trial must give jury instructions. (California Supreme Court Survey: 1985), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 2, p 501, January, 1986,

Barber, S. R. (1981). Chandler v. Florida: a social scientific, legal and historical evaluation of cameras in the courtroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

Barnett, Nona J.; Feild, Hubert S. (1978). Character of the defendant and length of sentence in rape and burglary crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 271-277

Baron, C. H. (1972). Law and the fly-bottle: aspects of professor hart's jurisprudence of non-descriptive legal utterances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Barr, M. J. (1976). The perception and evaluation of information elicited in a jury trial.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University.

Barrett, Curtis L.; Johnson, Phillip W.; Meyer, Robert G. (1985). Expert eyewitness, consultant, advocate: One role is enough. Social Action and the Law, 11, 56-57

Bartholomew, Allen A. (1981). Criminal intent and the psychologist. Australian Psychologist, 16, 413-422

Bartholomew, Allen A.; Badger, Philip; Milte, Kerry L. (1977). The psychologist as an expert witness in the criminal courts. Australian Psychologist, 12, 133-150

Baruch, M. N. (1985). Undoing the expert witness: effects of discrediting expertise and trustworthiness in ambiguous and unambiguous crime situations (eyewitness, credibility). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Basavaraju, K. (1988). Testimony expertise of clinical neuropsychologists vs. neurologists in a simulated personal-injury case. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Baumeister, Roy F.; Darley, John M. (1982). Reducing the biasing effect of perpetrator attractiveness in jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 286-292

Baumeister, Roy F.; Darley, John M. (1982). Reducing the biasing effect of perpetrator attractiveness in jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 286-292.

Bayly, M. J. (1988). The impact of opening statement presentation order and trial information content on jurors' evaluations of the trial and defendant. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

Bazelon, David L. (1975). A jurist's view of psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 3, 175-190

Beach, James M., Products liability - damages - jury must be charged as to present value principles when calculating value of future losses. (Survey of Recent Developments in New Jersey Law), Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 17, No 2, pp 493-495, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Bearden, W. D., & Durand, R. M. (1978). Beliefs and evauations underlying juror attitudes toward service. Law and Psychological Review, 4, 105-113.

Beattie, S. J. (1984). Alcohol as a mitigating factor in the commission of a crime: jury findings of culpability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.

Beauvais, C. G. (1982). Perceptions of rape victims in mock jury trials.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California State University, Fullerton.

Becker, T. L., Hildum, D. C., & Bateman, K. (1965). The influence of jurors' values on their verdicts: A courts and politics experiment. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 45, 130-140.

Beckham, B.; Aronson, H. (1978). Selection of jury foremen as a measure of the social status of women. Psychological Reports, 43, 475-478

Bedrick, D. M. (1980). Jury behavior as a function of the severity and nature of the defendant's prior criminal record. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

Begam, R. G. (1977). The attorneys. Judicature, 61, 71; 76-78.

Beit Hallahmi, Benjamin (1974). Treating the sex offender. Crime and Delinquency, 20, 33-37

Bell, B. E. (1988). Framing Statistical Testimony and Judgements of Liability and Damages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1985). Vivid persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 659-664.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of , minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679

Bell, Daniel J. (1985). Domestic violence: Victimization, police intervention, and disposition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 525-534

Belli, M. M. (1954). Modern trials. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, (Supplement, 1966).

Belote, Farrald G., Jury research: spotting jurors who can hurt, Litigation, Vol 12, No 4, pp 17(4), June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Ben Shakhar, Gershon; Bar Hillel, Maya; Lieblich, Israel (1986). Trial by polygraph: Scientific and juridical issues in lie detection. Special Issue: Psychology in law enforcement. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 459-479

Ben-Veniste, R., & Frampton, G. (1977). Stonewall: The legal case against the Watergate conspirators. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Benezech, M. (1978). Considerations on acting out and the criminal liability of offenders loss of object, juridical mental alienation. Annales Medico Psychologiques, 136, 1184-1191

Bennett, C. E. (March/April, 1977). Psychological methods of jury selection in the typical criminal case. Criminal Defense, 4(2), 11-22.

Benokraitis, N. V. (1975). Institutional racism: An empirical study of blacks and the jury selection process in ten southern states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Benokraitis, Nijole (1982). Racial exclusion in juries. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 29-47

Berg, K., & Vidmar, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 147-157.

Berg, Martin, Judge rules jury pools must have young, poor people for balance. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 10, Wed, July 8, 1987.

Berg, Martin, Juror misconduct gets closer look as trials lengthen; God and Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Tue, September 8, 1987.

Bergin, Allen E. (1980). Negative effects revisited: A reply. Professional Psychology, 11, 93-100

Bergman, Paul, The war between the states (of mind): oral versus textual reasoning, Arkansas Law Review, Vol 40, No 3, pp 505-544, January, 1987, - Winter.

Bergstein, Melvyn H., Courtroom psychology and jury selection., (book reviews), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 119, p 6, Thu, January 29, 1987.

Berk, R. A., Hennessy, M., & Swan, J. (1977). The vagaries and vulgarities of scientific jury selection: A methodological evaluation. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 143-158.

Berkow, Ellen Beth, Constitutional criminal procedure - self-incrimination - court may compel witnesses to testify before a grand jury who are immune from prosecution, University of Baltimore Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 186-195, September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Berman, Alan L. (1989). Malpractice. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 19, 395-402

Berman, J., & Sales, B. D. (1977). A critical evaluation of the systematic approach to jury selection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 219-240.

Bermant, G. (May, 1975). The notion of conspiracy is not tasty to Americans. Psychology Today, pp. 60-67.

Bermant, G., & Coppock, R. (1972-1973). Outcomes of six- and twelve-member jury trials: An analysis of 128 civil cases in the state of Washington. Washington Law Review, 48, 593-596.

Bermant, G., & Jacoubovitch, M. D. (1975). Fish out of water: A brief overview of social and psychological concerns about videotaped trials. Hastings Law Journal, 26, 999-1011.

Bermant, G., & Shapard, J. (1981). The voir dire examination, juror challenges, and adversary advocacy. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology: The trial process. 2. New

ork: Plenum.

Bermant, G., Chappell, D., Crockett, G. T., Jacoubovitch, M., & McGuire, M. (1975). Juror responses to prerecorded videotape trial presentations in California and Ohio. Hastings Law Journal, 26, 975-998.

Bermant, G., McGuire, M., McKinley, W., & Salo, C. (1974). The logic of simulation in jury research. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 224-233.

Bermant, G., Nemeth, C., & Vidmar, N. (1976). Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath & Company.

Bermant, Gordon (1986). Two conjectures about the issue of expert testimony. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 97-100

Bermant, Gordon; McGuire, Mary; McKinley, William; Salo, Chris (1974). The logic of simulation in jury research. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 224-233

Bernard, J. L. (1979). Interaction between the race of the defendant and that of jurors in determining verdicts. Law and Psychology Review, 5 103-111

Bernard, J. L.; Dwyer, W. O. (1984). Witherspoon v. Illinois : The court was right. Law and Psychology Review, 8 105-114

Bernard, John L.; Cohen, Robert; Lupfer, Michael. (1985). The influence of juror's level of moral reasoning and the nature of closing arguments in determining the verdict in a civil case: A report of two experiments. Law and Psychology Review, 1985, 15, 656-672.

