AP-LS LINKS - Publishing

Publishing

Professional Organizations and Activities

Publishing - Jury Research

Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). S.12 of the Canada evidence act and the deliberation of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253.

Kohn, Alan, Conviction upset by challenges to get predominant black jury, New York Law Journal, Vol 193, p 1, May 16, 1985,

Postel, Theodore, Unpublished, revised jury instructions. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 179, p 1, Tue, September 13, 1988.

'Death-qualified' juries more likely to conflict?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, January 13, 1986,

Abbott, Walter F., Shadow juries: a checklist of practical decisions, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 10, No 3, pp 30-35, September 22, 1987, - Fal.

Abramovsky, Abraham, Peremptory challenges in New York, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 43, p 1, Mon, March 7, 1988.

Acker, J. R. (1987). The supreme court's use of social science research in criminal cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University Of New York, Albany.

Acker, James R. (1990). Social science in Supreme Court criminal cases and briefs: The actual and potential contribution of social scientists as amici curiae. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 25-42

Ackerman, Adele M.; McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Defendant characteristics and judgment behaviors of adolescent mock jurors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 123-130

Ackerman, Adele M.; McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Mock trial jury decisions as a function of adolescent juror guilt and hostility. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 195-201

Adkins, J. C. (1968-1969, December/January). An art? A science? Or luck? Trial, 37-39.

Adler, F. (1973, Winter). Socioeconomic factors influencing jury verdicts. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 1-10.

Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.

Ainsworth, Price; Miller, Mike C., Removing the blindfold: general verdicts and letting the jury know the effects of its answers. (appendix contains survey of state law) (Texas), South Texas Law Review, Vol 29, No 1, pp 233-261, October, 1987.

Alexander, M., & Licker, J. (1975, July). Jury selection: Finding rigid and flexible jurors and deciding if they are needed (Report No. CR-18). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology Report Series, Brooklyn College, C.U.N.Y.

Alker, H. R., Jr., Hosticka, C., & Mitchell, M. (1976). Jury selection as a biased social process. Law and Society Review, 11, 9-41.

Allen, R. J. (1982). Presumptions, inferences and burden of proof in federal civil actions--an anatomy of unnecessary ambiguity and a proposal of reform. Northwestern University Law Review, 76, 892-912.

Allison, Scott T.; Messick, David M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579

Amato, P. R. (1979). Juror-defendant similarity and the assessment of guilt in politically motivated crimes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 31, 79-88.

Amsterdam. (1976). Trial Manual for Defense of Criminal Cases. The American Law Institute.

Anderson, D. D. (1981). Defendant's past criminal record: effects of attributional information and judicial instructions on verdict-related judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Andrews, F. M. (1981). The influence of evidenciary and extraevidenciary factors on decisions in a simulated rape trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.

Andrews, L. B. (1952). Mind control in the courtroom. Psychology Today, March 1982, pp. 66-70; 73. Appleman, J. A. Chapter 7. In J. A. Appleman (Ed.),Successful jury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Angira, K. K. (1987). Effect of physical attractiveness on the Juridic judgement of male and female jurors. Indian Journal of Current Psychological Research, 2, 89-92.

Anthony, Philip K.; Vinson, Donald E., Demonstrative exhibits: a key to effective jury presentations, For the Defense, Vol 28, No 11, pp 13-17, November, 1986.

Antley, Roy, Unconstitutional presumptions in criminal trials may be harmless error, Houston Law Review, Vol 25, No 1, pp 203-216, January, 1988.

Appelbaum, Paul S. (1984). Standards for civil commitment: A critical review of empirical research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 133-144

Applegate, Joe, Rand study finds big jury awards frequently shrink, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Thu, July 9, 1987.

Appleman, J. A. (1952). Chapter 7. In J. A. Appleman (Ed.), Successful jury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Arbuthnot, Jack (1983). Attributions of responsibility by simulated jurors: Stage of moral reasoning and guilt by association. Psychological Reports, 52, 287-298.

Arbuthnot, Jack (1986). Jurors' views on due process and the death penalty: A sociomoral framework for voir dire and jury selection. Social Action and the Law, 12, 3-9, 27 30.

Arbuthnot, Jack, Jurors' views on due process and the death penalty: a sociomoral framework for voir dire and jury selection, Social Action and the Law Vol 12, No 1, pp 3-9, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Archer, Richard L.; Foushee, H. Clayton; Davis, Mark H.; Aderman, David (1979). Emotional empathy in a courtroom simulation: A person situation interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 275-291

Arden, P. K. (1984). Two methods of simulated jury selection: a comparison of information usage and decision-making strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School Of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

Are juries capricious? Study raises question, Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 7, p 3, December 17, 1984,

Arnold, Robert Paul, Discrimination in jury selection via peremptory challenge: many are called, but few are chosen, Northern Illinois University Law Review, Vol 5, No 1, pp 71-96, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Arnold. (May 5, 1974). How Mitchell-Stans jury reached acquittal vote. New York Times, 1, col. 6.

arter, P.B., Do courts decide according to the evidence? (Canada, Great Britain), University of British Columbia Law Review, Vol 22, No 2, pp 351-367, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Ashby, J. B. (1978). Juror selection and the sixth amendment right to an impartial jury. Creighton Law Review, 11, 1137-1168.

Asken, M. J. (1976). Psychology in the courtroom: jury instructions and the myth of jury decision by legal principle.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.

Atlas, David Y., The unanimous acquittal instruction: a rational approach to instructing jurors on lesser included offenses, Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol 16, No 2, pp 331-360, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Aubrey, M. (1989). Content analysis of jury deliberations in a child sexual abuse mock trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University Of New York, Buffalo.

Aubrey, Moss; Ewing, Charles P. (1989). Student and voter subjects: Differences in attitudes toward battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 289-297

Austin, Arthur D., What makes juries listen., (Book reviews), American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Vol 8, No 3, pp 509-514, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Austin, W. T. (1982). Portrait of a courtroom: Social and ecological impressions of the adversary process. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 286-302.

Babcock, B. A. (1975). Voir dire: Preserving "its wonderful power." Stanford Law Review, 27, 545-565.

Baer, Donald M. (1981). A hung jury and a Scottish verdict: "Not proven." Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 91-97

Bailey, F. L., & Rothblatt, H. B. (1974). Fundamentals of criminal advocacy. New York: The Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co.

Baker, E. (1984). Conviction proneness as a predictor of sworn juror decisions (jury selection, scientific). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University Of New York.

Baker, Paul M. (1984). Seeing is behaving: Visibility and participation in small groups. Environment and Behavior, 16, 159-184

Baker, Steven J., Jury impeachment: the illusory clerical error exception. (Mich.), University of Detroit Law Review, Vol 63, No 3, pp 499-516, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Balch, Robert W.; Giffiths, Curt T.; Hall, Edwin L.; Winfree, L. Thomas (1976). The socialization of jurors: The voir dire as a rite of passage. Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 271-273

Baldwin, J., & McConville, M. (1979). Trial by jury: Some empirical evidence on contested criminal cases in England. Law and Society Review, 13, 861-890.

Balkany, N. S. (1987). Perceived effectiveness of seven psychological interventions in trial preparation and courtroom performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union For Experimenting Colleges And Universities.

Ballew vs. Georgia. (1978, March 21). Opinions--The United States Law Week, 46, 4217-4223.

Bankart, C. Peter; Powers, Scott W. (1986). Individual decisions and group consensus. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 369-374

Bankhead, Missy Kelly, Peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude a group of persons from a jury based upon a group, rather than a specific, bias. (California Supreme Court Survey: June 1985 - August 1985), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 2, pp 530-531, January, 1986,

Bankhead, Missy Kelly, When there is evidence to justify a conviction of a lesser offense than the one for which the defendant is being tired, the trial must give jury instructions. (California Supreme Court Survey: 1985), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 2, p 501, January, 1986,

Barber, S. R. (1981). Chandler v. Florida: a social scientific, legal and historical evaluation of cameras in the courtroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

Barnett, Nona J.; Feild, Hubert S. (1978). Character of the defendant and length of sentence in rape and burglary crimes. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 271-277

Baron, C. H. (1972). Law and the fly-bottle: aspects of professor hart's jurisprudence of non-descriptive legal utterances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Barr, M. J. (1976). The perception and evaluation of information elicited in a jury trial.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yeshiva University.

Barrett, Curtis L.; Johnson, Phillip W.; Meyer, Robert G. (1985). Expert eyewitness, consultant, advocate: One role is enough. Social Action and the Law, 11, 56-57

Bartholomew, Allen A. (1981). Criminal intent and the psychologist. Australian Psychologist, 16, 413-422

Bartholomew, Allen A.; Badger, Philip; Milte, Kerry L. (1977). The psychologist as an expert witness in the criminal courts. Australian Psychologist, 12, 133-150

Baruch, M. N. (1985). Undoing the expert witness: effects of discrediting expertise and trustworthiness in ambiguous and unambiguous crime situations (eyewitness, credibility). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Basavaraju, K. (1988). Testimony expertise of clinical neuropsychologists vs. neurologists in a simulated personal-injury case. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Baumeister, Roy F.; Darley, John M. (1982). Reducing the biasing effect of perpetrator attractiveness in jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 286-292

Baumeister, Roy F.; Darley, John M. (1982). Reducing the biasing effect of perpetrator attractiveness in jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 286-292.

Bayly, M. J. (1988). The impact of opening statement presentation order and trial information content on jurors' evaluations of the trial and defendant. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

Bazelon, David L. (1975). A jurist's view of psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 3, 175-190

Beach, James M., Products liability - damages - jury must be charged as to present value principles when calculating value of future losses. (Survey of Recent Developments in New Jersey Law), Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 17, No 2, pp 493-495, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Bearden, W. D., & Durand, R. M. (1978). Beliefs and evauations underlying juror attitudes toward service. Law and Psychological Review, 4, 105-113.

Beattie, S. J. (1984). Alcohol as a mitigating factor in the commission of a crime: jury findings of culpability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.

Beauvais, C. G. (1982). Perceptions of rape victims in mock jury trials.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California State University, Fullerton.

Becker, T. L., Hildum, D. C., & Bateman, K. (1965). The influence of jurors' values on their verdicts: A courts and politics experiment. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 45, 130-140.

Beckham, B.; Aronson, H. (1978). Selection of jury foremen as a measure of the social status of women. Psychological Reports, 43, 475-478

Bedrick, D. M. (1980). Jury behavior as a function of the severity and nature of the defendant's prior criminal record. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

Begam, R. G. (1977). The attorneys. Judicature, 61, 71; 76-78.

Beit Hallahmi, Benjamin (1974). Treating the sex offender. Crime and Delinquency, 20, 33-37

Bell, B. E. (1988). Framing Statistical Testimony and Judgements of Liability and Damages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1985). Vivid persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 659-664.

Bell, Brad E.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of , minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679

Bell, Daniel J. (1985). Domestic violence: Victimization, police intervention, and disposition. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 525-534

Belli, M. M. (1954). Modern trials. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, (Supplement, 1966).

Belote, Farrald G., Jury research: spotting jurors who can hurt, Litigation, Vol 12, No 4, pp 17(4), June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Ben Shakhar, Gershon; Bar Hillel, Maya; Lieblich, Israel (1986). Trial by polygraph: Scientific and juridical issues in lie detection. Special Issue: Psychology in law enforcement. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 459-479

Ben-Veniste, R., & Frampton, G. (1977). Stonewall: The legal case against the Watergate conspirators. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Benezech, M. (1978). Considerations on acting out and the criminal liability of offenders loss of object, juridical mental alienation. Annales Medico Psychologiques, 136, 1184-1191

Bennett, C. E. (March/April, 1977). Psychological methods of jury selection in the typical criminal case. Criminal Defense, 4(2), 11-22.

Benokraitis, N. V. (1975). Institutional racism: An empirical study of blacks and the jury selection process in ten southern states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Benokraitis, Nijole (1982). Racial exclusion in juries. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 29-47

Berg, K., & Vidmar, N. (1975). Authoritarianism and recall of evidence about criminal behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 147-157.

Berg, Martin, Judge rules jury pools must have young, poor people for balance. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 10, Wed, July 8, 1987.

Berg, Martin, Juror misconduct gets closer look as trials lengthen; God and Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Tue, September 8, 1987.

Bergin, Allen E. (1980). Negative effects revisited: A reply. Professional Psychology, 11, 93-100

Bergman, Paul, The war between the states (of mind): oral versus textual reasoning, Arkansas Law Review, Vol 40, No 3, pp 505-544, January, 1987, - Winter.

Bergstein, Melvyn H., Courtroom psychology and jury selection., (book reviews), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 119, p 6, Thu, January 29, 1987.

Berk, R. A., Hennessy, M., & Swan, J. (1977). The vagaries and vulgarities of scientific jury selection: A methodological evaluation. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 143-158.

Berkow, Ellen Beth, Constitutional criminal procedure - self-incrimination - court may compel witnesses to testify before a grand jury who are immune from prosecution, University of Baltimore Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 186-195, September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Berman, Alan L. (1989). Malpractice. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior, 19, 395-402

Berman, J., & Sales, B. D. (1977). A critical evaluation of the systematic approach to jury selection. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 4, 219-240.

Bermant, G. (May, 1975). The notion of conspiracy is not tasty to Americans. Psychology Today, pp. 60-67.

Bermant, G., & Coppock, R. (1972-1973). Outcomes of six- and twelve-member jury trials: An analysis of 128 civil cases in the state of Washington. Washington Law Review, 48, 593-596.

Bermant, G., & Jacoubovitch, M. D. (1975). Fish out of water: A brief overview of social and psychological concerns about videotaped trials. Hastings Law Journal, 26, 999-1011.

Bermant, G., & Shapard, J. (1981). The voir dire examination, juror challenges, and adversary advocacy. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology: The trial process. 2. New

ork: Plenum.

Bermant, G., Chappell, D., Crockett, G. T., Jacoubovitch, M., & McGuire, M. (1975). Juror responses to prerecorded videotape trial presentations in California and Ohio. Hastings Law Journal, 26, 975-998.

Bermant, G., McGuire, M., McKinley, W., & Salo, C. (1974). The logic of simulation in jury research. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 224-233.

Bermant, G., Nemeth, C., & Vidmar, N. (1976). Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: D. C. Heath & Company.

Bermant, Gordon (1986). Two conjectures about the issue of expert testimony. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 97-100

Bermant, Gordon; McGuire, Mary; McKinley, William; Salo, Chris (1974). The logic of simulation in jury research. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 1, 224-233

Bernard, J. L. (1979). Interaction between the race of the defendant and that of jurors in determining verdicts. Law and Psychology Review, 5 103-111

Bernard, J. L.; Dwyer, W. O. (1984). Witherspoon v. Illinois : The court was right. Law and Psychology Review, 8 105-114

Bernard, John L.; Cohen, Robert; Lupfer, Michael. (1985). The influence of juror's level of moral reasoning and the nature of closing arguments in determining the verdict in a civil case: A report of two experiments. Law and Psychology Review, 1985, 15, 656-672.

Bernard, John L.; Cohen, Robert; Lupfer, Michael (1985). The influence of juror's level of moral reasoning and the nature of closing arguments in determining the verdict in a civil case: A report of two experiments. Law and Psychology Review, 9 93-102

Bernstein, Barton E.; McCutchan, Betty (1983). The grand jury vs. the social worker: Friends or enemies? Social Work, 28, 224-227

Berry, Robert M., Remedies to the dilemma of death-qualified juries, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Journal, Vol 8, No 3, pp 479-501, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Bersoff, Donald N. (1987). Social science data and the Supreme Court: Lockhart as a case in point. American Psychologist, 42, 52-58

Bevan, W. (1958). Leadership of the jury foreman. Journal of Public Law, 7, 419-449.

Bevan, W., Albert, R. S., Loiseaux, P. R., Mayfield, P. N., & Wright, G. (1958). Jury behavior as a function of the prestige of the foreman and the nature of his leadership. Journal of Public Law, 7, 419-449.

Biddle, W. Gregory (1988). Magwood v. Smith : The effect of a jury's failure to consider mitigating circumstances in a death penalty case. Law and Psychology Review, 12 151-158

Biddle, W. Gregory (1988). Magwood v. Smith : The effect of a jury's failure to consider mitigating circumstances in a death penalty case. Law and Psychology Review, 1987, Fal 5, 467-477.

Binder, Arnold (1983). Juvenile justice and juvenile offenders: An overview. Counseling Psychologist, 11, 65-67

Birch, D.J., Hostile witness - for the defendant - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 445-446, July, 1985,

Birch, D.J.; Bouldstridge, Julia, Confession - whether voir dire required - whether defence case must be put to witnesses on voire dire. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 196-198, March, 1987.

Birch, D.J.; Cowan, Veronica, Sexual offences - identification in issue - whether direction on corroboration necessary. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 688-690, October, 1988.

Biskind, E. L. (1976). How to prepare a case for trial. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Bjurstrom, Callie A., Letting the jury decide the question of extreme and outrageous conduct for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional Arizona Law Review, Vol 29, No 2, pp 361-372, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Blackman, Julie; Brickman, Ellen (1984). The impact of expert testimony on trials of battered women who kill their husbands. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 413-422

Blackmar, Charles B., Arbitrator' credibility calls and jury instructions, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol 30, No 1, pp 133-148, October, 1985,

Blanck, Peter D. (1987). The "process" of field research in the courtroom: A descriptive analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 337-358

Blauner, R. (1975). The sociology of jury selection. In A. F. Ginger (Ed.), Jury selection in criminal trials. Tiburon, CA: Law Press.

Bley, J. W. (1980). Effects of prior sex history and physical resistance evidence on verdicts of individuals and simulated juries in rape trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.

Blinder, M. (1978). Picking juries. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 1, 8-13.

Block, Gertrude (1982). The Hinckley trial and the fallacious presumptions of the insanity defense. Etc., 39, 222-238

Blodgett, Nancy, Stage fright: deal with fears before jury, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 26, October, 1985,

Bloom, Joseph D.; Rogers, Jeffrey L.; Manson, Spero M. (1982). After Oregon's insanity defense: A comparison of conditional release and hospitalization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 391-402

Blue, Lisa A.; Boudreaux, Joe N., The "liability crisis" and voir dire; how to find "tort-reform" proponents among prospective jurors, Trial, Vol 23, No 2, pp 59(2), February, 1987.

Blum, A. F. (1987). Ethnicity and the jury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Blunk, R. A., & Sales, B. D. (1977). Persuasion during the voir dire. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications.

Bodenhausen, Galen V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737

Bodenhausen, Galen V. (1988). Stereotypic biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737.

Bodin, H. S. (1954). Selecting a jury. New York: Practicing Law Institute.

Boehm, V. (1968). Mr. Prejudice, Miss Sympathy and the authoritarian personality: An application of psychological measuring to the problem of jury bias. Wisconsin Law Review, 734-750.

Boehnert, Caryl E. (1989). Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful insanity pleas. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 31-39

Boland, Barbara; Wilson, James Q. (1978). Age, crime, and punishment. Public Interest, 51 22-34

Bond, Patti, Why juries acquit some women who kill, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 4, March 5, 1985,

Bonner, J. T., JR., (1972). A study of the persuasion of juries by expert witnesses in condemnation cases. Ohio State University.

Bonora, B., & Krauss, E. (Eds.) (1979). Jurywork: Systematic techniques. U.S.A.: National Jury Project.

Boone, J. S. (1972). The effects of race, arrogance, and evidence on simulated jury decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Boor, Myron (1975). Effects of victim competence and defendant opportunism on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 301-302

Boor, Myron (1976). Effects of victim injury, victim competence, and defendant opportunism on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 100, 315-316

Bordens, K. The effect of a defendant's background characteristics and strength of evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors. Unpublished masters thesis.

Bordens, K.S. and Horowitz, I.A. (1983). Information processing in joined and severed trials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 351-370.

Bordens, Kenneth S.; Horowitz, Irwin A. (1986). Prejudicial joinder of multiple offenses: Relative effects of cognitive processing and criminal schema. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 243-258

Bordens, Kenneth S.; Horowitz, Irwin A. (1986). Prejudicial joinder of multiple offenses: Relative effects of cognitive processing and criminal schema. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 243-258.

Borgida, E. Legal reform of rape laws: Social psychological and constitutional considerations. Chapter to appear in L. Bickman (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Borgida, Eugene (1981). Legal reform of rape laws. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 2 211-241

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger (1988). The entrapment defense: Juror comprehension and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19-40.

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger (1988). The entrapment defense: Juror comprehension and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19-40

Borgida, Eugene; Park, Roger, The entrapment defense; juror comprehension and decision making, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 19-40, March, 1988.

Bottorff, Sarah, Study challenges Justice Dept. data on size of jury verdicts, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 21, Fri, May 30, 1986,

Boudouris, James (1988). Jury selection in Polk County, Iowa. Forensic Reports, 1, 237-258

Bowen, M. W. (1987). Eligible jurors' perceptions of liability for the negligent infliction of emotional distress to a bystander. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School Of Professional Psychology, Berkeley/Alameda.

Bowes, M. R. (1972). Voir dire: Strategy and tactics in the defense of social and political activists. Akron Law Review, 5, 265-294.

Boyle, D. J. (1942). The juridic effects of moral certitude on prenuptial guarantees. Unpublished doctoral disseration, Catholic University of America.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1976). A game theory approach to jury selection. Trial, 12, 47-49.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1976). A game theory approach to jury selection. Trial, 12, 47-49.

Brams, S. J., & Davis, M. D. (1978). Optimal jury selection: A game theoretic model for the exercise of peremptory challenges. Forthcoming in Operations Research.

Brand, A. H. (1985). Predicting juror bias and its effects on group deliberation, verdict, and recall of trial information (authoritarian trial). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Brandstatter, H., & Klein-Moddenborg, V. (1979). A modified proportional change model of attitude change by group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 363-380.

Braswell, Henry, The Texas approach to fundamental error in the criminal jury charge, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 48, No 3, pp 278(12), March, 1985,

Bray, R. M. (1974). Decision rules, attitude similarity, and jury decision-making.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Bray, R. M. (March, 1980). Attraction, believability, and mock juror judgments. Some data presented at Southeastern Psychological Association, Washington.

Bray, R. M., & Kerr, N. L. (in press). Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations. Law and Human Behavior.

Bray, R. M., & Noble, A. M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430.

Bray, R. M., Kerr, N. L., & Atkin, R. S. (1978). Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1224-1240.

Bray, Robert M.; et al (1978). The effects of defendant status on the decisions of student and community juries. Social Psychology, 41, 256-260

Bray, Robert M.; Noble, Audrey M. (1978). Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1424-1430

Breck, David F.; Wolk, Richard, Should summary jury trials be regularly used?, Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 66, No 11, pp 1096-1098, November, 1987.

Brekke, N. C. (1985). Expert scientific testimony in rape trials (rape trauma syndrome, lie detectors, jury decision-making, social judgment, myths). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Brekke, Nancy; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.

Brekke, Nancy; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386

Bremer, Celeste F.; Simmer, W. Scott, One day in court: suggestions for implementing summary jury trials in Iowa, Drake Law Review, Vol 36, No 2, pp 297-315, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Brenneman, Hugh W., Jr.; Wesoloski, Edward, Blueprint for a summary jury trial, Advocate (Idaho), Vol 30, No 1, pp 21(3), January, 1987.

Bridgeman, D. L., & Marlowe, D. (1979). Jury decision making: An empirical study based on actual felony trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 91-98.

Bridgeman, Diane L.; Marlowe, David (1979). Jury decision making: An empirical study based on actual felony trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 91-98

Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 1, 19-30.

Brigham, John C. , 47-56

Brigham, John C.; Bothwell, Robert K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19-30.

Brigham, John C.; Bothwell, Robert K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19-30

Brigham, John C.; WolfsKeil, Melissa P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349

Britt, S. H. (1935). The legal concept of intent: a study in psychological jurisprudence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.

Broder, Ivy E., Characteristics of million dollar awards: jury verdicts and final disbursements. (The Litigation Explosion Debate), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 3, pp 349-359, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Brodsky, Daniel J., Educating juries: the battered woman defence in Canada, Alberta Law Review, Vol 25, No 3, pp 461-476, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Brody, A. (1957). Selecting a jury--Art or blind-man's buff? Criminal Law Review, 4, 67-78.

Broeder, D. W. (1958). The University of Chicago jury project. Nebraska Law Review, 38, 744-761.

Broeder, D. W. (1965a). Plaintiff's family status as affecting juror behavior: Some tentative insights. Journal of Public Law, 14, 131-141.

Broeder, D. W. (1965b). Previous jury trial service affecting juror behavior. 138-143.

Broeder, D. W. (1965c). Voir dire examinations: An empirical study. Southern California Law Review, 38, 503-528.

Bronson, E. J. (1970). On the conviction proneness and representativeness of the death-qualified jury: An empirical study of Colorado veniremen. University of Colorado Law Review, 42, 1-32.

Bronson, E. J. (1980). Does the exclusion of scrupled jurors in capital cases make the jury more likely to convict? Some evidence from California. Woodrow Wilson Journal of Law, 3, 11-34.

Brooks, David, One-day, one-trial: are jurors inventing excuses? Getting out of jury duty. (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 120, p 1, Thu, August 27, 1987.

Brooks, W., & Doob, A. (1975). Justice and the jury. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 171-182.

Browne, Paul, Albany kills effort to end mandatory jury sequestration. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 90, p 1, Wed, May 11, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Anti-prosecutor air seen in Albany: hopes fade on bill to limit immunity for grand jury witnesses, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 115, p 1, Thu, June 16, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Court defines rule for absent jurors: state appeals tribunal cautions trial judges. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 5, p 1, Fri, July 8, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Governor submits bill to end mandatory jury sequestering. (New York Governor Mario Cuomo), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 88, p 1, Mon, May 9, 1988.

Browne, Paul, State, DAs opposed on plan to lift witness immunity. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 74, p 1, Tue, April 19, 1988.

Browne, Paul, Study asked of juries in complex cases. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 9, p 2, Thu, July 14, 1988.

Buchanan, R. W., Pryor, B., Taylor, K. P., & Strawn, D. V. (1978). Legal communication: An investigation of juror comprehension of pattern jury instructions. Communication Quarterly, 26, 31-35.

Buckhout, R. (1973). Jury without peers (CR-2). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology.

Buckhout, R. (1977). Jury verdicts: Comparison of six vs. twelve person juries and unanimous vs. majority decision rule in a murder trial (CR-12). Brooklyn, New York: Center for Responsive Psychology.

Buckhout, R. (1978). U.S. vs. Swinton: A case history in jury selection. In Sales, B. D. (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum Press.

Buckhout, R., Baker, E., Perlman, M., & Speigel, R. (1977). Jury attitudes and the death penalty. Social Action and the Law, 3, 80-81.

Buckhout, R., Licker, J., Alexander, M., Gambardella, J., Eugenio, P., & Kakoullis, B. (1979). Discretion in jury selection (pp. 176-196). In L. E. Abt & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), Social psychology and discretionary law. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Buckhout, Robert; Weg, Steve; Reilly, Vincent; Frohboese, Robinsue (1977). Jury verdicts: Comparison of 6- vs. 12-person juries and unanimous vs. majority decision rule in a murder trial. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 10, 175-178

Bukoff, A. (1984). The effects of video camera techniques on the pre-deliberation judgments and perceptions of role-playing jurors (law, depositions, broadcasting). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

Burget, Lisa D., Control of jury. (Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-1985), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 74, No 3, pp 793-801, February, 1986,

Burget, Lisa D., Right to jury trial. (Fifteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1984-1985), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 74, No 3, pp 776-792, February, 1986,

Burleigh, Nina, Appeals alleging biased juror selection on rise. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 244, p 1, Tue, December 15, 1987.

Burleigh, Nina, Court to hear jury bias case. (includes other Illinois Supreme Court cases), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, August 27, 1985,

Burleigh, Nina, Deliberations in mock trial raise questions about the value of jury system, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 209, p 1, Mon, October 26, 1987.

Burleigh, Nina, Jury waiver appeal argued. (People v. Smith) (Illinois), Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, January 9, 1985,

Burleigh, Nina, Prosecutors want right to jury trial. (Ill.), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, February 1, 1985,

Burns, L. (1976). The expressed attitudes of jurors toward jury duty.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley.

Burns, T. F. (1987). Evidence, procedure, and jury dispositions in civil commitment hearings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Burton, Nancy M.; Steadman, Henry J. (1978). Legal professionals' perceptions of the insanity defense. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 6, 173-187

Bush, Neal (1976). The case for expansive voir dire. Law and Psychology Review, 2 9-26

Bussiere, E. (1989). Social welfare and the courts: the dilemmas of liberalism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis

Byrd, Lee, Deaver judge postpones trial; blames media for interruption. (perjury trial of Michael K. Deaver), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 3, Fri, July 17, 1987.

Cabrera, Sigfredo A., Why the jury system is important to the legal system, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 5, p 4, Thu, January 7, 1988.

Caccacale, J. L. (1979). In re judicum parium: an analysis of jurors in criminal trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Calder, Bobby J.; Insko, Chester A.; Yandell, Ben (1974). The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 62-93

Call, J. E. (1985). Are federal courts more supportive of defendants' rights than state courts: the case of jury discrimination (federalism, judicial behavior). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

Call, John A., Handling the jury; the psychology of courtroom persuasion, Brief, Vol 16, No 3, pp 47(6), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Call, John A., Jury research: improving trial results, Trial Lawyers Quarterly, Vol 18, No 2-3, pp 33-48, June 22, 1987, - Summer-Fall.

Call, John A., Litigation research - a key to success at trial, For the Defense, Vol 29, No 5, pp 14-18, May, 1987.

Call, John A., The psychology of jury deliberations, Los Angeles Daily Journal Vol 101, No 26, p S28, Fri, February 5, 1988.

Call, John A., The psychology of jury deliberations, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 50, No 6, pp 590(4), June, 1987.

Call, John A., The trial as story; how jurors perceive what they see and hear during trial, Trial, Vol 22, No 11, pp 84(4), November, 1986.

Callans, Patrick J., Sixth Amendment - assembling a jury willing to impose the death penalty: a new disregard for a capital defendant's rights. (Supreme Court Review), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 76, No 4, pp 1027-1050, December 22, 1985, - Winter,

Callender, C. N. (1924). The selection of jurors; a comparative study of the methods of selection and the personnel of juries in philadelphia and other cities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Campbell, Enid, Jury secrecy and impeachment of jury verdicts. (part 1) (Great Britain), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 9, No 3, pp 132-155, June, 1985,

Campbell, Enid, Jury secrecy and contempt of court. (Australia), Monash University Law Review, Vol 11, No 4, pp 169-200, December, 1985,

Campbell, S. (1972). The multiple function of the criminal defense voir dire in Texas. American Journal of Criminal Law, 1.

Can't tell juries damage awards are non-taxable, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 104, July, 1985,

Cannito, J. A., & Becker, K. L. (1979). The case for limited use of polls in the jury selection process. Journal of Computers, Technology and Law, 7, 111-134.

Carr, James M., At Witt's end: the continuing quandary of jury selection in capital cases, Stanford Law Review, Vol 39, No 2, pp 427-460, January, 1987.

Carrizosa, Philip, Appeals court lifts federal restriction of civil jury trials; costs no justification, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Fri, June 27, 1986,

Carrizosa, Philip, Court refuses plea to pull ruling on jury trials cutoff, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Wed, December 24, 1986.

Carrizosa, Philip, Grand juries held subject to limits in releasing evidence. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 78, p 1, Tue, April 19, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, High court again curbs use of race in jury selection. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, August 20, 1985,

Carrizosa, Philip, High court asked to strike jury instruction's parole element. (includes other California cases), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 2, September 5, 1984,

Carrizosa, Philip, High court rejects new challenge to grand jury limits. (People v. Superior Court) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 81, p 1, Fri, April 22, 1988,.

Carrizosa, Philip, Justices struggle over jury selection: state high court hears arguments on ethnic representation on juries. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 74, p 8, Wed, April 13, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, Lucas embraces Wheeler reasoning in reversing death; black juror exclusions. (People v. Snow) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, No 257, p 1, Mon, December 28, 1987.

Carrizosa, Philip, Lucas ruling limits Bird court decision on eyewitnesses: no cross-racial effect? (California Supreme Court), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 131, p 1, Fri, July 1, 1988.

Carrizosa, Philip, Murder reversal sidesteps issue of aliens on juries. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, February 26, 1985,

Carrizosa, Philip, Results of study of smaller juries said inconclusive; but some contend 8 jurors cheaper, just as fair as 12; further testing asked, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, December 16, 1985,

Carroll, John S.; et al (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201

Carroll, John S.; et al (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201.

Carroll, K. R. (1981). Factors affecting juror response to the insanity defense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.

Cartwright, R. E. (1977). Jury selection. Trial, pp. 29-31.

Carver, C. A. (1978). Psychological androgyny and its relationship to jurors' decisions in sexual assault cases.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Caryl-Thomas, Eira, Conspiracy to defraud involving commission of substantive offence - whether indictable only as statutory conspiracy - trial by jury - when commencing. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 619-620, October, 1984,

Cason, Melodie M., When separate trials are ordered, jury findings on a primary claim for attorneys' fees are neither ress judicata nor collateral estoppel of a counterclaim for legal malpractice, South Texas Law Review, Vol 28, No 3, pp 671-688, May, 1987.