Bernard, John L.; Cohen, Robert; Lupfer, Michael (1985). The influence of juror's level of moral reasoning and the nature of closing arguments in determining the verdict in a civil case: A report of two experiments. Law and Psychology Review, 9 93-102

Bernstein, Barton E.; McCutchan, Betty (1983). The grand jury vs. the social worker: Friends or enemies? Social Work, 28, 224-227

Berry, Robert M., Remedies to the dilemma of death-qualified juries, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal, Vol 8, No 3, pp 479-501, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Bersoff, Donald N. (1987). Social science data and the Supreme Court: Lockhart as a case in point. American Psychologist, 42, 52-58

Bevan, W. (1958). Leadership of the jury foreman. Journal of Public Law, 7, 419-449.

Bevan, W., Albert, R. S., Loiseaux, P. R., Mayfield, P. N., & Wright, G. (1958). Jury behavior as a function of the prestige of the foreman and the nature of his leadership. Journal of Public Law, 7, 419-449.

Biddle, W. Gregory (1988). Magwood v. Smith : The effect of a jury's failure to consider mitigating circumstances in a death penalty case. Law and Psychology Review, 12 151-158

Biddle, W. Gregory (1988). Magwood v. Smith : The effect of a jury's failure to consider mitigating circumstances in a death penalty case. Law and Psychology Review, 1987, Fal 5, 467-477.

Binder, Arnold (1983). Juvenile justice and juvenile offenders: An overview. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 65-67

Birch, D.J., Hostile witness - for the defendant - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 445-446, July, 1985,

Birch, D.J.; Bouldstridge, Julia, Confession - whether voir dire required - whether defence case must be put to witnesses on voire dire. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 196-198, March, 1987.

Birch, D.J.; Cowan, Veronica, Sexual offences - identification in issue - whether direction on corroboration necessary. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 688-690, October, 1988.

Biskind, E. L. (1976). How to prepare a case for trial. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Bjurstrom, Callie A., Letting the jury decide the question of extreme and outrageous conduct for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional Arizona Law Review, Vol 29, No 2, pp 361-372, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Blackman, Julie; Brickman, Ellen (1984). The impact of expert testimony on trials of battered women who kill their husbands. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 413-422

Blackmar, Charles B., Arbitrator' credibility calls and jury instructions, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol 30, No 1, pp 133-148, October, 1985,

Blanck, Peter D. (1987). The "process" of field research in the courtroom: A descriptive analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 337-358

Blauner, R. (1975). The sociology of jury selection. In A. F. Ginger (Ed.), Jury selection in criminal trials. Tiburon, CA: Law Press.

Bley, J. W. (1980). Effects of prior sex history and physical resistance evidence on verdicts of individuals and simulated juries in rape trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.

Blinder, M. (1978). Picking juries. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 1, 8-13.

Block, Gertrude (1982). The Hinckley trial and the fallacious presumptions of the insanity defense. Etc., 39, 222-238

Blodgett, Nancy, Stage fright: deal with fears before jury, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 26, October, 1985,

Bloom, Joseph D.; Rogers, Jeffrey L.; Manson, Spero M. (1982). After Oregon's insanity defense: A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 391-402

Blue, Lisa A.; Boudreaux, Joe N., The "liability crisis" and voir dire; how to find "tort-reform" proponents among prospective jurors, Trial, Vol 23, No 2, pp 59(2), February, 1987.

Blum, A. F. (1987). Ethnicity and the jury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Blunk, R. A., & Sales, B. D. (1977). Persuasion during the voir dire. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications.

Bodenhausen, Galen V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737

Bodenhausen, Galen V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737.

Bodin, H. S. (1954). Selecting a jury. New York: Practicing Law Institute.

Boehm, V. (1968). Mr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 734-750.

Boehnert, Caryl E. (1989). Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful insanity pleas. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 31-39

Boland, Barbara; Wilson, James Q. (1978). Age, crime, and punishment. Public Interest, 51 22-34

Bond, Patti, Why juries acquit some women who kill, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 4, March 5, 1985,

Bonner, J. T., JR., (1972). A study of the persuasion of juries by expert witnesses in condemnation cases. Ohio State University.

Bonora, B., & Krauss, E. (Eds.) (1979). Jurywork: Systematic techniques. U.S.A.: National Jury Project.

Boone, J. S. (1972). The effects of race, arrogance, and evidence on simulated jury decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Boor, Myron (1975). Effects of victim competence and defendant opportunism on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 301-302

Boor, Myron (1976). Effects of victim injury, victim competence, and defendant opportunism on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 100, 315-316

Bordens, K. The effect of a defendant's background characteristics and strength of evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors. Unpublished masters thesis.

Bordens, K.S. and Horowitz, I.A. (1983). Information processing in joined and severed trials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 351-370.

Bordens, Kenneth S.; Horowitz, Irwin A. (1986). Prejudicial joinder of multiple offenses: Relative effects of cognitive processing and criminal schema. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 243-258

Bordens, Kenneth S.; Horowitz, Irwin A. (1986). Prejudicial joinder of multiple offenses: Relative effects of cognitive processing and criminal schema. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 243-258.

Borgida, E. Legal reform of rape laws: Social psychological and constitutional considerations. Chapter to appear in L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Borgida, Eugene (1981). Legal reform of rape laws. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 2 211-241

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger (1988). The entrapment defense: Juror comprehension and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19-40.

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger (1988). The entrapment defense: Juror comprehension and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19-40

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger, The entrapment defense; juror comprehension and decision making, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 19-40, March, 1988.

Bottorff, Sarah, Study challenges Justice Dept. data on size of jury verdicts, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 21, Fri, May 30, 1986,

Boudouris, James (1988). Jury selection in Polk County, Iowa. Forensic Reports, 1, 237-258

Bowen, M. W. (1987). Eligible jurors' perceptions of liability for the negligent infliction of emotional distress to a bystander. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School Of Professional Psychology, Berkeley/Alameda.

Bowes, M. R. (1972). Voir dire: Strategy and tactics in the defense of social and political activists. Akron Law Review, 5, 265-294.

Boyle, D. J. (1942). The juridic effects of moral certitude on prenuptial guarantees. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Catholic University of America.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1976). A game theory approach to jury selection. Trial, 12, 47-49.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1976). A game theory approach to jury selection. Trial, 12, 47-49.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brand, A. H. (1985). Predicting juror bias and its effects on group deliberation, verdict, and recall of trial information (authoritarian trial). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Brandstatter, H., & Klein-Moddenborg, V. (1979). A modified proportional change model of attitude change by group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 363-380.

Braswell, Henry, The Texas approach to fundamental error in the criminal jury charge, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 48, No 3, pp 278(12), March, 1985,

Bray, R. M. (1974). Decision rules, attitude similarity, and jury decision-making.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Bray, R. M. (March, 1980). Attraction, believability, and mock juror judgments. Some data presented at Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington.

Bray, R. M., & Kerr, N. L. (in press). Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations. Law and Human Behavior.

Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430.

Bray, R. M., Kerr, N. L., & Atkin, R. S. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.

Bray, Robert M.; et al (1978). The effects of defendant status on the decisions of student and community juries. Social Psychology, 41, 256-260

Bray, Robert M.; Noble, Audrey M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430

Breck, David F.; Wolk, Richard, Should summary jury trials be regularly used?, Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 66, No 11, pp 1096-1098, November, 1987.

Brekke, N. C. (1985). Expert scientific testimony in rape trials (rape trauma syndrome, lie detectors, jury decision-making, social judgment, myths). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Brekke, Nancy; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.

Brekke, Nancy; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386

Bremer, Celeste F.; Simmer, W. Scott, One day in court: suggestions for implementing summary jury trials in Iowa, Drake Law Review, Vol 36, No 2, pp 297-315, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Brenneman, Hugh W., Jr.; Wesoloski, Edward, Blueprint for a summary jury trial, Advocate (Idaho), Vol 30, No 1, pp 21(3), January, 1987.

Bridgeman, D. L., & Marlowe, D. (1979). Jury decision making: An empirical study based on actual felony trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 91-98.

Bridgeman, Diane L.; Marlowe, David (1979). Jury decision making: An empirical study based on actual felony trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 91-98

Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 19-30.

Brigham, John C. , 47-56

Brigham, John C.; Bothwell, Robert K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19-30.

Brigham, John C.; Bothwell, Robert K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19-30

Brigham, John C.; WolfsKeil, Melissa P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349

Britt, S. H. (1935). The legal concept of intent: a study in psychological jurisprudence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.

Broder, Ivy E., Characteristics of million dollar awards: jury verdicts and final disbursements. (The Litigation Explosion Debate), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 3, pp 349-359, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Brodsky, Daniel J., Educating juries: the battered woman defence in Canada, Alberta Law Review, Vol 25, No 3, pp 461-476, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Brody, A. (1957). Selecting a jury--Art or blind-man's buff? Criminal Law Review, 4, 67-78.

Broeder, D. W. (1958). The University of Chicago jury project. Nebraska Law Review, 38, 744-761.

Broeder, D. W. (1965a). Plaintiff's family status as affecting juror behavior: Some tentative insights. Journal of Public Law, 14, 131-141.

Broeder, D. W. (1965b). Previous jury trial service affecting juror behavior. 138-143.

Broeder, D. W. (1965c). Voir dire examinations: An empirical study. Southern California Law Review, 38, 503-528.

Bronson, E. J. (1970). On the conviction proneness and representativeness of the death-qualified jury: An empirical study of Colorado veniremen. University of Colorado Law Review, 42, 1-32.

Bronson, E. J. (1980). Does the exclusion of scrupled jurors in capital cases make the jury more likely to convict? Some evidence from California. Woodrow Wilson Journal of Law, 3, 11-34.

Brooks, David, One-day, one-trial: are jurors inventing excuses? Getting out of jury duty. (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 120, p 1, Thu, August 27, 1987.

Brooks, W., & Doob, A. (1975). Justice and the jury. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 171-182.

Browne, Paul, Albany kills effort to end mandatory jury sequestration. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 90, p 1, Wed, May 11, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Anti-prosecutor air seen in Albany: hopes fade on bill to limit immunity for grand jury witnesses, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 115, p 1, Thu, June 16, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Court defines rule for absent jurors: state appeals tribunal cautions trial judges. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 5, p 1, Fri, July 8, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Governor submits bill to end mandatory jury sequestering. (New York Governor Mario Cuomo), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 88, p 1, Mon, May 9, 1988.

Browne, Paul, State, DAs opposed on plan to lift witness immunity. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 74, p 1, Tue, April 19, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Study asked of juries in complex cases. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 9, p 2, Thu, July 14, 1988.

Buchanan, R. W., Pryor, B., Taylor, K. P., & Strawn, D. V. (1978). Legal communication: An investigation of juror comprehension of pattern jury instructions. Communication Quarterly, 26, 31-35.

Buckhout, R. (1973). Jury without peers (CR-2). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology.

Buckhout, R. (1977). Jury verdicts: Comparison of six vs. twelve person juries and unanimous vs. majority decision rule in a murder trial (CR-12). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology.

Buckhout, R. (1978). U.S. vs. Swinton: A case history in jury selection. In Sales, B. D. (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press.

Buckhout, R., Baker, E., Perlman, M., & Speigel, R. (1977). Jury attitudes and the death penalty. Social Action and the Law, 3, 80-81.

Buckhout, R., Licker, J., Alexander, M., Gambardella, J., Eugenio, P., & Kakoullis, B. (1979). Discretion in jury selection (pp. 176-196). In L. E. Abt & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), Social psychology and discretionary law. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Buckhout, Robert; Weg, Steve; Reilly, Vincent; Frohboese, Robinsue (1977). Jury verdicts: Comparison of 6- vs. 12-person juries and unanimous vs. majority decision rule in a murder trial. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 175-178

Bukoff, A. (1984). The effects of video camera techniques on the pre-deliberation judgments and perceptions of role-playing jurors (law, depositions, broadcasting). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

Burget, Lisa D., Control of jury. (Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-1985), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 74, No 3, pp 793-801, February, 1986,

Burget, Lisa D., Right to jury trial. (Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-1985), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 74, No 3, pp 776-792, February, 1986,

Burleigh, Nina, Appeals alleging biased juror selection on rise. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 244, p 1, Tue, December 15, 1987.

Burleigh, Nina, Court to hear jury bias case. (includes other Illinois Supreme Court cases), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, August 27, 1985,

Burleigh, Nina, Deliberations in mock trial raise questions about the value of jury system, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 209, p 1, Mon, October 26, 1987.

Burleigh, Nina, Jury waiver appeal argued. (People v. Smith) (Illinois), Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, January 9, 1985,

Burleigh, Nina, Prosecutors want right to jury trial. (Ill.), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, February 1, 1985,

Burns, L. (1976). The expressed attitudes of jurors toward jury duty.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley.

Burns, T. F. (1987). Evidence, procedure, and jury dispositions in civil commitment hearings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Burton, Nancy M.; Steadman, Henry J. (1978). Legal professionals' perceptions of the insanity defense. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 6, 173-187

Bush, Neal (1976). The case for expansive voir dire. Law and Psychology Review, 2 9-26

Bussiere, E. (1989). Social welfare and the courts: the dilemmas of liberalism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis

Byrd, Lee, Deaver judge postpones trial; blames media for interruption. (perjury trial of Michael K. Deaver), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 3, Fri, July 17, 1987.

Cabrera, Sigfredo A., Why the jury system is important to the legal system, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 5, p 4, Thu, January 7, 1988.

Caccacale, J. L. (1979). In re judicum parium: an analysis of jurors in criminal trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Calder, Bobby J.; Insko, Chester A.; Yandell, Ben (1974). The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 62-93

Call, J. E. (1985). Are federal courts more supportive of defendants' rights than state courts: the case of jury discrimination (federalism, judicial behavior). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

Call, John A., Handling the jury; the psychology of courtroom persuasion, Brief, Vol 16, No 3, pp 47(6), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Call, John A., Jury research: improving trial results, Trial Lawyers Quarterly, Vol 18, No 2-3, pp 33-48, June 22, 1987, - Summer-Fall.

Call, John A., Litigation research - a key to success at trial, For the Defense, Vol 29, No 5, pp 14-18, May, 1987.

Call, John A., The psychology of jury deliberations, Los Angeles Daily Journal Vol 101, No 26, p S28, Fri, February 5, 1988.

Call, John A., The psychology of jury deliberations, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 50, No 6, pp 590(4), June, 1987.

Call, John A., The trial as story; how jurors perceive what they see and hear during trial, Trial, Vol 22, No 11, pp 84(4), November, 1986.

Callans, Patrick J., Sixth Amendment - assembling a jury willing to impose the death penalty: a new disregard for a capital defendant's rights. (Supreme Court Review), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 76, No 4, pp 1027-1050, December 22, 1985, - Winter,

Callender, C. N. (1924). The selection of jurors; a comparative study of the methods of selection and the personnel of juries in philadelphia and other cities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Campbell, Enid, Jury secrecy and impeachment of jury verdicts. (part 1) (Great Britain), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 9, No 3, pp 132-155, June, 1985,

Campbell, Enid, Jury secrecy and contempt of court. (Australia), Monash University Law Review, Vol 11, No 4, pp 169-200, December, 1985,

Campbell, S. (1972). The multiple function of the criminal defense voir dire in Texas. American Journal of Criminal Law, 1.

Can't tell juries damage awards are non-taxable, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 104, July, 1985,

Cannito, J. A., & Becker, K. L. (1979). The case for limited use of polls in the jury selection process. Journal of Computers, Technology and Law, 7, 111-134.