Casper, Jonathan D.; Benedict, Kennette; Perry, Jo L. (1989). Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 291-310

Castle, Linda L., Juries hit corporate and government defendants hardest, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 146, October, 1985,

Catano, Victor M. (1980). Impact on simulated jurors of testimony as a function of non evidential characteristics of witness and defendant. Psychological Reports, 46, 343-348

Catterall, Lee, Juries must be told who will pay damages. (Kaeo v. David) (Hawaii), The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 11, Mon, June 2, 1986,

Cavoukian, A. (1980). The influence of eyewitness identification evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Cavoukian, Ann; Heslegrave, Ronald J. (1980). The admissibility of polygraph evidence in court: Some empirical findings. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 117-131

Celebrezze, Frank D., Improper jury comments, Barrister, Vol 14, No 3, pp 52(5), June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Celebrezze, Frank D., Prosecutorial misconduct: quelling the tide of improper comment to the jury, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol 35, No 3, pp 237-247, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Celebrezze, Frank D., Prosecutorial misconduct: quelling the tide of improper comment to the jury, Prosecutor, Journal of the National District Attorneys Association, Vol 21, No 1, pp 51-56, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Center For jury Studies Newsletter. September 1982, 4(5), pp. 1-8.

Chapman, Sean, A significant step toward eliminating discrimination in the jury selection process, Arizona Law Review, Vol 29, No 4, pp 697-705, September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79, 1306-1374.

Chase, E. P. (1924). The political theory of the non-jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Chenoweth, Priscilla Read, A most curious set of jury instructions. (acquittals in organized crime case in New Jersey) (United States v. Accetturo), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 14, p 7, Thu, October 6, 1988.

Chiang, Harriet, New laws prompt updated jury instructions. (Calif.), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 3, Thu, July 10, 1986,

Chiang, Harriet, Study says juries disfavor business in civil lawsuits, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 1, July 23, 1985,

Chiang, Harriet, Survey finds slower growth in big verdicts, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 3, Fri, December 26, 1986.

Chiapuzio, Marianne, Peremptory challenges based on group bias violates a defendant's right to be tried by a representative cross section of the community. (California Supreme Court Survey September 1986-November 1986), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14, No 3, pp 716-721, March, 1987.

Chicago lawyers prove that the jury system works well in a lawsuit against a telephone company whose willful and wanton acts of negligence in 1967 resulted in two deaths thirteen years later. (Illinois), ATLA Law Reporter, Vol 30, No 10 pp 456-457, December, 1987.

Chin, Beverly A., Limiting the defense's use of peremptory challenges, Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol 8, No 1, pp 103-119, January, 1988, - Winter.

Choosing capital juries: a case of clear thinking. (from Los Angeles Herald-Examiner), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 4, Thu, May 8, 1986,

Christie, R. (1977). Probability v. precedence: The social psychology of jury selection. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books (D. C. Heath & Co.), 265-281.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

Ciolek, T. Matthew (1983). The proxemics lexicon: A first approximation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 8, 55-79

Circuit court voids verdict by judge, orders jury trial. (Gargiulo v. Delsole), New York Law Journal, Vol 194, p 1, July 29, 1985,

Clancy, Kevin W., Jury instructions - presumptions of intent. (1986 Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law: 1986), Annual Survey of Massachusetts Law, Vol 33, pp 62-70, January, 1986, - Annual,

Clarke, David B. (1986). Voluntary euthanasia and the Hemlock Society. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1503

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1985). Another look at the impact of juror sentiments toward defendants on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 637-651

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1985). Another look at the impact of juror sentiments toward defendants on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 637-651.

Clary, E. Gil; Shaffer, David R. (1980). Effects of evidence withholding and a defendant's prior record on juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 237-245

Clyne, S. F. (1982). The judicial evaluation model: a case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College.

Cobb, Priscilla L., Race discrimination and jury selection. (Equal Protection, part 2), Annual Survey of American Law, Vol 1987, No 1, pp 67-92, June, 1988.

Codefendant confessions and the demise of confrontation, Harvard Law Review, Vol 101, No 8, pp 1876-1894, June, 1988.

Cohen, David L.; Peterson, John L. (1981). Bias in the courtroom: Race and sex effects of attorneys on juror verdicts. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 81-87

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Wiley.

Cohen, Jeremy; Mutz, Diana; Price, Vincent; Gunther, Albert (1988). Perceived impact on defamation: An experiment on third person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173

Cohen, Jeremy; Mutz, Diana; Price, Vincent; Gunther, Albert (1988). Perceived impact on defamation: An experiment on third person effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.

Cohen, Joel, Legal issues in jury tampering - who shares the responsibility?, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 42, p 1, Fri, March 4, 1988.

Cohen, Joel, Subpoenaing grand jury targets chilling right to 5th Amendment, New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Wed, June 3, 1987.

Cohen, Mark A. (1988). Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law and Society Review, 22, 537-555

Cohen, Mark A., Pain, suffering, and jury awards: a study of the cost of crime to victims, Law & Society Review, Vol 22, No 3, pp 537-555, October, 1988.

Colasanto, D., & Sanders, J. (1978). Methodological issues in simulated jury research. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association meeting.

Coleman, Ron, Watch out for flying drumsticks. (jury awards), Student Lawyer, Vol 15, No 5, pp 3(2), January, 1987.

Colquitt, J. A. (1987). Reception and use of social science evidence in the trial court. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.

Conley, L. M. (1985). Discretionary justice: sources of sentence disparity (decisions, psychological jurisprudence, criminology). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

Connolly, Terry (1987). Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 101-112

Connolly, Terry (1987). Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 101-112.

Connolly, Terry, Decision theory, reasonable doubt, and the utility of erroneous acquittals, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 2, pp 101-112, June, 1987.

Connor, Xavier, Trial by jury - can it survive? (Australia), Law Institute Journal, Vol 61, No 8, pp 818(2), August, 1987.

Connors, Gerard J.; Ranish, Steven S.; Maisto, Stephen A. (1982). Alcohol and victim compensation as determinants of responsibility attribution in traffic accidents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43, 1251-1256

Connors, M. M. (1976). Video technology in the courts: the effects on jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Conour, William F., Misdemeanor jury trials - waiver. (Indiana), Res Gestae, Vol 32, No 2, pp 80(2), August, 1988.

Conrad, Mark, American juries on trial: faces of American justice., (book reviews), New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 5, PUBLISHER Dembner Books, November 16, 1984,

Constable, M. (1989). The jury 'De medietate linguae': Changing conceptions of law and citizenship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Constantini, E., & King J. (1980/1981). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 15, 9-40.

Cook, Alberta I., Ga. jury accepts verbal-abuse defense, The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 3, Mon, December 1, 198.

Cook, Alberta I., Judges more willing to cut jury awards; argument against caps? The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 3, Mon, July 20, 1987.

Cook, Alberta I., Newspaper to appeal jury finding of bias. (New York Daily News), The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 9, Mon, April 27, 1987.

Cooper, Alan, Grand jury given access to civil depositions. (Foremost Guaranty Corp. v. Community Savings & Loan), The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 24, p 10, Mon, February 22, 1988.

Cooper, Cynthia, Jury system - people in the trenches. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 121, p 1, Fri, June 24, 1988.

Cooper, Toni, The juror gods. (personal narrative of jury duty) (Delaware), Delaware Lawyer, Vol 5, No 4, pp 40(2), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Cope, Virginia, Can jurors ignore inadmissible evidence?, Trial, Vol 24, No 9, pp 80(4), September, 1988.

Corboy, Philip H.; Abbott, Walter F.; Droll, David; Mugler, Molly S.; Gidmark, David, Mock trials, community attitude surveys, shadow juries: a round table discussion, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 10-20, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Corder, Billie F.; Whiteside, Reid (1988). A survey of jurors' perception of issues related to child sexual abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6, 37-43

Corder, Billie F.; Whiteside, Reid

Cornelius, A. L. (1932). Trial tactics. New York: Bender.

Cornish, Richard C., Right to a civil jury trial: state versus federal court, Colorado Lawyer, Vol 17, No 1, pp 39(4), January, 1988.

Costantino, M. A. (1982). Abolish lawyers' voir dire of juries. Litigation, 8(3), 5-7.

Coulter, James A., III, It is reversible error to refuse a jury instruction when the defendant's identification is crucial to the issue of guilt. (California Supreme Court Survey December 1986-February 1987), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14 No 4, pp 1070-1071, May, 1987.

Counsel must divulge fee information to grand jury, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 96, July, 1985,

County Court of Ulster County v. Allen. 442 U.S. 140 (1979).

Couric, Emily, Jury sleuths: in search of the perfect panel, The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 1, Mon, July 21, 1986,

Courlander, Michael, The effect of a defendant's suffering on jurors' verdicts, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 11, No 2, pp 35-39, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Court limits subpoenas to grand jury targets' lawyers. (reasonable need standard), ABA Journal, Vol 71, pp 96-97, July, 1985,

Court to decide if white jury was fair to black defendant, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 195, p 1, Wed, October 5, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Alleged bias of disqualified juror. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 3, pp 283-285, August, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Alternative verdicts. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 171-172, May, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Communications between judge and jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 34-36, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Decision to jury on alternative charges. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 3, pp 274-276, August, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on causing grievous bodily harm. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 163-164, May, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on charge of conspiracy. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 2, pp 143-145, May, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction on unanimity and majority verdict. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 36-37, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Direction to jury on lying alibi. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 3, pp 234-235, August, 1986,

Coutts, J.A., Disqualification of a juryman. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 52, No 1, pp 31-34, February, 1988.

Coutts, J.A., Evidence implicating one or other co-defendant. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 4, pp 367-369, November, 1986.

Coutts, J.A., Unanimous verdict by a divided jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 1, pp 56-57, February, 1987.

Coutts, J.A., What unanimity is required of the jury. (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 50, No 3, pp 230-232, August, 1986,

Coutts, J.A., When may a jury change its mind? (Great Britain), Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 51, No 2, pp 180-181, May, 1987.

Covey, K. H. (1980). Murder vs. Assault: verdicts, legal attitudes, and attributions of mock jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

Covington, Margaret, Jury selection: innovative approaches to both civil and criminal litigation, St. Mary's Law Journal, Vol 16, No 3, pp 575-599, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Covington, Margaret, Use of expert assistance in jury selection, Case & Comment, Vol 90, No 4, pp 20(5), July, 1985,

Cowan, C. L., Thompson, W. C., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79.

Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C.; Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (1984). The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 53-79

Cowan, Veronica; Birch, D.J., Previous statement - admissions and exculpatory - whether whole statement admissible - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 303-305, May, 1988.

Cowan, Veronica; Smith, J.C., Direction to jury - more than one factual basis for establishing offence or defence. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 177-181, March, 1988.

Cox, Gail Diane, Juries sympathetic in drug-test cases; appeals often favor employers. (Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.), The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 13, p 3, Mon, December 7, 198.

Cox, Gail Diane, No jury required in sanity cases for outpatient status. (In re Franklin) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 99, p 1, Mon, November 3, 1986.

Cox, Michele; Tanford, Sarah (1989). Effects of evidence and instructions in civil trials: An experimental investigation of rules of admissibility. Social Behaviour, 4, 31-55

Cox, Michele; Tanford, Sarah (1989). An alternative method of capital jury selection. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 167-183

Cozen, Stephen A.; Selleck, Joann, Picking a jury in a punitive damages case, For the Defense, Vol 30, No 1, pp 13-18, January, 1988.

Craig, P. L. (1980). Insanity defense: attorneys' views. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming.

Crawford, R. F., JR. (1979). The relationship of self-actualization and jury bias.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.

Creech, Barry Lynn, Petit deliberation of grand jury discrimination. ( ), North Carolina Law Review, Vol 64, No 6, pp 1179-1195, August, 1986,

Crippen, Gary L., Juries on trial., (book reviews), Bench & Bar of Minnesota, Vol 42, No 9, p 35, PUBLISHER Dembner Books, October, 1985,

Critical information at a murder sentencing. (whether evidence of subsequent murder conviction can be used as aggravating factor when jury decides on capital punishment) (State v. Biegenwald) (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 1, p 6, Thu, July 7, 1988.

Crosson, R. F. (1966). An investigation into certain personality variables among capital trial jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University.

Crosson, R. F. (1968). An investigation into certain personality variables among capital trial jurors. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

Crump, D. (1980). Attorney's goals and tactics in voir dire examination. Texas Bar Journal, 244-247.

Crump, Susan Waite, Jury misconduct, jury interviews, and the Federal Rules of Evidence: is the broad exclusionary principle of rule 606(b) justified?, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 66, No 3, pp 509-543, March, 1988.

Crump, Susan Waite, Lockhart v. McCree: the "biased but unbiased juror," what are the states' legitimate interests?, Denver University Law Review, Vol 65, No 1, pp 1-39, September 22, 1988, - Fall.

Cruse, Donna; Browne, Beverly A. (1987). Reasoning in a jury trial: The influence of instructions. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 129-133

Cruse, Donna; Browne, Beverly A. (1987). Reasoning in a jury trial: The influence of instructions. Journal of General Psychology, 114, 129-133.

Cruse, Donna; Leigh, Barbara C. (1987). "Adam's Rib" revisited: Legal and non legal influences on the processing of trial testimony. Social Behaviour, 2, 221-230

Cruz, Nestor, The Castaneda test in employment cases: a critique, Florida Bar Journal, Vol 61, No 7, pp 75(2), July, 1987.

Curran, John F., Jr., CPL 190.25(4); the disclosure of grand jury testimony in a subsequent civil action. (New York), St. John's Law Review, Vol 60, No 2, pp 303-399, January, 1986, - Winter,

Curtis, Calvin C., Are we making the dictionary a defendant's best friend? (Colorado), Journal of Contemporary Law, Vol 12, No 2, pp 261-269, January, 1987 - Winter.

Cutler, B. L. (1987). Juror memory, knowledge, inference, and decisionmaking in eyewitness identification cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1985). Calibrating confidence and accuracy: Recognizing faces. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Schmolesky, J. M. (1988). Presumption instructions and juror decision making. Forensic Reports, 1, 165-192.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decisionmaking in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1986a). The reliability of eyewitness identifications: Effects of encoding variables. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1986b). Increasing the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Schmolesky, J. N. (1985). Presumption instructions and juror decisionmaking. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & O'Rourke, T. E., & Martens, T. K. (1985). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Unpublished manuscript.

Cutler, B.L., Dexter, H.R., & Penrod, S.D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215-225.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. Nonadversarial methods for sensitizing jurors to eyewitness evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Cutler, B.L., Penrod, S.D., & Dexter, H.R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191.

Cutler, Brian L.; Dexter, Hedy R.; Penrod, Steven D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215-225

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Dexter, Hedy R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Dexter, Hedy R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185-191

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Stuve, Thomas E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41-55

Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D.; Stuve, Thomas E., Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 41-55, March, 1988.

Czukar, Gail (1983). Legal aspects of parenthood for mentally retarded persons. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 2, 57-69

Dane, Francis C. (1985). In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 141-158

Dane, Francis C. (1985). In search of reasonable doubt: A systematic examination of selected quantification approaches. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 141-158.

Dane, Francis C., In search of reasonable doubt. (jury decision making models), Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, pp 141-158, June, 1985,

Daniel, Jozef; Sarmany, Ivan; Zelman, Juraj (1977). Subjects' attitudes towards psychological experiments. Studia Psychologica, 19, 13-18

Daniels, Stephen; Martin, Joanne, Civil jury awards are not out of control, Judges Journal, Vol 26, No 1, pp 10(9), January, 1987, - Winter.

Daniels, Stephen; Martin, Joanne, Jury verdicts and the "crisis" in civil justice. (The Litigation Explosion Debate), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 3, pp 321-348, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Dantin, J. W. (1983). Effects of the timing of judicial instruction on jury outcome. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mississippi.

Darby, Bruce W.; Jeffers, Devon (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39-50

Darby, Bruce W.; Jeffers, Devon (1988). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39-50.

Darrow, C. (May, 1936). Attorney for the defense. Esquire Magazine. Reprinted in California Trial Lawyers Journal, 1974-1975.

Davidson, Victor Curtis, II, Constitutional law: jury selection - death-qualified juries held constitutional, Cumberland Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 257-273, January, 1987, - Winter.

Davis, B. E., & Wiley, R. E. (1967). Thoughts on jury selection. Journal of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia, 34, 15-20.

Davis, Donald A.; Willey, Larry C., The federal grand jury: friend or foe? (Criminal Law: Issues and Ideas), Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 65, No 1, pp 58-63, January, 1986,

Davis, J. H. (1984). Order in the courtroom. In D. J. Muller, D. E. Blackman, & A. J. Chapman (Eds.) Psychology and the law, Chichester, G. B.: Wiley.

Davis, J. H., Kerr, N. L., Atkin, R. S., Holt, R. W., & Meek, D. (1975). The decision processes of six- and twelve-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14.

Davis, J. H., Tindale, R. S., Nagao, D. H., Hinsz, V. B., & Robertson, B. (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012.

Davis, James H.; et al (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5)y,1003-1012.

Davis, James H.; et al (1977). Victim consequences, sentence severity, and decision processes in mock juries. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 18, 346-365

Davis, James H.; et al (1975). The decision processes of 6- and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1-14

Davis, James H.; et al (1984). Order effects in multiple decisions by groups: A demonstration with mock juries and trial procedures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1003-1012

Davis, James H.; Holt, Robert W.; Spitzer, Craig E.; Stasser, Garold (1981). The effects of consensus requirements and multiple decisions on mock juror verdict preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 1-15

Davis, James H.; Kameda, Tatsuya; Parks, Craig; Stasson, Mark; et al (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1000-1012

Davis, James H.; Stasser, Garold; Spitzer, Craig E.; Holt, Robert W. (1976). Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1177-1187

Davis, James H.; Stasson, Mark F.; Ono, Kaoru; Zimmerman, Suzi (1988). Effects of straw polls on group decision making: Sequential voting pattern, timing, and local majorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 918-926.

Davis, James R., Inside the jury., (book reviews), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 76, No 1, pp 254-256, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Davis, Paul L. (1972). The insanity defense and its burden of proof in the state of Alaska. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 11-25

Davis, R. W. (1979). The influence of pretrial publicity and trial timing on the deliberation process and verdicts of simulated jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.

Davis, Roger W. (1986). Pretrial publicity, the timing of the trial, and mock jurors' decision processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 590-607

Davis, S. K. P. (1977). The impact of jury service on support for the local court system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.

De Carmine, India, Battered-woman-syndrome testimony and the jury: the question of admissibility, New York Law School Law Review, Vol 32, No 1, pp 79-109, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

De Falla, Emily M., Voir dire for California's civil trials: applying the Williams standard, Hastings Law Journal, Vol 39, No 2, pp 517-553, January, 198.

Death penalty foes can be kept off juries, High Court rules, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 17, No 10, pp 4-5, May 15, 1986,

DeBenedictis, Don J., Novel jury test staged in Seattle venue dispute, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 114, p 20, October 22, 1984,

DeBenedictis, Don J., Punitive awards found increasing in business cases; but new study says juries less generous for personal injuries; Los Angeles is leader Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Tue, March 24, 1987.

DeBenedictis, Don J., Rand study finds juries compensate injuries inequitably: 9,000 verdicts studied. (Illinois), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 1, October 31, 1984,

Deffenbacher, K. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and conficence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, K. (1983). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.

Deffenbacher, Kenneth A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship? Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260

Deffenbacher, Kenneth A.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior? Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15-30

Deitz, Sheila R.; Blackwell, Karen T.; Daley, Paul C.; Bentley, Brenda J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372-384.

Deitz, Sheila R.; Blackwell, Karen T.; Daley, Paul C.; Bentley, Brenda J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372-384

Deitz, Sheila R.; Byrnes, Lynne E. (1981). Attribution of responsibility for sexual assault: The influence of observer empathy and defendant occupation and attractiveness. Journal of Psychology, 108, 17-29

Deitz, Sheila R.; Sissman, Peter L. (1984). Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 423-434

Deitz, Sheila R.; Sissman, Peter L. (1984). Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 423-434.

Demarest, Sylvia M.; Jones, David E., Exemplary damages as an instrument of social policy: is tort reform in the public interest? (Texas) (Symposium: Developments in Tort Law and Tort Reform), St. Mary's Law Journal, Vol 18, No 3, pp 797-834, January, 1987, - Winter.

Demetrio, Thomas A., Should juries decide complex cases?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 2, March 5, 1985,

Demetriou, Andreas; Charitides, Leonidas (1986). The adolescent's construction of procedural justice as a function of age, formal thought and sex. International Journal of Psychology, 21, 333-353

Denton, Herbert H., Libel juries often trip over concept of 'malice'; issue proves difficult in Sharon case. (Ariel Sharon vs. Time), Washington Post, Vol 108, p A9, Wed, January 23, 1985,

Deosaran, Ramesh (1984). Towards a social psychology of trial by jury. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 343-360.

Deosaran, Ramesh (1984). Towards a social psychology of trial by jury. British Journal of Criminology, 24, 343-360

DeSanto, James J., Improving the jury selection process. (from 1984 Allerton House Conference on the Civil Jury Trial in Illinois), Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 73, No 3, pp 162-164, November, 1984,

DeTurck, Mark A.; Texter, Lynne A.; Harszlak, Janet J. (1989). Effects of information processing objectives on judgments of deception following perjury. Special Issue: Social cognition and communication. Communication Research, 16, 434-452

Deutsch, Michael E., The improper use of the federal grand jury: an instrument for the internment of political activists. (Symposium on the Grand Jury), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 75, No 4, pp 1159-1196, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Devine, Foy R., Inside the jury room; deliberations of a mock jury, Trial, Vol 24, No 9, pp 74-78, September, 1988.

Devine, Patricia G.; Ostrom, Thomas M. (1985). Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 5-21

Devitt, E. J., & Blackmar, C. B. (1977). Federal jury practice and instructions (Vol. 1). St. Paul, MN: West.

Devlin, Lord, Trial by jury for fraud. (Great Britain), Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 6, No 3, pp 311-321, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Devlin, P. (1966). Trial by jury. London: Stevens & Sons.

Diamond, S. S. (1974). A jury experiment reanalyzed. Journal of Law Reform, 7, 520-532.

Diamond, S. S., & Zeisel, H. (1974). A courtroom experiment on juror selection and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 276-277.

Diamond, Shari S. (1982). Growth and maturation in psychology and law. Law and Society Review, 17, 11-22

Diamond, Shari S.; Stalans, Loretta J. (1989). The myth of judicial leniency in sentencing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 73-89

Diamond, Shari S.; Zeisel, Hans (1974). A courtroom experiment on juror selection and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 276-277

Dickerson, Brian, Bar request raises issue of jury bias, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 6, April 22, 1985,

Dickerson, R. E. (1973). A study of the petit jury as a true cross section of the community.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

Dickson, D. J. (1988). Autonomy, discretion and representation: a comparative study of jury development in athens, england, and the united states of america. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

DiGennaro, Judith, Anatomy of a Jury: the System on Trial, Criminal Justice Journal, Vol 9, No 2, pp 391-393, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Dillard, Nancy D., The death knell of the insurmountable burden. (discriminatory jury selection), Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol 31, No 2, pp 473-506, January, 1987, - Winter.

Dillehay, R. C., & Nietzel, M. T. (1980, November). Voir dire: Courtroom realities and social science research. Paper presented at the meeting of American Society of Criminology, San Francisco, California.

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179-191

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T. (1985). Juror experience and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 179-191.

Dillehay, Ronald C.; Nietzel, Michael T., Jury experience and jury verdicts, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, pp 179-191, June, 1985,

Dillon, William D., Grand jury investigations in RICO cases: a myriad of ethical considerations, Journal of the Legal Profession, Vol 11, pp 155-167, January, 1986, - Annual,

DiMona, J. (1974, July 8). The real surprise of the Mitchell-Stans trial. New York, pp. 31-37.

Disney, Mitchell F., A black criminal defendant is not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right where a branch court limits its jury selection pool. (California Supreme Court Survey December 1986-February 1987), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14 No 4, pp 1023-1025, May, 1987.

District Court usurped jury's function in police-demotion case. (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 10, p 11, Mon, July 13, 1987.

Dombroff, Mark A., Jury instructions can be crucial in trial process, Legal Times, Vol 7, p 26, February 25, 1985,

Donohoe, M. C. (1986). Jurors' decisions in a simulated trial of the pms defense: Background characteristics and attitudes toward menstruation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College.

Donovan, J. (1975, Winter). Modern jury trials and advocates. 1887, 227. Cited in G. Mariana, Peremptory challenge -- Divining Divining rod for a sympathetic jury? The Catholic Lawyer, 21, 56-81.

Doob, A. N., & Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). Some empirical evidence on the effect of s.12 of the Canada evidence act upon an accused. The Criminal Law Quarterly, 15, 88-95.

Dow, P. E. (1978). A study of the juror interaction process in criminal trials.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton.

Dowdle, M., Gillen, H., & Miller, A. (1974). Integration and attribution theories as predictors of sentencing by a simulated jury. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1(1), 270-272.

Dowdle, Michael D.; Gillen, H. Barry; Miller, Arthur G. (1974). Integration and attribution theories as predictors of sentencing by a simlulated jury. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 270-272

Downing, Mary Beth, Civil contempt and the federal grand jury, New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement, Vol 13, No 1, pp 69-87, January, 1987, - Winter.

Dravin, L. P. (1982). Effect of sex of defendant, sex of expert witness and type of crime on judicial decisions: a mock jury study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.

Dresslar, Tom, Bill to increase privacy of jurors draws opposition: trial lawyers, media fear threat to rights to know, fair trial; rule uniformity sought. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 94, p 1, Wed, May 11, 1988.

Druff, James H., The cross-section requirement and jury impartiality, Calif. L. Rev., Vol 73, No 5, pp 1555-1596, October, 1985,

Ducat, C. R. (1970). Dimensions of jurisprudence and judicial decision-making in the law of obscenity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Dudley, R. L. (1980). Explanations of judicial decision making: testing the psychometric model against case law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

Due-care presumption held to be outmoded. (Rice v. Shuman) (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 10, p 1, Mon, January 5, 1987.

Duggan, L. M., III. (1987). Jurors' perception of children in a child sexual abuse trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

Dunham, Roger G.; Alpert, Geoffrey P.; Connors, Darrell J., Black representation on juries in Miami. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 79-88, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Dunn, Ian M., Letters. (jury) (Australia), Legal Service Bulletin, Vol 11, No 1, p 42, February, 1986,

Durand, R. M., & Bearden, W. O. (1979). Juror usage: A moderator of perceptions of jury service. Journal of Social Psychology, 107, 143-144.

Durand, R. M., Bearden, W. O., Ashworth, G. E., & Gustafson, A. W. (1978). Attitudinal and normative beliefs underlying individual perceptions of juror service. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 207-213.

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O.; Gustafson, A. William (1978). Previous jury service as a moderating influence on jurors' beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Reports, 42, 567-572

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O. (1979). Juror usage: A moderator of perceptions of jury service. Journal of Social Psychology, 107, 143-144

Durand, Richard M.; Bearden, William O.; Ashworth, G. Edward; Gustafson, A. William (1978). Attitudinal and normative beliefs underlying individual perceptions of juror service. Journal of Social Psychology, 106, 207-213

Dyer, Billy Coe, The jury on the quarterdeck: the effect of pleading admiralty jurisdiction when a proceeding turns hybrid, Texas Law Review, Vol 63, No 3, pp 533-564, November, 1984,

Dyner, Mark, Jury trial required in statutory civil penalty actions, Utah Law Review, Vol 1988, No 2, pp 435-454, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Eakin, Beth A. (1975). An empirical study of the effect of leadership influence on decision outcomes in different sized jury panels. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 109-126

Ebbesen, E., & Konecni, V. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts. The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805-821.

Ebner, D. L. (1983). Can the accuracy of memory in an eyewitness be predicted?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

Edelman, Paul S., Death on High Seas Act: jury trials, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 106, p 3, Fri, June 3, 1988.

Edinger, J. A., & Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal involvement and social control. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 30-56.

Efran, Michael G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54

Egeth, Howard E.; McCloskey, Michael (1984). The jury is still out: A reply to Deffenbacher. American Psychologist, 39, 1068-1069.

Eisland, Marla, The Federal Magistrates Act: are defendants' rights violated when magistrates preside over jury selection in felony cases?, Fordham Law Review, Vol 56, No 4, pp 783-796, March, 1988.

Eisner, Donald A. (1984). Mental injury in workers' compensation: An examination of job stress. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 101-111

Elliott, Philip C., A judge's thoughts about criminal instructions. (Michigan), Cooley Law Review, Vol 5, No 1, pp 23-37, January, 1988.

Ellis, T.S., III; O'Brien, J. Thomas, Jr., Virginia's jury exemptions: ripe for reform, University of Richmond Law Review, Vol 20, No 4, pp 971-995, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Ellison, W. James (1987). State execution of juveniles: Defining "youth" as a mitigating factor for imposing a sentence of less than death. Law and Psychology Review, 11 1-38

Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Bukaty, Raymond M.; Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C. (1984). The death qualified jury and the defense of insanity. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 81-93

Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Bukaty, Raymond M.; Cowan, Claudia L.; Thompson, William C. (1984). The death qualified jury and the defense of insanity. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 81-93.

Elwork, A. (1977). Applying psychological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of jury instructions.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Co.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1982). Making jury instructions understandable. Charlottesville, VA: The Michie Co.

Elwork, A., Sales, B. D., & Alfini, J. J. (1977). Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 163-189.

English, Peter, Power to the jury? Some reflections on an aspect of homicide trials. (Great Britain), Bracton Law Journal, Vol 19, pp 30-36, January, 1987, - Annual.

Enright, Sean, Britain's reluctant jurors, New Law Journal, Vol 138, No 6367, pp 538(2), July 29, 1988.

Enright, William B., Don't create an adversarial arena. (jury selection), ABA Journal, Vol 70, pp 14(3), November, 1984,

Epstein, Jeffrey, Benefactor defense before the grand jury: the legal advice and incrimination theories of the attorney-client privilege, Cardozo Law Review, Vol 6, No 3, pp 537-582, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Epstein, Judith; Carne, John, On pretrial publicity, verdict 'not guilty': defendants don't suffer from press coverage, Legal Times, Vol 11, No 21, p 16, Mon, October 24, 1988, 07099399 .

Epstein, Judith; Carne, John, Pre-trial publicity: no harm to jury pool, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 18, p 6, Thu, November 3, 1988.

Erickson, Bonnie; Lind, E. Allan; Johnson, Bruce C.; O'Barr, William M. (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266-279

Erickson, Maynard L.; Gibbs, Jack P. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253-264

Espinosa, Philip J., Constitutional law - jury selection - prosecutor's peremptory challenges excluding every potential black juror violates defendant's right to trial by an impartial jury, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol 18, No 2, pp 463-476, January, 1987, - Winter.

Estes, A. W. (1977, Spring). Jury selection: How principles of modern psychology can help you get the jury you want. Journal of the Kansas Trial Lawyers, pp. 36-40.

Etzioni, A. (1974, May 26). Science: Threatening the jury trial. Washington Post, Sec. C, p. 3.

Etzioni, A. (1974, November/December). Creating an imbalance. Trial, 23 & 30.

Evans, Phil, A member of the jury. (Great Britain), Legal Action, pp 12-13, March, 1985,

Evans, Sandra S.; Lundman, Richard J. (1983). Newspaper coverage of corporate price fixing: A replication. Criminology An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 529-541

Fagan, Jeffrey (1990). Social and legal policy dimensions of violent juvenile crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 93-133

Fahringer, H. P. (1980, Summer). "In the valley of the blind" -jury selection in a criminal case. Trial Diplomacy Journal, 3, 34-54.

Fahringer, Herald Price, Jury Argument in Criminal Cases: a Trial Lawyer's Guide Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol 22, No 2, pp 188-192, PUBLISHER Azimuth Press, March, 1986,

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A. J. (1988). Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 1-17.

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A. J. (1988). Bayes' theorem in the trial process: Instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 1-17

Faigman, David L.; Baglioni, A.J., Jr., Bayes' theorem in the trial process; instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 1, pp 1-17, March, 1988.

Fairall, Paul, Murder - provocation - unwilled act - guidelines for written memorandum to jury. (South Australia), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 11, No 4, pp 231-233, August, 1987.

Falk, P. J. (1988). Courts' citation and reference to social science in legal opinions involving gay individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Fargo, Marjorie, Make the post-trial interview work for you: don't make the same mistake Delorean's prosecutors made, Criminal Justice, Vol 3, No 2, pp 2(7), June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Farmer, L. C. (1975). Juror evaluations as a function of live, color video, black and white video, audio, and transcript presentations of trial testimony.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University.

Farmer, L. C., Williams, G. R., Cundick, B. P., Howell, R. J., Lee, R. E., & Rooker, C. K. (1977). The effect of the method of presenting trial testimony on juror decisional processes. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications, 59-76.

Farmer, L. C., Williams, G. R., Lee, R. E., Cundick, B. P., Howell, R. J., & Rooker, C. K. (1977). Juror perceptions of trial testimony as a function of the method of presentation. In G. Bermant, C. Nemeth, & N. Vidmar (Eds.), Psychology and the law. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books (D.C. Heath and Co.), 209-238.