Carr, James M., At Witt's end: the continuing quandary of jury selection in capital cases, Stanford Law Review, Vol 39, No 2, pp 427-460, January, 1987.

Carrizosa, Philip, Appeals court lifts federal restriction of civil jury trials; costs no justification, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Fri, June 27, 1986,

Carrizosa, Philip, Court refuses plea to pull ruling on jury trials cutoff, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Wed, December 24, 1986.

Carrizosa, Philip, Grand juries held subject to limits in releasing evidence. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 78, p 1, Tue, April 19, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, High court again curbs use of race in jury selection. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, August 20, 1985,

Carrizosa, Philip, High court asked to strike jury instruction's parole element. (includes other California cases), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 2, September 5, 1984,

Carrizosa, Philip, High court rejects new challenge to grand jury limits. (People v. Superior Court) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 81, p 1, Fri, April 22, 1988,.

Carrizosa, Philip, Justices struggle over jury selection: state high court hears arguments on ethnic representation on juries. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 74, p 8, Wed, April 13, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, Lucas embraces Wheeler reasoning in reversing death; black juror exclusions. (People v. Snow) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, No 257, p 1, Mon, December 28, 1987.

Carrizosa, Philip, Lucas ruling limits Bird court decision on eyewitnesses: no cross-racial effect? (California Supreme Court), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 131, p 1, Fri, July 1, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, Murder reversal sidesteps issue of aliens on juries. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, February 26, 1985,

Carrizosa, Philip, Results of study of smaller juries said inconclusive; but some contend 8 jurors cheaper, just as fair as 12; further testing asked, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, December 16, 1985,

Carroll, John S.; et al (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201

Carroll, John S.; et al (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201.

Carroll, K. R. (1981). Factors affecting juror response to the insanity defense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.

Cartwright, R. E. (1977). Jury selection. Trial, pp. 29-31.

Carver, C. A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and its relationship to jurors' decisions in sexual assault cases.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Caryl-Thomas, Eira, Conspiracy to defraud involving commission of substantive offence - whether indictable only as statutory conspiracy - trial by jury - when commencing. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 619-620, October, 1984,

Cason, Melodie M., When separate trials are ordered, jury findings on a primary claim for attorneys' fees are neither ress judicata nor collateral estoppel of a counterclaim for legal malpractice, South Texas Law Review, Vol 28, No 3, pp 671-688, May, 1987.

Casper, Jonathan D.; Benedict, Kennette; Perry, Jo L. (1989). Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 291-310

Castle, Linda L., Juries hit corporate and government defendants hardest, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 146, October, 1985,

Catano, Victor M. (1980). Impact on simulated jurors of testimony as a function of non evidential characteristics of witness and defendant. Psychological Reports, 46, 343-348

Catterall, Lee, Juries must be told who will pay damages. (Kaeo v. David) (Hawaii), The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 11, Mon, June 2, 1986,

Cavoukian, A. (1980). The influence of eyewitness identification evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Cavoukian, Ann; Heslegrave, Ronald J. (1980). The admissibility of polygraph evidence in court: Some empirical findings. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 117-131

Celebrezze, Frank D., Improper jury comments, Barrister, Vol 14, No 3, pp 52(5), June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Celebrezze, Frank D., Prosecutorial misconduct: quelling the tide of improper comment to the jury, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol 35, No 3, pp 237-247, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Celebrezze, Frank D., Prosecutorial misconduct: quelling the tide of improper comment to the jury, Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association, Vol 21, No 1, pp 51-56, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Center For jury Studies Newsletter. September 1982, 4(5), pp. 1-8.

Chapman, Sean, A significant step toward eliminating discrimination in the jury selection process, Arizona Law Review, Vol 29, No 4, pp 697-705, September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.

Chase, E. P. (1924). The political theory of the non-jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Chenoweth, Priscilla Read, A most curious set of jury instructions. (acquittals in organized crime case in New Jersey) (United States v. Accetturo), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 14, p 7, Thu, October 6, 1988.

Chiang, Harriet, New laws prompt updated jury instructions. (Calif.), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 3, Thu, July 10, 1986,

Chiang, Harriet, Study says juries disfavor business in civil lawsuits, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, July 23, 1985,

Chiang, Harriet, Survey finds slower growth in big verdicts, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 3, Fri, December 26, 1986.

Chiapuzio, Marianne, Peremptory challenges based on group bias violates a defendant's right to be tried by a representative cross section of the community. (California Supreme Court Survey September 1986-November 1986), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14, No 3, pp 716-721, March, 1987.

Chicago lawyers prove that the jury system works well in a lawsuit against a telephone company whose willful and wanton acts of negligence in 1967 resulted in two deaths thirteen years later. (Illinois), ATLA Law Reporter, Vol 30, No 10 pp 456-457, December, 1987.

Chin, Beverly A., Limiting the defense's use of peremptory challenges, Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol 8, No 1, pp 103-119, January, 1988, - Winter.

Choosing capital juries: a case of clear thinking. (from Los Angeles Herald-Examiner), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 4, Thu, May 8, 1986,

Christie, R. (1977). Probability v. precedence: The social psychology of jury selection. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books (D. C. Heath & Co.), 265-281.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

Ciolek, T. Matthew (1983). The proxemics lexicon: A first approximation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 55-79

Circuit court voids verdict by judge, orders jury trial. (Gargiulo v. Delsole), New York Law Journal, Vol 194, p 1, July 29, 1985,

Clancy, Kevin W., Jury instructions - presumptions of intent. (1986 Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law: 1986), Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law, Vol 33, pp 62-70, January, 1986, - Annual,

Clarke, David B. (1986). Voluntary euthanasia and the Hemlock Society. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1503

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1985). Another look at the impact of juror sentiments toward defendants on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 637-651

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1985). Another look at the impact of juror sentiments toward defendants on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 637-651.

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1980). Effects of evidence withholding and a defendant's prior record on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 237-245

Clyne, S. F. (1982). The judicial evaluation model: a case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.

Cobb, Priscilla L., Race discrimination and jury selection. (Equal Protection, part 2), Annual Survey of American Law, Vol 1987, No 1, pp 67-92, June, 1988.

Codefendant confessions and the demise of confrontation, Harvard Law Review, Vol 101, No 8, pp 1876-1894, June, 1988.

Cohen, David L.; Peterson, John L. (1981). Bias in the courtroom: Race and sex effects of attorneys on juror verdicts. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 81-87

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.

Cohen, Jeremy; Mutz, Diana; Price, Vincent; Gunther, Albert (1988). Perceived impact on defamation: An experiment on third person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173

Cohen, Jeremy; Mutz, Diana; Price, Vincent; Gunther, Albert (1988). Perceived impact on defamation: An experiment on third person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.

Cohen, Joel, Legal issues in jury tampering - who shares the responsibility?, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 42, p 1, Fri, March 4, 1988.

Cohen, Joel, Subpoenaing grand jury targets chilling right to 5th Amendment, New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Wed, June 3, 1987.

Cohen, Mark A. (1988). Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law and Society Review, 22, 537-555

Cohen, Mark A., Pain, suffering, and jury awards: a study of the cost of crime to victims, Law & Society Review, Vol 22, No 3, pp 537-555, October, 1988.

Colasanto, D., & Sanders, J. (1978). Methodological issues in simulated jury research. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association meeting.

Coleman, Ron, Watch out for flying drumsticks. (jury awards), Student Lawyer, Vol 15, No 5, pp 3(2), January, 1987.

Colquitt, J. A. (1987). Reception and use of social science evidence in the trial court. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.