Fattah, Ezzat A. (1983). Canada's successful experience with the abolition of the death penalty. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25, 421-431

Fattmann, Kenneth J. (1986). One short of a jury: The missing voice in an obstetrical case conference. Military Medicine, 151, 312-314

Faulkner, Larry R.; McFarland, Bentson H.; Bloom, Joseph D.; Stern, Thomas O. (1986). A method for quantifying and comparing civil commitment processes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 744-749.

Faulkner, Larry R.; McFarland, Bentson H.; Bloom, Joseph D.; Stern, Thomas O. (1986). A method for quantifying and comparing civil commitment processes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 744-749

Fayssoux, Kimberlye K., The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and trial by jury: proposals for change, Virginia Law Review, Vol 73, No 3, pp 601-630, April, 1987.

Federal courts experiment with jury procedures, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 15, No 19, pp 5-6, October 1, 1984,

Fehr, Lawrence A.; Fischer, Shelley M.; Stamps, Leighton E. (1987). Mock jurors' behavior: Sentencing as a function of jurors' guilt. Psychological Reports, 60, 727-731.

Fehr, Lawrence A.; Fischer, Shelley M.; Stamps, Leighton E. (1987). Mock jurors' behavior: Sentencing as a function of jurors' guilt. Psychological Reports, 60, 727-731

Feild, H. S. (1978). Juror background characteristics and attitudes toward rape. Law and Human Behavior, 2, 73-93.

Feild, H. S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 261-284.

Feild, H. S., & Barnett, N. J. (1978). Simulated jury trials: Students vs. "real" people as jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 287-293.

Feild, Hubert S. (1979). Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 261-284

Feild, Hubert S.; Barnett, Nona J. (1978). Simulated jury trials: Students vs. real people as jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 287-293

Feld, Barry C. (1983). Delinquent careers and criminal policy: Just deserts and the waiver decision. Criminology An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 195-212

Feld, Barry C. (1988). In re Gault revisited: A cross state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology (1987, Montreal Canada). Crime and Delinquency, 34, 393-424

Feldman, M. S. (1978). Juror competence through judicial instruction: effects of trial evidence, defendant background, and judicial instructions on the decisional behavior of simulated jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo.

Feldman, Robert S.; Chesley, Richard B. (1984). Who is lying, who is not: An attributional analysis of the effects of nonverbal behavior on judgements of defendant believability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 451-461

Feldman, S., & Wilson, K. (1981). The value of interpersonal skills in lawyering. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 311-324.

Fell, Gordon, The role of the jury in criminal cases - entrenched or vulnerable? (Australia), Sydney Law Review, Vol 11, No 2, pp 374-386, March, 198.

Feneck, N. (1977). Dogmatism and the ability of mock jurors to disregard inadmissible evidence.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Fiala, J. F. (1983). Reactance effects in individual decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.

Field (1978).

Finch, Michael; Ferraro, Mark, The empirical challenge to death-qualified juries: on further examination, Nebraska Law Review, Vol 65, No 1, pp 21-74, January, 1986, - Winter,

Finkel, Norman J. (1988). Maligning and misconstruing jurors' insanity verdicts: A rebuttal. Forensic Reports, 1, 97-124

Finkel, Norman J. (1989). The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 403-419

Finkel, Norman J. (1990). De facto departures from insanity instructions: Toward the remaking of common law. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 105-122

Finkel, Norman J.; Duff, Kevin B. (1989). The insanity defense: Giving jurors a third option. Forensic Reports, 2, 235-263

Finkel, Norman J.; Handel, Sharon F. (1988). Jurors and insanity: Do test instructions instruct? Forensic Reports, 1, 65-79

Finkel, Norman J.; Handel, Sharon F. (1989). How jurors construe "insanity." Law and Human Behavior, 13, 41-59

Finkel, Norman J.; Shaw, Ray; Bercaw, Susan; Koch, Juliann (1985). Insanity defenses: From the jurors' perspective. Law and Psychology Review, 1984, Fal 2, 435-449.

Finkel, Norman J.; Shaw, Ray; Bercaw, Susan; Koch, Juliann (1985). Insanity defenses: From the jurors' perspective. Law and Psychology Review, 9 77-92

Finlay, Belva, What's in a name? (jury selection) (California), California Lawyer, Vol 5, No 2, pp 9(3), February, 1985,

Finlay, Belva; Allen, Peter, The voir dire rap. (California), California Lawyer, Vol 7, No 10, pp 13(1), October, 1987.

Finn, J.N., Three cases on irregularities in jury trials. (Bates, Ashby and Ashby; Tinker and Minhinnich; Coombs) (New Zealand Court of Appeal), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 9, No 3, pp 171-176, June, 1985,

Fischer, Shelley M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1985). The effect of defendant's plea on mock juror decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 531-533.

Fischer, Shelley M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1985). The effect of defendant's plea on mock juror decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 531-533

Fischoff, S. (1979). "Recipe for a jury" revisited: A balance theory prediction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 99, 335-349.

Fischoff, Stuart (1979). "Recipe for a jury" revisited: A balance theory prediction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 335-349

Fishbein, M., & Azjen,I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Fishbein, M., & Azjen,I. (1976).

Fisher, Steven W., Batson v. Kentucky: purposeful discrimination in jury selection. (part 1), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 87, p 1, Thu, November 3, 1988.

Fisher, Steven W., Batson v. Kentucky: purposeful discrimination in jury selection. (part 2), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 88, p 6, Fri, November 4, 1988.

Fitzgerald, R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1984). Due process vs crime control. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 31-51.

Fitzgerald, Robert; Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (1984). Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 31-51.

Fitzgerald, Robert; Ellsworth, Phoebe C. (1984). Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 31-51

Fletcher, Joan Halligan, Constitutional law - it is a violation of equal protection for prosecutor to remove black jurors on basis of race or assumption unable to impartially consider a case against a black , Drake Law Review, Vol 36, No 3, pp 635-642, June 22, 1987, - Summer,.

Flintoff, Gerald; McAndrews, George, Recent Federal Circuit decisions re jury trials have clarified the law in this area. (mini-debate) (Proceedings of Judicial Conference of the Court of Appeals Federal Rules Decisions, Vol 108, No 3, pp 524-531, March, 1986,

Flynn, C. Maria, Criminal law - felony murder - proper jury instruction concerning causation necessary to support felony murder conviction. (Survey of Recent Developments in New Jersey Law), Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 185-187, January, 1987, - Winter.

Foley, Joan B., Death qualification: are capital defendants entitled to acquittal-prone juries? An argument in support of the status quo, St. Louis University Law Journal, Vol 30, No 1, pp 193-225, October, 1985,

Foley, Linda A.; Chamblin, Minor H. (1982). The effect of race and personality on mock jurors' decisions. Journal of Psychology, 112, 47-51.

Foley, Linda A.; Chamblin, Minor H. (1982). The effect of race and personality on mock jurors' decisions. Journal of Psychology, 112, 47-51

Foley, S. A. (1979). Racial factors and personality variables related to the decisions of jurors. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, New York City.

Fontes, N. E. (1975). The behavioral impact of inadmissible evidence on jurors: a preliminary study.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Foote, D. (1981, March 9). Trials by trial jury. Newsweek, pp. 84.

Ford, Marilyn Chandler, The role of extralegal factors in jury verdicts. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 16-39, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Forgas, Joseph P. (1977). Polarization and moderation of person perception judgements as a function of group interaction style. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 175-187

Forgas, Joseph P. (1980). Images of crime: A multidimensional analysis of individual differences in crime perception. International Journal of Psychology, 15, 287-299

Forst, Brian (1983). Capital punishment and deterrence: Conflicting evidence? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 927-942

Forston, R. F. (1969). The decision-making process in the american civil jury: a comparative methodological investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Forston, R. F. (1969). The decision-making process in the American civil jury: A comparative methodological investigation (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1968). Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, 2182A-2183A. (University Microfilms No. 60-16, 395).

Foss, R. D. (1975). A social psychological analysis of the simulated trial jury.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.

Foss, Robert D. (1976). Group decision processes in the simulated trial jury. Sociometry, 39, 305-316

Foss, Robert D. (1981). Structural effects in simulated jury decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1055-1062

Foster, Thomas K., Grand jury subpoenas of a target's attorney: the need for a preliminary showing, Georgia Law Review, Vol 20, No 3, pp 747-780, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Fox, Martin, Appeal tests judge's use of recorded charge to jury.(Fogel v. Lenox Hill Hospital) (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Thu, January 22, 198.

Fox, Martin, Appellate court disapproves tape-recorded jury charge. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Thu, March 5, 1987.

Fox, Martin, Panel reverses conviction on issue of jury prejudice. (People v. Rukaj) (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 196, p 1, Mon, September 29, 1986,

Fox, Martin, Panel reverses conviction on issue of jury prejudice. (People v. Rukaj) (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 196, p 1, Mon, September 29, 1986.

Fox, Martin, Panel upholds trial judge in ruling over black jurors. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 198, p 1, Wed, September 23, 1987.

Fox, Martin, Verdict by 5-member jury voided in malpractice case. (Waldman v. Cohen) (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Fri, February 27, 1987.

Fox, Phyllis (1985). Scientific resources on the child as witness. Social Action and the Law, 11, 16-17

Fox, Steven G.; Walters, H. A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 215-228.

Fox, Steven G.; Walters, H. A. (1986). The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 215-228

Fraher, Richard M., Adjudicative facts, non-evidence facts, and permissible jury background information. (Faculty Symposium: In Commemoration of the Indiana University School of Law Library Building), Indiana Law Journal, Vol 62, No 2, pp 333-353, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Frank, Cheryl, Judging juries: some cases too complex? (includes related article on judges' innovations and bibliography), ABA Journal, Vol 71, pp 26-27, December, 1985,

Frank, Cheryl, Jury bias: black exclusion study sought, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 35, March, 1985,

Frank, Cheryl, Jury overhaul; N.Y. panel's recommendations. (New York), ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 25, May, 1985,

Frank, Cheryl, Jury researchers disagree, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 26, May, 1985,

Frank, Maurice A., Anatomy of a jury: the system on trial., (book reviews), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 2, Fri, September 12, 1986,

Frankel, Arthur; Morris, William N. (1976). Testifying in one's own defense: The ingratiator's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 475-480

Frazier, David A., What makes juries listen: a communications expert looks at the trial., (book reviews), Advocate (Idaho), Vol 29, No 11, pp 18(2), November, 1986.

Frazier, Patricia; Borgida, Eugene (1985). Rape trauma syndrome evidence in court. American Psychologist, 40, 984-993.

Frazier, Patricia; Borgida, Eugene (1985). Rape trauma syndrome evidence in court. American Psychologist, 40, 984-993

Frazier, Patricia; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 101-122.

Frazier, Patricia; Borgida, Eugene (1988). Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 101-122

Freckelton, Ian, Reforming the jury system. (Australia), Legal Service Vol 11, No 3, pp 138-140, June, 1986,

Frederick, J. T. (1978). Jury behavior: A psychologist examines jury selection. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 5(3), 571-585.

Frederick, J. T. (1980). The role of equity considerations and methodological factors in the simulated jury paradigm. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University.

Frederick, Jeffrey T. (1984). Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of "scientific jury selection." Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 375-394.

Frederick, Jeffrey T. (1984). Social science involvement in voir dire: Preliminary data on the effectiveness of "scientific jury selection." Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 375-394

Frederick, Jeffrey T., Effective voir dire; from the mouths of jurors. (Discovery: Its Key Role in Preparing a Case), Trial, Vol 24, No 8, pp 66-72, August, 1988.

Frederick, Jeffrey T., Four ways to use a litigation psychologist in jury trials Florida Bar Journal, Vol 58, No 10, pp 633-637, November, 1984,

Freedman, Jonathan L. (1990). The effect of capital punishment on jurors' willingness to convict. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 465-477

Freeman, Martha, From Fresno: conscript-a-judge; drafting lawyers to sit as judges for jury trials is easing the court's load, California Lawyer, Vol 8, No 5, pp 25(1), June, 1988.

Freundlich, K. F. (1984). Effects of pretrial publicity and ego level on verdict and jury deliberation styles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Fried, M., Kaplan, K. J., & Klein, K. W. (1975). Juror selection: An analysis of voir dire. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Volume 4, Sage Criminal Justice System Annuals. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Friedman, Richard D., Generalized inferences, individual merits, and jury discretion. (Symposium: Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence), Boston University Law Review, Vol 66, No 3-4, pp 509-519, May, 1986,

Friedrich, O. (1981, September 28). We, the jury, find the... That irksome, boring, vital rewarding, democratic experience. Time Magazine, pp. 44-48; 54-56.

Friedrich, O.

(1981, September 28). We, the jury, find the... That irksome, boring, vital rewarding, democratic experience. Time Magazine, pp. 44-48; 54-56.

Friend, Ronald M.; Vinson, Michael (1974). Leaning over backwards: Jurors' responses to defendants' attractiveness. Journal of Communication, 24, 124-129

Fuchs, Bernard, A judge's charge to jury on circumstantial evidence. (N.Y.), New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Fri, April 17, 1987.

Fukurai, H. (1985). Institutionalized racial inequality: a theoretical and empirical examination of the jury selection process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.

Fulero, Solomon M. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the free press/fair trial controversy: Another view. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259-264.

Fulero, Solomon M. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the free press/fair trial controversy: Another view. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259-264

Fullin, James L., Jr.; Myse, Gordon, We can improve the quality of jury deliberations, Judges Journal, Vol 26, No 4, pp 2(10), September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Furtick-Smith, S. J. (1989). The effects of inadmissible evidence on decisions in military mock juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California State University, Long Beach.

Fyfe, James J. (1982). Blind justice: Police shootings in Memphis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 707-722

Gabrielli, Domenick L., Criminal jury instructions: New York, New York State Bar Journal, Vol 56, No 7, pp 34-36, PUBLISHER New York Committee on Criminal Jury Instructions, November, 1984,

Garcia, L., & Griffitt, W. (1978). Evaluation and recall of evidence: Authoritarianism and the Patty Hearst case. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 57-67.

Garcia, Luis T.; Griffitt, William (1978). Authoritarianism situation interactions in the determination of punitiveness: Engaging authoritarian ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 469-478

Garcia, Luis T.; Griffitt, William (1978). Impact of testimonial evidence as a function of witness characteristics. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 37-40

Gatz, A. D. (1963). Evaluating bias in jury selection. New York State Bar Journal, pp. 400-404.

Gelowitz, Mark A., Jury unanimity on questions of material fact: when six and six do not equal twelve. (Canada), Queen's Law Journal, Vol 12, No 1, pp 66-103, January, 1987, - Winter.

Gennusa, Thomas A., II, Preservation of the right to civil jury trial, Loyola Law Review, Vol 32, No 4, pp 909-915, January, 1987, - Winter.

George, Keith, Reforming West Virginia's jury selection process: West Virginia jury selection and service legislation of 1986. (Developments in West Virginia Law: 1986 Student Material - Notes), West Virginia Law Review, Vol 89, No 2, pp 439-450, January, 1987, - Winter.

George, Mark, Jury selection, Texas style, New Law Journal, Vol 138, No 6362, pp 438(3), June 24, 1988.

Gerbasi, K. C., Zuckerman, M., & Reis, H. T. (1977). Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 323-345.

Gerbasi, Kathleen C.; Zuckerman, Miron; Reis, Harry T. (1977). Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 323-345

Giacopassi, David J.; Wilkinson, Karen R. (1985). Rape and the devalued victim. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 367-383

Gibbs, Margaret S.; Sigal, Janet; Adams, Bonnie; Grossman, Beth (1989). Cross examination of the expert witness: Do hostile tactics affect impressions of a simulated jury? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 275-281

Gibney, L. B. (1989). An investigation into the verdict preferences of death qualified and non-death qualified juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.

Gidmark, David, The tobacco juries: an in-depth study, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 10, No 2, pp 18-28, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Gidmark, David, The verdict on surrogate jury research, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 82(5), March 1, 1988.

Gifford, G. L. (1980, October). A practical guide: The art of selecting a jury. Judicature, 64(4), 194.

Gifford, Glen, Juries: a new weapon against the racially-based peremptory challenge, University of Florida Law Review, Vol 37, No 4, pp 897-904, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Gill, Donna, Jurors bungle or blossom as they find ways through new system. (part 2) (Chicago), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 107, p 1, Wed, June 1, 1988.

Gill, Donna, One-day jury system celebrates its success. (part 1), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 106, p 1, Tue, May 31, 1988.

Ginger, A. F. (1975). Jury selection in criminal trials . Tiburon, Calif.: Law Press Corp.

Girdner, Bill, Court attacks rule that minors have no jury right. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 1, August 30, 1984,

Girdner, Bill, Lawyer's advice to jury witness leads to charges: defense bar protests. (San Diego), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 1, October 11, 1984,

Given, P. L. (1927). The juristic person: a problem in the philosophy of law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Givens, R. A. (1980). Advocacy: The art of pleading a cause. New York: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill.

Givens, Richard A., Should juries decide 'complex' cases?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 2, June 4, 1985,

Gizzi, James F., Jury selection - exclusion of potential jurors in capital sentencing cases no longer requires that venire members express their views about the death penalty with unmistakable clarity, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 16 No 3-4, pp 851-876, June 22, 1986, - Summer-Fall,

Gladstone, Sheila, An analysis of limitations governing criminal jury instructions on presumptions, Arizona Law Review, Vol 28, No 2, pp 311-321, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Glass, Benjamin, Jury instructions, New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 2, December 27, 1984,

Glassner, Barry; Ksander, Margret; Berg, Bruce; Johnson, Bruce D. (1983). A note on the deterrent effect of juvenile vs. adult jurisdiction. Social Problems, 31, 219-221

Gleason, J. M., & Harris, V. A. (1976). Group discussion and defendant's socio-economic status as determinants of judgments by simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 186-191.

Gleason, James M.; Harris, Victor A. (1976). Group dimension and defendant's socio economic status as determinants of judgments by simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 186-191

Gleason, James M.; Harris, Victor A. (1975). Race, socio economic status, and perceived similarity as determinants of judgments by simulated jurors. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 175-180

Glueck, S. S. (1924). The criminal responsibility of the insane: a study in sociological jurisprudence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Gold, Alan D., Criminal negligence - elements of offence. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Quarterly, Vol 29, No 1, pp 12-14, December, 1986.

Gold, Alan D., Trial by jury: R. v. Morgentaler. (Canada), Criminal Law Quarterly, Vol 29, No 2, pp 176-184, March, 1987.

Gold, Victor, Court advocacy: reflections on the use of psychological persuasion techniques in the courtroom, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 65, No 3, pp 481-515 March, 1987.

Gold, Victor J., Jury wobble: judicial intolerance of jury inferential error. (Symposium: Legal Implications of Human Error), Southern California Law Review, Vol 59, No 2, pp 391-406, January, 1986,

Goldberg, F. (1970). Toward expansion of Witherspoon: Capital scruples, jury bias, and use of psychological data to raise presumptions in the law. Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review, 5, 53-69.

Goldberg, Neil A., Courting the jury to reduce damages, For the Defense, Vol 29, No 4, pp 10-19, April, 1987.

Golden, Yosh, Jury bias arguments begin. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 8, p 1, Wed, January 13, 1988.

Golding, Stephen L.; Roesch, Ronald; Schreiber, Jan (1984). Assessment and conceptualization of competency to stand trial: Preliminary data on the Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 321-334

Goldkamp, John S.; Gottfredson, Michael R. (1979). Bail decision making and pretrial detention: Surfacing judicial policy. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 227-249

Goldman, Alan H. (1986). Cognitive psychologists as expert witnesses: A problem in professional ethics. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 29-45

Goldman, Jacquelin; Freundlich, Kenneth F.; Casey, Victoria A. (1983). Jury emotional response and deliberation style. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 11, 319-334

Goldman, Jacquelin; Freundlich, Kenneth F.; Casey, Victoria A. (1983). Jury emotional response and deliberation style. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 11, 319-334.

Goldman, Jacquelin; Maitland, Karen A.; Norton, Pennie L. (1975). Psychological aspects of jury performance. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 3, 367-379

Goldstein, Alvin G.; Chance, June E.; Gilbert, Barbara (1984). Facial stereotypes of good guys and bad guys: A replication and extension. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 549-552

Goldstein, I. (1935). Trial technique. Chicago: Callaghan.

Goldstein, Robert L. (1985). Response to Stone's "Comment on Goldstein's posttrial competency examination of jurors." Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 201-203.

Goldstein, Robert L. (1985). Response to Stone's "Comment on Goldstein's posttrial competency examination of jurors." Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 201-203

Goldstein, Robert L. (1985). Sanctum sanctorum : The psychiatrist's role in posttrial competency examination of jurors. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 191-196.

Goldstein, Robert L. (1985). Sanctum sanctorum : The psychiatrist's role in posttrial competency examination of jurors. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 191-196

Goldstein, Robert L. (1987). The twilight zone between scientific certainty and legal sufficiency: Should a jury determine the causation of schizophrenia? Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 15, 95-104

Goldstein, Robert L. (1988). Psychiatrists in the hot seat: Discrediting doctors by impeachment of their credibility. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 225-234

Goldstein, Robert L. (1989). The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: II. A systematic analysis of exculpatory delusions. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17, 61-67

Goldstein, Robert L. (1989). The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: IV. The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17, 269-281

Goldstein, Robert L.; Rotter, Merrill (1988). The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Judicial standards of wrongfulness since M'Naghten. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 359-367

Goldstein, Robert LLoyd, The twilight zone between scientific certainty and legal sufficiency: should a jury determine the causation of schizophrenia?, The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol 15, No 1, pp 95-104, March, 1987.

Goldwurm, G. F.; Jurich, D.; Colombo, F.; Noe, D.; et al

Gombossy, George, Jury tells Exxon to pay $10 million to fired executive. (Dowie v. Exxon), The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 8, Mon, August 4, 1986.

Good, Lawrence R. (1977). Opinion similarity and impressions of prospective jurors. Psychology, 14, 17-19

Goodman, Gail S.; Golding, Jonathan M.; Helgeson, Vicki S.; Haith, Marshall M.; et al (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27-40

Goodman, Gail S.; Golding, Jonathan M.; Helgeson, Vicki S.; Haith, Marshall M.; Michelli, Joseph, When a child takes the stand: jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 1, pp 27-40, March, 1987.

Goodman, Gail S.; Goldings, Jonathan M.; Haith, Marshall M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139-156.

Goodman, Gail S.; Goldings, Jonathan M.; Haith, Marshall M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139-156

Goodman, J. (1986). Probabilistic scientific evidence: jurors' inferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Goodman, Jane; Greene, Edith (1989). The use of paraphrase analysis in the simplification of jury instructions. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 237-251

Goodman, Jane; Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F., What confuses jurors in complex court cases; view from the bench and jury box, Los Angeles Daily Journal Vol 98, p 4, November 21, 1985,

Goodman, Jane; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1988). The relevance of expert testimony on eyewitness memory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 115-121.

Goodman, Jane; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1988). The relevance of expert testimony on eyewitness memory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 115-121

Goodman, Jane; Loftus, Elizabeth F., How to play to the jury you select - in complex and other cases, Criminal Justice, Vol 2, No 1, pp 2(6), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Gordon, Mary A.; McClure, Rita M. (1972). How judgments of responsibility are affected by objective and subjective communications. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 4, 4-10

Gordon, R. A. (1968). A study in forensic psychology: Petite jury verdicts as a function of jury size. Dissertation Abstracts, 29, 1161b.

Gordon, R. I. (1968). A study in forensic psychology: petit jury verdicts as a function of the number of jury members. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.

Gordon, R. I., & Jacobs, P. D. (1969). Forensic psychology: Perception of guilt and income. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 143-146.

Gordon, Randall A.; Bindrim, Thomas A.; McNicholas, Michael L.; Walden, Teresa L. (1988). Perceptions of blue collar and white collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191-197.

Gorenflo, Daniel W.; Crano, William D. (1989). Judgmental subjectivity/objectivity and locus of choice in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 605-614

Gossett, J. S. (1980). The role of the clear and present danger doctrine in prejudicial publicity cases before the united states supreme court: 1941-1976. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Grady, D. (1981, January). Picking a jury. Discover, pp. 38-41.

Grandison, R. J. (1984). Individual differences in the behavioral confirmation of the mental illness stigma (self-monitoring, attribution, social cognition). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.

Graves, C. M. (1975). A systems approach to jury selection.. Unpublished masters dissertation, California State University, Long Beach.

Gray, D. B., & Ashmore, R. D. (1976). Biasing influence of defendants' characteristics on simulated sentencing. Psychological Reports, 38, 727-738.

Gray, M. J. (1979). Absolute size versus proportional size of the minority in mock jury deliberations.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.

Green, Doye E., Jr., The problem of pretrial publicity and its effect on the Alday murder cases, Mercer Law Review, Vol 38, No 4, pp 1477-1491, June 22, 1987 - Summer.

Green, Herbert, Recent developments in instructions, Army Lawyer, pp 46-52, April, 1988.

Greenberg & Ruback (1982)

Greenberg, Jeff; Williams, Kipling D.; O'Brien, Mary K. (1986). Considering the harshest verdict first: Biasing effects on mock juror verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 41-50.

Greenberg, Jeff; Williams, Kipling D.; O'Brien, Mary K. (1986). Considering the harshest verdict first: Biasing effects on mock juror verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 41-50

Greenberg, Mel L., Criminal law - admissibility of prior inconsistent statements made before the grand jury. (Massachusetts), Massachusetts Law Review, Vol 70, No 2, pp 99-100, June, 1985,

Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1985). When crimes are joined at trial. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 193-207.

Greene, E. L. (1983). Judges' instruction on eyewitness testimony: evaluation and revision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Greene, E., Wilson, L., & Loftus, E. F. (1986, March). Impact of hypnotic testimony on the jury. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Tucson, AZ.

Greene, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1985). When crimes are joined at trial. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 193-207.

Greene, Edith (1986). Forensic hypnosis to lift amnesia: The jury is still out. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 65-72.

Greene, Edith (1988). Judge's instruction on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 252-276

Greene, Edith (1988). Judge's instruction on eyewitness testimony: Evaluation and revision. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 252-276.

Greene, Edith, A jury researcher joins the jury, Case & Comment, Vol 91, No 1, pp 28(8), January, 1986,

Greene, Edith, Eyewitness testimony and the use of cautionary instructions. (Symposium on Eyewitness Identification Testimony), University of Bridgeport Law Review, Vol 8, No 1, pp 15-20, January, 1987, - Winter.

Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1985). When crimes are joined at trial. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 193-207.

Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1985). When crimes are joined at trial. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 193-207

Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). What's new in the news? The influence of well publicized news events on psychological research and courtroom trials. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 211-221.

Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). Solving the eyewitness problem. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 395-406

Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F., When crimes are joined at trial. (jury perceptions), Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, p 193, June, 1985,

Greene, Edith; Raitz, Allan, Judging the jury., (book reviews), Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 10, No 3, pp 38-39, September 22, 1987, - Fall.

Greene, Edith; Raitz, Allan; Lindblad, Heidi (1989). Jurors' knowledge of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 105-125

Greene, Edith; Wilson, Leanne; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1989). Impact of hypnotic testimony on the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 61-78

Greener, R.O., Consent - recklessness -genuine though mistaken belief a defence - direction to jury - Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976, s. 1(1)(2). (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 236-237, April, 1985,

Griesel, Christopher, Alternative and inconsistent theories of recovery or defense may be submitted in a single broad issue without mentioning all the theories in the jury charge, Texas Tech Law Review, Vol 18, No 3, pp 1017-1041, April, 1987.

Griffit, W., & Jackson, T. (1973). Simulated jury decisions: The influence of jury-defendant attitude similarity-dissimilarity. Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 1-7.

Griffitt, William; Garcia, Luis T. (1979). Reversing authoritarian punitiveness: The impact of verbal conditioning. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 55-61

Griffitt, William; Jackson, Thomas (1973). Simulated jury decisions: The influence of jury defendant attitude similarity dissimilarity. Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 1-7

Grofman, B. (1979). Jury decision making models and the Supreme Court: The jury cases from Williams v. Florida to Ballew v. Georgia. Unpublished manuscript.

Grofman, B. (1979). Mathematical models of juror and jury decision-making: The state of the art. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology (Vol. 2): The jury and trial process. New York: Plenum.

Grofman, B. The slippery slope: Jury size and jury verdict requirements -- Legal and social science approaches.

Grofman, Bernard (1985). The effect of restricted and unrestricted verdict options on juror choice. Social Science Research, 14, 195-204.

Grofman, Bernard (1985). The effect of restricted and unrestricted verdict options on juror choice. Social Science Research, 14, 195-204

Gross, Samuel R. (1984). Determining the neutrality of death qualified juries: Judicial appraisal of empirical data. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 7-30.

Gross, Samuel R. (1984). Determining the neutrality of death qualified juries: Judicial appraisal of empirical data. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 7-30

Grunat, Joshua G., Post-submission substitution of alternate jurors in federal criminal cases: effects of violations of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 23(b) and 24(c), Fordham Law Review, Vol 55, No 5, pp 861-883, April, 1987.

Guidelines for the conduct of a jury trial. (from Allerrton House Conference on the Civil Jury Trial in Illinois), Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 73, No 3, pp 148-149, November, 1984,

Gustafson, Kristin A., Are jury instructions on statutory defenses essential to a fair trial?, Maine Law Review, Vol 38, No 2, pp 589-612, July, 1986,

Gustlin, S. I. (1986). Extraevidential factors involved in attributions of blame and responsibility in a rape trial (sexual assault). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

Gwin, Robert Y., Summary jury trial: an explanation and analysis, Kentucky Bench and Bar, Vol 52, No 1, pp 16(4), December 22, 1987, - Winter.

Habush, Robert L., A case of "jury tampering", Trial, Vol 23, No 3, pp 5(1), March, 1987.

Haddad, James B., Deception of courts and grand juries as part of prosecutorial investigations, Criminal Justice, Vol 2, No 1, pp 28-32, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Hadden, Stuart C. (1973). Social dimensions of jury decision making. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 269-277

Halbert, R. G. (1978). The effects of image size on jurors' perceptions of a videotaped deposition: a medium shot in the dark.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Hall Law Review, Vol 18, No 2, pp 478-503, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Halpern, Abraham L. (1977). The insanity defense: A juridical anachronism. Psychiatric Annals, 7, 398-409

Hamilton, V. L. (1975). The crime of obedience: jury simulation of a military trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Obedience and responsibility: A jury simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 126-146.

Hamilton, V. Lee (1978). Obedience and responsibility: A jury simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 126-146

Hammer, J. H. (1989). The effect of offender punishment on crime victim's recovery, and perceived fairness (equity) and process control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research.

Hammitt, James K.; Carroll, Stephen J.; Relles, Daniel A., Tort standards and jury decisions. (Critical Issues in Tort Law Reform: a Search for Principles), Journal of Legal Studies, Vol 14, No 3, pp 751-762, December, 1985,

Haney, C. (1984a). On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of death qualification process. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 121-132.

Haney, C. (1984b). Examining death qualification. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 133-154.

Haney, Craig (1980). Psychology and legal change: On the limits of a factual jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 147-199

Haney, Craig (1984). Examining death qualification: Further analysis of the process effect. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 133-151.

Haney, Craig (1984). Examining death qualification: Further analysis of the process effect. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 133-151

Haney, Craig (1984). On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death qualification process. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 121-132.

Haney, Craig (1984). On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death qualification process. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 121-132

Hanley, Robert F., Voir dire: the view from the jury box, Litigation, Vol 12, No 4, pp 21(3), June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Hannon, R. T. (1979). Effects of a rape victim's past history on outcomes of juror deliberations.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America.

Hans & Vidmar, in press.

Hans, V. P. (1978). The effects of the unanimity requirement on group decision processes in simulated juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Hans, V. P., & Doob, A. N. (1976). S.12 of the Canada evidence act and the deliberation of simulated juries. Criminal Law Quarterly, 18, 235-253.

Hans, V. P. & Vidmar, N. (1982). Jury selection. In N. Kerr & R. M. Bray (eds.) The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

Hans, Valerie P. (1982). Jury selection in two countries: A psychological perspective. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 283-300

Hans, Valerie P., The conduct of voir dire: a psychological analysis. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 40-58, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Hansell, D. W. (1963). The persuasive elements in summation speeches of twenty contemporary jury trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver.

Hardaway, Y. V. (1978). Effect of nature of offense and locus of control of mock jury deliberations.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville.

Harrington, D. C., & Dempsey, J. (1969). Psychological factors in jury selection. Tennessee Law Review, 37, 173-178.

Harris, Richard J. (1978). The effect of jury size and judge's instructions on memory for pragmatic implications from courtroom testimony. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 129-132

Hart, B. L. (1978). Effects of videotaped testimony on juror behavior.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University.

Hartland, John (1974). An alleged case of criminal assault upon a married woman under hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 16, 188-198

Hartmann, Amy B., Clean sweep of the new trial safeguard against prejudice from unauthorized communications with jury members, Wayne L. Rev., Vol 31, No 3, pp 1083-1102, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Harvey, John H.; Cacioppo, John T.; Yasuna, Amy (1977). Temporal pattern of social information and self attribution of ability. Journal of Personality, 45, 281-296

Harvey, William F., Jury discrimination and the peremptory challenge for cause, Creighton Law Review, Vol 20, No 1, pp 221-245, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Hastie, R., Penrod, S., and Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hatvany, Nina; Strack, Fritz (1980). The impact of a discredited key witness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 490-509

Hawkins, C. (1961). Interaction and coalition realignments in consensus-seeking groups: a study of experimental jury deliberations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Hawrish, E., & Tate, E. (1974-1975). Determinants of jury selection. Saskatchewan Law Review, 39, 285-292.