Conley, L. M. (1985). Discretionary justice: sources of sentence disparity (decisions, psychological jurisprudence, criminology). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

Connolly, Terry (1987). Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 101-112

Connolly, Terry (1987). Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 101-112.

Connolly, Terry, Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 2, pp 101-112, June, 1987.

Connor, Xavier, Trial by jury - can it survive? (Australia), Law Institute Journal, Vol 61, No 8, pp 818(2), August, 1987.

Connors, Gerard J.; Ranish, Steven S.; Maisto, Stephen A. (1982). Alcohol and victim compensation as determinants of responsibility attribution in traffic accidents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43, 1251-1256

Connors, M. M. (1976). Video technology in the courts: the effects on jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Conour, William F., Misdemeanor jury trials - waiver. (Indiana), Res Gestae, Vol 32, No 2, pp 80(2), August, 1988.

Conrad, Mark, American juries on trial: faces of American justice., (book reviews), New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 5, PUBLISHER Dembner Books, November 16, 1984,

Constable, M. (1989). The jury 'De medietate linguae': Changing conceptions of law and citizenship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Constantini, E., & King J. (1980/1981). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 15, 9-40.

Cook, Alberta I., Ga. jury accepts verbal-abuse defense, The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 3, Mon, December 1, 198.

Cook, Alberta I., Judges more willing to cut jury awards; argument against caps? The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 3, Mon, July 20, 1987.

Cook, Alberta I., Newspaper to appeal jury finding of bias. (New York Daily News), The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 9, Mon, April 27, 1987.

Cooper, Alan, Grand jury given access to civil depositions. (Foremost Guaranty Corp. v. Community Savings & Loan), The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 24, p 10, Mon, February 22, 1988.

Cooper, Cynthia, Jury system - people in the trenches. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 121, p 1, Fri, June 24, 1988.

Cooper, Toni, The juror gods. (personal narrative of jury duty) (Delaware), Delaware Lawyer, Vol 5, No 4, pp 40(2), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Cope, Virginia, Can jurors ignore inadmissible evidence?, Trial, Vol 24, No 9, pp 80(4), September, 1988.

Corboy, Philip H.; Abbott, Walter F.; Droll, David; Mugler, Molly S.; Gidmark, David, Mock trials, community attitude surveys, shadow juries: a round table discussion, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 10-20, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Corder, Billie F.; Whiteside, Reid (1988). A survey of jurors' perception of issues related to child sexual abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6, 37-43

Corder, Billie F.; Whiteside, Reid

Cornelius, A. L. (1932). Trial tactics. New York: Bender.

Cornish, Richard C., Right to a civil jury trial: state versus federal court, Colorado Lawyer, Vol 17, No 1, pp 39(4), January, 1988.

Costantino, M. A. (1982). Abolish lawyers' voir dire of juries. Litigation, 8(3), 5-7.

Coulter, James A., III, It is reversible error to refuse a jury instruction when the defendant's identification is crucial to the issue of guilt. (California Supreme Court Survey December 1986-February 1987), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14 No 4, pp 1070-1071, May, 1987.

Counsel must divulge fee information to grand jury, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 96, July, 1985,

County Court of Ulster County v. Allen. 442 U.S. 140 (1979).

Couric, Emily, Jury sleuths: in search of the perfect panel, The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 1, Mon, July 21, 1986,

Courlander, Michael, The effect of a defendant's suffering on jurors' verdicts, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 11, No 2, pp 35-39, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Court limits subpoenas to grand jury targets' lawyers. (reasonable need standard), ABA Journal, Vol 71, pp 96-97, July, 1985,

Court to decide if white jury was fair to black defendant, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 195, p 1, Wed, October 5, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Alleged bias of disqualified juror. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 3, pp 283-285, August, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Alternative verdicts. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 171-172, May, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Communications between judge and jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 34-36, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Decision to jury on alternative charges. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 3, pp 274-276, August, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on causing grievous bodily harm. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 163-164, May, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on charge of conspiracy. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 2, pp 143-145, May, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on unanimity and majority verdict. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 36-37, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction to jury on lying alibi. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 3, pp 234-235, August, 1986,

Coutts, J.A., Disqualification of a juryman. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 31-34, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Evidence implicating one or other co-defendant. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 4, pp 367-369, November, 1986.

Coutts, J.A., Unanimous verdict by a divided jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 1, pp 56-57, February, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., What unanimity is required of the jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 3, pp 230-232, August, 1986,

Coutts, J.A., When may a jury change its mind? (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 180-181, May, 1987.

Covey, K. H. (1980). Murder vs. Assault: verdicts, legal attitudes, and attributions of mock jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

Covington, Margaret, Jury selection: innovative approaches to both civil and criminal litigation, St. Mary's Law Journal, Vol 16, No 3, pp 575-599, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Covington, Margaret, Use of expert assistance in jury selection, Case & Comment, Vol 90, No 4, pp 20(5), July, 1985,

Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79.

Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C.; Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79

Cowan, Veronica; Birch, D.J., Previous statement - admissions and exculpatory - whether whole statement admissible - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 303-305, May, 1988.

Cowan, Veronica; Smith, J.C., Direction to jury - more than one factual basis for establishing offence or defence. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 177-181, March, 1988.

Cox, Gail Diane, Juries sympathetic in drug-test cases; appeals often favor employers. (Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.), The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 13, p 3, Mon, December 7, 198.

Cox, Gail Diane, No jury required in sanity cases for outpatient status. (In re Franklin) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Mon, November 3, 1986.

Cox, Michele; Tanford, Sarah (1989). Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of rules of admissibility. Social Behaviour, 4, 31-55

Cox, Michele; Tanford, Sarah (1989). An alternative method of capital jury selection. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 167-183

Cozen, Stephen A.; Selleck, Joann, Picking a jury in a punitive damages case, For the Defense, Vol 30, No 1, pp 13-18, January, 1988.

Craig, P. L. (1980). Insanity defense: attorneys' views. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming.

Crawford, R. F., JR. (1979). The relationship of self-actualization and jury bias.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.

Creech, Barry Lynn, Petit deliberation of grand jury discrimination. ( ), North Carolina Law Review, Vol 64, No 6, pp 1179-1195, August, 1986,

Crippen, Gary L., Juries on trial., (book reviews), Bench & Bar of Minnesota, Vol 42, No 9, p 35, PUBLISHER Dembner Books, October, 1985,

Critical information at a murder sentencing. (whether evidence of subsequent murder conviction can be used as aggravating factor when jury decides on capital punishment) (State v. Biegenwald) (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 1, p 6, Thu, July 7, 1988.

Crosson, R. F. (1966). An investigation into certain personality variables among capital trial jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.

Crosson, R. F. (1968). An investigation into certain personality variables among capital trial jurors. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

Crump, D. (1980). Attorney's goals and tactics in voir dire examination. Texas Bar Journal, 244-247.

Crump, Susan Waite, Jury misconduct, jury interviews, and the Federal Rules of Evidence: is the broad exclusionary principle of rule 606(b) justified?, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 66, No 3, pp 509-543, March, 1988.

Crump, Susan Waite, Lockhart v. McCree: the "biased but unbiased juror," what are the states' legitimate interests?, Denver University Law Review, Vol 65, No 1, pp 1-39, September 22, 1988, - Fall.

Cruse, Donna; Browne, Beverly A. (1987). Reasoning in a jury trial: The influence of instructions. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 129-133

Cruse, Donna; Browne, Beverly A. (1987). Reasoning in a jury trial: The influence of instructions. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 129-133.

Cruse, Donna; Leigh, Barbara C. (1987). "Adam's Rib" revisited: Legal and non legal influences on the processing of trial testimony. Social Behaviour, 2, 221-230

Cruz, Nestor, The Castaneda test in employment cases: a critique, Florida Bar Journal, Vol 61, No 7, pp 75(2), July, 1987.