Hayden, G., Senna, J., & Siegel, L. (1978). Prosecutorial discretion in peremptory challenges: An empirical investigation of information use in the Massachusetts jury selection process. New England Law Review, 13, 768-791.

Hayden, R. M., & Anderson, J. K. (1979). On the evaluation of procedural systems in laboratory experiments: A critique of Thibaut and Walker. Law and Human Behavior, 3(1,2), 21-38.

Hayes, H. D. (1988). Capital jury selection in florida and texas--a quantitative distinction without a legally qualitative difference?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.

Hayes, Hugh D., Capital jury selection in Florida and Texas - a quantitative distinction without a legally qualitative difference?, Nova Law Review, Vol 12 No 2, pp 743-786, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Haynes, R. How to try a jury case: A lawyer's view. Based on an interview with R. Haynes by W. Pannill.

Helgeson, Vicki S.; Shaver, Kelly G. (1990). Presumption of innocence: Congruence bias induced and overcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 276-302

Hendrick, Clyde; Shaffer, David R. (1975). Murder: Effects of number of killers and victim mutilation on simulated jurors' judgments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 313-316

Hendrick, Clyde; Shaffer, David R. (1975). Effect of pleading the fifth amendment on perceptions of guilt and morality. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 449-452

Hendry, Sarah H.; Shaffer, David R.; Peacock, Dina (1989). On testifying in one's own behalf: Interactive effects of evidential strength and defendant's testimonial demeanor on mock jurors' decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 539-545

Hengeveld, Elizabeth M., Draining the jury pool, The National Law Journal, Vol 7 p 43, October 1, 1984,

Henry, Brian R., The criminal defense counsel's concise guide to prejudicial judicial communication during criminal jury trials, Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol 23, No 5, pp 413-441, September, 1987.

Hentoff, Nicholas, Upholding the practice of death qualification against fair cross-section and jury impartiality challenges, Arizona Law Review, Vol 29, No 2 pp 307-322, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Hepburn, John R. (1980). The objective reality of evidence and the utility of systematic jury selection. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 89-101

Herbsleb, J. D., Sales, B. D., & Berman, J. J. (1978). When psychologists aid in voir dire: Legal and ethical considerations. In L. E. Abt, & I. Stuart, (Eds.), The social psychology of discretionary law. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hernandez, M. G. (1985). The influence of psychiatric testimony, criteria for insanity, and juror legal reasoning level on verdict choice and satisfaction with verdict choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Herrman, Margaret S.; Bordner, Diane C. (1983). Attitudes toward pornography in a Southern community. Criminology An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 349-374

Hester, Reid K.; Smith, Ronald E. (1973). Effects of a mandatory death penalty on the decisions of simulated jurors as a function of heinousness of the crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 1, 319-326

Heuer & Penrod (1986).

Heuer, L. B., and Penrod, S. (1984). A field experiment on jury decisionmaking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

Heuer, Larry; Penrod, Steven (1988). Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 231-261.

Heuer, Larry; Penrod, Steven (1988). Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 231-261

Heuer, Larry; Penrod, Steven D. (1989). Instructing jurors: A field experiment with written and preliminary instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 409-430

Heuer, Larry; Penrod, Steven, Increasing jurors' participation in trials: a field experiment with jury notetaking and question asking, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 3, pp 231-261, September, 1988.

Hewitt, John D.; Hoover, Dwight W. (1982). Local modernization and crime: The effects of modernization on crime in Middletown, 1845-1910. Law and Human Behavior, 6, 313-325

Heyl, C. W. (1952). Selection of the jury. Illinois Bar Journal, 40, 328-341.

Hicks, Steven R. (1987). Admissibility of expert testimony on the psychology of the battered child. Law and Psychology Review, 1986, Jan Feb 10, 16-17.

Hicks, Steven R. (1987). Admissibility of expert testimony on the psychology of the battered child. Law and Psychology Review, 11 103-143

Hines, Sally H.; Bachman, Mary; Starr, Mark (1973). Trial by newpaper? The cases of Charles Manson and William Calley. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 8, 257-269

Hinkle, A. L. (1979). The effect of expert witness and jury size on jury verdicts: a simulation study.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.

Hinkle, Andrew L.; Smeltzer, Donald J.; Allen, Cynthia A.; King, Glen D. (1983). The judgments of college students and jurors concerning sanity and guilt of an alleged murderer. Journal of Social Psychology, 120, 253-257.

Hite, Peggy A. (1988). An examination of the impact of subject selection on hypothetical and self reported taxpayer noncompliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 9, 445-466

Hittner, David, The summary jury trial. (Texas) (Special Issue: Alternative Dispute Resolution), Texas Bar Journal, Vol 51, No 1, pp 40(2), January, 1988.

Hochstedler, Ellen (1987). Twice cursed? The mentally disordered criminal defendant. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 251-267

Hodgson, Shari; Pryor, Bert (1984). Sex discrimination in the courtroom: Attorney's gender and credibility. Psychological Reports, 55, 483-486.

Hodgson, Shari; Pryor, Bert (1984). Sex discrimination in the courtroom: Attorney's gender and credibility. Psychological Reports, 55, 483-486

Hofer, P. J. (1987). Cognitive strategies for interpreting law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

Hofer, Roy E., The real world of juries, damages, and injunctions in patent cases. (Symposium on Intellectual Property), Albany Law Review, Vol 50, No 3, pp 593-599, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Hoffheimer, Michael H. (1989). Effect of particularized instructions on evaluation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Psychology Review, 13 43-58

Hoffman, Brian F. (1986). "Psychiatrists and personal injury litigation": Dr. Hoffman replies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 1488

Hoffman, Eric (1980). Perceived severity and justifiability of a deviant act and their relationship to suggested sanctions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 787-791

Hoffman, Eric (1980). Responsibility for a transmitted command: A juror simulation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 1097-1098

Hoffman, Eric (1981). Effect of prior perpetration and victimization upon assignment of criminal responsibility. Psychological Reports, 48, 73-74

Hoffman, Eric (1981). Social class correlates of perceived offender typicality. Psychological Reports, 49, 347-350

Hogan, R. Ben, III, Jury Instructions on Products Liability., (book reviews), Trial, Vol 24, No 5, pp 100-101, PUBLISHER The Michie Co., May, 1988.

Hoge, Steven K.; Gutheil, Thomas G.; Kaplan, Eric (1987). The right to refuse treatment under Rogers v. Commissioner : Preliminary empirical findings and comparisons. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 15, 163-169

Hoiberg, B., & Stires, L. (1973). The effect of several types of pre-trial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267-275.

Hoiberg, Bruce C.; Stires, Lloyd K. (1973). The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267-275

Holdenson, Oliver P., The admission of expert evidence of opinion as to the potential unreliability of evidence of visual identification. (Australia), Melbourne University Law Review, Vol 16, No 3, pp 521-547, June, 1988,.

Holdsworth, W. S. (1956). A history of the English Law. London: Metheun.

Hollos, Marida; Leis, Philip E.; Turiel, Elliot (1986). Social reasoning in Ijo children and adolescents in Nigerian communities. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 17, 352-374

Holstein, J. A. (1981). The jury decision-making process: interpretation and deliberation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

Holstein, James A. (1985). Jurors' interpretations and jury decision making. Law and Huran Behavior, 9, 83-100.

Holstein, James A. (1985). Jurors' interpretations and jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 83-100

Holstein, James A., Jurors' interpretations and jury decision making, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 1, pp 83-100, March, 1985,

Homans, Susan S.; Curran, William J.; McGarry, A. Louis (1973). Charged with murder: Six men discuss their attitudes toward trial. Massachusetts Journal of Mental Health, 3, 4-32

Homant, Robert J.; Kennedy, Daniel B. (1986). Judgment of legal insanity as a function of attitude toward the insanity defense. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 8, 67-81

Homant, Robert J.; Kennedy, Daniel B. (1986). Judgment of legal insanity as a function of attitude toward the insanity defense. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 8, 67-81.

Hommers, Wilfried (1988). Recompense as stimulus and response: Toward an exchange of law and psychology. German Journal of Psychology, 12, 139-151

Honts, G. E., III. (1988). Peremptory challenges: thunder in the jury box. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.

Hoover, Michael J., Voir dire. (Master Advocate's Edition), Air Force Law Review Vol 27, pp 43-58, January, 1987, - Annual.

Hopkins, Ann, Mens rea and the right to trial by jury, California Law Review, Vol 76, No 2, pp 391-420, March, 198.

Hopper, David D., Batson v. Kentucky and the prosecutorial peremptory challenge: arbitrary and capricious equal protection?, Virginia Law Review, Vol 74, No 4, pp 811-841, May, 1988.

Hopper, M. F. (1979). The construction and use of moral meaning in felony jury trials: an observational study.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Horn, E. R. (1976). The effects of a prior conviction and kind of conflicting evidence on the attribution of credibility to a witness by a juror.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.

Horowitz, I. A. (1980). Juror Selection: A comparison of two methods in several criminal cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 86-99.

Horowitz, I. A. & Willging, T. E. (1984). The psychology of law: Integrations and applications. Boston: Little, Brown.

Horowitz, I. A., Bordens, K. S. & Feldman, M. S. (1981)

Horowitz, I. A., Bordens, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (1980). A comparison of verdicts obtained in separate and joined criminal trials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 444-456.

Horowitz, I. A., Bordens, K. S. & Feldman, M. S. (1981)

Horowitz, I. A., Bordens, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (1980). A comparison of verdicts obtained in separate and joined criminal trials. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 444-456.

Horowitz, Irwin A. (1980). Juror selection: A comparison of two methods in several criminal cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 86-99

Horowitz, Irwin A. (1985). The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 25-36

Horowitz, Irwin A. (1985). The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 25-36.

Horowitz, Irwin A. (1988). Jury nullification: The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 439-453.

Horowitz, Irwin A. (1988). Jury nullification: The impact of judicial instructions, arguments, and challenges on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 439-453

Horowitz, Irwin A., The effect of jury nullification instruction on verdicts and jury functioning in criminal trials, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 1, pp 25-36, March, 1985,

Horowitz, Irwin A.; Bordens, Kenneth S. (1988). The effects of outlier presence, plaintiff population size, and aggregation of plaintiffs on simulated civil jury decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 209-229.

Horowitz, Irwin A.; Bordens, Kenneth S., The effects of outlier presence, plaintiff population size, and aggregation of plaintiffs on simulated civil jury decisions, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 3, pp 209-229, September, 1988.

Horowitz, Irwin A.; Seguin, David G. (1986). The effects of bifurcation and death qualification on assignment of penalty in capital crimes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 165-185.

Horowitz, Irwin A.; Seguin, David G. (1986). The effects of bifurcation and death qualification on assignment of penalty in capital crimes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 165-185

Horowitz, Robert (1983). Policy: Child welfare: An evolving legal bases. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 15, 59-69

Hosch, H. M., Beck, E. L., & McIntyre, P. (1980). Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury desicions. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 287-296.

Hosch, Harmon M. (1980). A comparison of three studies of the influence of expert testimony on jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 297-302

Hosch, Harmon M.; Beck, E. Link; McIntyre, Patricia (1980). Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 287-296

Houlden, P. J. (1977). The effect on jurors of the context in which unfavorable evidence is presented.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Howard, I. J. (1983). The culpability of homicide: differential treatment towards heterosexual and homosexual perpetrators and victims. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

Howard, Judith A.; Leber, B. Douglas (1988). Social izing attribution: Generalization to "real" social environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 664-687

Howard, Judith A.; Levinson, Randy (1985). The overdue courtship of attribution and labeling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 191-202

Howard, W. G. (1971). The jury: social characteristics and psychological attitudes.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

Howard, W. Gary; Redfering, David (1983). The dynamics of jury decision making: A case study. Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 83-89.

Howard, W. Gary; Redfering, David (1983). The dynamics of jury decision making: A case study. Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 83-89

Howitt, Dennis (1982). Pre trial publicity: The case for reform. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 311-322

Hrdlicka, J. C. (1977). Does the defendant have a right of access to prospective jurors' prior voting records? Louisiana Law Review, 38, 205-213.

Hubbard, Maury Albon, III, Death qualification of jury prior to guilt phase of bifurcated capital trial held constitutional, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 66, No 1, pp 183-198, November, 1987.

Huebner-Dimitrius, J. (1984). The representative jury: fact or fallacy?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.

Hughes, G. David; Hsiao, Henry S., Pretesting all phases of a jury trial with the aid of a microcomputer, American Journal of Trial Advocacy, Vol 9, No 1, pp 53-66, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Hugonnet, M. H. (1985). The effects of authoritarianism, insanity plea and type of offense on mock juror judgments (ngi, ngbri, jury). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University.

Hume, J. C. (1887). Jury reform.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

Hunt, M. (1982, November 24). Putting juries on the couch. New York Times Magazine, 70-72; 78-79; 82-85.

Hunter, R.M. (1935). Law in the jury room. Ohio State Law Journal, 1, 1-19.

Hyman, H. M., & Tarrant, C. M. (1975). Aspects of American trial jury history. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Volume 4, Sage Criminal Justice System Annuals. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Imus, Neil W., Jury selection. (Fourteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1983-1984), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 73, No 2, pp 610-620, December, 1984,

Ingulli, Elaine D., Trial by jury: reflections on witness credibility, expert testimony, and recantation, Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol 20, No 2, pp 145-185, January, 1986, - Winter,

Inwinkelried, Edward J.; Schwed, Lloyd R., Guidelines for drafting understandable jury instructions: an introduction to the use of psycholinguistics, Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol 23, No 2, pp 135-150, March, 1987.

Isaacs, Samuel G., Evaluating the panel; understanding implied and nonverbal communication, Trial, Vol 23, No 6, pp 21(3), June, 1987.

Isaacson, Norman (1976). General semantics and the jury system. Etc., 33, 239-243

Isozaki, Mikitoshi (1984). The effect of discussion on polarization of judgments. Japanese Psychological Research, 26, 187-193

Isozaki, Mikitoshi (1984). The effect of discussion on polarization of judgments. Japanese Psychological Research, 26, 187-193.

Izzett, Richard R.; Leginski, Walter (1974). Group discussion and the influence of defendant characteristics in a simulated jury setting. Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 271-279

Izzett, Richard; Fishman, Leslie (1976). Defendant sentences as a function of attractiveness and justifications for actions. Journal of Social Psychology, 100, 285-290

Jackson, P. D. (1980). Some variables affecting consideration of inadmissible evidence by deliberating juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University.

Jackson, Robin (1983). Mental retardation and criminal justice: Some issues and problems. British Journal of Mental Subnormality, 29, , 7-12

Jacob, Herbert (1983). Trial courts in the United States: The travails of exploration. Law and Society Review, 17, 407-423

Jacobs, W. J. (1988). A victimological study regarding the victim in the judicial process. Unpublished masters thesis, University of South Africa.

Jacobsen, L. S. (1980). Six-person mock jury verdicts as a function of assigned decision rule, level of apparent guilt, and individual juror authoritarianism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Jacobson, Mark A., Reducing the impact of juror discrimination in interracial crimes, Law & Inequality: a Journal of Theory and Practice, Vol 5, No 1, pp 135-160, May, 1987.

Jacobson, Richard J.; Selander, Larry; Gudel, Paul J., Talking to juries: the inner game, Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol 9, No 2, pp 21(5), June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Jacobson, Steven K.; Berger, Charles R. (1974). Communication and justice: Defendant attributes and their effects on the severity of his sentence. Speech Monographs, 41, 282-286

Jacobus, John L., Constitutional law: the Eighth Amendment and sympathy instructions to juries in death penalty cases, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol 10, No 3, pp 757-762, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Jacoubovitch, M. D., Bermant, G., Crockett, G. T., McKinley, W., & Sastad, A. (1977). Juror responses to direct and mediated presentations of expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 227-238.

Jacoubovitch, M. Daniel; et al (1977). Juror responses to direct and mediated presentations of expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 227-238

Jahns, Jeffrey J., I, the juror; what one lawyer learned from jury duty, Trial, Vol 23, No 1, pp 44(5), January, 1987.

James, R. (1958). Jurors' reactions to alternative definitions of legal insanity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

James, R. (1959). Status and competence of jurors. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 563-570.

Jara-Elias, J. R. (1978). Some communication strategies in the courtroom: a simulated jury study.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Jayne, H. Martin, Jury selection. (Master Advocate's Edition), Air Force Law Review, Vol 27, pp 59-66, January, 1987, - Annual.

Jeffords, Charles R. (1984). Prosecutorial discretion in cases of marital rape. Victimology, 9, 415-425

Jelalian, Elissa; Miller, Arthur G. (1984). The perseverance of beliefs: Conceptual perspectives and research developments. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 25-56

Jendrek, Margaret P. (1984). Two models of formal social control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 335-353

Jendrek, Margaret P.; Kaplan, Martin F. (1987). Social science evidence and the discrepancy in the Federal Rules of Evidence on character testimony. Law and Psychology Review, 1986, Jun 31, 381-386.

Jendrek, Margaret P.; Kaplan, Martin F. (1987). Social science evidence and the discrepancy in the Federal Rules of Evidence on character testimony. Law and Psychology Review, 11 39-53

Jennings, J. M., II. (1983). The press, the courts, and the regulation of prejudicial publicity: a historical analysis of attempts to balance first amendment and sixth amendment rights. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.

Johnson, J. H., III. (1983). The effects of refusing to testify, social-occupational status, prior convictions, judge's instructions, and authoritarianism on juridic decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.

Johnson, Joel T.; Drobny, Jerome (1987). Happening soon and happening later: Temporal cues and attributions of liability. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 209-234

Johnson, Joel T.; Drobny, Jerome (1985). Proximity biases in the attribution of civil liability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 283-296

Johnson, Sheri Lynn, Black innocence and the white jury, Michigan Law Review, Vol 83, No 7, pp 1611-1708, June, 1985,

Johnson, Stephen D. (1985). Religion as a defense in a mock jury trial. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 213-220

Johnson, Stephen D. (1985). Religion as a defense in a mock jury trial. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 213-220.

Johnston, J. S. (1984). Imperfect information and the legal process: toward a general economic theory of tort liability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

Jonakait, Randolph N., The subversion of the hearsay rule: the residual hearsay exceptions, circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, and grand jury testimony, Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol 36, No 3, pp 431-481, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Jones, Margaret L., Second-guessing the jury, Student Lawyer, Vol 15, No 8, pp 22(7), April, 1987.

Jones, S. E. (1985). Judge versus attorney-conducted voir dire: an empirical investigation of veniremen self-disclosure (correctional, forensic, law-psychology). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Jones, Susan E. (1987). Judge versus attorney conducted voir dire: An empirical investigation of juror candor. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 131-146.

Jones, Susan E. (1987). Judge versus attorney conducted voir dire: An empirical investigation of juror candor. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 131-146

Jones, Susan E., Judge- versus attorney-conducted voir dire: an empirical investigation of juror candor, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 2, pp 131-146, June, 1987.

Jordan, W. E. (1980). Jury Selection. Colorado Springs, Colorado: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill.

Jordan, W. E. (1981). A trial judge's observations about voir dire examination. Defense Law Journal, 30(3), 223-247.

Joseph, Joanne M.; Tedeschi, James T. (1983). Perceived responsibility and the least of evils principle. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 51-58

Juhnke, R., Vought, C., Pyszczynski, T. A., Dane, F. C., Losure, B. D., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1979). Effects of presentation mode upon mock jurors' reactions to a trial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 36-39.

Juhnke, Ralph; et al (1979). Effects of presentation mode upon mock jurors' reactions to a trial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 36-39

Julavits, William F. (1983). Legal issues in emergency psychiatry. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 335-345

Juries awarding more punitive damages, Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 10 p 5, Mon, March 30, 198.

Jurma, William E.; Wright, Beverly C. (1990). Follower reactions to male and female leaders who maintain or lose reward power. Small Group Research, 21, 97-112

Juror names & addresses not covered by First Amendment public access right; high court rules that state law sealing juror questionnaires makes data secret, News Media & the Law, Vol 12, No 3, pp 16-17, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Jurors deliver verdict. (survey of Kansans who have recently served on civil juries), The Journal of the Kansas Bar Association, Vol 57, No 3, pp 7(2), March, 1988.

Jurors speak: a roundtable with judges and lawyers. (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 118, p 1, Thu, December 4, 1986.

Jurors unlikely to follow judge's order to disregard testimony, study shows. (study done at Northwestern University by Jonathan D. Casper), Chicago Daily Bulletin, Vol 134, No 60, p 1, Mon, March 28, 1988.

Jurow, G. (1971). New data on the effect of a death qualified jury on the guilt determination process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 567-611.

Jurow, G. L. (1971). Juror verdicts and attitudes toward capital punishment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University.

Jury acquits alleged mafia boss, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Fri, March 13, 1987.

Jury acquits. (Great Britain), Solicitors Journal, Vol 129, No 7, p 105, February 15, 1985,

Jury awards reduced by post-trial proceedings, Journal of Accountancy, Vol 164, No 3, pp 64(3), September, 1987.

Jury bias case held retroactive by court, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Mon, January 13, 1987.

Jury demand for prosecutors OK'd. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, p 1, Wed, May 14, 1986,

Jury duty. (Great Britain), New Law Journal, Vol 138, No 6360, pp 395(1), June 10, 1988.

Jury instructions and adequacy of counsel . (incompetent to stand trial), Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, Vol 10, No 4, pp 267(2), July, 1986,

Jury instructions and evidence scrutinized. (insanity), Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, Vol 10, No 4, pp 273(4), July, 1986,

Jury instructions for civil and criminal RICO cases with commentary, Brigham Young University Law Review, Vol 1987, No 1, pp 1-150, January, 1987, - Winter,.

Jury selection. (Great Britain), New Law Journal, Vol 135, No 6231, pp 1173(2), November 29, 1985,

Jury sets record sex-bias award. (Oregon), The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 25, p 37, Mon, February 29, 1988.

Jury trial. (Scotland), Scots Law Times, No 8, pp 59-61, February 19, 1988.

Jury vetting. (Great Britain), New Law Journal, Vol 135, No 6187, pp 69-70, January 25, 1985,

Jury: attorney committed consumer fraud, The National Law Journal, Vol 10, No 49 p 6, Mon, August 15, 1988.

Juveniles to be tried by 'jury of their peers.' (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Thu, October 15, 1987.

Kaberon, Seth, 7th Circuit reverses jury bias decision, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 138, p 1, Fri, July 15, 1988, 06921449 .

Kaberon, Seth, 7th Circuit reverses 1985 ruling. (test for jury instructions on lesser included offenses) (United States v. Schmuck), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin Vol 134, No 25, p 1, Fri, February 5, 1988.

Kaberon, Seth, Appeal of jury selection ruling set in reverse bias case, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 133, p 1, Fri, July 8, 1988.

Kaberon, Seth, Court: no warning of contempt needed. (grand jury), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Tue, November 4, 1986.

Kaberon, Seth, Federal judges can't order summary jury trials: court, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 15, p 1, Fri, January 22, 1988.

Kaberon, Seth, Federal rule change affects jury instructions, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Mon, August 17, 1987.

Kaberon, Seth, Grand juries expired; convictions void, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 3, Mon, June 1, 1987.

Kaberon, Seth, Grand jury extensions upheld, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol No 33, p 1, Thu, February 18, 1988.

Kaberon, Seth, Greylord jury urged to see through 'smoke and mirrors.', Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 2, Fri, February 13, 1987.

Kaberon, Seth, Jury hears conflicting accounts of murder interrogation, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 14, p 3, Thu, January 21, 1988.

Kaberon, Seth, Jury told of court bribe scheme. (Greylord) (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Thu, November 13, 1986.

Kaberon, Seth, Testimony by judge should not have been allowed: 7th Circuit, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 212, p 1, Thu, October 29, 1987.

Kaberon, Seth, Threat in Florida may lead to prosecution in Chicago, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, No 251, p 1, Thu, December 24, 1987.

Kadane, Joseph B. (1984). After Hovey : A note on taking account of the automatic death penalty jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 115-120

Kadane, Joseph B. (1984). After Hovey : A note on taking account of the automatic death penalty jurors. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 115-120.

Kadish, M., & Kadish, S. (1971). The institutionalization of conflict: jury acquittals. Journal of Social Issues, 27(2), 199-218.

Kafker, Scott, The right to venue and the right to an impartial jury: resolving the conflict in the federal constitution, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol 52, No 3, pp 729-750, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Kagehiro, D. K. (1981). Schema-based information processing of simulated jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.

Kagehiro, Dorothy K.; Stanton, W. Clark (1985). Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178

Kagehiro, Dorothy K.; Stanton, W. Clark (1985). Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178.

Kagehiro, Dorothy K.; Stanton, W. Clark, Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. (jury verdicts), Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 2, pp 159-178, June, 1985,

Kairys, D., Schulman, J., & Harring, S. (1975). (Eds.), The jury system: New methods for reducing prejudice. Philadelphia: National Jury Project and National Lawyers Guild.

Kaiser, D. L. (1978). Group polarization in simulated juries: affective influences on evaluative judgments.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.

Kalven, H. Jr., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little, Brown, & Company.

Kameda, T. (1989). Effects of two procedural factors on group decision-making: deliberation style and assigned decision rule. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Kamenar, Paul; McIntyre, Kevin, Federal regulators show indifference. (jury trials for business), Legal Times, Vol 9, p 16, Mon, October 6, 1986.

Kamins, Barry, Jury nullification - a rarity in criminal-law practice, New Law Journal, Vol 194, p 1, August 20, 1985,

Kaminski, E. P. (1978). The effects of camera shot and witness type on jurors' responses to a videotaped deposition.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Kaminski, Edmund P.; Miller, Gerald R. (1984). How jurors respond to videotaped witnesses. Journal of Communication, 34, 88-102.

Kaminski, Edmund P.; Miller, Gerald R. (1984). How jurors respond to videotaped witnesses. Journal of Communication, 34, 88-102

Kandel, William L.; Panter, Danielle R., Jury trials under state EEO laws, Employee Relations Law Journal, Vol 12, No 1, pp 127-139, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Kane, Lake juries return record malpractice awards. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Wed, October 7, 1987.

Kaplan, Debora, Criminal law: the Oklahoma uniform jury instruction on the burden of proof for the insanity defense, Oklahoma Law Review, Vol 39, No 1, pp 97-107, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1979). Effects of juror identification with the victim depend on likelihood of victimization. Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1979). Effects of juror identification with the victim depend on likelihood of victimization. Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1979). Effects of juror identification with the victim depend on likelihood of victimization. Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455.

Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, L. E. (1979). Effects of juror identification with the victim depend on likelihood of victimization. Law and Human Behavior, in press.

Kaplan, M. F., & Schersching, C. (1980). Reducing juror bias: An experimental approach. In Lipsitt and Sales (Eds.), New directions in psycholegal research. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

Kaplan, Martin F. (1977). Discussion polarization effects in a modified jury decision paradigm: Informational influences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 40, 262-271

Kaplan, Martin F. (1983). A model of information integration in jury deliberation. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 5, 91-96

Kaplan, Martin F. (1984). How do people influence in jury deliberation? A social psychological view. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 407-412.

Kaplan, Martin F. (1984). How do people influence in jury deliberation? A social psychological view. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 407-412

Kaplan, Martin F. (1989). Judgments of murder mysteries as a means of studying juror cognition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 299-310

Kaplan, Martin F.; Kemmerick, Gwen D. (1974). Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 493-499

Kaplan, Martin F.; Krupa, Sharon (1986). Severe penalties under the control of others can reduce guilt verdicts. Law and Psychology Review, 1986, 14, 61-69.

Kaplan, Martin F.; Krupa, Sharon (1986). Severe penalties under the control of others can reduce guilt verdicts. Law and Psychology Review, 10 1-18

Kaplan, Martin F.; Miller, Charles E. (1977). Judgments and group discussion: Effect of presentation and memory factors on polarization. Social Psychology Quarterly, 40, 337-343

Kaplan, Martin F.; Miller, Lynn E. (1979). A model of cognitive processes in jurors. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 48-60

Kaplan, Martin F.; Miller, Lynn E. (1978). Reducing the effects of juror bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1443-1455

Kaplan, Martin F.; Steindorf, Jeffrey; Iervolino, Annette (1978). Courtrooms, politics, and morality: Toward a theoretical integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 155-160

Kaplan, Robert M.; Atkins, Cathie J. (1982). Psychological issues raised in the California Supreme Court case People vs Collins. Psychological Reports, 50, 259-266

Karcher, J. T. (1969). Importance of voir dire. Practicing Lawyer, 15.

Kargon, Robert (1986). Expert testimony in historical perspective. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 15-27

Karuza, Jurgis; Brickman, Philip (1981). Preference for similarity in higher and lower status others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 504-508

Karuza, Jurgis; Carey, Thomas O. (1984). Relative preference and adaptiveness of behavioral blame for observers of rape victims. Journal of Personality, 52, 249-260

Kassin & Wrightsman (1984)

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133-146.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423-442.

Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133-146.

Kassin, Saul M. (1983). Deposition testimony and the surrogate witness: Evidence for a "messenger effect" in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 281-288

Kassin, Saul M. (1983). Deposition testimony and the surrogate witness: Evidence for a "messenger effect" in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 281-288.

Kassin, Saul M. (1984). TV cameras, public self consciousness, and mock juror performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20,-sup 3 336 349.

Kassin, Saul M. (1984). TV cameras, public self consciousness, and mock juror performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 336-349

Kassin, Saul M.; Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Smith, Vicki L. (1989). The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098

Kassin, Saul M.; Juhnke, Ralph G. (1983). Juror experience and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1182-1191.

Kassin, Saul M.; Juhnke, Ralph G. (1983). Juror experience and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1182-1191

Kassin, Saul M.; Reddy, Marisa E.; Tulloch, William F. (1990). Juror interpretations of ambiguous evidence: The need for cognition, presentation order, and persuasion. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 43-55

Kassin, Saul M.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133-146

Kassin, Saul M.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423-442.

Kassin, Saul M.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1979). On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1877-1887

Kassin, Saul M.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423-442

Kassin, Saul M.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1981). Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 489-506

Kassman, Marty, Stone got caught between a rock and a hard place: grand power to subpoena outtakes that reveal confidential news sources. (Bradley M. Stone), COMM-ENT, Vol 10, No 2, pp 623-653, January, 1988, - Winter.

Katz, L. S. (1968-1969, December/January). The twelve man jury. Trial, pp. 39-40; 42.

Katz's scan of jury verdict reveal psychic overload. (Philadelphia), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 9, p 3, Mon, August 18, 1986,

Katzev, Richard D.; Wishart, Scott S. (1985). The impact of judicial commentary concerning eyewitness identifications on jury decision making. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 733-745.

Katzev, Richard D.; Wishart, Scott S. (1985). The impact of judicial commentary concerning eyewitness identifications on jury decision making. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 733-745

Kauffman, R. A., & Ryckman, R. M. (1979). Effects of locus-of-control, outcome severity, and attitudinal similarity of defendant on attributions of criminal responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 340-343.

Kaye, D.H., Statistical analysis in jury discrimination cases. (this article is a revised version of a chapter in Statistical Methods in Discrimination Litigation edited by D.H. Kaye and Mikel Aickin), Jurimetrics Journal, Vol 25, No 3, pp 274-289, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Kaylin, Jennifer, Exclusion of young adults from jury pools ruled illegal, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 6, April 27, 1985,

Keeton, R. E. (1954). Trial tactics and methods. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.

Keilitz, Ingo; Miller, Susan L. (1980). Handicapped adolescents and young adults in the justice system. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1, 117-126

Kelley, Patrick J.; Beyler, Keith H., Large damage awards and the insurance crisis: causes, effects and cures. (Allerton House Conference on Tort Damages, May 15-17, 1986), Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 75, No 3, pp 140(21), November, 198.

Kelley, Thomas M. (1983). Status offenders can be different: A comparative study of delinquent careers. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 365-380

Kelly, D. P. (1983). Rape victims' perceptions of criminal justice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

Kelly, F. Donald (1976). The counseling jury: A step toward accountability. Counselor Education and Supervision, 15, 228-232

Kelner, Joseph; Kelner, Robert S., Alternate jurors. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Wed, June 10, 1987.

Kelsey, Margaret Carolyn, Control of the jury. (Trial) (Seventeenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1986-1987), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 76, No 3, pp 971-986, February, 1988.

Kempf, Kimberly L.; Austin, Roy L. (1986). Older and more recent evidence on racial discrimination in sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 29-48.

Kempf, Kimberly L.; Austin, Roy L. (1986). Older and more recent evidence on racial discrimination in sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 29-48

Kennady, E. Hubbard, III, The habitual offender statute: discussion of the enhanced range of punishment during voir dire: between a rock (of Scylla) and a hard place (of Charybdis). (Texas), Texas Bar Journal, Vol 51, No 5, pp 436(4), May, 1988.

Kenny, Anthony (1984). The psychiatric expert in court. Psychological Medicine, 14, 291-302

Kent-Smith, Henry L., Damages - jury instructions - upon request, juries in a personal injury suit must be instructed on the tax-exempt status of a damage award, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol 19, No 1, pp 231-243, September 22, 1987, - Fal.

Kerr, N., Atkin, R., Stasser, G., Meek, D., Holt, R., & Davis, J. Guilt (1976). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned rule on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282-294.

Kerr, N., Atkin, R., Stasser, G., Meek, D., Holt, R., & Davis, J. Guilt (1976). Beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned rulV on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282-294.

Kerr, N. L. (1980, June). Effects of prior juror experience on juror behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Law and Society Association and the ISA Research Committee on Sociology of Law, Madison, Wisconsin.

Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (1982). The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.

Kerr, N. L., Nerenz, D. R., & Herrick, D. (1979). Role playing and the study of jury behavior. Sociological Methods Research, 7, 337-355.

Kerr, N.L., Harmon, D.L., and Graves, J.K (1982). Independence of multiple verdicts by jurors and juries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 12-29.

Kerr, Norbert L. (1978). Beautiful and blameless: Effects of victim attractiveness and responsibility on mock jurors' verdicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 479-482

Kerr, Norbert L. (1978). Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1431-1442

Kerr, Norbert L. (1981). Effects of prior juror experience on juror behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 175-193

Kerr, Norbert L. (1981). Social transition schemes: Charting the group's road to agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 684-702

Kerr, Norbert L.; Bull, Raymond H.; MacCoun, Robert J.; Rathborn, Harriet (1985). Effects of victim attractiveness, care and disfigurement on the judgements of American and British mock jurors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 47-58.

Kerr, Norbert L.; et al (1976). Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 282-294

Kerr, Norbert L.; Harmon, Douglas L.; Graves, James K. (1982). Independence of multiple verdicts by jurors and juries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 12-29

Kerr, Norbert L.; Huang, Juin Yih (1986). Jury verdicts: How much difference does one juror make? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 325-343.

Kerr, Norbert L.; Huang, Juin Yih (1986). Jury verdicts: How much difference does one juror make? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 325-343

Kerr, Norbert L.; Kurtz, Susan T. (1977). Effects of a victim's suffering and respectability on mock juror judgments: Further evidence on the just world theory. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 8, 42-56

Kerr, Norbert L.; MacCoun, Robert J. (1985). The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363.

Kerr, Norbert L.; MacCoun, Robert J. (1985). The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 349-363

Kerr, Norbert L.; Sawyers, Gary W. (1979). Independence of multiple verdicts within a trial by mock jurors. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 16-27

Kerr, Norbert L.; Watts, Barbara L. (1982). After division, before decision: Group faction size and predeliberation thinking. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 198-205

Kessler, J. B. (1973). A content analytic comparison of the six-member and twelve-member jury decision-making processes.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

Kessler, J. B. (1973). An empirical study of six- and twelve-member jury decision-making processes. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 6, 712-734.

Kessler, J. B. (1975). The social psychology of jury deliberations. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. (Volume 4). Sage Criminal Justice System Annuals. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1975.

Kette, Gerhard; Brandstatter, Hermann (1990). Time series analysis of a murder trial. Social Behaviour, 5, 15-31

Kidd, Robert F.; Sieveking, Nicholas A. (1974). Effects of labeling and of theoretical explanations of deviancy on juror attitudes: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Community Psychology, 2, 187-191

Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The Psychology of Commitment. New York: Academic Press.

King, Michael A., Criminal law and procedure; restricting an accused's right to have his guilt tried by an randomly selected jury. (4th circuit review, 1984-1985 case note), Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol 43, No 2, pp 539-556, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Kingston, Timothy, Constitutional law - does the new death qualification standard ensure a biased jury?, Land and Water Law Review, Vol 21, No 2, pp 579-589, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Klein, H. E. (1968). The effects of expert testimony in sanity hearings on verdicts of simulated juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma.

Klein, Kitty; Creech, Blanche (1982). Race, rape, and bias: Distortion of prior odds and meaning changes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 21-33

Kliegerman, Ronald E., Charges to the jury and requests to charge in a criminal case: 2 vols., (book reviews), New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 2, PUBLISHER Callahan & Co., November 2, 1984,

Kline, F. G., & Jess, P. H. (1966). Prejudicial publicity: Its effects on law school mock juries. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 113-120.

Kline, M. V. (1979). The role of suggestibility in lawyer-jury relationships. In L. E. Abt, & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), Social psychology and discretionary law. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

Kline, Milton V. (1979). Defending the mentally ill: The insanity defense and the role of forensic hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 375-401

Klofas, John; Weisheit, Ralph (1986). Pleading guilty but mentally ill: Adversarial justice and mental health. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 9, 491-501

Knapman, Lynne, Death by fire started by defendant - directions to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 468-469, July, 1986,

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Aider and abettor - attempted rape - evidence against principal corroborated -direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Review, pp 458-460, July, 1986,

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Attempting to obtain property by deception - causation - operative cause question of fact for jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 398-399, June, 1987.

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Causing grievous bodily harm with intent - foresight of harm - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 466-467, July, 1986,

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Evidence. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 110-112, February, 1988.

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Section 1(1) of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953 - offensive weapon - whether jury must be unanimous that article is offensive per se or that it is possessed with intent. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 239-241, April, 1986,

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Summing up - admission of essential ingredient - duty of prosecution counsel. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 127-128, February, 1988.

Knapman, Lynne; Smith, J.C., Sword stick - offensive per se. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 695-696, October, 1988.

Knivila, Kelly, Right to jury trial. (Trial) (Seventeenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1986-1987) Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 76, No 3, pp 946-971, February, 1988.

Knowles, Lyle; Hickman, Kenneth (1984). Selecting a jury of peers: How close do we get? Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 207-212.

Knowles, Lyle; Hickman, Kenneth (1984). Selecting a jury of peers: How close do we get? Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 207-212

Knudsen, Donald P., Inequities and abuses of death qualification: causes and cures, South Dakota Law Review, Vol 32, No 2, pp 281-299, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Koenig, Dorean M.; Kerr, Norbert L.; Van Hoek, Dawn, Michigan standard criminal jury instructions: judges' perspectives after ten years' use, Cooley Law Review, Vol 4, No 2, pp 347-373, May, 198.

Kohn, Alan, Peremptory challenges barred to get minority-free juries, New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 1, December 5, 1984,

Kohn, Alan, U.S. trial judges cautioned on bias in juror challenges, New York Law Journal, Vol 198, No 85, p 1, Fri, October 30, 1987.

Kornstein, Daniel J., The Convention and partial verdicts, New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 2, Mon, June 15, 1987.

Krafka, C. L. (1985). Sexually explicit, sexually violent, and violent media: effects of multiple naturalistic exposures and debriefing on female viewers (jury decisionmaking). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Kramer, Daniel; Moore, Thomas A., Requests to charge. (medical malpractice) (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 43, p 3, Wed, August 31, 1988.

Kramer, Geoffrey P.; Kerr, Norbert L. (1989). Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior: A methodological note. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 89-99

Krasity, Kenneth A., The role of the judge in jury trials: the elimination of judicial evaluation of fact in American state courts from 1795 to 1913, University of Detroit Law Review, Vol 62, No 4, pp 595-632, June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Kress, J. B. (1978). Rise to the challenge. Federal grand jury repression, resistance, and reform, 1970-1973.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Krueger, H. K. (1988). Juridic decisions: the impact and perceived relevance of intentional evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.

Kuehn, John L., Speaker-telephone testimony in civil jury trials: the next best thing to being there?, Wisconsin Law Review, Vol 1988, No 2, pp 293-319, March, 1988.

Kuhlman, Darlene, The new standards for malice, Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol 31, No 1, pp 153-166, October, 1986.

Kulka, Richard A.; Kessler, Joan B. (1978). Is justice really blind? The influence of litigant physical attractiveness on juridical judgment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 366-381

Kunin, C. C. (1988). Free press and fair trial: pretrial publicity and motions for change of venue. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

Kunstler, W. M. (1983, March 11). It takes a lawyer, not a judge, to quiz prospective jurors. New York Times, pp. 28.

Kurdys, D. B. (1983). Bias and locus of control expectancy in jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Berkeley.

Kurn, Sharon I., An unfortunate change in Arizona's lesser-included offense jury instruction, Arizona Law Review, Vol 27, No 2, pp 515-528, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Kuvin, Seymour F. (1986). Psychiatric disability evaluations: Malingering, advocacy, bias. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7, 10, 23

Kuzins, Rebecca, Jury instruction on cocaine type required by court. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 97, p 1, December 25, 1984,

L. S. E. Jury Project. (1973). Juries and the rules of evidence. The Criminal Law Review, 208-223.

La Kind, E. D. (1978). The effects of social information and mood on social outlook and juridic decisions.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.

Laben, Joyce K.; Kashgarian, Mark; Nessa, Donald B.; Spencer, Lona D. (1977). Reform from the inside: Mental health center evaluations of competency to stand trial. Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 52-62

Labros, Thomas D., The summary trial as an alternative to jury system, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 2, Fri, March 6, 1987.

LaFree, Gary D.; Reskin, Barbara F.; Visher, Christy A. (1985). Jurors' responses to victims' behavior and legal issues in sexual assault trials. Social Problems, 32, 389-407

LaFree, Gary D.; Reskin, Barbara F.; Visher, Christy A. (1985). Jurors' responses to victims' behavior and legal issues in sexual assault trials. Social Problems, 32, 389-407.

Lakind, E., & Hornstein, H. A. (1979). The effect of mood and social oulook on hypothetical juridic decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 548-559.

LaKind, Elizabeth; Hornstein, Harvey A. (1979). The effect of mood and social outlook on hypothetical juridic decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 548-559

Lambert, David, Juveniles' right to trial by jury: recent developments, Clearinghouse Review, Vol 18, No 8, pp 876-877, December, 1984,

Lamberth, John; Krieger, Edith; Shay, Susanne (1982). Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 419-434

Lamberth, John; Krieger, Edith; Shay, Susanne. (1982). Juror decision making: A case of attitude change mediated by authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 419-434.

Lambros, Thomas D., Summary jury trial, Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly, Vol 37, No 2, pp 139-148, January, 1987, - Winter.

Lambros, Thomas D., The summary jury trial - an alternative method of resolving disputes. (Alternative Dispute Resolution and the Courts), Judicature, Vol 69, No 5, pp 286(5), February, 1986,

Lance, James R., Beyond reasonable doubt: appellate review of jury instructions containing erroneous reasonable doubt definitions. (Fourth Circuit Review), Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol 42, No 2, pp 572-587, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Lands, N. E. (1986). Race and jury verdict predictions: when is race a factor in conviction proneness?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami.

Lane, Margaret J. (1984). Eyewitness identification: Should psychologists be permitted to address the jury? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1321-1365

Lane, Margaret J., Eyewitness identification: should psychologists be permitted to address the jury?, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 75, No 4, pp 1321-1365, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Lanza Kaduce, Lonn; Bishop, Donna M. (1986). Legal fictions and criminology: The jurisprudence of drunk driving. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 358-378

Larntz, Kinley (1975). Reanalysis of Vidmar's data on the effects of decision alternatives on verdicts of simulated jurors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 123-125

Lassiter, G. Daniel; Irvine, Audrey A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point on view of judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 268-276

Lauderdale, Helen J. (1984). The admissibility of expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1366-1416.

Lauderdale, Helen J. (1984). The admissibility of expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 1366-1416

Lauer, Kent, Minorities termed underrepresented in federal juries; expert witness study, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Thu, September 3, 198.

Lauter, David, Civil jury trials ending in U.S. courts, The National Law Journal Vol 8, p 3, Mon, June 23, 1986,

Lauter, David, Congress OKs jury trial funds, The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 30, Mon, July 7, 1986,

Lauter, David, Grand jury data sharing is proposed, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 5, October 1, 1984,

Lauter, David, Jury-trial ban to end soon?, The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 13, Mon, June 30, 1986,

Law book's author ruled qualified for jury service. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 2, November 30, 1984,

Lee, A. F. (1977). The grand jury: an empirical reevaluation.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Miami University.

Lee, Margaret T.; Ofshe, Richard (1981). The impact of behavioral style and status characteristics on social influence: A test of two competing theories. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 73-82

Leen, Mark, Scope of defendant's right to a unanimous jury verdict in second degree murder cases. (Recent Developments in Utah Law), Utah Law Review, Vol 1988, No 1, pp 196-203, January, 1988, - Winter.

Lees Haley, Paul R. (1984). The psychology of jury selection. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 61-64

Lees-Haley, Paul R., Psychology of jury selection, Res Gestae, Vol 28, No 12, pp 650-651, June, 1985,

Legant, P. (1973). The deserving victim: effects of length of pretrial detention, crime severity, and juror attitudes on simulated jury decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.

Leigh, Lawrence J., A theory of jury trial advocacy, Utah Law Review, Vol 1984 No 4, pp 763-806, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Leippe, Michael R. (1980). Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 261-274

Leippe, Michael R. (1985). The influence of eyewitness nonidentifications on mock jurors' judgments of a court case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 656-672

Leippe, Michael R.; Romanczyk, Ann (1989). Reactions to child , eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103-132

Lenehan, Gregory E.; O'Neill, Patrick (1981). Reactance and conflict as determinants of judgment in a mock jury experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 231-239

Lerner, Steve (1985). The wrong arm of the law. Social Action and the Law, 11, 18-23

Lester, Randall C., The "substantial factor test" for causation, Montana Law Review, Vol 48, No 2, pp 391-400, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

LeVan, Elizabeth A. (1984). Nonverbal communication in the courtroom: Attorney beware. Law and Psychology Review, 8 83-104

Leventhal, Gloria; Krate, Ronald (1977). Physical attractiveness and severity of sentencing. Psychological Reports, 40, 315-318

Levin, Doron, Social science and law: do jury consultants really help in jury selection?, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 134, p 1, Mon, July 11, 1988.

Levine, James P. (1983). Jury toughness: The impact of conservatism on criminal court verdicts. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 71-87.

Levine, James P. (1983). Jury toughness: The impact of conservatism on criminal court verdicts. Crime and Delinquency, 29, 71-87

Levine, Murray; et al (1978). Adapting the jury trial for program evaluation: A report of an experience. Evaluation and Program Planning, 1, 177-186

Levison, G. K. (1978). The effects of natural audio and compressed audio speech presentation on four factors of simulated-jury decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College.

Levit, W. H., Nelson, D. W., Ball, V. C., & Chernick, R. (1971). Expediting voir dire: An empirical study. Southern California Law Review, 44, 916-995.

Lewin, T. (1982, March 9). Business and the law. Jury research: Ethics argued. The New York Times, pp. 28.

Lind E. A., Conley, J., Erickson, B. E., & O'Barr, W. M. (1978). Social attribution and conversation style in trial testimony. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1558-1567.

Lind, E.A. & Partridge, A. (1982). Suggestions for improving juror understanding of instructions. In P. Marshall, T. Flannery, & P.E. Higginbotham, (Eds.) Pattern criminal jury instructions. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.

Lindsay, R. C.; Lim, Robert; Marando, Louis; Cully, Deborah (1986). Mock juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 447-459.

Lindsay, R. C.; Lim, Robert; Marando, Louis; Cully, Deborah (1986). Mock juror evaluations of eyewitness testimony: A test of metamemory hypotheses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 447-459

Lindsay, R. C.; Wells, Gary L.; O'Connor, Fergus J. (1989). Mock juror belief of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses: A replication and extension. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 333-339

Linz & Penrod (in press).

Linz, Daniel G.; Penrod, Steven (1984). Increasing attorney persuasiveness in the courtroom. Law and Psychology Review, 8 1-47

Linz, Daniel; Penrod, Steven; McDonald, Elaine (1986). Attorney communication and impression making in the courtroom: Views from off the bench. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 281-302

Lipinski, R. M. (1989). Stability in jury process: a comparison of three civil cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Lipton, J. P. (1979). Sociocultural and personality perspectives on jury behavior and decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.

Lipton, Jack P. (1983). Racism in the jury box: The Hispanic defendant. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5, 275-290.

Lipton, Jack P. (1983). Racism in the jury box: The Hispanic defendant. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5, 275-290

Lisko, Roy K., Judging the jury., (book reviews), Trial, Vol 22, No 12, pp 74(2) December, 1986.

Lisko, Roy K., Jury selection: strategy and science., (book reviews), Trial, Vol 23, No 9, pp 109(1), September, 198.

Lloyd Bostock, Sally M. (1981). Do lawyers' references to "common sense" have anything to do with what ordinary people think? British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 161-163

Lockhart v. McCree and the death-qualified jury, Army Lawyer, pp 72(2), August, 1986,

Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Loftus, E. L. (1980a). Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 9-15.

Loftus, E. L. (1980b). Psychological aspects of courtroom testimony. In F. Wright, C. Bahn, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Annals of the New Yord Academy of Sciences: Forensic psychology and psychiatry (Vol. 347). New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.

Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1980). Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 9-15

Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564-572

Loftus, Elizabeth F.; Schneider, Norman G., Challenging eyewitness testimony; jurors believe confident witnesses even when they are wrong, Trial, Vol 23, No 6 pp 40(5), June, 1987.

Logan, Gary J., Post-trial adjustments to jury awards, Trial, Vol 23, No 10, pp 96(2), October, 198.

Loh, W. D. (1984). Social Research in the judicial process: Cases, readings, and text. New York: Sage.

Loh, Wallace D. (1981). Perspectives on psychology and law. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 314-355

Lonergan, Kevin T., Voir dire and challenges: law and practice, Army Lawyer, 38(6), October, 1987.

Louis, Martin B., Allocating adjudicative decision making authority between the trial and appellate levels: a unified view of the scope of review, the judge-jury question, and procedural discretion, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 64, No 5, pp 993-1047, June, 1986,

Lovejoy, G. H. (1976). The effects of the pre-trial use of judicial controls on simulated jury decisions.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

Lowenstein, L. F. (1977). Are juries impartial? Journal of Criminal Law, Oct Dec No 164 247-258

Lowenstein, L. F. (1980). Are juries impartial? Police Journal, 12, 28-30

Lowenstein, L. F. (1980). Are juries impartial? Police Journal, 12, 24-28

Ludwig, Kurt; Fontaine, Gary (1978). Effect of witnesses' expertness and manner of delivery of testimony on verdicts on simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 42, 955-961

Luginbuhl, James; Middendorf, Kathi (1988). Death penalty beliefs and jurors' responses to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 263-281

Luginbuhl, James; Middendorf, Kathi Death penalty beliefs and jurors' responses to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 263-281.

Luginbuhl, James; Middendorf, Kathi, Death penalty beliefs and jurors' responses to aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 3, pp 263-281, September, 1988.

Lupfer, Michael B.; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Brown, Craig M. (1987). (1988). The influence of level of moral reasoning on the decisions of jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 653-667.

Lupfer, Michael B.; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Brown, Craig M. (1987). The influence of level of moral reasoning on the decisions of jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 653-667

Lupfer, Michael; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Smalley, Dale; et al (1985). An attributional analysis of jurors' judgments in civil cases. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 743-751.

Lupfer, Michael; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Smalley, Dale (1986). Presenting favorable and unfavorable character evidence to juries. Law and Psychology Review, 1986, Aug 51, 242-258.

Lupfer, Michael; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Smalley, Dale; et al (1985). An attributional analysis of jurors' judgments in civil cases. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 743-751

Lupfer, Michael; Cohen, Robert; Bernard, J. L.; Smalley, Dale (1986). Presenting favorable and unfavorable character evidence to juries. Law and Psychology Review, 10 59-71

Lussier, Richard J.; Perlman, Daniel; Breen, Lawrence J. (1977). Causal attributions, attitude similarity, and the punishment of drug offenders. British Journal of Addiction, 72, 357-364

Lyon, Donald M., Appeal and error; inconsistent jury instructions. (Survey of Washington Law), Gonzaga Law Review, Vol 23, No 3, pp 671-677, October, 1988.

Lyons, Arthur W.; Regina, Joanne (1986). Mock jurors' behavior as a function of sex and exposure to an educational videotape about jury duty. Psychological Reports, 58, 599-604.

Lyons, Arthur W.; Regina, Joanne (1986). Mock jurors' behavior as a function of sex and exposure to an educational videotape about jury duty. Psychological Reports, 58, 599-604

Lytton, William B., Grand jury secrecy - time for a reevaluation. (Symposium on the Grand Jury), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 75, No 4, pp 1100-1128, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Maatman, Gerald L., Jr., The future of summary jury trials in federal courts: Strandell v. Jackson County, John Marshall Law Review, Vol 21, No 3, pp 455-487, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Macauley, William A.; Heubel, Edward J.; Holzman, Charles J., The never ending quest for representative juries: the reluctant juror, Detroit College of Law Review, Vol 1984, No 4, pp 919-932, December 22, 1984, - Winter,

Maccoun, R. J. (1984). Modeling the impact of extralegal bias and defined standards of proof on the decisions of mock jurors and juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

MacCoun, Robert J. (1989). Experimental research on jury decision making. Science, 244, 1046-1050

MacCoun, Robert J., Anatomy of a Jury: the System on Trial., (book reviews), Judicature, Vol 70, No 3, pp 172(2), PUBLISHER Random House, October, 1986.

MacCoun, Robert J., Evaluating jury performance: complex litigation confronts the jury system; a case study. (from Judicature), (book reviews), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 2, PUBLISHER University Publications of America, July 18, 1985,

MacCoun, Robert J.; Kerr, Norbert L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33.

MacCoun, Robert J.; Kerr, Norbert L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21-33

MacCoun, Robert J.; Tyler, Tom R. (1988). The basis of citizens' perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 333-352

MacCoun, Robert J.; Tyler, Tom R., The basis of citizens' perceptions of the criminal jury; procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 12, No 3, pp 333-352, September, 1988.

MacCoun,-Robert J.; Tyler, Tom R. (1988). The basis of citizens' perceptions of the criminal jury: Procedural fairness, accuracy, and efficiency. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 333-352.

MacKinnon, Catherine A. (1983). Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8, 635-658.

MacKinnon, Catherine A. (1983). Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: Toward feminist jurisprudence. Signs, 8, 635-658

Macrae, C. Neil; Shepherd, John W. (1989). Do criminal stereotypes mediate juridic judgements? British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 189-191

Maffeo, Patricia A. (1988). The post trial interview: Ethical and legal concerns. Forensic Reports, 1, 141-154

Magid, Laurie, Challenges to jury composition: purging the Sixth Amendment analysis of equal protection concepts, San Diego Law Review, Vol 24, No 5, pp 1081-1116, September, 1987.

Mahoney, Anne R. (1982). American jury voir dire and the ideal of equal justice. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 481-494.

Mahoney, Anne R. (1982). American jury voir dire and the ideal of equal justice. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18, 481-494

Mahoney, Joan (1988). An essay on surrogacy and feminist thought. Special Issue: Forum on surrogate motherhood: Politics and privacy. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 16, 81-88

Majewski, Amy L., Inconsistent jury verdicts returned on multiple count indictment of a single defendant. (Alaska), Alaska Law Review, Vol 3, No 2, pp 387-409, December, 1986.

Malmquist, Carl P. (1985). United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: A critical look. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 13, 137-164

Malouff, John; Schutte, Nicola S. (1989). Shaping juror attitudes: Effects of requesting different damage amounts in personal injury trials. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 491-497

Mancini, Marie-Laurence, Jury selection - peremptory challenges subject to scrutiny under Sixth Amendment right to impartial jury, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 16, No 1, pp 192-219, January, 1986, - Winter,

Mansfield, John H., Jury notice, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 74, No 2, pp 395-428, December, 1985,

Mapley, G. E. (1982, March). The Effect of prior mock jury experience on subsequent decisions of guilt. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Spartanburg, South Carolina.

March, Mary G., Constitutional law - Sixth Amendment challenge to discriminatory use of peremptory challenges limited by harmless error doctrine, Temple Law Review, Vol 61, No 1, pp 261-279, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Marcotte, Paul, 'The jury will disregard...' but new study suggests that by then it's too late. (American Bar Foundation research on whether jurors follow judge's admonition to disregard certain evidence) (includes related article), ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 34(2), November 1, 1987.

Marcotte, Paul, Jurors give nod to retrial: sleeping overturns judgment, ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 18(2), June 1, 1987.

Marcotte, Paul, No forced summary jury trials: trial judge can't order parties to try settlement device, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 32(1), April 1, 1988.

Marcotte, Paul, Putting jury in your shoes. (video in the courtroom as way of convincing the jury), ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 20(1), July 1, 1987.

Marcotte, Paul, Summary jury trials touted; nonbinding 'verdict' induces settlement of most cases, ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 27(1), April 1, 1987.

Marcotte, Paul, Voir dire straits; picking sympathetic juror is hit-and-miss, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 32(1), February 1, 1988.

Marder, Nancy S., Gender dynamics and jury deliberations, Yale Law Journal, Vol 96, No 3, pp 593-612, January, 1987.

Margolin, Kenneth N., Juries' rightful power. (from Boston Sunday Globe Dec. 22, 1985), Trial, Vol 22, No 4, pp 96(1), April, 1986,

Marks, Gary; Miller, Norman (1985). The effect of certainty on consensus judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 165-177

Marquart, James W.; Ekland Olson, Sheldon; Sorensen, Jonathan R. (1989). Gazing into the crystal ball: Can jurors accurately predict dangerousness in capital cases? Law and Society Review, 23, 449-468

Marshall, L. L. ( ). Juror, judge, and counsel perceptions of voir dire (illinois). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University Graduate School.

Marshall, Linda L.; Smith, Althea (1986). The effects of demand characteristics, evaluation anxiety, and expectancy on juror honesty during voir dire. Journal of Psychology, 120, 205-217.

Marshall, Linda L.; Smith, Althea (1986). The effects of demand characteristics, evaluation anxiety, and expectancy on juror honesty during voir dire. Journal of Psychology, 120, 205-217

Marshall, W. L., Parker, L., & Hayes, B. J. (1982). Treating public speaking problems: A study using flooding and the elements of skills training. Behavior Modification, 6, 147-170.

Martin, K. J. (1937). The waiver of jury trail in felony cases, with special reference to ohio and maryland. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Martin, Merle P.; Fuerst, William L., A juror management simulation. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 89-99, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Martin, Michael J.; Schumm, Walter R.; Bugaighis, Margaret A.; Jurich, Anthony P.; et al (1987). Family violence and adolescents' perceptions of outcomes of family conflict. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 165-171

Martin, Michael M., Juror testimony to impeach verdict, New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Fri, June 12, 1987.

Martin, Michael, Who decides admissibility question? Judge or jury? (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 49, p 3, Fri, September 9, 1988.

Masling, M. S. (1982). Crime seriousness and attitudes towards the accused. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Master, Franklin D. (1984). Punishment of the mentally ill offender: The state of Nevada vs Patrick Henry Lizotte. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 5, 17-27

Masters, Kim, Jury's rationality: reasonable doubt, Legal Times, Vol 7, p 1, December 3, 1984,

Mathews, M. Cash, The county grand jury system: a study in reforms, The Justice System Journal, Vol 10, No 1, pp 110-119, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Mathewson, Mark, Juries won't understand what they're doing if they can't understand what judges and lawyers are saying, Student Lawyer, Vol 15, No 2, pp 6(3), October, 1986.

Matlon, R. J. (1981). Instructional practices: Teaching communication in the legal process. Communication Education, 30, 399-409.

Matlon, R. J. (1982). Bridging the gap between communication education and the legal education. Communication Education, 31, 39-53.

Matlon, Ronald J.; Davis, James W.; Catchings, Billy W.; Derr, William R.; et al (1986). Factors affecting jury decision making. Social Action and the Law, 12, 41-48

Matlon, Ronald J.; Davis, James W.; Catchings, Billy W.; Derr, William R.; et al (1986). Factors affecting jury decision making. Social Action and the Law, 12, 41-48.

Matlon, Ronald J.; Davis, James W.; Catchings, Billy W.; Derr, William R.; Waldron, Vincent R., Factors affecting jury decision-making, Social Action and the Law, Vol 12, No 2, pp 41-48, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Maxwell, Christopher K., Verdict by direction in the criminal trial. (Australia) Law Society Journal, Vol 26, No 5, pp 54-57, June, 1988.

Mayer, Ginger G., Retroactive application of constitutional rules regarding criminal procedure, University of Cincinnati Law Review, Vol 56, No 3, pp 1097-1114, January, 1988, - Winte.

Mays, Daniel T.; Franks, Cyril M. (1980). Getting worse: Psychotherapy or no treatment the jury should still be out. Professional Psychology, 11, 78-92

McAllaster, Carolyn, Tips on voir dire, Trial, Vol 24, No 4, pp 94-95, April, 1988.

McAllister, Hunter A.; Bregman, Norman J. (1986). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 168-170.

McAllister, Hunter A.; Bregman, Norman J. (1989). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: A test of the disconfirmed expectancy explanation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 20-29

McAllister, Hunter A.; Bregman, Norman J. (1986). Juror underutilization of eyewitness nonidentifications: Theoretical and practical implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 168-170

McCann, C. D. (1982). Preserving sequential order: goal-directed processing and social-cognitive consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario.

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard E. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? American Psychologist, 38, 550-563.

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard E. (1984). Process and outcome considerations in juror evaluation of eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, 39, 1065-1066.

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard E. (1984). Process and outcome considerations in juror evaluation of eyewitness testimony. American Psychologist, 39, 1065-1066

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard E. (1983). A time to speak, or a time to keep silence? American Psychologist, 38, 573-575

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard E. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? American Psychologist, 38, 550-563

McCloskey, Michael; Egeth, Howard; McKenna, Judith (1986). The experimental psychologist in court: The ethics of expert testimony. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 1-13

McComas, William C.; Noll, Mark E. (1974). Effects of seriousness of charge and punishment severity on the judgments of simulated jurors. Psychological Record, 24, 545-547

McConahay, J. B., Mullin, C. J., & Frederick, J. (1977). The uses of social science in trials with political overtones: The trial of Joan Little. Law and Contemporary Problems, 41, 205-229.

McCready, J. C. (1954). Challenging jurors. Dickinson Law Review, 58, 384-386.

McCune, E. E. (1957). Jury selection in california: a study in judicial administration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

McElhaney, James W., Creating tension; making a jury care about what happens next, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 84(2), June 1, 1988.

McElhaney, James W., The golden rule, ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 106(2), December 1, 1987.

McEvoy, Glenn M.; Buller, Paul F.; Roghaar, Steven R. (1988). A jury of one's peers. Personnel Administrator, 33, 94-101.

McEvoy, Glenn M.; Buller, Paul F.; Roghaar, Steven R. (1988). A jury of one's peers. Personnel Administrator, 33, 94-101

McGaughey, Karen J.; Stiles, William B. (1983). Courtroom interrogation of rape victims: Verbal response mode use by attorneys and witnesses during direct examination vs. cross examination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 78-87.

McGillis, D. (1979). Biases ajl jury decision making. In I. Frieze, D. Bar-Tel, & J. Bass (Eds.), New approaches to social problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McGillis, D. (1979). Biases and jury decision making. In I. Frieze, D. Bar-Tel, & J. Bass (Eds.), New approaches to social problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

McGlynn, Richard P.; Dreilinger, Evan A. (1981). Mock juror judgment and the insanity plea: Effects of incrimination and sanity information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 166-180

Mcgowen, K. R. (1981). Systematic jury selection: what's the verdict?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.

McGowen, K. R. (1981). Systematic jury selection: what's the verdict?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Auburn University.

McGowen, Ramsey; King, Glen D. (1982). Effects of authoritarian, anti authoritarian, and egalitarian legal attitudes on mock juror and jury decisions. Psychological Reports, 51, 1067-1074.

McGowen, Ramsey; King, Glen D. (1982). Effects of authoritarian, anti authoritarian, and egalitarian legal attitudes on mock juror and jury decisions. Psychological Reports, 51, 1067-1074

McGuire, Mary V.; Bermant, Gordon (1977). Individual and group decisions in response to a mock trial: A methodological note. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 220-226

McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327-337.

McHugh, Carol, Are juries becoming too generous? (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, April 27,

McHugh, Carol, Court says jury can hear tape recordings. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, December 20, 1985,

McHugh, Carol, Summary jury trial hailed, use encouraged in certain cases. (Cook County Circuit Court, Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Thu, April 17, 1986,

McInerney, Murray, There's no substitute for a jury. (Australia), Law Inst. J., Vol 59, No 10, pp 1084-1086, October, 1985,

McKay, H. Bryan; Lerner, Melvin J. (1977). Sympathy and suffering: Reactions to the plight of an "innocent victim." Crime and Justice, 4, 282-289

McKenna, J. A. (1986). Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness performance: a critical evaluation (identification). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

McMahon, E. A. (1974). A study of the relationship of psychiatric testimony and juror variables to the decision process.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

McMahon, E.J., Juror data held confidential; disclosure denied to media; Court of Appeals also rules on interest on verdicts. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 198, No 122, p 1, Thu, December 24, 1987.

McMahon, P. M. (1984). The effects of personal similarity, situational relevance, and case specificity on judgments about rape cases (mock jury, defensive attribution). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University.

McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Methodological problems in mock jury research. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 277-278.

McMahon, Pamela M.; Fehr, Lawrence A. (1984). Methodological problems in mock jury research. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 277-278

McMichael, Daniel J., Jury argument permitted regarding absent witnesses. (Missouri), Journal of the Missouri Bar, Vol 42, No 1, pp 37-41, January, 1986,

McNinch, D. D. (1981). Efficacy and outcome expectancies and their relation to decision making in mock juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

McShane, Marilyn D.; Williams, Frank P., III; Pelfrey, William V., Eligibility for jury service in capital trials: a question of potential exclusion and bias, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 50, No 4, pp 365(6), April, 1987.