Curran, John F., Jr., CPL 190.25(4); the disclosure of grand jury testimony in a subsequent civil action. (New York), St. John's Law Review, Vol 60, No 2, pp 303-399, January, 1986, - Winter,

Curtis, Calvin C., Are we making the dictionary a defendant's best friend? (Colorado), Journal of Contemporary Law, Vol 12, No 2, pp 261-269, January, 1987 - Winter.

Cutler, B. L. (1987). Juror memory, knowledge, inference, and decisionmaking in eyewitness identification cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1985). Calibrating confidence and accuracy: Recognizing faces. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Schmolesky, J. M. (1988). Presumption instructions and juror decision making. Forensic Reports, 1, 165-192.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decisionmaking in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1986a). The reliability of eyewitness identifications: Effects of encoding variables. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1986b). Increasing the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Schmolesky, J. N. (1985). Presumption instructions and juror decisionmaking. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & O'Rourke, T. E., & Martens, T. K. (1985). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Unpublished manuscript.

Cutler, B.L., Dexter, H.R., & Penrod, S.D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215-225.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. Nonadversarial methods for sensitizing jurors to eyewitness evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.

Cutler, Brian L.; Dexter, Hedy R.; Penrod, Steven D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215-225

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Dexter, Hedy R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Dexter, Hedy R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Stuve, Thomas E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Stuve, Thomas E., Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 41-55, March, 1988.

Czukar, Gail (1983). Legal aspects of parenthood for mentally retarded persons. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 2, 57-69

Dane, Francis C. (1985). In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 141-158

Dane, Francis C. (1985). In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 141-158.

Dane, Francis C., In search of reasonable doubt. (jury decision making models), Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, pp 141-158, June, 1985,

Daniel, Jozef; Sarmany, Ivan; Zelman, Juraj (1977). Subjects' attitudes towards psychological experiments. Studia Psychologica, 19, 13-18

Daniels, Stephen; Martin, Joanne, Civil jury awards are not out of control, Judges Journal, Vol 26, No 1, pp 10(9), January, 1987, - Winter.

Daniels, Stephen; Martin, Joanne, Jury verdicts and the "crisis" in civil justice. (The Litigation Explosion Debate), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 3, pp 321-348, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Dantin, J. W. (1983). Effects of the timing of judicial instruction on jury outcome. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi.

Darby, Bruce W.; Jeffers, Devon (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39-50

Darby, Bruce W.; Jeffers, Devon (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39-50.

Darrow, C. (May, 1936). Attorney for the defense. Esquire Magazine. Reprinted in California Trial Lawyers Journal, 1974-1975.

Davidson, Victor Curtis, II, Constitutional law: jury selection - death-qualified juries held constitutional, Cumberland Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 257-273, January, 1987, - Winter.

Davis, B. E., & Wiley, R. E. (1967). Thoughts on jury selection. Journal of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia, 34, 15-20.

Davis, Donald A.; Willey, Larry C., The federal grand jury: friend or foe? (Criminal Law: Issues and Ideas), Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 65, No 1, pp 58-63, January, 1986,

Davis, J. H. (1984). Order in the courtroom. In D. J. Muller, D. E. Blackman, & A. J. Chapman (Eds.) Psychology and the law, Chichester, G. B.: Wiley.

Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Holt, R. W., & Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of six- and twelve-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14.

Davis, J. H., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Robertson, B. (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012.

Davis, James H.; et al (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5)y,1003-1012.

Davis, James H.; et al (1977). Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 346-365

Davis, James H.; et al (1975). The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14

Davis, James H.; et al (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012

Davis, James H.; Holt, Robert W.; Spitzer, Craig E.; Stasser, Garold (1981). The effects of consensus requirements and multiple decisions on mock juror verdict preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 1-15

Davis, James H.; Kameda, Tatsuya; Parks, Craig; Stasson, Mark; et al (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1000-1012

Davis, James H.; Stasser, Garold; Spitzer, Craig E.; Holt, Robert W. (1976). Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1177-1187

Davis, James H.; Stasson, Mark F.; Ono, Kaoru; Zimmerman, Suzi (1988). Effects of straw polls on group decision making: Sequential voting pattern, timing, and local majorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 918-926.

Davis, James R., Inside the jury., (book reviews), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 76, No 1, pp 254-256, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Davis, Paul L. (1972). The insanity defense and its burden of proof in the state of Alaska. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 11-25

Davis, R. W. (1979). The influence of pretrial publicity and trial timing on the deliberation process and verdicts of simulated jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.

Davis, Roger W. (1986). Pretrial publicity, the timing of the trial, and mock jurors' decision processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 590-607

Davis, S. K. P. (1977). The impact of jury service on support for the local court system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.

De Carmine, India, Battered-woman-syndrome testimony and the jury: the question of admissibility, New York Law School Law Review, Vol 32, No 1, pp 79-109, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

De Falla, Emily M., Voir dire for California's civil trials: applying the Williams standard, Hastings Law Journal, Vol 39, No 2, pp 517-553, January, 198.

Death penalty foes can be kept off juries, High Court rules, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 17, No 10, pp 4-5, May 15, 1986,

DeBenedictis, Don J., Novel jury test staged in Seattle venue dispute, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 114, p 20, October 22, 1984,

DeBenedictis, Don J., Punitive awards found increasing in business cases; but new study says juries less generous for personal injuries; Los Angeles is leader Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Tue, March 24, 1987.

DeBenedictis, Don J., Rand study finds juries compensate injuries inequitably: 9,000 verdicts studied. (Illinois), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 1, October 31, 1984,

Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and conficence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, K. (1983). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, Kenneth A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260

Deffenbacher, Kenneth A.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15-30

Deitz, Sheila R.; Blackwell, Karen T.; Daley, Paul C.; Bentley, Brenda J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372-384.

Deitz, Sheila R.; Blackwell, Karen T.; Daley, Paul C.; Bentley, Brenda J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372-384

Deitz, Sheila R.; Byrnes, Lynne E. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. Journal of Psychology, 108, 17-29

Deitz, Sheila R.; Sissman, Peter L. (1984). Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 423-434

Deitz, Sheila R.; Sissman, Peter L. (1984). Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 423-434.

Demarest, Sylvia M.; Jones, David E., Exemplary damages as an instrument of social policy: is tort reform in the public interest? (Texas) (Symposium: Developments in Tort Law and Tort Reform), St. Mary's Law Journal, Vol 18, No 3, pp 797-834, January, 1987, - Winter.

Demetrio, Thomas A., Should juries decide complex cases?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 2, March 5, 1985,

Demetriou, Andreas; Charitides, Leonidas (1986). The adolescent's construction of procedural justice as a function of age, formal thought and sex. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 333-353

Denton, Herbert H., Libel juries often trip over concept of 'malice'; issue proves difficult in Sharon case. (Ariel Sharon vs. Time), Washington Post, Vol 108, p A9, Wed, January 23, 1985,

Deosaran, Ramesh (1984). Towards a social psychology of trial by jury. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 343-360.

Deosaran, Ramesh (1984). Towards a social psychology of trial by jury. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 343-360

DeSanto, James J., Improving the jury selection process. (from 1984 Allerton House Conference on the Civil Jury Trial in Illinois), Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 73, No 3, pp 162-164, November, 1984,

DeTurck, Mark A.; Texter, Lynne A.; Harszlak, Janet J. (1989). Effects of information processing objectives on judgments of deception following perjury. Special Issue: Social cognition and communication. Communication Research, 16, 434-452

Deutsch, Michael E., The improper use of the federal grand jury: an instrument for the internment of political activists. (Symposium on the Grand Jury), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 75, No 4, pp 1159-1196, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Devine, Foy R., Inside the jury room; deliberations of a mock jury, Trial, Vol 24, No 9, pp 74-78, September, 1988.