Meek, Clara L., The use of peremptory challenges to exclude blacks from petit juries in civil actions: the case for striking peremptory strikes, Review of Litigation, Vol 4, No 2, pp 175-215, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Meier, Robert F.; Johnson, Weldon T. (1977). Deterrence as social control: The legal and extralegal production of conformity. American Sociological Review, 42, 292-304

Mello, Michael; Robson, Ruthann, Judge over jury: Florida's practice of imposing death over life in capital cases, Florida State University Law Review, Vol 13, No 1, pp 31-75, March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Melton, Gary B. (1981). Children's competency to testify. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 73-85

Melton, Gary B.; Monahan, John; Saks, Michael J. (1987). Psychologists as law professors. American Psychologist, 42, 502-509

Meltzer, Cynthia L., The battle over the standards for death-qualifying juries: defendants lose another round, Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol 61, No 3, pp 611-628 June 22, 1985, - Summer,

Merrick, Robert A. (1985). The tort of outrage: Recovery for the intentional infliction of mental distress. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 165-175

Metaxas, John C., Judge's subtle non-verbal behavior useful in prediction of jury verdicts. (Calif.), The National Law Journal, Vol 8, p 4, Mon, March 24, 1986,

Metaxas, John C., Who fares best with juries? Blacks found less likely to win, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 8, August 19, 1985,

Metcalfe, N.P.; Smith, J.C., Murder - mens rea - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 117-119, February, 1988.

Metchik, Eric W. (1988). Parole decisionmaking: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32, 233-247

Mewett, Alan W., The jury stand-by. (Canada), Criminal Law Quarterly, Vol 30, No 4, pp 385-386, September, 1988.

Meza, L. L. (1983). What is salient trial information to actual juror judgment?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.

Miers, David R. (1983). Compensation and conceptions of victims of crime. Victimology, 8, 204-212

Miklosovic, P. J. (1944). Attempted marriages and their consequent juridic effects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America.

Miles, Judith E., Criminal law - sufficiency of evidence before grand jury - withholding exculpatory matter. (Mass.), Massachusetts Law Review, Vol 70, No 1, pp 42-44, March, 1985,

Miller, A. R. (1986). The physical attractiveness of physiques in determining certainty of guilt, recommended punishment, and rehabilitative potential of defendants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

Miller, F. T. (1986). Juries and judges versus the law: Virginia from the Revolution to the confrontation between John Marshall and Spencer Roane (Jeffersonians, anti-federalism, Fairfax litigation, constitution, indebtedness). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Miller, Gerald R. (1975). Jurors' responses to videotaped trial materials: Some recent findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 561-569

Miller, Gerald R.; Fontes, Norman E.; Boster, Franklin J.; Sunnafrank, Michael J. (1983). Methodological issues in legal communication research: What can trial simulations tell us? Communication Monographs, 50, 33-46.

Miller, Jeffrey, Anatomy of a jury: the system on trial, New Zealand Law pp 412(1), December, 1986.

Miller, M., & Hewitt, J. (1978). Conviction of a defendant as a function of juror-victim racial similarity. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 159-160.

Miller, Marc; Morris, Norval (1988). Predictions of dangerousness: An argument for limited use. Special Issue: The prediction of interpersonal criminal violence. Violence and Victims, 3, 263-283

Miller, Marina; Hewitt, Jay (1978). Conviction of a defendant as a function of juror victim racial similarity. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 159-160

Miller, Neal, Facts, expert facts, and statistics: descriptive and research methods in litigation. (part 2), Rutgers Law Review, Vol 40, No 2, pp 467-520, January, 1988, - Winter.

Miller, Robert D.; Stava, Lawrence J.; Miller, Rodney K. (1988). The insanity defense for sex offenders: Jury decisions after repeal of Wisconsin's sex crimes law. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 186-189.

Millhouse, Keith F., Reversible error exists when the court fails to instruct jury on need to find intent to kill as a prerequisite to special circumstances. (California Supreme Court Survey: June 1985 - August 1985),Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 2, pp 486-487, January, 1986,

Mills, C. J., & Bohannon, W. E. (1980). Character structure and jury behavior: Conceptual and applied implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 662-667.

Mills, Carol J.; Bohannon, Wayne E. (1980). Character structure and jury behavior: Conceptual and applied implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 662-667

Mills, L. R. (1973). Six- and twelve-member juries: An empirical study of trial results. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 6, 671-711.

Milne, Erwin L., A civil jury trial - what do "fair" and "impartial" mean? (Missouri), Journal of the Missouri Bar, Vol 40, No 8, pp 543-547, December, 1984,

Mintz, Jonathan B., A half step in the right direction (racial discrimination and peremptory challenges under the heavier confines of equal protection.), Cornell Law Review, Vol 72, No 5, pp 1026-1046, July, 1987.

Mitchell, H., & Byrne, D. (1973). The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 123-129.

Mitchell, H. E. (1979). Affective and informational determinants of juror decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

Mitchell, H. E., & Byrne, D. (1971). Effects of juror's attitudes and authoritarianism of judicial decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 123-129.

Mobley, L. P. (1972). Jury decision-making in student protest cases.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Kentucky.

Mogill, Kenneth M.; Nixon, William R., Jr., A practical primer on jury selection. (Criminal Law: Issues and Ideas), Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 65, No 1, pp 52-57, January, 1986,

Monahan, John P., III, Control of the jury. (Fourteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1983-1984) Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 73, No 2, pp 620-628, December, 1984,

Monahan, John; Hood, Gloria L. (1976). Psychologically disordered and criminal offenders: Perceptions of their volition and responsibility. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 123-134

Monk, Charles, Control of the jury. (Sixteenth Annual Review of Criminal Procedure: United States Supreme Court and Courts of Appeals 1985-1986), Georgetown Law Journal, Vol 75, No 3, pp 1070-1081, February, 1987.

Moore, Dale L., Disparate treatment of the allocation of power between judge and jury in legal and medical malpractice cases, Temple Law Review, Vol 61, No 2, pp 353-391, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Moore, H. D. (1974). Redressing the balance. Trial, pp. 29; 31; 35.

Moore, R. D. (1928). Voir dire examination of jurors: I. The English practice. Georgetown Law Journal, 16, 438-453.

Moran, G., & Comfort, J. C. (1986). Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 146-155.

Moran, G., & Comfort, J. C. (1982). Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1052-1063.

Moran, Gary; Comfort, John C. (1986). Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 146-155.

Moran, Gary; Comfort, John C. (1982). Scientific juror selection: Sex as a moderator of demographic and personality predictors of impaneled felony juror behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1052-1063.

Moretz, Walter J. (1980). Male female comparisons of attitudes toward the justice system among senior high school students. Adolescence, 15, 257-266

Morgan, Donald W.; McCullough, Thomas M.; Jenkins, Peter L.; White, William M. (1988). Guilty but mentally ill: The South Carolina experience. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 41-48

Morgan, Oliver J. (1982). Runaways: Jurisdiction, dynamics, and treatment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8, 121-127

Morier, D. M. (1987). The role of expert psychiatric predictions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial: a multi-method investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Morse, Stephen J.; Whitebread, Charles H. (1982). Mental health implications of the juvenile justice standards. Child and Youth Services, 5, 5-27

Morse, W. L. (1932). A survey of the grand jury system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.

Moskitis, R. L. (1976). The constitutional need for discovery of pre-voir dire juror studies. Southern California Law Review, 49, 597-634.

Moss, Debra Cassens, Jury trials at risk?, ABA Journal, Vol 72, pp 32(1), October 1, 198.

Moss, Debra Cassens, Punitive-damages jurors; study suggests selecting depressed people, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 18(1), September 1, 1988.

Moss, Debra Cassens, Tort reformers crying wolf? Rand study shows critics ignore reduction of jury awards, ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 40(1), October 1, 1987.

Mossman, K. (1973, May). Jury selection: An expert's view. Psychology Today, pp. 78-79

Mossner, Eugene D., In defense of the trial bar and the civil jury, Michigan Bar Journal, Vol 66, No 10, pp 968-970, October, 1987.

Mulvey, Edward P. (1982). Family courts: The issue of reasonable goals. Law and Human Behavior, 6, 49-64

M?nsterberg, H. (1909). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. Garden City, NY: Clark, Boardman.

Munsterman, G. Thomas; Aikman, Alexander B., Jury management in Los Angeles County: an analysis of issues and change. (California) (from State Court Journal), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p S9, July 12, 1985,

Munsterman, G. Thomas; Munsterman, Janice T., The search for jury representativeness. (Research on Juries), The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 59-78, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Murley, J. A. (1987). Justice and numbers: the twelve member unanimous criminal jury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.

Murphy, Peter W., Previous consistent and inconsistent statements: a proposal to make life easier for juries. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 270-283, May, 1985,

Myers, David G.; Kaplan, Martin F. (1976). Group induced polarization in simulated juries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 63-66

Myers, David G.; Lamm, Helmut (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602-627

Myers, Lowell J., The implied jury instruction, ABA Journal, Vol 70, pp 88-89, November, 1984,

Myers, Martha A. (1980). Social contexts and attributions of criminal responsibility. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 405-419

Nagao, D. H., & Davis, J. H. (1980). The effects of prior experience on mock juror case judgements. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(2), 190-199.

Nagao, Dennis H.; Davis, James H. (1980). The effects of prior experience on mock juror case judgments. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 190-199

Nardi, Catherine D. (1984). Hypnosis of the accused: Defendant's choice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 995-1019

Nasar, Jack L.; Kang, Junmo (1989). A Post Jury Evaluation: The Ohio State University design Competition for a Center for the Visual Arts. Environment and Behavior, 21, 464-484

Nash, Michael (1973). Unanimity in criminal jury verdicts. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5 5-13

Nash, Michael M. (1974). Parameters and distinctiveness of psychological testimony. Professional Psychology, 5, 239-243

Nathan, A. (1980). The effects of source expertness, message style, and group deliberation on mock jury decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Naylor, Bronwyn (1989). Dealing with child sexual assault: Recent developments. British Journal of Criminology, 29, 395-407

NC, US (1988). A survey of jurors' perception of issues related to child sexual abuse. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 6, 37-43.

Neal, David, Juries: trial by jury, the constitution and drugs. (Australia), Legal Service Bulletin, Vol 11, No 3, pp 137-138, June, 1986,

Neal, David, Law and authority: the campaign for trial by jury in New South Wales, Journal of Legal History, Vol 8, No 2, pp 107-128, September, 1987.

Neal, David, The gang of twelve; 'the jury in a criminal trial', NSW Law Reform Commission discussion paper, September 1985, Legal Service Bulletin, Vol 10, No 6, pp 293-295, December, 1985,

Neises, Michael L.; Dillehay, Ronald C. (1987). Death qualification and conviction proneness: Witt and Witherspoon compared. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 479-494.

Neises, Michael L.; Dillehay, Ronald C. (1987). Death qualification and conviction proneness: Witt and Witherspoon compared. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 479-494

Neises, Michael L.; Dillehay, Ronald C., Death qualification and conviction proneness: Witt and Witherspoon compared. (Wainwright v. Witt, Witherspoon v. Illinois) (Death Penalty), Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol 5, No 4, pp 479-496, September 22, 1987, - Autumn.

Nelligan, Peter J. (1988). The effects of the gender of jurors on sexual assault verdicts. Sociology and Social Research, 72, 249-251.

Nelligan, Peter J. (1988). The effects of the gender of jurors on sexual assault verdicts. Sociology and Social Research, 72, 249-251

Nellis, Joseph L. (1983). The insanity defense: A crazyguilt inheritance. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 1, 11-15

Nelson, M. D. (1972). Free press-fair trial: the effects of "sensational" and "non-sensational" pre-trial news stories and of a judge's admonition upon "juror" and "non-juror" guilt assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.

Nelson, S. H. (1979). Jurors' verdicts in a mock rape trial experiment: a social learning approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University.

Nemec, A. M. (1973). The effect of attitude similarity and locus-of-control on simulated jury decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University.

Nemeth, Charlan (1977). Interactions between jurors as a function of majority vs. unanimity decision rules. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 38-56

Nemeth, Charlan J.; Kwan, Julianne L. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 788-799

Nemeth, Charlan; Endicott, Jeffrey; Wachtler, Joel (1976). From the '50s to the '70s: Women in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 39, 293-304

Nemeth, Charlan; Sosis, Ruth H. (1973). A simulated jury study: Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 90, 221-229

Nesson, C. R. (1979). Reasonable doubt and permissive inferences: The value of complexity. Harvard Law Review, 1187, 1208-1253.

Netteburg, K. L. (1980). Cameras in the courtroom: is a picture worth a thousand words?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.

Neumeyer, Gregory W., A proposed new standard for death-qualified juries, Creighton Law Review, Vol 20, No 1, pp 247-269, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Newell, Bryan K., Criminal procedure - presentence investigation reports become a mandatory part of non-jury sentencing procedures in Texas criminal cases, St. Mary's Law Journal, Vol 17, No 2, pp 586-590, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Newkirk, J. M. (1981). The effect of different reasonable doubt definitions and group versus individual deliberation on the behavior of mock jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.

Nicholas, Helen A., Criminal law - child sexual abuse - expert testimony as to credibility, Duquesne Law Review, Vol 26, No 4, pp 997-1010, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Nietzel, M. T., & Dillehay, R. C. (1979). Psychologists and voir dire: A strategy and its applications. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, New York City.

Nietzel, Michael T.; Dillehay, Ronald C.; Himelein, Melissa J. (1987). Effects of voir dire variations in capital trials: A replication and extension. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 467-477

Nietzel, Michael T.; Dillehay, Ronald C.; Himelein, Melissa J., Effects of voir dire variations in capital trials: a replication and extension. (Death Penalty), Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol 5, No 4, pp 467-477, September 22, 1987, - Autumn.

North, Kenneth E., Jury Trials: the Psychology of Winning Strategy, Trial, Vol 24, No 1, pp 91(2), January, 1988.

Nyberg, Cheryl Rae; Boast, Carol, Jury instructions: a bibliography; part I; civil jury instructions, Legal Reference Services Quarterly, Vol 6, No 1-2, pp 5-32, March 22, 1986, - Spring-Summer,

O'Brien, John, Rare double-jury murder trial for 2 defendants in Rochester. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 24, p 34, Fri, February 5, 1988.

O'connell, P. D. (1987). Pre trial publicity - change of venue - public opinion polls... A theory of procedural justice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Reno.

O'Connell, Peter D., Pretrial publicity, change of venue, public opinion polls - a theory of procedural justice, University of Detroit Law Review, Vol 65, No 2, pp 169-197, January, 1988, - Winter.

O'Hanlon, Kate, Jury - picture of defendant on trial appearing in newspaper in sensationalised report - whether judge entitled to consult jury to decide on likelihood of prejudice arising. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 395-396, June, 1985,

Obermaier, Otto G., Juries and their verdicts, New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 1, December 4, 1984,

Odgers, Stephen J. (1988). Evidence law and previously hypnotized witnesses. Centenary Congress of the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science Symposium (1988, Sydney, Australia). Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, 91-102

Ohberg, Hjordis G.; Haring, Gene F.; Marsh, Robert F. (1982). Embezzlement and multiple personality. Medical Hypnoanalysis, 3, 153-163

Okun, J. (1968). Investigation of jurors by counsel: Its impact on the decisional process. Georgetown Law Journal, 56, 839-879.

Olson, T. V. (1988). Towards a decision model of jury verdicts in medical malpractice cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.

Oros, Cheryl J.; Elman, Donald (1979). Impact of judge's instructions upon jurors' decisions: The "cautionary charge" in rape trials. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 28-36

Osborn, A. S. (1937). The mind of the juror.

Osborn, A. S. (1939). The selection of jurors. Judicature, 22, 209.

Osborne, Yvonne H.; Rappaport, Neil B.; Meyer, Robert G. (1986). An investigation of persuasion and sentencing severity with mock juries. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 339-349.

Osborne, Yvonne H.; Rappaport, Neil B. (1985). Sentencing severity with mock jurors: Predictive validity of three variable categories. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 467-473.

Osborne, Yvonne H.; Rappaport, Neil B.; Meyer, Robert G. (1986). An investigation of persuasion and sentencing severity with mock juries. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 4, 339-349

Osborne, Yvonne Hardaway; Rappaport, Neil B.; Meyer, Robert G., An investigation of persuasion and sentencing severity with mock juries, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol 4, No 3, pp 339-349, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Ostrom, Thomas M.; Werner, Carol; Saks, Michael J. (1978). An integration theory analysis of jurors' presumptions of guilt or innocence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 436-450

Oswald, Timothy J., Jury instructions. (criminal law in the Ninth Circuit: recent developments), Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol 18, No 2, pp 424-479 March 22, 1985, - Spring,

Ottinger, Mary Ann, Juror bias in medical negligence cases; how to recognize and neutralize it, Trial, Vol 23, No 6, pp 34(4), June, 1987.

Overcast, Thomas D.; Sales, Bruce D.; Kesler, Julie A. (1983). Psychological evaluation of children at the request of noncustodial parents. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 1, 65-74

Padawer-Singer, A. M., & Barton, A. H. (1975). The impact of pretrial publicity on jurors' verdicts. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America: A critical overview. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N., & Singer, R. L. (1977). Voir dire by two lawyers: An essential safeguard. Judicature, 57, 386-391.

Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N., & Singer, R. L. (1977). Legal and social-psychological research in the effects of pre-trial publicity on juries, numerical makeup of juries, non-unanimous verdict requirements. Law and Psychological Review, 3, 71-77.

Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N., & Singer, R. L. (1977). An experimental study of twelve vs. six member juries under unanimous vs. nonunanimous decisions. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications.

Padawer-Singer, A. M., Singer, A. N., & Singer, R. L. (1977). Voir dire by two lawyers: An essential safeguard. Judicature, 57, 386-391.

Padawer Singer, Alice M.; Singer, Andrew N.; Singer, Rickie L. (1977). Legal and social psychological research in the effects of pre trial publicity on juries, numerical makeup of juries, non unanimous verdict requirements. Law and Psychology Review, 3 71-79

Padilla, E. R. (1974). The effects of order of presentation and cognitive complexity on the decisions and perceptions of simulated jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

Paduano, Anthony; Smith, Clive A. Stafford, Deathly errors: juror misperceptions concerning parole in the imposition of the death penalty, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol 18, No 2, pp 211-257, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Paris, D. A. (1985). The effect of type of crime, age of eyewitness, and juror informedness on mock jury decisional outcome (forensic, expert testimony, child eyewitness). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montana.

Parker, Graham, Trial by jury in Canada, Journal of Legal History, Vol 8, No 2, pp 178-189, September, 1987.

Parker, J. Wilson, Free expression and the function of the jury, Boston University Law Review, Vol 65, No 3, pp 483-557, May, 1985,

Parker, R. A. (1981). Toward a critical methodology for judicial opinions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Parnell, Albert H., An aggressive defense against punitive damages claims. (part 2), For the Defense, Vol 29, No 11, pp 25-31, November, 1987.

Pasewark, Richard A.; McGinley, Hugh (1985). Insanity plea: National survey of frequency and success. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 13, 101-108

Pasternack, S. R. (1982). The effects of perceived community pressure on simulated juror guilt attributions: an experimental study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee.

Patterson, Arthur H. (1986). Scientific jury selection: The need for a case specific approach. Social Action and the Law, 11, 105-109

Patterson, Arthur H., Scientific jury selection: the need for a case specific approach, Social Action and the Law, Vol 11, No 4, pp 105-109, January, 1986, - Winter,

Patton, Timothy, The discriminatory use of peremptory challenges in civil litigation: practice, procedure and review, Texas Tech Law Review, Vol 19, No 3, pp 921-1001, June, 1988.

Paulin, David J., Constitutional law - First Amendment - obscenity test requires trier of fact to determine whether "reasonable person" would find material lacks serious value and erroneous jury instructions concerning obscenity standard is subject to harmless error analysis, Seton

Pavalon, Eugene I., Jury selection theories; art? science? guessing game?, Trial Vol 23, No 6, pp 26(6), June, 1987.

Pearson, Jessica; Luchesi Ring, Maria A. (1982-83). Judicial decision making in contested custody cases. Journal of Family Law, 21, 703-724

Pellegrini, Nicholas A., Extension of a criminal defendant's right to a public trial: access to courtroom during the jury charge, St. John's Law Review, Vol 61 No 2, pp 277-289, January, 1987, - Winter.

Pemberton, Richard L., The jury on trial, Bench & Bar of Minnesota, Vol 43, No 11, pp 5(2), December, 1986.

Pennington, Donald C. (1982). Witnesses and their testimony: Effects of ordering on juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 318-333.

Pennington, Donald C. (1982). Witnesses and their testimony: Effects of ordering on juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 318-333

Pennington, N. (1981). Causal reasoning and decision making: the case of juror decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Pennington, Nancy; Hastie, Reid (1981). Juror decision making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 246-287

Pennington, Nancy; Hastie, Reid (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258

Pennington, Nancy; Hastie, Reid (1990). Practical implications of psychological research on juror and jury decision making. Special Issue: Illustrating the value of basic research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 90-105

Penrod, S. (1980). Confidence, accuracy, and the eyewitness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.

Penrod, S. (1983). Jury decision making models. In H. H. Blumberg, P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2). Chichester, England: Wiley.

Penrod, S. (1984, October). Conducting experimental research with real trials. Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Salt Lake City, UT.

Penrod, S., & Borgida, E. (1983). Legal rules and lay inference. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Penrod, S., & Crain, B.A. (1984). The effects of timing, form, and order of judges' instructions on juror comprehension, unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin.

Penrod, S. & Cutler, B. (1986)

Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1979). Models of jury decision-making: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 462-492.

Penrod, S., & Hastie, R. (1979). Models of jury decision making: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 462-492.

Penrod, S., & Linz, D. (1985). Voir dire: Its uses and abuses. In M. Kaplan, (Ed.), The impact of social psychology on procedural justice. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.

Penrod, S., & Linz, D. (1986). Voir dire: Uses and abuses. In M. Kaplan (Ed.), The impact of social psychology on procedural justice (pp. 135-166). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Penrod, S., Coates, D., Linz, D., Herzberg, S. Atkinson, M., & Heuer, L. (1984). The implications of social science research for trial practice attorneys. In D. J. Muller, D. G. Blackman, & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Perspectives in psychology and law. London: Wiley.

Penrod, S. D. (1979). Study of attorney and "scientific" jury selection models. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Penrod, S. D. (1979). Study of attorney and 'scientific' jury selection models.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Penrod, S. D. (1979). Study of attorney and "scientific" jury selection models. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Penrod, S. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1987). Assessing the competency of juries. In I. Weiner & A. Hess (Eds.), The Handbook of Forensic Psychology. New York: Wiley.

Penrod, S.D. (1990). Predictors of jury decisionmaking in criminal and civil cases: A field experiment. Forensic Reports, 3, 261-277.

Penrod, S.D. & Cutler, B.L. (1989). Assessing the need for and impact of eyewitness expert testimony on jury decisionmaking. Law and Contemporary Problems, 52, 1001-1041.

Penrod, Steven; Hastie, Reid (1979). Models of jury decision making: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 462-492

Penrod, Steven; Hastie, Reid (1980). A computer simulation of jury decision making. Psychological Review, 87, 133-159

Penrod,S., Loftus, E., & Winkler, J. (1982). The reliability of eyewitness testimony: A psychological perspective. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom. New York: Academic Press, 1982.

Peremptory challenge. (Great Britain), Solicitors Journal, Vol 130, No 50, p 935 December 12, 1986.

Peremptory challenges spark race issue. (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 11, No 17, p 1, Mon, April 25, 1988.

Peremptory challenges to jurors at issue in Howard Beach case, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 18, No 19, pp 6-7, October 1, 1987.

Perlin, Michael L. (1977). The legal status of the psychologist in the courtroom. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 5, 41-54

Perlman, Harvey S., Pattern jury instructions: the application of social science research, Nebraska Law Review, Vol 65, No 3, pp 520-557, June 22, 1986, - Summer

Perlman, Peter, "Don't confuse me with the facts." (myths and facts about jury awards and liability insurance) (from the Jan. 1986 TRIAL), Advocate (Idaho), Vol 29, No 5, pp 10(1), May, 1986,

Perlman, Peter, The key to trial psychology; the human touch, Trial, Vol 23, No 9, pp 91(2), September, 1987.

Perloff, John W., Approaching the desired balance between peremptory challenges and racial equality in jury selection, University of Miami Law Review, Vol 39, No 4, pp 777-808, July, 1985,

Perry, Campbell; Laurence, Jean Roch (1989). Hypnosis in the forensic context: Trial by fantasy? Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 21-31

Perry, Ronald W. (1976). The effects of apparent guilt and prior attitudes on the verdicts of student juries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 115-118

Perry, Ronald W. (1977). The relationship of attitudes and action as a function of reporting conditions and reinforcement history. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 247-254

Peterson, John M. (1976). Jury criticism and design ability: Factors in evaluative judgments of design. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 147-154

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Company Publisher.

Pfeifer, Jeffrey E. (1988). Courtroom prejudice: An application of symbolic sexism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, 1-8.

Pfeifer, Jeffrey E. (1988). Courtroom prejudice: An application of symbolic sexism. Contemporary Social Psychology, 13, 1-8

Phillips, D. M. (1982). An assessment of defensive attribution of responsibility as an explanatory concept in juridic decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University.

Phillips, Dretha M. (1985). Defensive attribution of responsibility in juridic decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 483-501.

Phillips, Dretha M. (1985). Defensive attribution of responsibility in juridic decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 483-501

Phillips, J.H., Can the jury cope? (The Twenty-Fourth Australian Legal Convention of the Law Council of Australia, Perth, Sept. 20-25th, 1987), Australian Law Journal, Vol 61, No 9, pp 479-487, September, 1987.

Phillips, Patricia, The verdict on juries; few can afford the selection process, Los Angeles Lawyer, Vol 7, No 9, pp 5(2), December, 1984,

Pigott, Maggy; Smith, J.C., Corroboration - whether judge required to direct jury that the evidence of an accomplice had to be credible before the question of corroboration arose. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 485-487, July, 1987.

Pigott, Maggy; Smith, J.C., Handling - assisting in the disposal of property - nature of the offence - directions to the jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 56-57, January, 1986,

Pipkin, William E. (1989). Expert opinion testimony: Experts, where did they come from and why are they here? Law and Psychology Review, 13 103-118

Pisterman, S. J. (1983). Differential judgements of male and female juvenile offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston (Canada).

Plutchik, R., & Schwartz, A. K. (1965). Jury selection: Folklore or science? Criminal Law Bulletin, 1(4), 3-10.

Pogrebin, Mark R.; Regoli, Robert M.; Perry, Ken (1986). Not guilty by reason of insanity: A research note. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 8, 237-241

Pollack, D. R. (1973). The effect of need for social approval, political viewpoint, and type of crime on decisions of three-person mock juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Pope, Maurice (1989). Upon the country: Juries and the principle of random selection. Social Science Information, 28, 265-289

Posner, Richard A., The summary jury trial and other methods of alternative dispute resolution: some cautionary observations. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol 53, No 2, pp 366-393, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Postel, Theodore, Amended complaint increase ad damnum. (jury demand) (Illinois) Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Tue, October 7, 1986.

Postel, Theodore, Court statistics: jury verdict reporter facts. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Wed, July 1, 1987.

Postel, Theodore, Evidence warranted submission. (Ill.), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Wed, September 30, 1987.

Postel, Theodore, Jury instructions: free from argument. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 197, p 1, Fri, October 7, 1988.

Postel, Theodore, Jury instructions: non-pattern in contract cases. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 1, July 23, 1985,

Postel, Theodore, Limited use of non-IPI. (Illinois pattern instructions), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 1, Wed, June 10, 1987.

Postell, Claudia J., Juror privacy bill stirs opposition. (California), Trial, Vol 24, No 8, pp 75-76, August, 1988.

Poulson, R. L. (1988). The effects of legal and extralegal factors on juror attribution of criminal responsibility: an empirical analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.

Practice and potential of the advisory jury, Harvard Law Review, Vol 100, No 6, pp 1363-1381, April, 1987.

Prager, Irene G.; Deckelbaum, Gerard; Cutler, Brian L. (1989). Improving juror understanding for intervening causation instructions. Forensic Reports, 2, 187-193

Pravica, D. S. (1977). Effects of attractiveness, strength of evidence, severity of crime, and questionable evidence on decisions in a simulated jury trial.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California State University, Fullerton.

Preserve the right to a jury trial even in complex cases, New Jersey Law Journal Vol 95, p 4, March 28, 1985,

Prosecutor avoids race-bias charge. (Commonwealth v. Lloyd) (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 11, No 26, p 1, Mon, June 27, 1988.

Pryor, Bert; Buchanan, Raymond W. (1984). The effects of a defendant's demeanor on juror perceptions of credibility and guilt. Journal of Communication, 34, 92-99.

Pryor, Bert; Buchanan, Raymond W. (1984). The effects of a defendant's demeanor on juror perceptions of credibility and guilt. Journal of Communication, 34, 92-99

Pugh, M. D. (1983). Contributory fault and rape convictions: Loglinear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233-242.

Pugh, M. D. (1983). Contributory fault and rape convictions: Loglinear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233-242

Purtell, Rosemary, The continued use of discriminatory peremptory challenges after Batson v. Kentucky: is the only alternative to eliminate the peremptory challenge itself?, New England Law Review, Vol 23, No 1, pp 221-261, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Pyszczynski, Thomas A.; Greenberg, Jeff; Mack, Dave; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1981). Opening statements in a jury trial: The effect of promising more than the evidence can show. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 434-444

Pyszczynski, Thomas A.; Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1981). The effects of opening statements on mock jurors' verdicts in a simulated criminal trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 301-313

Quade, Vicki, Jury selection by computer: some problems, ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 27, May, 1985,

Quade, Vicki, No thanks! Jury exemptions abound, ABA Journal, Vol 71, pp 26-27, May, 1985,

Rahaim, G. L.JR. (1983). Eyewitness evidence and the effects of psychological testimony. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Rahaim, George L.; Brodsky, Stanley L. (1982). Empirical evidence versus common sense: Juror and lawyer knowledge of eyewitness accuracy. Law and Psychology Review, 7 1-15

Rahaim, George L.; Brodsky, Stanley L. (1982). Empirical evidence versus common sense: Juror and lawyer knowledge of eyewitness accuracy. Law and Psychology Review, 1982, Apr 5, 12-14.

Rai, S. N.; Angira, K. K. (1982). The effects of age of the transgressor on the juridic judgement of male and female jurors. Perspectives in Psychological Researches, 5, 12-14

Raimo, Angela M. (1987). Psychological challenges to eyewitness testimony. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 5, 23-36

Ranii, David, Summary jury trials gain favor; new spurs to settlement, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 1, June 10, 1985,

Ranii, David, What's a leg worth? To juries, it depends; awards vary widely, The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 3, November 12, 1984,

Ranish, S. S. (1978). Equity theory and the attitudes of mock jurors: the effects of victim compensation on the assignment of penalties.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University.

Ratinov, Aleksandr R. (1983). / Methodological issues of juridical psychology. Psikologicheskii Zhurnal, 4, 107-118.

Ratinov, Aleksandr R. (1983). / Methodological issues of juridical psychology. Psikologicheskii Zhurnal, 4, 107-118

Ray, P. J. (1984). Neutral versus adversarial models of expert mental health testimony in criminal responsibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University.

Read, Peter B. (1974). Source of authority and the legitimation of leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 37, 189-204

Reading the instructions right. (judge's instructions to death penalty jurors) (from Sacramento Bee), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 4, Wed, February 4, 1987.

Reardon, Richard; Rosen, Sidney (1984). Psychological differentiation and the evaluation of juridic information: Cognitive and affective consequences. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 195-211

Redman, R. Michael, Of mice and cheese. (instruction to juries) (Idaho), Advocate (Idaho), Vol 28, No 7, pp 5(5), June, 1985,

Redmount, R. S. (1957). Psychological tests for selecting jurors. Kansas Law Review, 5, 391-403.

Reed, J. (1965). Jury deliberation, voting and verdict trends. Southwest Social Science Quarterly, 45, 361-370.

Reed, R. S. (1976). Three approaches to the study of the criminal jury trial: observation, interview and experimentation.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, florida State University.

Reed, Robin (1980). Jury simulation the impact of judge's instructions and attorney tactics on decision making. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 68-72

Rees, Tom; Birch, D.J., Evidence of child - corroboration where identification at issue - "independent" source - direction on functions of judge and jury regarding corroboration evidence. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 301-303, May, 1988.

Rehbinder, Manfred (1982). Questions of the legal scholar concerning the so called sense of justice. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 5, 341-348

Report of the Cincinnati conference on trial by jury. (1937). University of Cincinnati Law Review, 11, 119-246.

Reskin, Barbara F.; Visher, Christy A. (1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors' decisions. Law and Society Review, 20, 423-438

Reskin, Barbara F.; Visher, Christy A. (1986). The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors' decisions. Law and Society Review, 20, 423-438.

Reskin, Lauren Rubenstein, Defendants not entitled to young adults on juries, ABA Journal, Vol 71, pp 102-103, December, 1985,

Reskin, Lauren Rubenstein, Juries need not include blue collars, uneducated, ABA Journal, Vol 72, pp 90(1), April, 1986,

Reskin, Lauren Rubenstein, Maryland okays death-qualified juries, ABA Journal, Vol 72, pp 111-112, March 1, 1986,

Reskin, Lauren Rubenstein, Racist joke in jury room kills death sentence. (Ill.) ABA Journal, Vol 71, p 106, June, 1985,

Reuben, Richard C., Study says don't touch doubt instruction. (jury instructions) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 3, Fri, April 10, 198.

Reyes, Robert M.; Thompson, William C.; Bower, Gordon H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 2-12

Reynolds, David E.; Sanders, Mark S. (1975). Effect of defendant attractiveness, age, and injury on severity of sentence given by simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 96, 149-150

Richardson, D. D. (1979). The influence of socioeconomic status and reciprocity on mock jurors' verdicts in a hypothetical rape case.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Richers-Rowland, Cynthia, The new and improved peremptory challenge, Hastings Law Journal, Vol 38, No 6, pp 1195-1222, August, 1987.

Rickman, L. E. (1988). Juror and defendant characteristics, "crime-stereotype," and jurors' guilty verdicts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Howard University.

Rieders, Clifford A., Summary jury trials; a settlement technique, Trial, Vol 23 No 9, pp 93(3), September, 198.

Riss, Suzanne, Court rules on publicity voir dire. (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 6, p 19, Thu, August 11, 1988.

Roberts, Christopher C.; Hoffman, Mary A.; Johnson, William L. (1978). Effects of jury deliberation on the verdicts and social perceptions of simulated jurors: Vidmar revisited. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 119-124

Roberts, G. (1984). Literature review: The family court. British Journal of Social Work, 14, 285-288

Roberts, J. V. (1983). Selective recall for supportive information. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

Robinson, Michael R., The peremptory challenge after Batson: limits on the prosecutor or license to discriminate?, Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 76, No 11, pp 620(8), July, 1988.

Rodriguez, Leticia; Bogett, William R. (1989). Societal considerations in scaling injury severity and effects. Journal of Safety Research, 20, 73-83

Rodriguez, Rubi; Nietzel, Michael T.; Berzins, Juris I. (1980). Sex role orientation and assertiveness among female college students. Behavior Therapy, 11, 353-366

Rodwan, Gail, Bias in the jury selection process: Michigan responds to one impediment (Criminal Law Symposium - Convicting the Guilty and Acquitting the Innocent: Impediments to the Search for Truth), Cooley Law Review, Vol 4, No 3, pp 559-564, September, 1987.

Rogers, Jeffrey L.; Bloom, Joseph D. (1982). Characteristics of persons committed to Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 10, 155-164

Rogers, Jeffrey L.; Bloom, Joseph D. (1985). The insanity sentence: Oregon's Psychiatry Security Review Board. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 69-84

Rogers, Richard; Dolmetsch, Robert; Wasyliw, Orest E.; Cavanaugh, James L. (1982). Scientific inquiry in forensic psychiatry. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 187-203

Rokeach, Milton; Vidmar, Neil (1973). Testimony concerning possible jury bias in a Black Panther murder trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 19-29

Roman, M. S. (1988). Effects of hypnosis on eyewitness recall confidence and accuracy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova University School of Psychology.

Roper, R. T. (1978). Measuring the simulated impact of judicial policy making: the united states supreme court and the jury's operating structure.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.

Roper, Robert T., A typology of jury research and discussion of the structural correlates of jury decisionmaking, The Justice System Journal, Vol 11, No 1, pp 5-15, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Rosenblum, Elise, Court to examine bias in jury selection. (State v. Gilmore) (New Jersey), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 122, No 16, p 3, Thu, October 20, 1988.

Rosenson, Valerie T., The court casts a false light backward. (death penalty juries), Boston University Law Review, Vol 66, No 2, pp 311-343, March, 1986,

Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rosoff, Stephen M. (1989). Physicians as criminal defendants: Specialty, sanctions, and status liability. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 231-236

Ross, David F.; Dunning, David; Toglia, Michael P.; Ceci, Stephen J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5-23

Ross, Glen F. (1980). The selection of jurors in the higher courts of Queensland. Australian Psychologist, 15, 351-358

Roth, R. (1984). The relation between individuals' extraversion and their perceptions of the credibility of likable and unlikable persons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

Rothblatt, H. B. (1966). Techniques for jury selection. Criminal Law Bulletin, 2(4), 14-29.

Rowe, Peter, The voire dire and the jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 226-232, April, 1986,

Rumsey, Michael G. (1976). Effects of defendant background and remorse on sentencing judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 64-68

Rusmore, J. T. (1977). An experimental comparison of the composite and jury methods of obtaining group judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Sabino, Anthony Michael, Jury trials in the bankruptcy court: the controversy ends, Commercial Law Journal, Vol 93, No 2, pp 238-258, June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Sackett, Kacy, Jury instruction deals with substitution of attorney. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 10, p B1, Thu, January 14, 1988.

Sage, 1972.

Sage, W. (1973, January). Psychology and the Angela Davis jury. Human Behavior, 56-61.

Sakhnova, T. V. (1986). Forensic psychological expert examination in civil court proceedings (failure of intention pleas). Soviet Journal of Psychology, 7, 575-582

Saks, M. (1976). The limits of scientific jury selection. Jurimetrics Journal, 17, 3-22.

Saks, M. J. (1975). Jury decision making as a function of group size and social decision rule. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36.

Saks, M. J. (1975). Jury decision-making as a function of group size and social decision rule. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Saks, M. J. (1975). Jury decision making as a function of group size and social decision rule. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36.

Saks, M. J. (1977). Jury verdicts: The role of group size and social decision rule. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books (D.C. Heath and Company).

Saks, M. J., Werner, C. M., & Ostrom, T. M. (1975). The presumption of innocence and the American juror. Journal of Contemporary Law, 2, 46-54.

Saks, Michael J.; Wissler, Roselle L. (1984). Legal and psychological bases of expert testimony: Surveys of the law and of jurors. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 435-449

Sales, B. D. (1977). Psychology in the legal process. New York: Spectrum Publications.

Sales, B. D. (1977). The criminal justice system. New York, N.Y.: Plenum Press.

Sales, B.D., Elwork, A., & Alfini, J.J. (1977). Improving comprehension for jury instructions. In B.D. Sales (Ed.), Perspectives in law and psychology: Volume 1. The criminal justice system. (pp. 23-90). New York: Plenum.

Sales, Bruce D.; Rich, Robert F.; Reich, Jonathan (1987). Victimization policy research. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 18, 326-337

Salner Marcia (1986). Validity in human science research. Saybrook Review, 6, 107-130

Sampson, Allan R.; Smith, Robert L. (1985). An information theory model for the evaluation of circumstantial evidence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 9 16.

Sampson, Allan R.; Smith, Robert L. (1985). An information theory model for the evaluation of circumstantial evidence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 15, 9-16

Sand, Leonard B., Trial by non-jury, Litigation, Vol 13, No 3, pp 5(4), March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Sanders, Glenn S.; Gansler, David A.; Reisman, Stephen (1989). The effects of hypnosis on eyewitness testimony and reactions to cross examination. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 33-60

Sanford, S. (1987). The nature of discourse in the courtroom: the complete rape trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Santagata, Marie G., One trial, two juries - it works in extraordinary cases. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 90, p 1, Wed, May 11, 1988.

Santiago, Frank, Iowa court bars DA from checking jurors' rap sheets. (Iowa v. Bessenecker), The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 6, Mon, May 4, 1987.

Santiago, Frank, Iowa DA rapped for having jurors' handwriting analyzed, The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 8, Mon, August 31, 1987.

Sarpy, Leon, Civil juries - after 25 years, Loyola Law Review, Vol 32, No 4, pp 917-919, January, 1987, - Winter.

Savitsky, Jeffrey C.; Lindblom, William D. (1986). The impact of the guilty but mentally ill verdict on juror decisions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 686-701.

Savitsky, Jeffrey C.; Lindblom, William D. (1986). The impact of the guilty but mentally ill verdict on juror decisions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 686-701

Saxman, P. H. (1989). Order effects in persuasive communication: determining primacy or recency by cues of contentiousness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Schaefer, David A., Low-cost shadow juries; the thirteenth juror, Trial, Vol 22, No 12, pp 58(5), December, 1986.

Schaefer, Jimmy, Down south, juries are big business. (jury selection and study in the United States), Canadian Lawyer, Vol 9, No 1, pp 28(2), February, 1985,

Schaffer, Jenny, Court rules jury instruction was prejudicial. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p B1, Wed, June 17, 1987.

Schaffer, S. J. (1984). Can jurors disregard inadmissible evidence? (Court, jurisprudence). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University.

Schamber, J. F. (1982). The influence of process jury instructions and pattern jury instructions on the content of jury deliberation and comprehension of the law in a simulated jury trial. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.

Scheinholtz, Leonard L.; Miscimarra, Philip A., The arbitrator as judge and jury: another look at statutory law in arbitration, Arbitration Journal, Vol 40, No 2, pp 55-66, June, 1985,

Scherer, Klaus R.; Scherer, Ursula; Hall, Judith A.; Rosenthal, Robert (1977). Differential attribution of personality based on multi channel presentation of verbal and nonverbal cues. Psychological Research, 39, 221-247

Schilling, M. E. (1983). Jury perception of criminal defendants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming.

Schlaff, Elizabeth, Impeachment of verdicts by juror testimony. (Connecticut), Connecticut Bar Journal, Vol 61, No 4, pp 215-230, August, 1987.

Schmidt, Linda M., A judge may comment on the evidence after jurors announce that they are deadlocked. (California Supreme Court Survey September 1986-November 1986), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 14, No 3, pp 728-740, March, 1987.

Schmolesky, J. M. (1981). County Court of Ulster County v. Allen and Sandstrom v. Montana: The Supreme Court lends an ear but turns its face. Rutgers Law Review, 33, 261-316.

Schmolesky, John M.; Cutler, Brian L.; Penrod, Steven D. (1988). Presumption instructions and juror decision making. Forensic Reports, 1, 165-192

Schneck, Steven Paul, Conviction-prone juries in capital trials. (1986 Annual Survey of American Law: Criminal Procedure), Annual Survey of American Law, Vol 1986, No 2, pp 311-334, May, 1987.

Schoenfeld, C. G. (1985). A psychoanalytic approach to the law of evidence. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 13, 109-135

Schonemann, Peter H. (1979). Alternative decision schemes for six person mock juries. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 388-398

Schornhorst, F. Thomas, Preliminary screening of prosecutorial access to death qualified juries: a missing constitutional link. (Faculty Symposium: Indiana University School of Law Library Building), Indiana Law Journal, Vol 62, No 2, pp 295-331, March 22, 1987, - Sprin.

Schrum, David A.; Martin, Anne W. (1982). Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law and Society Review, 17, 105-151.

Schrum, David A.; Martin, Anne W. (1982). Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law and Society Review, 17, 105-151

Schulman, J., Shaver, P., Colman, R., Emrich, B., & Christie, R. (1973, May). Recipe for a jury. Psychology Today, pp. 37-83.

Schum, David A. (1989). Knowledge, probability, and credibility. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 39-62

Schwartz, Hugh L.; Fleming, Jeanne J., To know your jurors, know their community. Surveys can help attorneys plan strategy and develop important evidence, Criminal Justice, Vol 2, No 4, pp 20(6), January, 1988, - Winter.

Schwartz, T. A. (1981). A reconceptualization of the first amendment: the Burger court and freedom of the press, 1969-1980. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

Schwartzberg, B. (1977). Deterrence or retribution: motivating factors in the assignment of punishment by a simulated jury as a function of intent, harm done and expected future behavior of defendant. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University.

Schweit, Katherine, Computerized jury selection procedure saves money. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Mon, July 7, 1986,

Schweit, Katherine, Convictions reversed over juror challenges. (People v. Nurse and Johnson), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 133, p 3, Wed, July 1, 198.

Schweit, Katherine, Jury instruction on circumstantial evidence voided. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 3, Mon, October 20, 1986.

Schweit, Katherine, Jury waiver in death cases in judges' hands. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Fri, June 20, 1986,

Schweit, Katherine, Misdemeanor jury call is revamped. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 1, Mon November 10, 1986.

Schweit, Katherine, Supreme Court rejects jury bias claim. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 72, p 1, Wed, April 13, 1988, 06586929 .

Schweit, Katherine, Trial judges told to prevent bias in jury selection. (People v. Andrews) (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 134, No 131, p 1, Wed, July 6, 1988.

Schweitzer, Nick, Uprooting bias or sowing it? Voir dire, Wisconsin Bar Bulletin Vol 60, No 2, pp 18(4), February, 1987.

Schwibbe, Gudrun; Schwibbe, Michael (1981). Judgment and treatment of people of varied attractiveness. Psychological Reports, 48, 11-14

Scopp, Leland S., The judicial "Good Samaritan" and unrequested criminal jury instructions. (New York), New York State Bar Journal, Vol 57, No 4, pp 24-28, May, 1985,

Scott, Edward M. (1977). Hypnosis in the courtroom. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 19, 163-165

Scott, J. A. M. (1984). Jury selection and the right to a fair trial: the genesis, implementation and impact of the jury selection acts (California, law). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.

Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973a). Jurors and their verdicts. Modern Law Review, 36, 496-508.

Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973b, April). Juries and the rules of evidence. Criminal Law Review, pp. 208-223.

Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973a). Jurors and their verdicts. Modern Law Review, 36, 496-508.

Sealy, A. P., & Cornish, W. R. (1973b, April). Juries and the rules of evidence. Criminal Law Review, pp. 208-223.

Sealy, A. P.; Wain, C. M. (1980). Person perception and jurors' decisions. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 7-16

Sealy, A. Philip (1981). Another look at social psychological aspects of juror bias. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 187-200

Searles, Sidney Z., The role of the jury and the court in fixing just compensation in condemnation, Probate and Property, Vol 1, No 5, pp 24(3), September, 1987.

Sears, James D.; Stephens, H. Harold (1979). Beyond a right to education: Punishment of severely/profoundly handicapped students. Law and Psychology Review, 5 79-101

Seguin, D. G. (1985). The effects of bifurcation and death qualification on assignment of penalty in capital crimes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo.

Seguin, David G.; Horowitz, Irwin A. (1984). The effects of "death qualification" on juror and jury decisioning: An analysis from three perspectives. Law and Psychology Review, 8 49-81

Seidler, Debbie, Media law group looks at juries and contempt. (New South Wales) Law Society Journal, Vol 24, No 3, p 58, April, 1986,

Serr, Brian J.; Maney, Mark, Racism, peremptory challenges, and the democratic jury: the jurisprudence of a delicate balance, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 79, No 1, pp 1-65, March 22, 1988, - Spring.

Severance, L. J., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions. Law and Society Review, 17, 153-197.

Severance, Laurence J.; Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). Toward criminal jury instructions that jurors can understand. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 198-233

Severance, Laurence J.; Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). Toward criminal jury instructions that jurors can understand. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 198-233.

Severance, Laurence J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). Improving criminal justice: Making jury instructions understandable for American jurors. International Review of Applied Psychology, 1983, Mar 5, 91-96.

Severance, Laurence J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1982). Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions. Law and Society Review, 17, 153-197.

Severance, Laurence J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1982). Improving the ability of jurors to comprehend and apply criminal jury instructions. Law and Society Review, 17, 153-197

Severance, Laurence J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1984). Improving criminal justice: Making jury instructions understandable for American jurors. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 97-119

Seymour, H. L. (1986). Perceived control, crime severity and the not guilty by reason of insanity verdict (law). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

Shaffer, David R.; Case, Thomas (1982). On the decision to testify in one's own behalf: Effects of withheld evidence, defendant's sexual preferences, and juror dogmatism on juridic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 335-346

Shaffer, David R.; Case, Thomas; Brannen, Lanier (1979). Effects of withheld evidence on juridic decisions: Amount of evidence withheld and its relevance to the case. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 2-15

Shaffer, David R.; Plummer, Diane; Hammock, Georgina (1986). (1985). Hath he suffered enough? Effects of jury dogmatism, defendant similarity, and defendant's pretrial suffering on juridic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1059-1067.

Shaffer, David R.; Plummer, Diane; Hammock, Georgina (1986). Hath he suffered enough? Effects of jury dogmatism, defendant similarity, and defendant's pretrial suffering on juridic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1059-1067

Shaffer, David R.; Sadowski, Cyril (1979). Effects of withheld evidence on juridic decisions: II. Locus of withholding strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 40-43

Shaffer, David R.; Sadowski, Cyril J.; Hendrick, Clyde (1978). Effects of withheld evidence on juridic decisions. Psychological Reports, 42, 1235-1242

Shanley, M. G. (1985). Comparative negligence and jury behavior (trials, verdicts, automobile accident litigation, san francisco, california). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rand Graduate Institute.

Shapely, D. (1974). Jury selection: Social scientists gamble in an already loaded game. Science, 185, 1033-1034; 1071.

Shapiro, P., & Penrod, S. D. (in press). A meta-analysis of the facial recognition studeis. Psychological Bulletin.

Sharma, Poonam (1987). Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgression. Journal of Psychological Researches, 31, 20-25

Sharo, Cynthia A., Knowledge by the jury of a settlement where a plaintiff has settled with one or more defendants who are jointly and severally liable, Villanova Law Review, Vol 32, No 2, pp 541-574, April, 198.

Shaw, L. (1975). Trial by jury: an analysis of the jury's verdict. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.

Shay, S. (1987). Effects of defendant character and juror authoritarianism on the decision-making process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.

Shearer, Otis C., Anatomy of a jury: the system on trial., (book reviews), Texas Bar Journal, Vol 50, No 2, pp 213(1), February, 1987.

Sheiman, J. A. (1988). The effect of stereotyping on guardianship decisions: an empirical approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.

Sheppard, B. H. (1980). The influence of opinions on remembering revisited. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Sherrod, Drury (1985). Trial delay as a source of bias in jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 101-108

Sherrod, Drury, Trial delay as a source of bias in jury decision making, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 9, No 1, pp 101-108, March, 1985,

Shoot, Brian J., The jury charge and interrogatories under the new laws. (N.Y.), Trial Lawyers Quarterly, Vol 18, No 1, tp 25-35, January, 1987, - Winter.

Shorr, S. D. (1984). A study of the ability of the legal attitudes questionnaire - revised and selected demographic variables to identify jurors with operative bias (jury behavior). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities.

Short terms versus the seasoned juror. Center For Jury Studies Newsletter, May 1981, 3(3).

Showalter, C. Robert; Bonnie, Richard J. (1984). Psychiatrists and capital sentencing: Risks and responsibilities in a unique legal setting. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 12, 159-167

Sicola, Mary Kay; Shreves, Richard R., Jury consideration of mitigating evidence: a renewed challenge to the constitutionality of the Texas death penalty statute, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol 15, No 1-2, pp 55-68, September 22, 1987, - Fall-Winter.

Siegel, Barry, Ruling casts shadow on jury system; anguish in Georgia (Alday family murder trial; right to fair trial), Los Angeles Times, Vol 105, Section I p 1, Thu, March 20, 1986,

Siegel, Judith M.; Mitchell, Herman E. (1979). The influence of expectancy violations, sex, and authoritarianism on simulated trial outcomes. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 10, 37-47

Sigal, Janet; Braden, Jane; Aylward, Glen (1978). The effect of attractiveness of defendant, number of witnesses, and personal motivation of defendant on jury decision making behavior. Psychology, 15, 4-10

Sigal, Janet; Braden Maguire, Jane; Hayden, Mark; Mosley, Norman (1985). The effect of presentation style and sex of lawyer on jury decision making behavior. Eastern Psychological Association (1984, Baltimore, Maryland). Psychology A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 22, 13-19

Sigall, Harold; Ostrove, Nancy (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 410-414

Sigwirth, H. & Henze, F. (1973). Jurors' comprehension of jury instructions in southern Arizona. Unpublished report prepared for the Committee on Uniform Instructions of the State of Arizona.

Silver, D. (1978). A case against the use of public opinion polls as an aid in jury selection. Journal of Computers and Law, 6, 177-195.

Silvestrini, Elaine, Gloucester juries suspended; flaws found in selection. (N.J.), New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 117, p 7, Thu, May 15, 1986,

Silzer, Robert F.; Clark, Russell D. (1977). The effects of proportion, strength and value orientation of arguments on decision making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 451-464

Simmons, V. M. (1975). Decisions of simulated jurors: influence of sex, locus-of-control, judicial instructions and biasing information about the defendant.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University.

Simon, R. J. (1966). Murder, juries, and the press. Transaction, 3, 40-42.

Simon, R. J. (1967). The jury and the defense of insanity. Boston: Little, Brown, & Company.

Simon, R. J. (1968). The effects of newspapers on the verdicts of potential jurors. In R. J. Simon (Ed.), The sociology of law. San Francisco: Chandler.

Simon, Rita J. (1983). The defense of insanity. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 11, 183-201

Simon to document 'pattern' in jury bias cases. (Illinois), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 130, p 3, October 16, 1984,

Simpson, Reagan Wm., Jury practice in Texas civil cases, Texas Tech Law Review, Vol 17, No 1, pp 225-254, March, 1986,

Singer, Amy, The psychologist and the jury, Institute on Planning, Zoning and Eminent Domain. Proceedings., pp 8-1(9), January, 1986,

Singleton, John V.; Kass, Miriam, Helping the jury understand complex cases, Litigation, Vol 12, No 3, pp 11(5), March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Singleton, Royce; Hofacre, Susan (1976). Effects of victim's physical attractiveness on juridic judgments. Psychological Reports, 39, 73-74

Sipek, G. S. (1976). Five studies in the early history of the jury.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Sitarski, Lynne A., Criminal procedure - Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(b): a juror's doubts about the sufficiency of the evidence do not constitute "just cause" for the juror's dismissal, Temple Law Review, Vol 61, No 3, pp 991-1013, September 22, 1988, - Fall.

Skinner, L. J. (1977). Physical attractiveness of the defendant and the defense attorney in jury simulations with high and low structural verisimilitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.

Slocum, P. F. (1986). Judicial reform of the california criminal justice system through the exclusionary rule. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Slotznick, B. (1986). Oligarchy, unanimity and related institutions: some game theoretic and laboratory studies (social choice, juries, voting rules). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Slutzky, G. N. (1975). Jurors' evaluation and utilization of expert psychiatric testimony.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Smetana, Judith G. (1986). Preschool children's conceptions of sex role transgressions. Child Development, 57, 862-871

Smith, Bryan D., Young adults: a distinctive group under the Sixth Amendment's fair cross-section requirement, Pacific Law Journal, Vol 19, No 4, pp 1519-1542, July, 1988.

Smith, Edward D.; Hed, Anita (1979). Effects of offenders' age and attractiveness on sentencing by mock juries. Psychological Reports, Jun 44, 691-694

Smith, J.C., Satisfying the jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 335-344, June, 1988.

Smith, J.C.; Knapman, Lynne, Direction to jury to try to agree. (Great Criminal Law Review, pp 464-465, July, 1988.

Smith, J.C.; Knapman, Lynne, Forgery - false instrument - form in false name. Obtaining by deception - agreement by jury on means of deception. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 552-555, August, 1986,

Smith, J.C.; Knapman, Lynne, Manslaughter - acts of co-defendant beyond scope of agreement with appellant - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 693-695, October, 1988.

Smith, J.C.; Knapman, Lynne, Murder - joint enterprise - intention - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 338-340, May, 1987.

Smith, J.C.; Knapman, Lynne, Offence of specific intent - foresight of risk of act by co-defendant outside scope of agreement - direction to jury. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 616-618, September, 1988.

Smith, R. (1978). The influences of the interaction between the juror's self-others locus of control and the defendant's internality-externality on juridic decisions.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

Smith, V. L. (1987). The psychological and legal implications of pre-trial instruction in the law. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Smykla, John O. (1982). Lowering the jurisdictional age of the juvenile court: Problems and prospects of simple solutions. Law and Psychology Review, 7 17-37

Snider, Robert M., Jury instructions reconsidered; the 'plain English' movement has had little impact on the language used to instruct juries, California Lawyer Vol 5, No 12, pp 33(3), December, 1985,

Snortum, J. R., Klein, J. S., & Sherman, W. A. (1976). The impact of an aggressive juror in six- and twelve-member juries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 255-262.

Snortum, John R.; Klein, Jeff S.; Sherman, Wynn A. (1976). The impact of an aggressive juror in six and twelve member juries. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 3, 255-262

Snyder, E. C. (1971). Sex role differential and juror decisions. Sociology and Social Research, 55, 442-448.

Sobal, Jeffery; Hinrichs, Donald W. (1986). Bias against "marginal" individuals in jury wheel selection. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 71-89.

Sobal, Jeffery; Hinrichs, Donald W. (1986). Bias against "marginal" individuals in jury wheel selection. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 71-89

Sobal, Jeffrey; Hinrichs, Donald W., Bias against "marginal" individuals in jury wheel selection, Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol 14, No 1, pp 71-89, January, 1986,

Sobel, Suzanne B. (1979). Psychology and the juvenile justice system. American Psychologist, 34, 1020-1023

Sobrino, Oswald, The right to civil jury trial and the states. (Louisiana), Loyola Law Review, Vol 32, No 1, pp 267-289, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Solomon, N. A. (1977). The effects of persuading or being persuaded on persuasive style in two-member juries.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Long Island University, Brooklyn Center.

Solway, Kenneth S.; Hays, J. Ray (1978). An intellectual and personality study of juveniles who are petitioned for waiver of juvenile jurisdiction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 319-325

Somers, Clifford L., Jury selection ... and other illusions, For the Defense, Vol 28, No 4, pp 4(6), April, 1986,

Sommers, Richard J.; Firestone, Stephen E., In defence of the civil jury in personal injury actions. (Canada), Advocates' Quarterly, Vol 7, No 4, pp 492-494 February, 1987.

Sonaike, S. A. (1977). The impact of deliberation on juror perceptions of trial participants credibility and of verdicts and awards in simulated trial situations.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, michigan State University.

Sonquist, J. A., Baker, E., & Morgan, J. (1973). Searching for structure. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.

Sorensen, R. (1954). The role of public sentiment and personal prejudice in jury trials of criminal cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

Sorrels, J. Paul; Myers, Bettye (1983). Comparison of group and family dynamics. Human Relations, 36, 477-492

Sosis, R. (1974). Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 393-399.

Spanos, Nicholas P.; Gwynn, Maxwell I.; Terrade, Kevin (1989). Effects on mock jurors of experts favorable and unfavorable toward hypnotically elicited eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 922-926

Spears, David, Adverse effects of destroying records during investigation, New York Law Journal, Vol 200, No 34, p 5, Thu, August 18, 1988.

Spence, Gerry, How to make a complex case come alive for a jury, ABA Journal, Vol 72, pp 62(5), April, 1986,

Sperlich, P. W. (1979). Trial by jury: It may have a future. In P. Kurland and G. Casper (Eds.), Supreme court review. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.

Sperlich, P. W., & Jaspovice, M. L. (1975). Statistical decision theory and the selection of grand jurors: Testing for discrimination in a single panel. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 2, 75.

Squiers, Deborah, Lawyers cautioned against challenges to juror pools, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 63, p 1, Mon, April 4, 1988.

Squiers, Deborah, Panel upholds juror selection by magistrates, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 106, p 1, Fri, June 3, 1988.

Squires, Deborah, Court upholds verdict altered by trial judge, New York Law Journal, Vol 199, No 3, p 1, Wed, January 6, 1988.

Stanley, A. J. (1977). The judge. Judicature, 61, 70; 72-75.

Starke, J.G., The jury and jury trial practices again under scrutiny in Australia, Australian Law Journal, Vol 62, No 1, pp 12-14, January, 1988.

Stasser, G. L. (1977). A model of social influence during group discussion: an application with four- and six-person mock juries.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

Stasser, Garold; Davis, James H. (1981). Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. Psychological Review, 88, 523-551

Stasser, Garold; Davis, James H. (1977). Opinion change during group discussion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 252-256

Stasser, Garold; Stella, Nancy; Hanna, Coleen; Colella, Adrienne (1984). The majority effect in jury deliberations: Number of supporters versus number of supporting arguments. Law and Psychology Review, 1984, Spr 8 49 81.

Steadman, Henry J. (1985). Insanity defense research and treatment of insanity acquittees. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 37-48

Steadman, Henry J.; et al (1982). Mentally disordered offenders: A national survey of patients and facilities. Law and Human Behavior, 6, 31-38

Stein, Jacob A., Willy Loman, attorney and counselor-at-law. (attorneys "selling" themselves to jury) (Section on Persuasion), Litigation, Vol 12, No 2, pp 27(2), January, 1986, - Winter,

Steinberg, B. S. (1987). Comparison of lay and special jurors in comprehension and use of mental health expert testimony. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hahnemann University Graduate School.

Stempel, Jeffrey W., A distorted mirror: the Supreme Court's shimmering view of summary judgment, directed verdict, and the adjudication process, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol 49, No 1, pp 95-193, January, 1988, - Winter.

Stephan, C. (1974). Sex prejudice in jury simulation. Journal of Psychology, 88, 305-312.

Stephan, C. (1975). Selective characteristics of jurors and litigants: Their influences on juries' verdicts. In R. Simon (Ed.), The jury system in America. Volume 4, Sage Criminal Justice Systems Annuals. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Stephan, Cookie (1974). Sex prejudice in jury simulation. Journal of Psychology, 88, 305-312

Stephan, Cookie W.; Stephan, Walter G. (1986). Habla Ingles? The effects of language translation on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 577-589.

Stephan, Cookie W.; Stephan, Walter G. (1986). Habla Ingles? The effects of language translation on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 577-589

Stephan, Cookie; Tully, Judy C. (1977). The influence of physical attractiveness of a plaintiff on the decisions of simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 149-150

Stephens, H. Harold (1981). The admissibility of polygraph results in criminal actions in Alabama state and federal courts: Must we await Buck Rogers in the twenty fifth century courtroom? Law and Psychology Review, 6 69-95

Stephens, Pamela J., Controlling the civil jury: towards a functional model of justification, Kentucky Law Journal, Vol 76, No 1, pp 81-165, October, 1987.

Stewart, David O., Court rules against jury selection based on race. (also includes attorneys' fees and libel and slander case) (Supreme Court report), ABA Journal, Vol 72, pp 68(4), July 1, 1986,

Stewart, David O., Hypnotized witnesses, loaded jurors. (Rock v. Arkansas, Tanner v. United States), ABA Journal, Vol 73, pp 54(5), October 1, 1987.

Stibelman, Arleen, Judge can't disagree with jury. (People v. Thorton) (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 8, Mon, June 22, 1987.

Stibelman, Arleen, No group bias in challenges to 3 minority jurors. (People v. Charron) (Cal.), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 1, Tue, July 28, 1987.

Stone, Alan A. (1985). Comment on Goldstein's posttrial competency examination of jurors. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 197-199.

Stone, Alan A. (1985). Comment on Goldstein's posttrial competency examination of jurors. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 13, 197-199

Stone, Christina, The Psychology of the American Jury., (book reviews), Texas Bar Journal, Vol 51, No 10, pp 1068(2), PUBLISHER The Michie Co., November, 198.

Stop jury bashing. (Great Britain), Solicitors Journal, Vol 132, No 23, p 831, June 10, 1988.

Straus, H. H., III. (1984). The effect of bias and evidence discrepancy on juror judgments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.

Stricker, George; Jurow, George L. (1974). The relationship between attitudes toward capital punishment and assignment of the death penalty. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 2, 415-422

Strier, Franklin Delano, Through the jurors' eyes, ABA Journal, Vol 74, pp 78(4) October 1, 1988.

Strodtbeck, F., & Mann, R. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3-11.

Strodtbeck, F., James, R., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22, 713-718.

Strodtbeck, F. L., & Hook, L. H. (1961). The social dimensions of a twelve-man jury table. Sociometry, 24, 397-415.

Strodtbeck, Fred L.; Lipinski, Richard M. (1985). Becoming first among equals: Moral considerations in jury foreman selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 927-936.

Strodtbeck, Fred L.; Lipinski, Richard M. (1985). Becoming first among equals: Moral considerations in jury foreman selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 927-936

Suarez, Edward M., Jr., Evidence - self-incrimination - New Jersey common law self-incrimination privilege inapplicable to contents of subpoenaed business records of sole proprietor, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 18, No 1, pp 154-182, January, 1988, - Winter.

Sue, S. Smith, R. E. & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.

Sue, S., Smith, R. E. & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effect of pre-trial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 163-171.

Sue, S. Smith, R. E. & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.

Sue, S., Smith, R. E. & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effect of pre-trial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 163-171.

Sue, S. Smith, R. E. & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.

Sue, S., Smith, R. E. & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effect of pre-trial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 163-171.

Sue, S. Smith, R. E. & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.

Sue, Stanley; Smith, Ronald E.; Caldwell, Cathy (1973). Effects of inadmissible evidence on the decisions of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 345-353

Sue, Stanley; Smith, Ronald E.; Pedroza, George (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302

Suggs, D., & Sales, B. D. (1981). Juror self-disclosure in the voir dire: A social science analysis. Indiana Law Journal, 56. Sunnafrank, Michael; Fontes, Norman E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1-15.

Suggs, D., & Sales, B. D. (1978). Using communication cues to evaluate prospective jurors in the voir dire. Arizona Law Review, 20, 629-642.

Suggs, D., & Sales, B. D. (1981). Juror self-disclosure in the voir dire: A social science analysis. Indiana Law Journal, 56.