Devine, Patricia G.; Ostrom, Thomas M. (1985). Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 5-21

Devitt, E. J., & Blackmar, C. B. (1977). Federal jury practice and instructions (Vol. 1). St. Paul, MN: West.

Devlin, Lord, Trial by jury for fraud. (Great Britain), Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 6, No 3, pp 311-321, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Devlin, P. (1966). Trial by jury. London: Stevens & Sons.

Diamond, S. S. (1974). A jury experiment reanalyzed. Journal of Law Reform, 7, 520-532.

Diamond, S. S., & Zeisel, H. (1974). A courtroom experiment on juror selection and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 276-277.

Diamond, Shari S. (1982). Growth and maturation in psychology and law. Law and Society Review, 17, 11-22

Diamond, Shari S.; Stalans, Loretta J. (1989). The myth of judicial leniency in sentencing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 73-89

Diamond, Shari S.; Zeisel, Hans (1974). A courtroom experiment on juror selection and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 276-277

Dickerson, Brian, Bar request raises issue of jury bias, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 6, April 22, 1985,

Dickerson, R. E. (1973). A study of the petit jury as a true cross section of the community.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

Dickson, D. J. (1988). Autonomy, discretion and representation: a comparative study of jury development in athens, england, and the united states of america. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

DiGennaro, Judith, Anatomy of a Jury: the System on Trial, Criminal Justice Journal, Vol 9, No 2, pp 391-393, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Dillard, Nancy D., The death knell of the insurmountable burden. (discriminatory jury selection), Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol 31, No 2, pp 473-506, January, 1987, - Winter.

Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1980, November). Voir dire: Courtroom realities and social science research. Paper presented at the meeting of American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, California.

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179-191

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179-191.

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T., Jury experience and jury verdicts, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, pp 179-191, June, 1985,

Dillon, William D., Grand jury investigations in RICO cases: a myriad of ethical considerations, Journal of the Legal Profession, Vol 11, pp 155-167, January, 1986, - Annual,

DiMona, J. (1974, July 8). The real surprise of the Mitchell-Stans trial. New York, pp. 31-37.

Disney, Mitchell F., A black criminal defendant is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right where a branch court limits its jury selection pool. (California Supreme Court Survey December 1986-February 1987), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14 No 4, pp 1023-1025, May, 1987.

District Court usurped jury's function in police-demotion case. (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 10, p 11, Mon, July 13, 1987.

Dombroff, Mark A., Jury instructions can be crucial in trial process, Legal Times, Vol 7, p 26, February 25, 1985,

Donohoe, M. C. (1986). Jurors' decisions in a simulated trial of the pms defense: Background characteristics and attitudes toward menstruation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Donovan, J. (1975, Winter). Modern jury trials and advocates. 1887, 227. Cited in G. Mariana, Peremptory challenge -- Divining Divining rod for a sympathetic jury? The Catholic Lawyer, 21, 56-81.

Doob, A. N., & Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). Some empirical evidence on the effect of s.12 of the Canada evidence act upon an accused. The Criminal Law Quarterly, 15, 88-95.

Dow, P. E. (1978). A study of the juror interaction process in criminal trials.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.

Dowdle, M., Gillen, H., & Miller, A. (1974). Integration and attribution theories as predictors of sentencing by a simulated jury. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1(1), 270-272.

Dowdle, Michael D.; Gillen, H. Barry; Miller, Arthur G. (1974). Integration and attribution theories as predictors of sentencing by a simlulated jury. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 270-272

Downing, Mary Beth, Civil contempt and the federal grand jury, New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, Vol 13, No 1, pp 69-87, January, 1987, - Winter.

Dravin, L. P. (1982). Effect of sex of defendant, sex of expert witness and type of crime on judicial decisions: a mock jury study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.

Dresslar, Tom, Bill to increase privacy of jurors draws opposition: trial lawyers, media fear threat to rights to know, fair trial; rule uniformity sought. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 94, p 1, Wed, May 11, 1988.

Druff, James H., The cross-section requirement and jury impartiality, Calif. L. Rev., Vol 73, No 5, pp 1555-1596, October, 1985,

Ducat, C. R. (1970). Dimensions of jurisprudence and judicial decision-making in the law of obscenity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Dudley, R. L. (1980). Explanations of judicial decision making: testing the psychometric model against case law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

Due-care presumption held to be outmoded. (Rice v. Shuman) (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 10, p 1, Mon, January 5, 1987.

Duggan, L. M., III. (1987). Jurors' perception of children in a child sexual abuse trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Dunham, Roger G.; Alpert, Geoffrey P.; Connors, Darrell J., Black representation on juries in Miami. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 79-88, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Dunn, Ian M., Letters. (jury) (Australia), Legal Service Bulletin, Vol 11, No 1, p 42, February, 1986,

Durand, R. M., & Bearden, W. O. (1979). Juror usage: A moderator of perceptions of jury service. Journal of Social Psychology, 107, 143-144.

Durand, R. M., Bearden, W. O., Ashworth, G. E., & Gustafson, A. W. (1978). Attitudinal and normative beliefs underlying individual perceptions of juror service. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 207-213.

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O.; Gustafson, A. William (1978). Previous jury service as a moderating influence on jurors' beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Reports, 42, 567-572

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O. (1979). Juror usage: A moderator of perceptions of jury service. Journal of Social Psychology, 107, 143-144

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O.; Ashworth, G. Edward; Gustafson, A. William (1978). Attitudinal and normative beliefs underlying individual perceptions of juror service. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 207-213

Dyer, Billy Coe, The jury on the quarterdeck: the effect of pleading admiralty jurisdiction when a proceeding turns hybrid, Texas Law Review, Vol 63, No 3, pp 533-564, November, 1984,

Dyner, Mark, Jury trial required in statutory civil penalty actions, Utah Law Review, Vol 1988, No 2, pp 435-454, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Eakin, Beth A. (1975). An empirical study of the effect of leadership influence on decision outcomes in different sized jury panels. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 109-126

Ebbesen, E., & Konecni, V. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts. The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805-821.

Ebner, D. L. (1983). Can the accuracy of memory in an eyewitness be predicted?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

Edelman, Paul S., Death on High Seas Act: jury trials, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 106, p 3, Fri, June 3, 1988.

Edinger, J. A., & Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 30-56.

Efran, Michael G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54

Egeth, Howard E.; McCloskey, Michael (1984). The jury is still out: A reply to Deffenbacher. American Psychologist, 39, 1068-1069.

Eisland, Marla, The Federal Magistrates Act: are defendants' rights violated when magistrates preside over jury selection in felony cases?, Fordham Law Review, Vol 56, No 4, pp 783-796, March, 1988.

Eisner, Donald A. (1984). Mental injury in workers' compensation: An examination of job stress. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 101-111

Elliott, Philip C., A judge's thoughts about criminal instructions. (Michigan), Cooley Law Review, Vol 5, No 1, pp 23-37, January, 1988.

Ellis, T.S., III; O'Brien, J. Thomas, Jr., Virginia's jury exemptions: ripe for reform, University of Richmond Law Review, Vol 20, No 4, pp 971-995, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Ellison, W. James (1987). State execution of juveniles: Defining "youth" as a mitigating factor for imposing a sentence of less than death. Law and Psychology Review, 11 1-38

Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Bukaty, Raymond M.; Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C. (1984). The death qualified jury and the defense of insanity. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 81-93

Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Bukaty, Raymond M.; Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C. (1984). The death qualified jury and the defense of insanity. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 81-93.

Elwork, A. (1977). Applying psychological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of jury instructions.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Co.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Co.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

English, Peter, Power to the jury? Some reflections on an aspect of homicide trials. (Great Britain), Bracton Law Journal, Vol 19, pp 30-36, January, 1987, - Annual.

Enright, Sean, Britain's reluctant jurors, New Law Journal, Vol 138, No 6367, pp 538(2), July 29, 1988.

Enright, William B., Don't create an adversarial arena. (jury selection), ABA Journal, Vol 70, pp 14(3), November, 1984,

Epstein, Jeffrey, Benefactor defense before the grand jury: the legal advice and incrimination theories of the attorney-client privilege, Cardozo Law Review, Vol 6, No 3, pp 537-582, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Epstein, Judith; Carne, John, On pretrial publicity, verdict 'not guilty': defendants don't suffer from press coverage, Legal Times, Vol 11, No 21, p 16, Mon, October 24, 1988, 07099399 .

Epstein, Judith; Carne, John, Pre-trial publicity: no harm to jury pool, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 18, p 6, Thu, November 3, 1988.

Erickson, Bonnie; Lind, E. Allan; Johnson, Bruce C.; O'Barr, William M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279

Erickson, Maynard L.; Gibbs, Jack P. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253-264

Espinosa, Philip J., Constitutional law - jury selection - prosecutor's peremptory challenges excluding every potential black juror violates defendant's right to trial by an impartial jury, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol 18, No 2, pp 463-476, January, 1987, - Winter.

Estes, A. W. (1977, Spring). Jury selection: How principles of modern psychology can help you get the jury you want. Journal of the Kansas Trial Lawyers, pp. 36-40.

Etzioni, A. (1974, May 26). Science: Threatening the jury trial. Washington Post, Sec. C, p. 3.

Etzioni, A. (1974, November/December). Creating an imbalance. Trial, 23 & 30.

Evans, Phil, A member of the jury. (Great Britain), Legal Action, pp 12-13, March, 1985,

Evans, Sandra S.; Lundman, Richard J. (1983). Newspaper coverage of corporate price fixing: A replication. Criminology An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 529-541

Fagan, Jeffrey (1990). Social and legal policy dimensions of violent juvenile crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 93-133

Fahringer, H. P. (1980, Summer). "In the valley of the blind" -jury selection in a criminal case. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 3, 34-54.

Fahringer, Herald Price, Jury Argument in Criminal Cases: a Trial Lawyer's Guide Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol 22, No 2, pp 188-192, PUBLISHER Azimuth Press, March, 1986,

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A. J. (1988). Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 1-17.

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A. J. (1988). Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 1-17

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A.J., Jr., Bayes' theorem in the trial process; instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 1-17, March, 1988.

Fairall, Paul, Murder - provocation - unwilled act - guidelines for written memorandum to jury. (South Australia), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 11, No 4, pp 231-233, August, 1987.

Falk, P. J. (1988). Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Fargo, Marjorie, Make the post-trial interview work for you: don't make the same mistake Delorean's prosecutors made, Criminal Justice, Vol 3, No 2, pp 2(7), June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Farmer, L. C. (1975). Juror evaluations as a function of live, color video, black and white video, audio, and transcript presentations of trial testimony.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.

Farmer, L. C., Williams, G. R., Cundick, B. P., Howell, R. J., Lee, R. E., & Rooker, C. K. (1977). The effect of the method of presenting trial testimony on juror decisional processes. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications, 59-76.

Farmer, L. C., Williams, G. R., Lee, R. E., Cundick, B. P., Howell, R. J., & Rooker, C. K. (1977). Juror perceptions of trial testimony as a function of the method of presentation. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books (D.C. Heath and Co.), 209-238.

Fattah, Ezzat A. (1983). Canada's successful experience with the abolition of the death penalty. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 421-431

Fattmann, Kenneth J. (1986). One short of a jury: The missing voice in an obstetrical case conference. Military Medicine, 151, 312-314

Faulkner, Larry R.; McFarland, Bentson H.; Bloom, Joseph D.; Stern, Thomas O. (1986). A method for quantifying and comparing civil commitment processes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 744-749.

Faulkner, Larry R.; McFarland, Bentson H.; Bloom, Joseph D.; Stern, Thomas O. (1986). A method for quantifying and comparing civil commitment processes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 744-749

Fayssoux, Kimberlye K., The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and trial by jury: proposals for change, Virginia Law Review, Vol 73, No 3, pp 601-630, April, 1987.

Federal courts experiment with jury procedures, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 15, No 19, pp 5-6, October 1, 1984,

Fehr, Lawrence A.; Fischer, Shelley M.; Stamps, Leighton E. (1987). Mock jurors' behavior: Sentencing as a function of jurors' guilt. Psychological Reports, 60, 727-731.

Fehr, Lawrence A.; Fischer, Shelley M.; Stamps, Leighton E. (1987). Mock jurors' behavior: Sentencing as a function of jurors' guilt. Psychological Reports, 60, 727-731

Feild, H. S. (1978). Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rape. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 73-93.

Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 261-284.

Feild, H. S., & Barnett, N. J. (1978). Simulated jury trials: Students vs. "real" people as jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 287-293.

Feild, Hubert S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261-284

Feild, Hubert S.; Barnett, Nona J. (1978). Simulated jury trials: Students vs. real people as jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 287-293

Feld, Barry C. (1983). Delinquent careers and criminal policy: Just deserts and the waiver decision. Criminology An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 195-212

Feld, Barry C. (1988). In re Gault revisited: A cross state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology (1987, Montreal Canada). Crime and Delinquency, 34, 393-424

Feldman, M. S. (1978). Juror competence through judicial instruction: effects of trial evidence, defendant background, and judicial instructions on the decisional behavior of simulated jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo.

Feldman, Robert S.; Chesley, Richard B. (1984). Who is lying, who is not: An attributional analysis of the effects of nonverbal behavior on judgements of defendant believability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 451-461

Feldman, S., & Wilson, K. (1981). The value of interpersonal skills in lawyering. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 311-324.

Fell, Gordon, The role of the jury in criminal cases - entrenched or vulnerable? (Australia), Sydney Law Review, Vol 11, No 2, pp 374-386, March, 198.

Feneck, N. (1977). Dogmatism and the ability of mock jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Fiala, J. F. (1983). Reactance effects in individual decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.

Field (1978).

Finch, Michael; Ferraro, Mark, The empirical challenge to death-qualified juries: on further examination, Nebraska Law Review, Vol 65, No 1, pp 21-74, January, 1986, - Winter,

Finkel, Norman J. (1988). Maligning and misconstruing jurors' insanity verdicts: A rebuttal. Forensic Reports, 1, 97-124

Finkel, Norman J. (1989). The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 403-419

Finkel, Norman J. (1990). De facto departures from insanity instructions: Toward the remaking of common law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 105-122

Finkel, Norman J.; Duff, Kevin B. (1989). The insanity defense: Giving jurors a third option. Forensic Reports, 2, 235-263

Finkel, Norman J.; Handel, Sharon F. (1988). Jurors and insanity: Do test instructions instruct? Forensic Reports, 1, 65-79

Finkel, Norman J.; Handel, Sharon F. (1989). How jurors construe "insanity." Law and Human Behavior, 13, 41-59

Finkel, Norman J.; Shaw, Ray; Bercaw, Susan; Koch, Juliann (1985). Insanity defenses: From the jurors' perspective. Law and Psychology Review, 1984, Fal 2, 435-449.

Finkel, Norman J.; Shaw, Ray; Bercaw, Susan; Koch, Juliann (1985). Insanity defenses: From the jurors' perspective. Law and Psychology Review, 9 77-92

Finlay, Belva, What's in a name? (jury selectio