Suggs, D., & Sales, B. D. (1978). Using communication cues to evaluate prospective jurors in the voir dire. Arizona Law Review, 20, 629-642.

Suggs, David; Berman, John J. (1979). Factors affecting testimony about mitigating circumstances and the fixing of punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 251-260

Suggs, David; Sales, Bruce D. (1978). The art and science of conducting the voir dire. Professional Psychology, 9, 367-388

Sullivan, Michael, The prosecutor's right to object to a defendant's abuse of peremptory challenges, Dickinson Law Review, Vol 93, No 1, pp 143-166, September 22, 1988, - Fall.

Sunnafrank, M. J. (1978). The effects of a defendant's physical attractiveness and experimental procedures on juridic judgments.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Sunnafrank, Michael; Fontes, Norman E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1-15

Super. Ct. says 'in itself' language not mandatory for jury instruction. (Pennsylvania), Pennsylvania Law Journal-Reporter, Vol 11, No 16, p 9, Mon, April 18, 1988,.

Supreme Court hears arguments on all-white juries, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 117, p 3, Thu, February 27, 1986Feb 27,

Supreme Court limits exclusion of blacks from juries, Criminal Justice Newsletter, Vol 17, No 10, pp 3-4, May 15, 1986,

Suter, R. F. (1978). An evaluation of the one day/one trial jury management system in East Lansing, Michigan.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Sutton, G. (1980). Stricken trial evidence and the jury.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.

Swanson, Victoria C., The Jury in America., (book reviews), Trial, Vol 24, No 9, pp 106-107, PUBLISHER Facts on File Publications, September, 1988.

Sweeney, B. J. (1980). The use of social science research in supreme court opinions related to obscenity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

Sweeney, Terence, Criminal procedure - jury selection - trial court did not impermissibly curtail defendant's right to exercise peremptory challenges by impaneling only thirteen jurors. Seton Hall Law Review, Vol 16, No 3-4, pp 906-908, June 22, 1986, - Summer-Fall,

Swigert, Victoria L.; Farrell, Ronald A.; Yoels, William C. (1976). Sexual homicide: Social, psychological, and legal aspects. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 391-401

Szasz, Thomas (1984). The insanity defense reconsidered. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 5, 109-117

Tabak, Ronald J. (1986). The death of fairness: The arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty in the 1980s. Review of Law and Social Change, 14, 797-848

Tan, Ying Hui, Corroboration - evidence of mental patient in secure hospital - whether sufficient to warn jury to "approach evidence with caution". (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, Vol 61, No 112, pp 101-102, February, 1985,

Tanford & Penrod (1985)

Tanford, J. Alexander; Tanford, Sarah, Better trials through science: a defense of psychologist-lawyer collaboration, North Carolina Law Review, Vol 66, No 4, pp 741-780, April, 1988.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1982). Biases in trials involving defendents charged with mutliple offenses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 453-480.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212.

Tanford, S., & Penrod S. (1984). Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212.

Tanford, S., & Penrod S. (1984). Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.

Tanford, S. & Penrod, S. (in press). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied social Psychology.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1982). Biases in trials involving defendents charged with mutliple offenses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 453-480.

Tanford, S., & Penrod S. (1984). Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.

Tanford, S. & Penrod, S. (in press). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied social Psychology.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212.

Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1982). Biases in trials involving defendents charged with mutliple offenses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 453-480.

Tanford, S. and Penrod, S. (1984). Social inference processes in juror judgments of multiple-offense trials. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 749-765.

Tanford, S. L. (1983). Decision making processes in joined criminal trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

Tanford, S., Penrod, S., & Collins, R. (1985). Decisionmaking in joined criminal trials: The influence of charge similarity, evidence similarity, and limiting instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 319-337.

Tanford, S. & Penrod, S. (in press). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied social Psychology.

Tanford, S. and Penrod, S. (1984). Social inference processes in juror judgments of multiple-offense trials. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 749-765.

Tanford, Sarah (1985). Decision making processes in joined criminal trials. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 367-385.

Tanford, Sarah (1985). Decision making processes in joined criminal trials. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 12, 367-385

Tanford, Sarah; Cox, Michele (1988). The effects of impeachment evidence and limiting instructions on individual and group decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 477-497.

Tanford, Sarah; Cox, Michele (1988). The effects of impeachment evidence and limiting instructions on individual and group decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 477-497

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1982). Biases in trials involving defendants charged with multiple offenses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 453-480.

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1982). Biases in trials involving defendants charged with multiple offenses. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 453-480

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212.

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1983). Computer modeling of influence in the jury: The role of the consistent juror. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 200-212

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1984). Social inference processes in juror judgments of multiple offense trials. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 749-765.

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1984). Social inference processes in juror judgments of multiple offense trials. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 749-765

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1986). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 322-347.

Tanford, Sarah; Penrod, Steven (1986). Jury deliberations: Discussion content and influence processes in jury decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 322-347

Tans, M. D., & Chaffee, S. H. (1966). Pretrial publicity and juror practice. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 647-654.

Tapp, June L. (1981). Psychologists and the law: Who needs whom? Applied Social Psychology Annual, 2 263-289

Tapp, June L. (1987). The jury as a socialization experience: A socio cognitive view. Advances in Forensic Psychology and Psychiatry, 2 1-32

Tapp, Mara, 'Silent jury' monitors activity in the federal courts. (Chicago), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 130, p 1, October 8, 1984,

Tarter, B. J. (1983). An experimental analysis of jury size and deliberation processes (verdict, minority). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.

Tarter-Hilgendorf, Barbara J., Large and small juries: is there a difference?, Social Action and the Law, Vol 12, No 1, pp 10-14, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Tate, E., Hawrish, E., & Clark, S. (1974). Communication variables in jury selection. Journal of Communication, 24, 130-139.

Tate, Eugene; Hawrish, Ernest; Clark, Stanley (1974). Communication variables in jury selection. Journal of Communication, 24, 130-139

Taylor, Gary, Jury sentencing: a last stand in six states, The National Law Journal, Vol 9, p 1, Mon, January 19, 1987.

Taylor, Stuart Jr., High court limits excluding blacks as jury members; restricts challenges by prosecution in cases with black defendants, New York Times, Vol 135, p 1(N) p A1(L), Thu, May 1, 1986,

Taylor, Stuart, Jr., The court and 'death-qualified' juries. (from the New York Times), Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 132, p 2, Mon, May 12, 1986,

Teague, Bernie, Democracy demands juries. (Victoria), Law Institute Journal, Vol 61, No 1-2, pp 5(1), January, 1987.

Tebben, C. L. (1988). A conceptual framework for the judicial resolution of federalism cases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School.

Tell, Lawrence J., From jury selection to verdict - in hours. (summary trials are making dockets lighter), Business Week, pp 48(1), September 7, 1987.

Telling juries the truth. (Victoria), Law Institute Journal, Vol 58, No 12, pp 1389-1390, December, 1984,

Terry, John, Abortion verdict sparks debate on value of jury researchers. (Canada), Canadian Lawyer, Vol 9, No 1, pp 28(1), February, 1985,

Tetreault, Patricia A. (1989). Rape myth acceptance: A case for providing educational expert testimony in rape jury trials. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 243-257

The American Jury on Trial., (book reviews), Florida Bar Journal, Vol 62, No 9, p 86, PUBLISHER Hemisphere Publishing Corp., October, 1988.

The confidentiality and sanctity of jury-room deliberations. (New South Wales), Australian Law Journal, Vol 60, No 2, pp 56-60, February, 1986,

The Deaver jurors. (trial postponed over question of whether voir dire should be open or closed) (from Washington Post), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 100, p 4, Wed, July 22, 1987.

The Psychology of the American Jury., (book reviews), Bench & Bar of Minnesota, Vol 45, No 2, p 10, PUBLISHER Michie Co., March, 1988.

Thode, E. W. (1964). The lawyer in court - his ethical standard, and certain matters of jury submission, the pretrial conference, and in personam jurisdiction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

Thoennes, Nancy A.; Pearson, Jessica (1985). Predicting outcomes in divorce mediation: The influence of people and process. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 115-126

Thomas, Charles W.; Cage, Robin J. (1977). The effect of social characteristics on juvenile court dispositions. Sociological Quarterly, 18, 237-252

Thomas, Ewart A.; Hogue, Anthony (1976). Apparent weight of evidence, decision criteria, and confidence ratings in juror decision making. Psychological Review, 83, 442-465

Thomas, M. R. (1978). Effects of task interruption and task involvement on jury deliberation.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America.

Thompson & Schumann (1985).

Thompson, Peter N., Fair and impartial jury - catch as catch can, Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol 31, No 2, pp 191-237, January, 1987, - Winter.

Thompson, W. C. (1984, August). Judgmental bias in reactions to mathematical evidence. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

Thompson, W. C. (1984).

Thompson, W. C. (1985). Integration of judgments in cascaded inference: intuitive and bayesian assessments of circumstantial evidence (jury, admissibility, probability). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.

Thompson, W. C. (1986, March 14). Mathematical evidence in criminal trials: Improving the probability of justice. Paper presented at the midyear meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Tucson, AZ.

Thompson, W. C. (1986, March 14). Mathematical evidence in criminal trials: Improv

ng the probability of justice. Paper presented at the midyear meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Tucson, AZ.

Thompson, W. C., & Schumann, E. L. (1985, August). Fallacious interpretaions of statistical evidence in criminal trials. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

Thompson, William C. (1989). Death qualification after Wainwright v. Witt and Lockhart v. McCree. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 185-215

Thompson, William C.; Cowan, Claudia L.; Ellsworth, Phoebe C.; Harrington, Joan C. (1984). Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 8, 95-113.

Thompson, William C.; Fong, Geoffrey T.; Rosenhan, D. L. (1981). Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463

Thornton, Billy (1977). Effect of rape victim's attractiveness in a jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 666-669

Thornton, Steve C., Constitutional law - equal protection clause bars prosecutors' peremptory challenge based solely on race, Mississippi College Law Review, Vol 7, No 2, pp 169-180, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Tindale, R. Scott; Davis, James H.; Vollrath, David A.; Nagao, Dennis H.; et al (1990). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 438-449

Tindale, R. Scott; Nagao, Dennis H. (1986). An assessment of the potential utility of "scientific jury selection": A "thought experiment" approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 409-425

Tindale, R. Scott; Nagao, Dennis H., An assessment of the potential utility of "scientific jury selection": a "thought experiment" approach, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Vol 37, pp 409(17), June, 1986,

Title, J. M. (1968-1969, December-January) Voir dire tug-of-war. Trial, pp. 41-42.

Title, J. M. (1968). Voir dire examination of jurors in criminal cases. Journal of the State Bar of California, 70, 70-89.

Title, J. M. (1968-1969, December-January) Voir dire tug-of-war. Trial, pp. 41-42.

Tivnan, 1974.

Tomkins, Alan J. (1987). Psychology and the Constitution. Psychology Today, 21, 48-50

Toomb, J. K. (1981). Equity theory and the law: an experimental study to assess the effects of belief in a just world on the sentencing behavior of mock jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

Totenberg, N. (1982, May 9). The jury pickers. In Wisconsin State Journal, pp. 12.

Trapp, G. Kay Lord, Constitutional law - juries - racially discriminatory use of peremptory challenges violates the Sixth Amendment ***impartial jury, Mississippi Law Journal, Vol 55, No 2, pp 389-411, June, 1985,

Tremper, Charles R. (1987). Sanguinity and disillusionment where law meets social science. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 267-276

Trial by jury demonstration staged for public at State Fair of Texas, Texas Bar Journal, Vol 50, No 11, pp 1240(1), December, 1987.

Trial by Jury: Social and Psychological Dynamics., (book reviews), Commonwealth Law Bulletin, Vol 14, No 2, pp 920(1), PUBLISHER Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of the West Indies, April, 1988.

Trial lawyers group says jury verdict statistics being misused, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Vol 131, p 2, December 12, 1985,

Trinkaus, John W. (1978). Jury service: An informal look. Psychological Reports, 43, 788

Trugman, Wendy Lynn, The representative jury standard: an alternative to Batson v. Kentucky, American Criminal Law Review, Vol 23, No 4, pp 403-424, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Tucker, Stanley L., Improving the jury decision process, Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 73, No 3, pp 176-179, November, 1984,

Tucker, T. C. (1987). The perceived attractiveness of sex-typed and androgynous sex-role qualities in males and females across the life span. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.

Turcin, Rudolf (1973). , Socijalna Psihijatrija, 1, 109-116

Turiel, Elliot; Nucci, Larry P.; Smetana, Judith G. (1988). A cross cultural comparison about what? A critique of Nisan's , study of morality and convention. Developmental Psychology, 24, 140-143

Turkington, Carol (1986). High court weighs value of research by social scientists. Social Action and the Law, 12, 57-59

Turner, Billy M.; Lovell, Rickie D.; Young, John C.; Denny, William F. (1986). Race and peremptory challenges during voir dire: Do prosecution and defense agree? Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 61-69

Turtle, J. W. (1988). Eyewitness lineup behavior and identification-accuracy assessment: Can eyewitness confidence calibration and jurors' accuracy assessment be improved by exposure to the identification task?. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta.

Twelve Good Men and True: the Criminal Jury Trial in England, 1200-1800., (book reviews), Harvard Law Review, Vol 101, No 8, p 1985, PUBLISHER Princeton University Press, June, 1988.

Uelman, Gerald F., Jury voir dire: notorious cases show a better way is at hand. (California), Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 98, p 4, February 4, 1985,

Uelmen, Gerald F., Striking jurors under Batson v. Kentucky; lessons from California, Criminal Justice, Vol 2, No 3, pp 2(5), September 22, 1987, - Fall,.

Uelmen, Gerald F., The joint defense privilege: know the risks. (Famous Cases: Juries), Litigation, Vol 14, No 4, pp 35(5), June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Ugwuegbu, D. C. (1973). Is justice color-blind?: The racial factor in jury attribution of criminal responsibility.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University.

Ugwuegbu, D. Chimaeze; Hendrick, Clyde (1974). Personal causality and attribution of responsibility. Social Behavior and Personality, 2, 76-86

Ugwuegbu, Denis C. (1976). Black jurors' personality trait attribution to a rape case defendant. Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 193-201

Ugwuegbu, Denis C. (1979). Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 133-146

Ungar, S. J. (1972). The Pentagon papers trial. Atlantic Monthly, Nov. 1972, pp. 22-23, 26-28, 30, 32, 34.

University.

Valenti, A., & Downing, L. (1975). Differential effects of jury size on verdicts following deliberations as a function of the apparent guilt of a defendant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 655-663.

Valenti, A., & Downing, L. (1974-1975). Six versus twelve member juries: An experimental test of the Supreme Court assumption of functional equivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 273-275.

Valenti, Angelo C.; Downing, Leslie L. (1975). Differential effects of jury size on verdicts following deliberation as a function of the apparent guilt of a defendant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 655-663

Valenti, Angelo; Downing, Leslie (1974). Six versus twelve member juries: An experimental test of the Supreme Court assumption of functional equivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 273-275

Vallinder, Torbjorn, The Swedish jury system in press cases: an offspring of the English trial jury?, Journal of Legal History, Vol 8, No 2, pp 190-220, September, 1987.

van Herp, Bill, The peremptory challenge and the racially impartial jury, Northern Kentucky Law Review, Vol 14, No 1, pp 91-125, March 22, 1987, - Spring.

Van Dyke, J. (1977). Jury selection procedures. Cambridge: Ballinger.

Van Dyke, J. (1977). Selecting a jury in political trials. Case Western Law Review, 27, 609-622.

Van Langenhove, Luk (1985). Juryrechtspraak in Belgie: de bruikbaarheid van rechtspsychologisch onderzoek. (The Belgian jury system: The utility of legal psychological research.) Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden, 40, 242.-253

Varinsky, Howard, Try out your case on a focus group: the group's reactions tell a lawyer how a real jury is likely to respond, California Lawyer, Vol 8, No 2, pp 47(3), March, 1988.

Varnell, Joel N., A proposal to improve juror quality, For the Defense, Vol 30, No 9, p 31, September, 1988.

Velin, Robert A.; Walters, Herman A. (1988). Intentional evidence: Effects on mock jurors' perceptions. Psychological Reports, 62, 290

Victor, E. (1989). Cognitive processing in complex litigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo.

Vidmar, N. (1980). The use of social science data in a change of venue application: A case study. Canadian Bar Review, 1980.

Villemur, Nora K.; Hyde, Janet S. (1983). Effects of sex of defense attorney, sex of juror, and age and attractiveness of the victim on mock juror decision making in a rape case. Sex Roles, 9, 879-889.

Vining, A. R. (1980). The limits of individualism: sentencing variation and disparity in California. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

Vinson, Donald E., Using behavioral research to uncover hidden jury bias, Risk Management, Vol 34, pp 44(6), June, 1987.

Vinson, Donald E., What makes jurors tick? The basis for winning your case, Trial, Vol 24, No 6, pp 58(4), June, 1988.

Visher, C. A. (1982). Jurors' decisions in criminal trials: individual and group influences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Visher, Christy A. (1987). Juror decision making: The importance of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 1-17.

Visher, Christy A. (1987). Juror decision making: The importance of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 1-17

Visher, Christy A., Juror decision making: the importance of evidence, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 1, pp 1-17, March, 1987.

Vollrath, D., & Davis, J. H. (in press). Jury size and decision rule. In Simon, R. (Ed.), The jury: Its role in American society. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.

Von Bodenhausen, G. (1987). Effects of social stereotypes on evidence processing: the cognitive basis of discrimination in juridic decision-making. Universty of Illinois, Urbana-Champagne.

Vore, David A. (1989). Psychological consultation for systematic jury selection. Fifth Annual Symposium in Forensic Psychology of the American College of Forensic Psychology (1989, San Diego, California). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 7, 21-36

Walden, J. B. (1968). Identification of content for data processing curriculum by the jury method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University.

Walker, Cynthia M., Jury misconduct. (California Supreme Court Survey September 1985-November 1985), Pepperdine Law Review, Vol 13, No 3, pp 937-938, March, 1986,

Wall, James A.; Rude, Dale E. (1987). Judges' mediation of settlement negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 234-239

Wallach, Lisa H., Prosecutorial misconduct in the grand jury: dismissal of indictments pursuant to the federal supervisory power, Fordham Law Review, Vol 56, No 1, pp 129-150, October, 1987.

Wallas, Jonathan, Race discrimination: who should decide?, Trial, Vol 23, No 7, pp 44(4), July, 1987.

Walters, M. J. (1982). Sequential decision-making in the criminal court: the influence of prior court outcomes on sanctioning and their relationship to discrimination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati.

Waly, P. R. (1968). Attitude anchoring effects in subjects acting as jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

Wanamaker, J. L. (1978). Computers and scientific jury selection: A calculated risk. Journal of Urban Law, 55, 345-370.

Ward, Laetitia; Wilson, John P. (1980). Motivation and moral development as determinants of behavioral acquiescence and moral action. Journal of Social Psychology, 112, 271-286

Warner, Kenneth E. (1979). The use of hypnosis in the defense of criminal cases. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 27, 417-436

Warner, T. D. (1987). Judicial instructions and expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy: effects on mock jurors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.

Wasleff, John A., Death qualification as a determinant of the impartiality and representativeness of a jury in death penalty cases, Cornell Law Review, Vol 72, No 5, pp 1075-1113, July, 1987.

Waters, Brian K.; Lee, Gus C. (1982). Legal and political considerations in large scale adaptive testing. HumRRO Professional Paper, Mar PP 1-82 29-32

Watts, Jeffrey D., Informing juries of the effects of their special verdicts under the law of joint and several liability, University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol 9, No 1, pp 275-300, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Watts, Thomas S., "Rummaging through a wilderness of verbiage": the charge conference, jury argument and instructions. (North Carolina), Campbell Law Review, Vol 8, No 2, pp 269-288, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Waxler, S. S. (1989). Alternate forms of testimony and the child witness (witness). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles.

Weathers, J. E. (1983). Effects of perceptual focus, fate of the accomplice, and severity of crime on jurors decisions to punish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Webstor, Timothy, Criminal procedure; defendant's right to public jury selection. (Pennsylvania Supreme Court Review, 1985), Temple Law Quarterly, Vol 59, No 2, pp 757-770, June 22, 1986, - Summer,

Weinberg & Baron (1982).

Weiner, David C., Avoiding the big sleep. (keeping juries attentive), Litigation Vol 12, No 3, pp 22(4), March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Weinstein, Jack B., The power and duty of federal judges to comment on the evidence in jury trials and some suggestions on charging juries. West's Federal Rules Decisions, Vol 118, No 1, pp 161-188, February, 1988.

Weinstein, S. (1978). The effects of normative and informational influences on jury members varying in field dependence and locus of control.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California State University, Long Beach.

Weiten, Wayne (1980). The attraction leniency effect in jury research: An examination of external validity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 340-347

Wellek, Jeffrey A. (1984). Eighth amendment: Trial court may impose death sentence despite jury's recommendation of life imprisonment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 813-838

Wellner, Alfred M.; Abidin, Richard R. (1981). Regulation/enforcement/discipline of professional practice in psychology: Issues and strategies. Professional Practice of Psychology, 2, 1-16

Wells, G. L. (1984). How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? In G. L. Wells and E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. L., & Murray, D. M. (1983). What can psychology say about the Neil V. Biggers criteria for judging eyewitness accuracy? Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 347-362.

Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.

Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Tousignant, J. P. (1980). Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 275-285.

Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448.

Wells, Gary L. (1984). Experimental psychology and the courtroom. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2, 363-373

Wells, Gary L. (1986). Expert psychological testimony: Empirical and conceptual analyses of effects. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 83-95

Wells, Gary L.; Ferguson, Tamara J.; Lindsay, R. C. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 688-696

Wells, Gary L.; Leippe, Michael R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682-687

Wells, Gary L.; Lindsay, R. C.; Ferguson, Tamara J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440-448

Wells, Gary L.; Lindsay, R. C.; Tousignant, J. P. (1980). Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 275-285

Wells, Gary L.; Lindsay, Rod C. (1985). Methodological notes on the accuracy confidence relation in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 413-419

Wells, Gary L.; Turtle, John W. (1987). Eyewitness testimony research: Current knowledge and emergent controversies. Special Issue: Forensic psychology. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 363-388

Wells, Robert V., Lawyer credibility; how the jury perceives it, Trial, Vol 21, No 7, pp 69-72, July, 1985,

Welsh, L. B. (1978). Factors which influence the decision-making of jurors.. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University.

Wenke, R. A. (1978). The art of selecting a jury. Los Angeles, CA: Parker & Son.

Werner, Carol M.; Kagehiro, Dorothy K.; Strube, Michael J. (1982). Conviction proneness and the authoritarian juror: Inability to disregard information or attitudinal bias? Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 629-636.

Werner, Carol M.; Strube, Michael J.; Cole, Allen M.; Kagehiro, Dorothy K. (1985). The impact of case characteristics and prior jury experience on jury verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 409-427.

Wertheim, Eric, Anonymous juries, Fordham Law Review, Vol 54, No 5, pp 981-1003, April, 1986,

West, Elizabeth A., Criminal procedure; threatening jurors. (Review of Selected 1987 California Legislation), Pacific Law Journal, Vol 19, No 2, p 567, January, 1988.

Wettstein, Robert M.; Mulvey, Edward P. (1988). Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 16, 11-24

Wexler, David B. (1975). The surfacing of behavioral jurisprudence. Behaviorism, 3, 172-176

Wexler, David B.; Schopp, Robert F. (1989). How and when to correct for juror hindsight bias in mental health malpractice litigation: Some preliminary observations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 485-504

Whalen, Denise H.; Blanchard, Fletcher A. (1982). Effects of photographic evidence on mock juror judgement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 30-41

Whisler, Barbara J., Sixth Amendment - death qualification of the jury: process is permissible where defendant does not face death penalty. (Supreme Court Review), Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol 78, No 4, pp 954-983, January, 1988, - Winter.

White, A. J., Jr. (1952). Selecting the jury. In J. A. Appleman (Ed.), Successful jury trials: A symposium. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

White, D. G. (1960). Sex bias in experimental juries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.

White, L. T. (1984). Defense strategy in the capital penalty trial: a social psychological analysis (death penalty, law-criminal, jury decision-making). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

White, Lawrence T. (1987). Juror decision making in the capital penalty trial: An analysis of crimes and defense strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 113-130

White, Lawrence T. (1987). Juror decision making in the capital penalty trial: An analysis of crimes and defense strategies. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 113-130.

White, Lawrence T. (1987). The mental illness defense in the capital penalty hearing. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 411-421

White, Lawrence T., Juror decision making in the capital penalty trial, Law and Human Behavior, Vol 11, No 2, pp 113-130, June, 1987.

White, M. J. (1972). Juror management in the united states district courts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida.

Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1983). The effects of witness confidence and competence on juror perceptions of credibility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Whitley, Bernard E.; Greenberg, Martin S. (1986). The role of eyewitness confidence in juror perceptions of credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 387-409.

Whitley, Bernard E.; Greenberg, Martin S. (1986). The role of eyewitness confidence in juror perceptions of credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 387-409

Wiggins, E. C. (1987). Procedural innovations to enhance juror comprehension in complex litigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.

Wilcox, Jamison, The craft of drafting plain-language jury instructions: a of sample pattern instruction on obscenity, Temple Law Quarterly, Vol 59, No 4, pp 1159-1187, December 22, 1986, - Winter.

Wilkinson, John H., Alternative dispute resolution - the summary jury trial, New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Mon, April 13, 1987.

Williams, Callie, Jury discrimination: the peremptory challenge as a racially discriminatory device, Southern University Law Review, Vol 12, No 2, pp 189-202, March 22, 1986, - Spring,

Williams, L. Norman, Defences of (a) no intent to deprive, (b) belief in consent - judge directing jury on dishonesty whether misdirection. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 239-241, April, 1985,

Williams, L. Norman; Birch, D.J., Visit of jury to scene of crime for purposes of witness's demonstration - whether judge to be present throughout. (Great Britain), Criminal Law Review, pp 309-310, May, 1985,

Williamson, H. E. (1980). Variables related to sentencing of incarcerated homicide offenders in Texas. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University.

Wilson, Anthony R. (1981). Perspectives on response able psychotherapy: Rebuttal to "Emotionality and irrationality in psychotherapeutic fads." Psychotherapy Theory, Research and Practice, 18, 159-162

Wilson, David W.; Donnerstein, Edward (1977). Guilty or not guilty? A look at the "simulated" jury paradigm. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 175-190

Wilson, Leanne; Greene, Edith; Loftus, Elizabeth F. (1986). Beliefs about forensic hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 110-121

Wilson, Marie G.; Northcraft, Gregory B.; Neale, Margaret A. (1989). Information competition and vividness effects in on line judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 132-139

Wilson, Shelley A., Criminal procedure; voir dire. (Review of Selected 1987 California Legislation), Pacific Law Journal, Vol 19, No 2, pp 566-567, January, 1988.

Wilson, Shelley A., Criminal procedure; venue - jury selection. (Review of Selected 1987 California Legislation), Pacific Law Journal, Vol 19, No 2, p 568, January, 1988.

Wims, L. A. (1989). The effect of modality of presentation on judicial processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island.

Winick, Charles; Smith, Alexander B., Post-trial sequestered juries tilt toward guilty verdicts. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 196, p 1, Fri, December 12, 1986.

Winterdyk, John (1988). Canadian police officers and eyewitness evidence: A time for reform. Canadian Police College Journal, 12, 175-191

Wise, Daniel, Court study urges changes aimed at better jury system. (New York, Jury System Management Advisory Committee of the Uniform Court System), New York Law Journal, Vol 192, p 1, December 12, 1984,

Wise, Daniel, Experimental jury technique brings reversal of conviction. (New York), New York Law Journal, Vol 193, p 1, June 17, 1985,

Wise, Daniel, Federal Bar panel opposes end to jury-unanimity rule, New York Law Journal, Vol 193, p 1, May 20, 1985,

Wise, Daniel, Panel to let 'med-mal' jury hear specific damage claim. (New York) New York Law Journal, Vol 197, p 1, Fri, May 1, 1987.

Wise, Stuart M., An impurrfect way to round up jurors. (cat called for jury duty), The National Law Journal, Vol 7, p 43, July 22, 1985,

Wissler, Roselle L.; Saks, Michael J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 37-48.

Wissler, Roselle L.; Saks, Michael J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 37-48

Wolchover, David, The right to jury trial - I. (Great Britain), New Law Journal, Vol 136, No 6257, pp 530(4), June 6, 1986,

Wolchover, David, The right to jury trial - II. (Great Britain), New Law Journal Vol 136, No 6259, pp 576(3), June 20, 1986,

Wolf, Sharon (1985). Manifest and latent influence of majorities and minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 899-908.

Wolf, Sharon (1985). Manifest and latent influence of majorities and minorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 899-908

Wolf, Sharon; Bugaj, Albert M. (1990). The social impact of courtroom witnesses. Social Behaviour, 5, 1-13

Wolf, Sharon; Montgomery, David A. (1977). Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment to disregard on the judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 205-219

Wolfson, Warren D., Improving civil jury: possible solutions. (from 1984 Allerton House Conference on the Civil Jury Trial in Illinois), Illinois Bar Journal, Vol 73, No 3, pp 144-148, November, 1984,

Wollersheim, Janet P.; Smith, Daniel J. (1980). Responsibility and the American criminal justice system: Some proposed reforms. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 2, 229-233

Woocher, Fredric D. (1986). Legal principles governing expert testimony by experimental psychologists. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 47-61

Wood, Linda A.; Kroger, Rolf O. (1985). Can we revive the classical experiment for social psychology? Canadian Psychology, 26, 282-291

Woolner, Ann, Study says jurors fail to disregard evidence, New Jersey Law Journal, Vol 120, p 1, Thu, September 17, 1987.

Worth, Leila T.; Allison, Scott T.; Messick, David M. (1987). Impact of a group decision on perception of one's own and others' attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 673-682

Wrightsman, Lawrence S. (1978). The American trial jury on trial: Empirical evidence and procedural modifications. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 137-164

Wursten, A. (1986). The psychologist and psychiatrist in court: perceived expertness and influence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.

Wyatt, R. L. (1982). The effects of the defendant's characteristics, authoritarianism, and group discussion on simulated juror's decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University.

Wyatt, Robert; Arbuthnot, Jack (1978). Moral judgment and simulated juridic decisions. Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 301-302

Wyman, R. G. (1984). Dogmatism as an important consideration in the conduct of voir dire (forensic). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

Yagla, Carolyn A., Jury discrimination, Marquette Law Review, Vol 70, No 4, pp 736-753, June 22, 1987, - Summer.

Yamada, Elaine M.; Tjosvold, Dean; Draguns, Juris G. (1983). Effects of sex linked situations and sex composition on cooperation and style of interaction. Sex Roles, 9, 541-553

Yanchar, N. V. (1982). Subject-juror decision-making in rape cases: effects of status of the complainant, and gender of the defense attorney, the prosecuting attorney, and the subject-juror. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: Free Press.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979a). The effects of attractiveness, feature saliency, and liking on memory for faces. In M. Cook, & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction: An international conference. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

Yarmey, A. D. (1979c). Through the looking glass: Sex differences in memory for self facial poses. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 450-459.

Yarmey, A. Daniel (1986). Ethical responsibilities governing the statements experimental psychologists make in expert testimony. Special Issue: The ethics of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 101-115.

Yeo, Stanley Meng Heong, Provoking the "ordinary" ethnic person: a juror's predicament. (Australia), Criminal Law Journal, Vol 11, No 2, pp 96-104, April, 1987.

Zatz, Marjorie S. (1985). Pleas, priors, and prison: Racial/ethnic differences in sentencing. Social Science Research, 14, 169-193.

Zatz, Marjorie S. (1985). Pleas, priors, and prison: Racial/ethnic differences in sentencing. Social Science Research, 14, 169-193

Zeisel H. (1977). The American jury. Paper presented at the 1977 Annual Chief Justice Earl Warren Conference on Advocacy in the United States.

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. S. (1978). The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court. Stanford Law Review, 30, 491-531.

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. (1976). The jury selection in the Mitchell-Stans conspiracy trial. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1, 151-174.

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. S. (1978). The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court. Stanford Law Review, 30, 491-531.

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. (1976). The jury selection in the Mitchell-Stans conspiracy trial. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1, 151-174.

Zeisel, H., & Diamond, S. S. (1978). The effect of peremptory challenges on jury and verdict: An experiment in a federal district court. Stanford Law Review, 30, 491-531.

Zeisel, Hans, A jury hoax: the superpower of the opening statement. (Famous Cases: Juries), Litigation, Vol 14, No 4, pp 17(2), June 22, 1988, - Summer.

Zeisel, Hans, Affirmative peremptory juror selection, Stanford Law Review, Vol 39, No 5, pp 1165-1172, May, 1987.

Ziegler, Dee, New study finds California voir dire holding up process; justice compromised?, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Vol 101, No 2, p 1, Mon, January 4, 1988.

Ziller, Robert C. (1977). Group dialectics: The dynamics of groups over time. Human Development, 20, 293-308

Zimroth, P. L. (1974). How they picked the Panther 21 jury. Juris Doctor, July/August, 38-41.

Colasanto, D., & Sanders, J. (1978). Methodological issues in simulated jury research. Paper presented at the Law and Society Association meeting.